Marriage and fertility in long-term survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult (AYA) high-grade sarcoma

Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and its effects on fertility in long-term female survivors of classic osteosarcoma

PURPOSE

To explore the effect of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) on female osteosarcoma patients' fertility function, we investigated and analyzed their marital status, fertility, and menstrual status in a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We selected female osteosarcoma patients from database from January 2004 to December 2013. Patients' characteristics such as age, tumor location, marital status, menstrual status, and fertility status were collected. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22.

RESULTS

A total of 122 female patients met these criteria and finally responded by questionnaire and telephone follow-up. The marriage rate of female osteosarcoma survivors was 50.8% (62/122), which was significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.000). The average marriage age of female osteosarcoma survivors was 25.5, which was obviously higher than the control group (p = 0.000). CIA occurred in 46 (36.1%) patients. We then found that the incidence of CIA was higher in older patients. (p = 0.011). All of the married patients wanted to have children, and 67.8% (42/62) of them had given birth after chemotherapy. The fertility of married patients with CIA was significantly reduced compared to that of married patients without CIA. (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with CIA have higher risk of impaired reproductive function than those who did not. Fertility preservation option before the start of the chemotherapy is important. And it is much value to record menstrual pattern and detect sex steroid levels after 6 months of therapy in order to be able to evaluate the fertility status.

Identification of Evidence for Key Positive Psychological Constructs in Pediatric and Adolescent/Young Adult Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review

Introduction: Children and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population susceptible to numerous late effects, such as fatigue and depression, which may diminish their long-term psychological, physical, spiritual, and emotional health. A well-rounded understanding of how positive psychological constructs affect the quality of care and treatment outcomes is therefore warranted.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of 15 positive psychological constructs in children and AYAs with cancer. The primary research questions were (1) what is known about positive psychological constructs in children and AYAs with cancer; (2) what value is ascribed to these constructs by patients?

Results: Two hundred seventy-six articles were included after database search and screening. These studies were mostly observational or qualitative and conducted in North America. Constructs were often poorly defined, and measurement tools used to gather data were wide ranging. Numerous factors were correlated with increased or decreased expression of certain constructs, but overall themes were difficult to identify. Similarly, patients often spoke of what increased or decreased expression of a construct, with less emphasis on what they implicitly value.

Discussion: This scoping review found ample evidence for what increases or decreases expression of positive psychological constructs, but this evidence was observational and often conflicting. In the future, we recommend the development of a core set of psychological outcomes, with definitions and corresponding measurement tools. We further recommend an emphasis on randomized trials to more rigorously study how expression of constructs can be improved and what effect this has on the quality of life.

Fertility in female cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Data on the effects of cancer treatments on fertility are conflicting. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the chances of childbirth in women survivors of different types of cancer. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched from database inception to 17 July 2019 for published cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies that investigated the reproductive chances in women survivors of different cancer types. Random-effects models were used to pool childbirth hazard ratios, relative risks, rate ratios and odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were estimated; 18 eligible studies were identified. Childbirth chances were significantly reduced in women with a history of bone cancer (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I² = 0%; P = 0.02 (two studies); RaR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95; I² = 69%; P = 0.01 (two studies); breast cancer (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90 (one study); RaR 0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.57; I² = 0%; P < 0.00001 (two studies); brain cancer (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.72; I² = 14%; P < 0.00001 (three studies); RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.91 (one study); RaR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.60; I² = 95%; P < 0.00001 (four studies); OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.60 (one study); and kidney cancer (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.98 (one study); RaR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.78 (one study). Reproductive chances in women survivors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, melanoma and thyroid cancer were unaffected. Women with a history of bone, breast, brain or kidney cancer have reduced chances of childbirth. Thyroid cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors can be reassured.