Retrospective analysis for the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer patients according to ascites burden

Prognostic Impact of Perioperative CA125 Status in Gastric Cancer Based on New Cutoff Values

Objectives The current carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) cutoff value demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity. Therefore, we used new cutoff values to evaluate the clinical impact of perioperative CA125 in gastric cancer. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 525 patients with gastric cancer (349 males and 176 females), of whom 445 patients underwent R0 resection and 80 patients underwent R1/R2 resection between 2011 and 2020. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated preoperative and postoperative cutoff CA125 values of 15.7 IU/mL and 17.3 IU/mL, respectively, to predict overall survival. Furthermore, we analyzed changes in postoperative CA125 levels and evaluated their prognostic impact using multivariate analysis. Results The preoperative CA125-positive rate was 25%. Males, advanced TNM factors, and noncurative resection cases demonstrated significantly higher positive rates than the other group. The preoperative CA125-positive group exhibited a significantly higher noncurative resection rate than the preoperative CA125-negative group (32% versus 10%, P < 0.01). Preoperatively, CA125-positive status was an independent poor prognostic factor (P < 0.01), and at three months postoperatively, it tended to be a poor prognostic factor. Conclusions High preoperative CA125 (>15.7 IU/mL) was a significant predictor for noncurative resection and poor overall prognosis in gastric cancer. Furthermore, postoperative CA125-positive status three months postoperatively was also a potential predictor of recurrence and poor prognosis.

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma presenting complete durable response by nivolumab treatment for multiple metastases and radiotherapy to oligoprogressive metastasis

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are highly aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used as the first-line treatment for this entity. However, there are no established therapeutic guidelines for platinum-resistant gastric NEC. We herein report a patient with metastatic gastric NEC who achieved durable and complete response to nivolumab with radiotherapy for oligoprogressive metastasis. A 70-year-old male patient had recurrences of resected gastric NEC, involving the liver and lymph nodes. His disease became refractory to cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy, after which he was treated with nivolumab. All the tumors showed marked shrinkage. However, 1 year after starting nivolumab, one metastatic lesion of the liver began to enlarge, and radiotherapy was performed to the lesion. Thereafter, a complete response was obtained, which has been maintained without any treatment for the past 2 years.

Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising efficacy in treatment and clinical management of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, the inhibitors also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The current systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs caused by ICIs.

AIM

To investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (Reg. number: CRD42020152291). Data included in this study were collected from patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer and treated with ICIs. A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analysis was carried out using the single sample rate method. Synthesis and analysis of the data was conducted using Stata/SE and Review Manager Software.

RESULTS

The patients enrolled in the present study included 14 patients from 14 case reports, 326 patients from 6 case series, and 1249 patients from 8 clinical trials. It was found that the overall incidence of irAEs was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11-20] for all grades and 3% (95%CI: 2-4) for the severe grade. It was evident that the incidence of irAEs varied with the type of inhibitor and organs. A comparative study of the anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death receptor-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments showed that the anti-PD-1 group had a higher overall incidence of irAEs (20%) as compared with that of the anti-PD-L1 group (13%). Results of this study showed that the endocrine system experienced the highest incidence of organ-specific irAEs (7.4%), including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, thyroiditis, diabetes, and adrenal insufficiency, followed by gastroenterology (2.2%), pulmonology (1.8%), neurology (1.4%), dermatology (1.4%), hematology (0.8%), and hepatology (0.7%). In clinical trials, it was found that the incidence of death related to irAEs was 1% (95%CI: 0-2.0), whereby colitis and interstitial lung diseases were the leading causes of death.

CONCLUSION

It was evident that the incidence and nature of irAEs are both organ- and inhibitor-specific. The anti-PD-1 group had the highest incidence of all irAEs grades including the severe grades of irAEs. Early identification and management of irAEs allows clinical oncologists to effectively consider the pros and cons and hence enables them to strike a balance.

Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a cost-effective and easily identifiable inflammatory biomarker that has been shown to be closely associated with tumor prognosis and predict survival in patients with multiple malignancies. However, the predictive value of NLR in patients with gastric cancer (GC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been fully explored. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the potential of NLR as a predictor of survival in this population.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from inception to the present for observational researches on NLR and its relationship with progression or survival in GC patients receiving ICIs. To assess the prognostic significance of NLR on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), we used fixed or random-effect models to derive and combine hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also examined the relationship between NLR and treatment efficacy by calculating relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in patients with GC receiving ICIs.

