Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary lung cancers clinically diagnosed without pathological confirmation: a single-institution experience

Comparison of long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) via Helical tomotherapy for early-stage lung cancer with or without pathological proof

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radio therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment option for nonsurgical candidates with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pathological proof is sometimes difficult to obtain in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy via helical tomotherapy (HT-SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer patients with or without a pathological diagnosis.

METHODS

Between June 2011 and December 2016, we treated 119 lung cancer patients with HT-SBRT, including 55 with a clinical diagnosis and 64 with a pathological diagnosis. Survival outcomes, including local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between two cohorts with and without a pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the whole group was 69 months. Patients with a clinical diagnosis were significantly older (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed between the clinical and pathological diagnosis cohorts in terms of the long-term outcome, with 5-year LC, PFS, CSS, and OS of 87% versus 83% (p = 0.58), 48% versus 45% (p = 0.82), 87% versus 84% (p = 0.65), and 60% versus 63% (p = 0.79), respectively. Recurrence patterns and toxicity were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Empiric SBRT appears to be a safe and effective treatment option in a multidisciplinary setting when patients with SPNs highly suggestive of malignancy are unable/refuse to obtain a definitive pathological diagnosis.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for empirically treated hypermetabolic lung lesions: a single-institutional experience identifying the Charlson score as a key prognostic factor

Background

Though pathologic evidence for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is preferred, many patients do not receive a biopsy prior to treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study seeks to analyze the overall survival (OS), local control, and toxicity rates for such patients.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients empirically treated with SBRT for presumed non-metastatic NSCLC at a single institution. Inclusion criteria included a hypermetabolic pulmonary lesion noted on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging but no pathological evidence of NSCLC. Patients with another known metastatic tumor were excluded. Statistical analysis was conducted with Cox proportional hazards analysis, univariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Ninety-one treatments in 90 unique patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were a median 77.9 years at the start of treatment and had a median Charlson score of 7. Pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) was a median 4.5 and 1.5 after treatment. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 36-month local control of 91.3% was achieved. Twenty-four-month OS and progression-free survival were 65.4% and 44.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) ≥120 Gy was predictive of improved OS (P=0.001), with 36-month OS of 50.5% for patients with BED ≥120 Gy and only 31.6% for patients with BED <120 Gy. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, Charlson score ≥9 was predictive of decreased OS (P=0.04), and BED ≥120 Gy trended towards improved OS (P=0.08). Thirty-two cases of grade <3 toxicity were reported, and only two cases of grade 3 morbidity (fatigue) were noted.

Conclusions

Local control rates for empiric SBRT treatment for hypermetabolic, non-metastatic NSCLC are similar to those for biopsied NSCLC. OS is primarily dependent on a patient’s overall health status, which can be accurately assessed with the Charlson score. BED ≥120 Gy may also contribute to improved OS.

Chest wall toxicity after stereotactic radiation in early lung cancer: a systematic review

Background

Radiation-induced chest wall pain (cwp) and rib fracture (rf) are late adverse effects after stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for stage i non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc); however, the literature about their incidence and risk factors shows variability. We performed a systematic review to determine the pooled incidence of cwp and rf in the relevant population.

Methods

A literature search using the prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines considered English publications in medline and embase from January 1996 to August 2017. Abstracts were screened, followed by full-text review and data extraction.

Results

The database searches identified 547 records. Twenty-eight publications comprising 3892 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median reported ages and follow-up durations fell into the ranges 67-82 years and 12-84 months. Prescriptions fell into the range of 40-70 Gy in 3-10 fractions. Despite study heterogeneity, the pooled incidences of cwp and rf were estimated to be 8.94% and 5.27% respectively. Nineteen studies reported cwp grade: 58 of 308 patients (18.8%) experienced grades 3-4 cwp (no grade 5 events reported). Thirteen studies reported rf grade: grades 3-4 rf were observed in 9 of 113 patients (7.96%). A high chest wall V30 was an important predictor of cwp and rf.

Conclusions

In patients with stage i nsclc, rates of cwp and rf after sbrt are low; however, tumour location, accurate toxicity reporting, and dose-fractionation schemes might alter those rates. Prospective correlation with dosimetry and quality of life assessment will further improve the understanding of cwp and rf after sbrt.

