Comparison of pirarubicin-based versus gemcitabine–docetaxel chemotherapy for relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma: a single institution experience

Noncoding RNA PVT1 in osteosarcoma: The roles of lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and teenagers and is characterized by high malignant potential, rapid disease progression and high disability and mortality rates. Recently, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have attracted the attention of many scholars due to their major regulatory roles in gene expression. Among them, lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1 encoded by the PVT1 gene have been the focus of many studies; they are upregulated in OS, and abundant evidence indicates that lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1 play key roles in the occurrence and development of OS. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action of lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1 in regulating apoptosis, proliferation, glycolysis, invasion, migration and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in OS and discusses their clinical applications in diagnosis, prognosis determination and drug resistance treatment, with the aim of helping researchers better understand the regulatory roles of lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1 in OS progression and providing a theoretical basis for the development of early screening and accurate targeted treatment strategies and prognostic biomarkers for OS based on lncRNA PVT1 and circPVT1.

Systematic Review of Recurrent Osteosarcoma Systemic Therapy

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary bone cancer, mainly affecting those of young ages. Although surgery combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy has significantly increased the chances of cure, recurrent and refractory disease still impose a tough therapeutic challenge. We performed a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence, regarding treatment of recurrent and/or refractory osteosarcoma over the last two decades. Among the 72 eligible studies, there were 56 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase I or II and non-randomized. Evaluated treatment strategies included cytotoxic chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase and mTOR inhibitors and other targeted agents, as well as immunotherapy and combinatorial approaches. Unfortunately, most treatments have failed to induce objective responses, albeit some of them may sustain disease control. No driver mutations have been recognized, to serve as effective treatment targets, and predictive biomarkers of potential treatment effectiveness are lacking. Hopefully, ongoing and future clinical and preclinical research will unlock the underlying biologic mechanisms of recurrent and refractory osteosarcoma, expanding the therapeutic choices available to pre-treated osteosarcoma patients.

Efficacy of combination-chemotherapy with pirarubicin, ifosfamide, and etoposide for soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution retrospective analysis

Background

The standard chemotherapy regimens for soft tissue sarcoma are doxorubicin-based. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pirarubicin, ifosfamide, and etoposide combination therapy for patients with this disease.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2017, 25 patients with soft tissue sarcoma were treated with pirarubicin (30 mg/m², 2 days), ifosfamide (2 g/m², 5 days), and etoposide (100 mg/m², 3 days) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response, and the secondary endpoint was adverse events of this regimen.

Results

Responses to this regimen according to RECIST criteria were partial response (n = 9, 36%), stable disease (n = 9, 36%) and progressive disease (n = 7, 28%). During the treatment phase, frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were hematological toxicities including white blood cell decreases (96%), febrile neutropenia (68%), anemia (68%), and platelet count decreases (48%). No long-term adverse events were reported during the study period.

Conclusion

This regimen was comparable to previously published doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy in terms of response rate. Although there were no long-lasting adverse events, based on our results, severe hematological toxicity should be considered.

Methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum regimen is still the preferred option for osteosarcoma chemotherapy: A meta-analysis and clinical observation

BACKGROUND

We designed the study to investigate whether methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum (MAP) chemotherapy strategy was still the preferred option for the survival of osteosarcoma patients.

METHOD

We collected some trials of osteosarcoma to make a meta-analysis first. Then, we retrospectively collected data from 115 patients with osteosarcoma and performed further analysis to verify the impact of MAP regimen on the survival of patients.

RESULTS

Seven studies including 3433 participants met the preliminary inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of the 3-year disease-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.28; P = .52) and overall survival (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.70-2.11; P = .54), 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.87-1.30; P = .54) and overall survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.12; P = .26), and mortality rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.70-1.17; P = .44), showed no statistically significant differences. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (498 [85.9%] patients in MAP vs 533 [93.3%] in MAP plus ifosfamide and etoposide, or other adjuvant therapy drugs [MAP]). MAP was associated with less frequent toxicities than MAP group with statistical significance in thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, and hypophosphatemia. The same phenomenon could also be seen in the analysis of clinical data.

CONCLUSION

MAP regimen remains the preferred option for osteosarcoma chemotherapy.

Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel: a regimen overestimated in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma?

Background

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GT) has been demonstrated to be effective against various types of solid tumors, including sarcoma. However, the regimen has not been confirmed in large, well-designed clinical trials in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with refractory metastatic osteosarcoma at Peking University People’s Hospital who were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 8, and docetaxel (75 mg/m²) IV on Day 8, repeated every 21 days.