Results

Nine studies of 806 patients were eligible. OS and PFS data were obtained from 9 and 5 studies, respectively. In nine studies, NLR was associated with poor survival, the pooled HR was 1.98 (95% CI 1.67- 2.35, p < 0.001), indicating a significant association between high NLR and worse OS. We conducted subgroup analyses based on study characteristics to confirm the robustness of our findings. A relationship between NLR and PFS were reported in five studies with a HR of 1.49 (95% CI 0.99- 2.23, p = 0.056), which was not significantly associated. Pooling four studies that examined the correlation between NLR and ORR/DCR in GC patients, we observed a significant correlation between NLR and ORR (RR = 0.51, p = 0.003), but no significant correlation between NLR and DCR (RR = 0.48, p = 0.111).

Conclusion

In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that increased NLR is significantly linked to worse OS in patients with GC receiving ICIs. In addition, lowering NLR can improve ORR. Thus, NLR can serve as a predictor for prognosis and treatment response in GC patients treated with ICIs. Nevertheless, further high-quality prospective studies are required to verify our findings in the future.

Distribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies into ascites in advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: case reports and literature review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including ramucirumab and nivolumab, are used to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Malignant ascites is often accompanied by peritoneal metastasis in AGC patients. However, the distribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies into ascites has yet to be adequately investigated.

METHODS

We determined serum and ascites concentrations of ramucirumab or nivolumab and total IgG in three AGC patients with massive ascites. When serum and ascites samples were obtained on the same day, the ascites-to-serum ratio (A/S ratio) of the concentration of monoclonal antibodies was evaluated. The relationship between time after last infusion and the A/S ratio of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies was examined using 15 datasets from the present study and the literature.

RESULTS

Ramucirumab and nivolumab were detected in massive ascites at considerable amounts (A/S ratios of 0.24-0.35 for ramucirumab and 0.17-0.55 for nivolumab). A positive correlation was detected between the A/S ratios of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the time after last infusion (r = 0.747). Removal of ascites using paracentesis eliminated at least 15.3%-30.3% and 5.2-27.4% of the injected ramucirumab and nivolumab, respectively. Endogenous IgG, as well as therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, were distributed into ascites; the A/S ratios for IgG were 0.22-0.45.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including ramucirumab and nivolumab, are distributed into massive ascites in AGC patients concomitantly with endogenous IgG. In these patients, retention of ascites and its removal may result in decreased systemic drug exposure to ramucirumab and nivolumab.

Real-World Data of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer has the fifth highest incidence among cancers in the world, and it causes the third most cancer-related deaths. In this study, data from patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) were analyzed. Pre-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and a sufficiently long trastuzumab-free interval may be predictive factors of T-DXd efficacy.

Abstract

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown promising efficacy against HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, data on its real-world efficacy in AGC patients are insufficient, and the predictive marker of T-DXd is unclear. In this multi-center retrospective study, we collected clinical information of 18 patients with HER2-positive AGC who received T-DXd after intolerant or refractory responses to at least two prior regimens and analyzed predictive factors. The median age was 71 years (range: 51–85), 13 men were included, and ECOG performance status (PS): 0/1/2/3 was 9/6/2/1. A total of 11 patients (61%) received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 14 patients were HER2 3+, and 4 patients were HER2 2+/FISH positive. The median trastuzumab (Tmab)-free interval was 7.7 months (range: 2.8–28.6). The overall response rate was 41%, and the disease control rate was 76%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.6–6.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 6.1 months (95% CI: 3.7–9.4). PFS (6.5 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.0292) and OS (9.2 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.0819) were longer in patients who received prior ICIs than in those who had not. PFS (6.5 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.0249) and OS (9.4 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.0426) were longer in patients with an 8 month or longer Tmab-free interval. In patients with ascites, PFS (6.5 vs. 2.75 months, p = 0.0139) and OS (9.4 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.0460) were shorter. T-DXd showed promising efficacy in HER2-positive AGC patients in a real-world setting. Pre-administration of ICIs and a sufficient Tmab-free interval may be predictive factors of T-DXd efficacy.