Survival After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Diagnosed or Biopsy-Proven Early-Stage NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It is unclear if survival outcomes for SBRT are influenced by a lack of pathological confirmation of malignancy and staging of disease in these patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess survival outcomes after SBRT in studies with patients with clinically diagnosed versus biopsy-proven early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

The main databases were searched for trials and cohort studies without restrictions to publication status or language. Two independent researchers performed the screening and selection of eligible studies. Outcomes were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random effects method for meta-analysis were used to assess pooled survival estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 11,195 nonduplicate records were identified by the original search strategy. After screening by title and abstract, 1051 potentially eligible records were identified. A total of 43 articles were included. The comparative studies showed lower 3-year overall survival and lower 2-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival for biopsy-proven disease compared to clinical disease. However, 5-year overall survival was the same for both groups. For the pooled estimates, 3-year disease-free survival and 2-year cancer-specific survival were lower for biopsied disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show a discrepancy in oncological outcomes for patients undergoing SBRT for suspected early-stage NSCLC in whom there is pathologic conformation of malignancy and those who there is only a clinical diagnose of NSCLC. These results emphasize the importance of obtaining pathologic proof of malignancy.

Empiric Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Collaborative Group multi-institutional evidence-based guidelines for the use of empiric stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without pathologic confirmation

The standard of care for managing early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is definitive surgical resection. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard treatment for patient who are medically inoperable, and it is increasingly being considered as an option in operable patients. With the growing use of screening thoracic CT scans for patients with a history of heavy smoking, as well as improved imaging capabilities, the discovery of small lung nodes has become a common dilemma. As a result, clinicians are increasingly faced with managing lung nodules in patients in whom diagnostic biopsy is not safe or feasible. Herein, we describe the scope of the problem, tools available for predicting the probability that a lung nodule is a malignancy, staging procedures, benefits of pathology-proven and empiric SBRT, considerations of safety based on location of the lesion of concern, and overall efficacy of SBRT.

Chest Wall Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Pooled Analysis of 57 Studies

PURPOSE

The significance of clinical and dosimetric risk factors in relation to chest wall (CW) injury after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors were analyzed through a meta-analysis of 57 published studies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Studies related to CW injury after lung SBRT were obtained through searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases. An estimate of the incidence of CW pain (CWP) or rib fracture (RF) was derived using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CWP or RF and clinical or dosimetric factors.

RESULTS

A total of 57 studies incorporating 5985 cases reporting clinical data on CW injury after SBRT were analyzed. The overall CWP and RF rates by Bayesian hierarchical modeling were 11.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-14.4) and 6.3% (95% CI, 3.7-9.7), respectively. The rates of grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 CWP were 6.2% (95% CI, 3.88-8.93) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.48-2.12), respectively. Sex was significantly correlated with RF (P < .001), with female patients having a greater risk of RF than male patients (hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76). No correlation was found between RF, grade ≥2 CWP, or grade ≥3 CWP, with the clinical and dosimetric factors of age, tumor size, origin of lung tumor, gross tumor volume, planning target volume, fractional dose, number of fractions, or biologically effective dose. However, tumor to CW distance (<16-25 mm), body mass index, maximum dose (Dmax) of 0.5 to 5 cm³, and the volume of CW or ribs receiving >30 Gy were significantly associated with CWP and RF.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rates of RF and grade ≥2 CWP after thoracic SBRT are relatively low. Sex, tumor to CW distance, maximum dose, and the radiation exposure of the CW or ribs are factors associated with the risk of CW toxicity after SBRT.

Optimizing the prescription isodose level in stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy of lung lesions as a potential for dose de-escalation

BACKGROUND

To derive and exploit the optimal prescription isodose level (PIL) in inverse optimization of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) as a potential approach to dose de-escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC).

METHODS

For ten patients, inverse Monte Carlo dose optimization was performed to cover 95% PTV by varying prescription isodose lines (PIL) at 60 to 80% and reference 85%. Subsequently, these were re-normalized to the median gross tumor volume dose (GTV-based prescription) to assess the impacts of PTV and normal tissue dose reduction.

RESULTS

With PTV-based prescription, GTV mean dose was much higher with the optimized PIL at 60% with significant reduction of normal lung receiving 30 to 10 Gy (V 30-10Gy ), and observable but insignificant dose reduction to spinal cord, esophagus, ribs, and others compared with 85% PIL. Mean doses to the normal lung between PTV and GTV was higher with 60-70% PIL than 85%. The dose gradient index was 5.0 ± 1.1 and 6.1 ± 1.4 for 60 and 85% PIL (p < 0.05), respectively. Compared with the reference 85% PIL plan using PTV-base prescription, significant decreases of all normal tissue doses were observed with 60% and 70% PIL by GTV-based prescription. Yet, the resulting biological effective (BED) mean doses of PTV remain sufficiently high, ranging 104.2 to 116.9 Gy α/β = 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing the PIL with VMAT has notable advantage of improving the dosimetric quality of lung SBRT and offers the potential of dose de-escalation for surrounding tissues while increasing the GTV dose simultaneously. The clinical implication of re-normalizing plans from PTV-prescription at 60-70% to the GTV median dose requires further investigations.