Results

A total of 52 patients with a median age of 18.4 years were treated with GT at the Peking University People’s Hospital from August 2012 to August 2017. A total of 174 courses were administered. Only five patients with pulmonary metastasis achieved a best response of stable disease (SD), while all other patients had progressive disease. The result was disappointing with an ORR of 0%, a DCR of 9.6%, and a median DOR of 3.5 months. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 69 (39.7%) courses and in 28 (53.8%) patients, most of which were myelosuppression, especially thrombocytopenia. No fatal adverse effect (AE) was found.

Conclusion

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GT) as a salvage regimen is well-tolerated but not as effective as expected in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma. This report highlights the need for the development of new approaches with higher activity in these patients.

Progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common type of primary bone tumor in children and adolescents and has been associated with a high degree of malignancy, early metastasis, rapid progression and poor prognosis. However, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with OS. OS chemotherapy is based primarily on the use of adriamycin, cisplatin (DDP), methotrexate (MTX), ifosfamide (IFO), epirubicin (EPI) and other drugs. Previous studies have revealed that the survival rate for patients with OS appears to have plateaued: 5-year survival rates remain close to 60%, even with the use of combined chemotherapy. The most limiting factors include complications and fatal toxicity associated with chemotherapy agents, particularly high-dose MTX (HD-MTX), for which high toxicity and great individual variation in responses have been observed. Docetaxel (TXT) is a representative member of the relatively recently developed taxane class of drugs, which function to inhibit OS cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. Recently, more clinical studies have reported that TXT combined with gemcitabine (GEM) is effective in the treatment of OS (relapse/refractory and progressive), providing evidence in support of potential novel treatment strategies for this patient population. However, there is still no global consensus on this type of chemotherapy approach. The present review summarizes current studies surrounding progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of OS and discusses the advantages and potential feasibility of TXT+GEM in the treatment of OS.

Does intensified chemotherapy increase survival outcomes of osteosarcoma patients? A meta-analysis

Study Design

Meta-analysis.

Background

Although some new insights have been offered for clinical and scientific relevance, minor progress has been made in osteosarcoma treatment after a dramatic survival improvement in the late 1980s with the addition of chemotherapy to surgery. Intensified chemotherapy strategies have been suggested to increase the survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma. We performed this study to access whether intensified chemotherapy strategiesincreased survival outcomes of osteosarcoma patients compared with conventional chemotherapy strategies.

Methods

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Cochrane Library were searched from database set up to October2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative clinical trials (CCTs) on intensified versus conventional chemotherapy strategies for osteosarcoma patients met the inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality standard were retrieved and reviewed. Data on participant characteristics, interventions, follow-up period, and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and analyzed by Review Manager 5.3.

Results

12 studies (8 RCTs and 4CCT) involving 4112 patients were selected. There were no significant differences between intensified and conventional chemotherapy strategies group in 3-year event-free survival (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, [0.74–1.37]; P = 0.97), 5-year event-free survival (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, [0.86–1.17]; P = 0.97), and 5-year overall survival (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, [0.87–1.26]; P = 0.64), and good histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, [0.78–1.60]; P = 0.55). Pooled analysis of local recurrence rate showed that local recurrence rate was significantly decreased in the intensified group compared with that in the conventional group (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, [0.42–0.85]; P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Intensified chemotherapy might not be a preferred treatment for all of the osteosarcoma patients.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma: Results from a single-institutional analysis

Background

Combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel has been reported to be a good therapeutic strategy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine with docetaxel in Japanese patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the effect of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy on overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity in 42 patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma who had received the therapy between October 2006 and September 2015, at Tohoku University Hospital.

Results

The median age was 55 years; 23 patients were men, and 19 were women. Eight had bone sarcoma and 34 had soft tissue sarcoma. Forty patients (95%) had previously been treated with one or more chemotherapeutic regimens. The overall response rate was 6.9% and the disease control rate was 55%. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months and the median overall survival was 14.3 months. Grade 3 or more neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74% and 4.8% of all patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The response rate was lower and myelosuppression was more frequently observed than in other previous reports. On the other hand, most of toxicities were enough manageable. In addition, some patients had long survival with a good response. Our study supports the notion that gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy is a good therapeutic option for treating patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma as well as bone sarcoma, also in Asian populations.

Long-term response of gemcitabine plus docetaxel chemotherapy regimen for extraskeletal osteosarcoma: A case report

Extraskeletal osteosarcomas (EOSs) are rare variants of primary osteosarcoma of the bone, and are defined as sarcomas located in the soft tissues and characterized by osteoid production. EOS exhibits distinctive demographic, imaging and prognostic features compared with osteosarcoma of bone origin. The available data are contradictory with regard to the use of chemotherapy regimens in the management of EOS. The present study describes a case of EOS that progressed following two lines of therapy oriented to soft-tissue and bone sarcoma histology, respectively. As a gemcitabine-docetaxel combination schedule has demonstrated synergistic activity against bone and soft-tissue sarcoma histologies, this chemotherapy regimen was selected as salvage therapy. The treatment was well-tolerated and induced a long lasting partial response for ~14 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report involving the clinical use of this combination regimen for the treatment of EOS. Furthermore, as demonstrated in this report, EOS may maintain relative chemosensitivity, indicating the potential to control advanced disease in the long term and to plan subsequent chemotherapy regimens.

