Stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial pneumonia: a review

Impact of OLD/Emphysema in LC Mortality Risk in Screening Programs: An Analysis of NLST and P-IELCAP

INTRODUCTION

The impact of obstructive lung disease (OLD) and emphysema on lung cancer (LC) mortality in patients undergoing LC screening is controversial.

METHODS

Patients with spirometry and LC diagnosed within the first three rounds of screening were selected from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and from the Pamplona International Early Lung Cancer Detection Program (P-IELCAP). Medical and demographic data, tumor characteristics, comorbidities and presence of emphysema were collected. The effect of OLD and emphysema on the risk of overall survival was assessed using unadjusted and adjusted Cox models, competing risk regression analysis, and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Data from 353 patients with LC, including 291 with OLD and/or emphysema and 62 with neither, were analyzed. The median age was 67.3 years-old and 56.1% met OLD criteria, predominantly mild (1: 28.3%, 2: 65.2%). Emphysema was present in 69.4% of the patients. Patients with OLD and/or emphysema had worse survival on univariate analysis (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.86-2.31; p=0.179). However, after adjusting for LC stage, age, and sex, the HR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.61-1.70; p=0.952). Specific LC survival between both groups showed an adjusted HR of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.47-1.72; p=0.76). Propensity score matching found no statistically significant difference in overall survival (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.59-1.9; p=0.929).

CONCLUSION

The survival of LC patients diagnosed in the context of screening is not negatively impacted by the coexistence of mild OLD and/or emphysema.

[Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for less than 3cm (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) inoperable lung tumors: 10 years experience of Montpellier Cancer Institute]

PURPOSE

Search for predictive factors on survival and local control for less than 3 centimeters (cm) (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) inoperable lung tumors treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in a retrospective monocentric study from Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM) PATIENTS AND METHOD: Every patients treated at ICM for a stage I or II inoperable lung tumors from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy nine lesions were treated in 176 patients, with a major part (82,7%) in operated due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Median overall survival for all patients was 71,7 months with a 35 months follow-up and the 2 years loco-regional free survival was 94,0 months. Better associated outcomes were stage I (median overall survival 71,7 versus 29,0 months P=0,004 ; HR=2,37 P=0,005), BED≥150Gy (median time-to-progression not reached versus 76,7 months P=0,025), small size of Planning Target Volume (PTV) (HR=0,42 P=0,032 when PTV<15,6 cc). 7,3% of all patients developed radiation pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is associated with an excellent overall survival and a high rate of local control for less than 3cm (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) lung tumors but a low rate of toxicities. For these patients with many comorbidities, BED over 150Gy seems to be associated with a better loco-regional free survival, while cause of death is often other than lung cancer.

Radiomics and Dosiomics Signature From Whole Lung Predicts Radiation Pneumonitis: A Model Development Study With Prospective External Validation and Decision-curve Analysis

PURPOSE

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is one of the common side effects of radiation therapy in the thoracic region. Radiomics and dosiomics quantify information implicit within medical images and radiation therapy dose distributions. In this study we demonstrate the prognostic potential of radiomics, dosiomics, and clinical features for RP prediction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiomics, dosiomics, dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics, and clinical parameters were obtained on 314 retrospectively collected and 35 prospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2013 to 2019. A radiomics risk score (R score) and dosiomics risk score (D score), as well as a DVH-score, were calculated based on logistic regression after feature selection. Six models were built using different combinations of R score, D score, DVH score, and clinical parameters to evaluate their added prognostic power. Overoptimism was evaluated by bootstrap resampling from the training set, and the prospectively collected cohort was used as the external test set. Model calibration and decision-curve characteristics of the best-performing models were evaluated. For ease of further evaluation, nomograms were constructed for selected models.

RESULTS

A model built by integrating all of the R score, D score, and clinical parameters had the best discriminative ability with areas under the curve of 0.793 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.735-0.851), 0.774 (95% CI, 0.762-0.786), and 0.855 (95% CI, 0.719-0.990) in the training, bootstrapping, and external test sets, respectively. The calibration curve image showed good agreement between the predicted and actual values, with a slope of 1.21 and intercept of -0.04. The decision curve image showed a positive net benefit for the final model based on the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic and dosiomic features have the potential to assist with the prediction of RP, and the combination of radiomics, dosiomics, and clinical parameters led to the best prognostic model in the present study.