Comparison of particle beam therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and hypothesis-generating meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess hypo-fractionated particle beam therapy (PBT)'s efficacy relative to that of photon stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified through extensive searches of the PubMed, Medline, Google-scholar, and Cochrane library databases from 2000 to 2016. Original English publications of ES NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the survival outcome, toxicity profile, and patterns of failure following each treatment.

RESULTS

72 SBRT studies and 9 hypo-fractionated PBT studies (mostly single-arm) were included. PBT was associated with improved overall survival (OS; p=0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS; p=0.01) in the univariate meta-analysis. The OS benefit did not reach its statistical significance after inclusion of operability into the final multivariate meta-analysis (p=0.11); while the 3-year local control (LC) still favored PBT (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Although hypo-fractionated PBT may lead to additional clinical benefit when compared with photon SBRT, no statistically significant survival benefit from PBT over SBRT was observed in the treatment of ES NSCLC in this hypothesis-generating meta-analysis after adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Clinical outcomes of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for elderly patients with presumed primary stage I lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In certain situations, especially in the elderly patient population, a tissue diagnosis of a suspected pulmonary neoplasm is not feasible. Often, a definitive treatment such as stereotactic body radiosurgery is recommended, rather than active surveillance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for elderly patients with presumed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological tissue confirmation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 25 elderly patients (≥75 years) with presumed primary stage I lung cancer treated with SBRT from 2009-2015. The primary end point was local control (LC); secondary end points were survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up (FU) was 36.0 months (range, 4 to 84 months). The 1-year LC rate was 100%, 3-year LC rate was 78.8%, and 5-year LC rate was 65.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 48.0 months (95% CI: 31.2-64.8). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.0%, 70.2%, and 50.7%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 100%, 81.3%, and 67.0%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicity was encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is safe and effective treatment for patients with presumed primary stage I lung cancer where obtaining pathological confirmation of malignancy is challenging.

Absence of Pathological Proof of Cancer Associated with Improved Outcomes in Early-Stage Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the trends in use of clinical diagnosis and its impact on treatment outcomes in patients receiving radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried from 2004 to 2012 for patients at least 18 years old in whom stage I (clinical stage T1a-T2a) lung cancer had been diagnosed and who underwent radiation therapy alone. Trends in diagnostic confirmation patterns were characterized. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess overall survival, and competing risk regression analysis was used to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 7050 patients were included; the disease of 6399 of them (90.8%) was pathologically diagnosed and that of 651 (9.2%) was clinically diagnosed. There was no significant change in the utilization of clinical versus pathologic diagnosis (p = 0.172) over time. Patients with T1 disease (p < 0.001), tumors 0 to 1.9 cm in size (p < 0.001), and upper lobe tumors (p = 0.004) were more likely to have been clinically diagnosed. On multivariable analysis, clinical diagnosis was associated with an improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.96) but was not associated with an improved overall survival (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13). When stratified by T stage, patients whose disease had been clinically diagnosed as stage T1a had an improved CSS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.96, p = 0.022). There was a trend toward improved CSS in patients with clinical stage T1b tumors (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-1.00, p = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved CSS in patients with a clinical diagnosis suggests treatment of benign disease, particularly in smaller tumors. Prudent patient selection is needed to reduce the potential for overtreatment.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of pneumothorax after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors

BACKGOUND

We retrospectively investigated the clinical characteristics and outcome of pneumothorax after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and July 2012, 473 patients with lung tumors were treated with SBRT. We identified 12 patients (2.5 %) with pneumothorax caused by SBRT, and evaluated the clinical features of pneumothorax.

RESULTS

All of the tumors were primary lung cancers. The severity of radiation pneumonitis was grade 1 in 10 patients and grade 2 in two patients. Nine patients had emphysema. The planning target volume and pleura overlapped in 11 patients, and the tumors were attached to the pleura in 7 patients. Rib fractures were observed in three patients before or at the same time as the diagnosis of pneumothorax. The median time to onset of pneumothorax after SBRT was 18.5 months (4-84 months). The severity of pneumothorax was grade 1 in 11 patients and grade 3 in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Although pneumothorax was a relatively rare late adverse effect after SBRT, some patients demonstrated pneumothorax after SBRT for peripheral lung tumors. Although most pneumothorax was generally tolerable and self-limiting, careful follow-up is needed.