Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with docetaxel-loaded microspheres controls heavily pretreated unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a case study

Prostate artery chemoembolization in prostate cancer: A proof of concept study in spontaneous prostate cancer in a canine model

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of docetaxel-loaded bead chemoembolization in spontaneous prostate cancer in a canine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five pet dogs with histopathologically proven prostate cancer were referred for prostate artery chemoembolization (PACE). After PACE, all animals were followed, including pharmacokinetic study and clinical and biological evolution, until death. Pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination was performed at one and two months. Animals were subjected to pathological examination after death.

RESULTS

Both prostate arteries were successfully chemoembolized in all dogs. A median dose of 18 mg (Q1, Q3; 11.8, 20 mg) docetaxel loaded in 3 mL of 50-100 µm super absorbent polymer beads was injected into each dog. At one month, four of the five dogs were still alive and the median prostate volume was 51% lower (prePACE median prostate volume, 18.4 mL [Q1, Q3; 12, 32.1 mL] vs. postPACE median prostate volume, 6.2 mL [Q1, Q3; 6.2, 11 mL]). At two months, three dogs died because of disease progression. The two remaining dogs showed a 70% median decrease in prostate volume. Prostate pathological examination showed 73% of necrosis. No worsening of urinary symptoms was observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed limited systemic passage of docetaxel. All dogs died of metastatic spread at nine months.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that PACE is feasible and safe for the treatment of spontaneous prostate cancer in a canine model and may provide a new approach to treat selected patients with prostate cancer.

Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable systemic chemotherapy refractory liver metastases: a retrospective single-center analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) who had failed systemic chemotherapy. In addition, the role of TACE in the treatment of CRCLM is also worth discussing.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated the consecutive medical records of patients with CRCLM treated with TACE from June 2014 to June 2018, who had failed at least two lines of prior chemotherapy. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three eligible patients were included in our study. The objective tumor radiologic regression and disease control rates were 52.8% and 79.2%, respectively. Median OS and PFS were 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.1 months, 16.9 months) and 6 months (95% CI 4.7 months, 7.3 months), respectively. Multivariate analysis found that synchronous metastatic disease, presence of extrahepatic metastasis, and Child-Pugh score B were independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. Two patients (3.8%) had severe complications. The results of subgroup analysis showed that synchronous liver metastasis and extrahepatic metastasis had an effect on the prognosis of patients, while the primary tumor sites (rectum, left, and right colon) had no effect on the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE is well tolerated and effective in patients with unresectable chemotherapy refractory CRCLM. Meanwhile, the results of this study also indicated that TACE is still a better treatment for these patients.

Selection and clinical significance of individualized treatment for metastatic liver cancer

The liver is one of the most common target organs for metastasis of malignant tumors, with a metastasis rate of 11.1%. Approximately 40% of patients with malignant tumors will develop liver metastasis. Metastatic liver cancer not only exhibits individualized difference in the origin of primary tumor, tumor gene, and biological behavior, but also varies in the stage of progression, anatomic characteristics, organ function, and complications. In view of the different sources and pathways of metastatic tumors, the treatment of metastatic liver cancer involves two aspects: primary tumor and liver metastasis. How to choose surgery, local ablation, chemotherapy, molecular targeted drugs, endocrine therapy, biological and immune therapy, and radiotherapy as well as the treatment opportunity rationally is the key to the treatment of metastatic liver cancer. Advanced imaging techniques are used to determine the size, number, location, and blood supply of metastatic liver cancer, so as to provide an objective basis for making an accurate individualized treatment plan for metastatic liver cancer. At present, any single therapy for metastatic liver cancer has its own indications. If a metastatic liver tumor cannot be resected radically , the use of a single therapy is difficult to cure or control the progression of the tumor. In this case, it is necessary to combine two or more than two kinds of treatment methods to achieve the synergistic effect. According to the specific condition of patients with metastatic liver cancer, the individual characteristics of the patients should be analyzed by experienced clinicians to formulate an individualized treatment plan in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine, so as to make the patients benefit most from the plan, improve the quality of life, and prolong the survival time.

Transarterial Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Until recently, hepatic arterial therapies (HAT) had been used for colorectal liver metastases after failure of first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapies. HAT has gained greater acceptance in patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases after failure of surgery or systemic chemotherapy. The current data demonstrate that HAT is a safe and effective option for preoperative downsizing, optimizing the time to surgery, limiting non-tumor-bearing liver toxicity, and improving overall survival after surgery in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases. The aim of this review is to present the current data for HAT in liver-only and liver-dominant colorectal liver metastases.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for colorectal liver metastases--current status and critical review

BACKGROUND

Transarterial liver-directed therapies are currently not recommended as a standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), however, is increasingly used for patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases after failure of surgery or systemic chemotherapy. The limited available data potentially reveals TACE as a valuable option for pre- and post-operative downsizing, minimizing time-to-surgery, and prolongation of overall survival after surgery in patients with colorectal liver only metastases.

PURPOSE

In this overview, the current status of TACE for the treatment of liver-dominant colorectal liver metastases is presented. Critical comments on its rationale, technical success, complications, toxicity, and side effects as well as oncologic outcomes are discussed. The role of TACE as a valuable adjunct to surgery is addressed regarding pre- and post-operative downsizing, conversion to resectability as well as improvement of the recurrence rate after potentially curative liver resection. Additionally, the concept of TACE for liver-dominant metastatic disease with a focus on new embolization technologies is outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

There is encouraging data with regard to technical success, safety, and oncologic efficacy of TACE for colorectal liver metastases. The majority of studies are non-randomized single-center series mostly after failure of systemic therapies in the 2nd line and beyond. Emerging techniques including embolization with calibrated microspheres, with or without additional cytotoxic drugs, degradable starch microspheres, and technical innovations, e.g., cone-beam computed tomography (CT) allow a new highly standardized TACE procedure. The real efficacy of TACE for colorectal liver metastases in a neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative setting has now to be evaluated in prospective randomized controlled trials.