Long-term efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations

Case report: Pathological complete response induced by immunochemotherapy in a case of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma staged IIIA-N2

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) represents a rare and highly aggressive variant of lung cancer, characterized by its recalcitrance to conventional therapeutic modalities and the attendant dismal prognosis it confers. Recent breakthroughs in immunotherapy have presented novel prospects for PSC patients; nevertheless, the utility of neoadjuvant/conversional immunotherapy in the context of PSC remains ambiguous. In this report, we present a middle-aged male presenting with Stage III PSC, notable for its high expression of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), initially deemed as non-resectable for sizeable tumor mass and multiple lymph nodes metastases. The patient underwent a transformation to a resectable state after a regimen of three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. Following definitive surgical resection, the individual realized a pathological complete response (pCR), culminating in a significant prolongation of event-free survival (EFS). This case underscores the viability of employing immunochemotherapy as a neoadjuvant/conversional strategy for chosen cases of PSC.

Real-World Treatment Outcomes of MET Exon14 Skipping in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: GFPC 03-18 Study

BACKGROUND

MET-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with MET exon14 skipping mutations (METexon14); yet, data on the management of these patients in clinical practice is sparse.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the management of METexon14 aNSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This real-life, retrospective study analyzed the management of METexon14 aNSCLC. The primary endpoint was the median overall survival (mOS). Secondary endpoints were to assess investigator-progression-free survival (PFS) and mOS in different subgroups: patients treated with (a) crizotinib, regardless of treatment line; (b) anti-MET TKIs (crizotinib, tepotinib, capmatinib); and (c) immunotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included between December 2015 and January 1, 2020 in 13 centers. Median age was 73 years, 62.7% were female, 83.9% had adenocarcinoma, 92.4% at stage IV, and 27% had more than three metastatic sites. The majority of the patients (106, 89.8%) received at least one systemic treatment; 73% received at least one anti-MET TKI: crizotinib (68.6%), tepotinib (16%), capmatinib (10%). Only 10% received two anti-MET TKIs in their treatment sequences. With a median follow-up of 16 months (95% CI 13.6-29.7), mOS was 27.1 months (95% CI 18-31.4). There was no significant difference between mOS of patients treated and never treated with crizotinib, 19.7 (95% CI 13.6-29.7) and 28 (95% CI 16.4-NR) months, respectively (p = 0.16); mOS of the TKI cohort and of the TKI-naïve patient cohort were 27.1 (95% CI 18-29.7) and 35.6 (95% CI 8.6-NR) months respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-life study, there was no evidence of benefit in mOS with anti-MET TKIs.

Refining patient selection of MET-activated non-small cell lung cancer through biomarker precision

Dysregulated MET signaling plays an important role in lung oncogenesis, tumor growth and invasiveness. It may occur through various mechanisms, such as MET overexpression or gene amplification or mutation, all of which can be detected by specific methods. The utility of MET overexpression as a biomarker remains unclear due to discrepancies in its occurrence and non-standardized cut-off thresholds. MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) was established as a strong predictor of response to selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and clinical trial results in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring METex14 led to the approval of capmatinib and tepotinib by regulatory agencies worldwide. MET amplification is an emerging biomarker, with clinical data indicating an association between MET gene copy number and response to MET-TKIs. Additionally, MET amplification represents an important mechanism of resistance to TKIs in oncogene-driven NSCLC. The identification of molecular alterations for which targeted therapies are available is important, and high-throughput next-generation sequencing techniques can provide information on multiple genes at the same time, helping to provide valuable predictive information for oncogene-driven cancers. This review summarizes the current methods used for the detection of METex14, MET amplification and MET overexpression, and discusses the evidence for the use of MET-TKIs in patients with NSCLC with MET dysregulation. We discuss the practical challenges that impact the use of METex14 in the clinic and the evidence gaps that need to be addressed to validate additional genomic markers for MET-dependent cancers.

Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Management of MET-Altered NSCLC

In Canada, the therapeutic management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare actionable mutations differs between provinces, territories, and individual centres based on access to molecular testing and funded treatments. These variations, together with the emergence of several novel mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) factor-targeted therapies for the treatment of NSCLC, warrant the development of evidence-based consensus recommendations for the use of these agents. A Canadian expert panel was convened to define key clinical questions, review evidence, discuss practice recommendations and reach consensus on the treatment of advanced MET-altered NSCLC. Questions addressed by the panel include: 1. How should the patients most likely to benefit from MET-targeted therapies be identified? 2. What are the preferred first-line and subsequent therapies for patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations? 3. What are the preferred first-line and subsequent therapies for advanced NSCLC patients with de novo MET amplification? 4. What is the preferred therapy for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC with acquired MET amplification progressing on EGFR inhibitors? 5. What are the potential strategies for overcoming resistance to MET inhibitors? Answers to these questions, along with the consensus recommendations herein, will help streamline the management of MET-altered NSCLC in routine practice, assist clinicians in therapeutic decision-making, and help ensure optimal outcomes for NSCLC patients with MET alterations.