Real-World Data of Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

Background:

A trial with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer showed that FTD/TPI is effective with manageable toxicity in these patients. However, real-world data on the effects of FTD/TPI in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are limited.

Methods:

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinicopathological data of patients with AGC who received FTD/TPI monotherapy at our institutions (Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, and Kansai Medical University Hospital) between September 2019 and July 2021. Tumor responses were evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results:

A total of 53 patients were included in the study. The median age was 70 (range, 37-85) years; 39 patients (74%) were men; the numbers of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0, 1, and 2 were 10 (19%), 39 (74%), and 4 (8%), respectively; and 27 patients (51%) had diffuse-type histology. A total of 29 patients (56%) had ascites. Prior nivolumab therapy was administered to 49 patients (92%). The response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 2% and 35%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 2.4 months, and OS was 5.8 months. Patients with ascites exhibited significantly shorter OS (8.6 vs 4.7 months, P = .0291) than those without ascites, and DCR (54% vs 18%, P = .0055) was significantly worse in patients with ascites. There was no significant difference in the frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher between patients with and without ascites.

Conclusion:

In a real-world setting, FTD/TPI has similar effectiveness as late-line chemotherapy for patients with AGC, including those who previously had received nivolumab.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer: the DELIVER trial (JACCRO GC-08)

BACKGROUND

There is no large real-world data regarding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in gastric cancer (GC). Although some tumors can grow rapidly after immunotherapy, the patient proportions and survival outcomes are unclear in GC.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective observational study was performed to evaluate clinical outcomes including survival time, safety, and tumor behavior of nivolumab treatment for patients with advanced GC. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor growth rate (TGR) at first evaluation, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 501 enrolled patients, 487 were evaluable (median age 70 years, 71% male, performance status 0/1/2 [42%/44%/14%], 21% HER2-pos, 42% patients with ascites). Median OS was 5.82 months (95% CI 5.29-7.00) with a 1-year survival rate of 30% and median PFS of 1.84 months (95% CI 1.71-1.97). The DCR was 39.4% and the RR was 14.2% (95% CI 10.3-18.8) in 282 patients with measurable lesions. In 219 patients evaluable for TGR, 20.5% were identified as hyperprogressive disease (HPD). OS from the first evaluation of patients with HPD was shorter compared with non-HPD (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.25-2.51, P = 0.001), but it was not worse than that of patients with progression and non-HPD (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72-1.53, P = 0.8). A multivariate analysis revealed the presence of peritoneal metastasis was a prognostic factor for OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data demonstrated the comparable survival time to a previous clinical trial and revealed the frequency and prognosis of patients with HPD in advanced GC treated with nivolumab.

Prognostic factors to predict the survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer who receive later-line nivolumab monotherapy-The Asahikawa Gastric Cancer Cohort Study (AGCC)

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is recommended in the guidelines; however, later-line treatment remains controversial. Since immune checkpoint inhibitors have been used for the treatment of various malignancies, trials have been performed for gastric cancer. A phase 3 trial indicated the survival benefit of nivolumab monotherapy for gastric cancer patients treated with prior chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A regional cohort study was undertaken to determine the real-world data of nivolumab treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. The patients were enrolled for 2 years from October 2017 to October 2019 and were prospectively followed for 1 year to examine the overall survival (OS). The patient characteristics were analyzed in a multivariate analysis and a nomogram to predict the probability of survival was generated.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients who received nivolumab as ≥third-line chemotherapy were included in the Asahikawa Gastric Cancer Cohort. The median OS was 7.5 (95% CI, 4.8-10.2) months and the response rate was 18.6%. Diffuse type classification, bone metastasis, high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and high CRP were associated with poor OS/prognosis in the multivariate analysis. A nomogram was developed based on these clinical parameters and the concordance index was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.91). The responders were aged and were frequently diagnosed with intestinal type gastric cancer, including patients with a HER2-positive status (27.3%) or microsatellite instability-high (27.3%) status.

CONCLUSIONS

The regional cohort study of nivolumab monotherapy for gastric cancer patients revealed prognostic factors and a nomogram was developed that could predict the probability of survival.