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in Older Adults With Early-Stage Peripheral Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of computed tomography(CT)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in medically inoperable older adults with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of medically inoperable older adults (≥70 years) with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent percutaneous multi-tined electrode RFA at our institution between January 2014 and December 2018. We analyzed the patients’ characteristics, therapy response, survival, as well as the procedure-related complications.

Results

Eighteen patients (10 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 75.9 (71−85) years were treated in during the study period. The median tumor size was 25 mm (range, 19−43 mm); 10 and 8 cases involved stage T1 and T2a disease, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 25 (11–45) months. RFA was technically successful for all 18 lesions, with no treatment-related mortality. The disease control rate was 83.3% (15/18 lesions). There were 6 cases of pneumothorax: one symptomatic case requiring thoracic drainage, and five requiring no treatment. Minor complications, including pulmonary infection, chest pain, fever, and cough, were treated within 4 days (range, 1−4 days). The progression-free survival rates were 83.3%, 64.9%, and 51.9% 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The corresponding overall survival rates were 92.2%, 81.5%, and 54.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

CT-guided percutaneous RFA is safe and effective in medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC and could be an alternative therapeutic strategy, particularly in older adults with early-stage peripheral lung cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Coexisting Interstitial Lung Disease

Simple Summary

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor for lung cancer, but the treatment options are often limited because of concerns that ILD may worsen with treatment. In this study, we analyzed whether the presence or absence of ILD affects the outcome of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For all cases, CT and clinical data were reviewed by a respiratory physician to determine the presence of ILD. Overall survival and disease-specific survival were lower in patients with ILD than in patients without ILD. There was no significant difference between the ILD group and the non-ILD group with respect to safety. CIRT was not associated with significantly more side-effects in patients with ILD than in patients without ILD. Coexisting ILD was a poor prognostic factor with respect to CIRT for clinical stage I lung cancer, as reported for other treatment methods.

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor both for the development and treatment failure of lung cancer. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcome of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in 124 patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of whom 26 (21%) had radiological signs of pre-existing ILD. ILD was diagnosed retrospectively by a pulmonologist based on critical review of CT-scans. Ninety-eight patients were assigned to the non-ILD group and 26 patients (21.0%) to the ILD group. There were significant differences in pre-treatment KL-6 values between the two groups. The three year overall survival and cause-specific survival rates were 83.2% and 90.7%, respectively, in the non-ILD group, and 59.7% and 59.7%, respectively, in the ILD group (between-group differences, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Radiation pneumonitis worse than Grade 2 was observed in three patients (3.0%) in the non-ILD group and two patients (7.6%) in the ILD group (p = 0.29). There were no cases of acute exacerbation in the ILD group. CIRT for stage I NSCLC was as safe in the ILD group as in the non-ILD group. Coexisting ILD was a poor prognostic factor in CIRT for clinical stage I lung cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife for T1N0M0 lung cancer patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction

We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1N0M0 lung cancer using CyberKnife (CK) among 13 patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction which was defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0) of <1 L. The prescribed dose was 54 Gy in 3 fractions but adjusted for some patients if their tumors were in close proximity to the organs at risk (54 Gy/3 fractions: n = 11; 50 Gy/5 fractions: n = 1; 60 Gy/8 fractions: n = 1). During follow up (median follow-up: 27 months), we evaluated local control, overall survival and toxicity, using diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests. The patients' median FEV1.0 was 0.84 L. Of the 13 patients, 3 were diagnosed as having lung cancer histologically and 10 diagnosed clinically. Their 2-year rates for overall survival and local control were 89 and 100%, respectively. So far, we have seen no adverse effects of grade 2 or higher. We concluded that CK-SBRT is effective and well tolerated for T1N0M0 lung cancer, even in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction, but should be further evaluated with a larger cohort and longer follow-up periods.