Combination therapy consisting of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and docetaxel as an active treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of single agent versus combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment in previously treated UC patients.

Methods

Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All relevant studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0).

Results

Fifty cohorts with 1,685 patients were included for analysis: 814 patients were treated with single agent chemotherapy and 871 with combined chemotherapy. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 year for combined chemotherapy than for single agent (relative risk [RR] 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01–2.37; P=0.03) but not for 2-year OS (RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92–1.85; P=0.064). Additionally, combined chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (RR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.60–3.18; P<0.001) and DCR (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01–1.25, P=0.033) compared to single agent for advanced UC patients. As for grade 3 and 4 toxicities, more frequencies of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combined chemotherapy than in single agent group, while equivalent frequencies of anemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were found between the two groups.

Conclusion

In comparison with single agent alone, combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment for advanced UC patients significantly improved ORR, DCR, and 1-year OS, but not 2-year OS. Our findings support the need to compare combined chemotherapy with single agent alone in the salvage setting in large prospective trials due to its potential survival benefit in advanced UC patients.

Sequential chemotherapy using gemcitabine + carboplatin followed by gemcitabine + carboplatin + docetaxel for advanced upper-tract urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of a sequential chemotherapy regimen using gemcitabine + carboplatin (GCarbo) followed by GCarbo + docetaxel (GCarboD) for advanced upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

We treated 56 patients with advanced UTUC. Mean patient age was 68.9 years, creatinine clearance was 51.2 mL/min, and the observation period was 20 months. Patients received two courses of GCarbo comprising 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15, and carboplatin at an area under the curve of four on day 2. If this regimen was effective, we administered two more courses of GCarbo; if the regimen was ineffective, we switched to two courses of GCarboD (70 mg/m(2)).

RESULTS

Complete (n = 3) and partial response (PR; n = 25) were achieved after GCarbo. Mean response duration was 9.7 months. Two of 17 cases achieved PR after GCarboD treatment (mean duration, 31.5 months). Median survival was 14.0 months with the GCarbo/GCarboD regimen. Responders to GCarbo therapy survived significantly longer. AEs with the GCarbo regimen included 31 instances of G3/4 blood toxicity and 8 instances of G3/4 urticaria; however, there were only 6 instances of G3/4 gastrointestinal complications. AEs with the GCarboD regimen included 16 instances of blood toxicity and 8 instances of gastrointestinal complications. Neither regimen resulted in G3/4 renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

GCarbo and GCarboD chemotherapy may be administered safely to patients with advanced UTUC, with or without renal dysfunction. Response to GCarbo was high (50.0 %) whereas GCarboD was of limited effectiveness for non-responders to GCarbo.