Pirarubicin versus doxorubicin in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma: does the analog matter?

Pirarubicin (THP), a novel anthracycline derivative of doxorubicin (ADM), is effective in treating patients with advanced, relapsed or recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma. But its role in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma is still not defined. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of THP-containing chemotherapy for osteosarcoma in comparison with ADM-containing chemotherapy to determine differences in efficacy and toxicities between THP- and ADM-containing regimens. From January 2008 to May 2011, 112 stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma patients were treated in our institute. Fifty-four patients received a median 6 cycles of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of THP (pirarubicin), DDP (cisplatin), IFO (ifosfamide) and MTX (methotrexate), while 58 patients received a median 6 cycles of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of ADM (doxorubicin), DDP (cisplatin), IFO (ifosfamide) and MTX (methotrexate). Efficacy and toxicity of the 2 anthracyclines given as combination chemotherapy were assessed in these patients. The limb salvage rate, histologic response rate, 2-year recurrence rate, 2-year metastasis rate, 2-year disease-free survival rate, 2-year overall survival rate, median disease-free survival time (DFS) and median overall survival time (OS) in THP-containing group were similar to that in ADM-containing group. Toxicities were well balanced in two groups. No death related to chemotherapy was observed. Left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged 1 and 2 years after chemotherapy in two groups. Efficacy and toxicity of THP-containing combination are similar to those of ADM-containing combination in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma.

RPN2 Gene Confers Osteosarcoma Cell Malignant Phenotypes and Determines Clinical Prognosis

Drug resistance and metastasis are lethal characteristics of tumors. We previously demonstrated that silencing of ribophorin II (RPN2), which is part of the N-oligosaccharyl transferase complex, efficiently induced apoptosis and reduced resistance to docetaxel in human breast cancer cells. Here, we report the clinical and functional correlations of RPN2 expression in osteosarcoma. Immunohistochemical evaluation of 35 osteosarcoma patient biopsies revealed that RPN2 was moderately to highly expressed in all specimens, and higher RPN2 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with poor prognosis. To investigate whether lethal phenotypes of osteosarcoma could be reduced by regulating the expression of RPN2, we conducted a study of RNAi-induced RPN2 knockdown in highly metastatic human osteosarcoma cells. The results indicated that RPN2 silencing reduced cell proliferation, sphere formation, cell invasion, and sensitized drug response in vitro. Mice bearing RPN2-silenced highly metastatic osteosarcoma xenografts showed reduced tumor growth and lung metastasis, and survived longer than mice bearing control tumor xenografts. Taken together, our data suggest that RPN2 silencing contributes to regulation of lethal osteosarcoma phenotypes and could be a novel target for RNAi-based therapeutics against osteosarcoma.

Comparison of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with gemcitabine plus docetaxel in refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma: Clinical outcomes from a retrospective database monitored in a single institute

The prognosis for patients with relapsed/metastatic osteosarcoma is poor and the optimal treatment strategy remains to be refined. Whilst gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination treatment has already been demonstrated to have certain promising results in the treatment of osteosarcoma, the use of pemetrexed, a multi-targeted antifolate, remains controversial. In the present study, a retrospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination in relapsed/metastatic osteosarcoma. Comparison of this treatment with that of the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination was also conducted. Clinical data from 39 patients suffering from refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma between January 2005 and May 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Of these patients, 21 were administered the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination, and 18 were provided the pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group, the overall response rate and disease control rate were found to be 9.5 and 28.5% respectively, compared with 5.5 and 33.3% respectively in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was found to be 1.8 months for both the gemcitabine plus docetaxel and pemetrexed plus cisplatin groups. The median overall survival (OS) time was 6 months in the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group and 7 months in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. No statistically significant differences were recognized between the overall response rates, disease control rates, PFS times and OS times in the two groups. The two combinations appeared to be well tolerated. However, the incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and leucopenia was higher in the gemcitabine plus docetaxel group than in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group. The present study clearly demonstrated that both chemo-combinations were well-tolerated and exerted antitumor activity in patients with refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma. However, with regard to grade 3/4 toxicity, the pemetrexed plus cisplatin chemotherapy appears to be better tolerated.