Prospective trial evaluating new circular and linear stapler devices for gastrointestinal anastomosis: preliminary data

Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study

PURPOSES

To compare the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) between Ethicon manual circular staplers (two-row) versus Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (three-row) and between Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ Series technology (two-row) versus Tri-Staple™ technology.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal surgery 2019-2022 in U.S. Premier Healthcare Database to assess the risk of AL within 30 days post-index procedure. The study devices were Ethicon manual circular staplers, Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology, and Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology.

RESULTS

Across 447 hospitals, the cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of AL within 30 days post-index procedure were 7.78% (6.91-8.74%) among 8337 patients in the Ethicon manual circular stapler cohort, 7.54% (6.87-8.27%) among 7928 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology cohort, and 8.19% (6.57-10.07%) among 1306 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology cohort. Comparative analyses revealed no difference comparing Ethicon manual circular staplers with Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with Tri-Staple™ technology (risk ratio [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01) or comparing Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with DST™ technology to Tri-Staple™ technology (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing a left-sided colorectal surgery from a U.S. hospital database, the risk of AL observed with manual two-row circular staplers was similar to that seen with three-row devices. This study affirms the safety of manual two-row circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis.

Comparison of pressure resistance of double-rows and triple-rows circular stapler in rectal double stapling technique: In vitro study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal anastomosis is a serious complication. Anastomotic failure depends on various parameters. The aim of our study was to evaluate the pressure resistance of a new device, EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology 28 mm Medium/Thick (Triple-rows circular stapler; TCS) compared with EEA™ circular stapler with DST series™ technology 28 mm, 4.8 mm staples (double-rows circular stapler; DCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed 30 anastomoses (DSC: 15, TCS: 15) of DST with porcine colon model in vitro. We performed following 3 comparative experiences; Experiment 1: observation of staple shape with a colonoscopy, Experiment 2: comparison of the pressure resistance, Experiment 3: comparison of leakage points.

RESULTS

There was no hypoplasia of staples and the shapes were well-formed by colonoscopy. The leakage pressure of DCS was 19.6 ± 4.4 mm Hg (mean ± standard deviation) and that of TCS was 38.6 ± 10.2 mm Hg (mean ± standard deviation). There was a significantly difference between 2 groups (P < .001). 12 cases of DCS (80%) and 10 cases of TCS (66.7%) had leakages from Circular stapler point. 2 cases of DCS (13.3%) and 5 cases of TCS (33.3%) had leakages from Crossing points. Only 1 case of DCS had leakages from Dog ear point (6.7%). There was no significantly difference in leakage site between 2 groups (P = .195).

CONCLUSIONS

TSC showed high pressure resistance during DST compared with that of DCS. It was suggested that TCS may contribute to the reduction of anastomotic leakage rate.

Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is a serious complication. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EEA™ circular stapler, a new triple-row circular stapler (TCS), relative to a conventional, double-row circular stapler (DCS). A total of 285 patients who underwent anastomosis with the double stapling technique at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital between 2017 and 2021 were included in this nonrandomized clinical trial with historical controls using a propensity score (PS) analysis. The primary endpoint was the risk of AL. We performed a 1:2 PS matching analysis. Before case matching, AL occurred in 15 (7.4%) and 2 (2.4%) patients in the DCS and TCS groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P = .17). After case matching, AL occurred in 13 patients (11.6%) and 1 patient (1.8%) in the DCS and TCS groups, respectively, revealing a significant difference (P = .04). Cox models were created by applying PS to adjust for group differences via regression adjustment. Odds ratios for AL in the DCS group versus the TCS group were 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-1.38) in the entire cohort, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.02-0.64) in the regression adjustment cohort, and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.02-1.09) in the 1:2 PS-matched cohort. PS analysis of clinical data suggested that the use of TCS contributes to a reduced risk of AL after colorectal anastomosis CTwith the double stapling technique.

Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal surgery using creactive protein

At present, anterior resection of the rectum or transabdominal rectal resection is the most common surgical technique for rectal cancer. Laparoscopic techniques are popular, and the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic rectal surgery have been confirmed. However, postoperative anastomotic leakage is a common, severe complication that leads to high mortality. Thus, early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage is important for reducing clinical consequences.The aim of this study was to determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) is a good predictor of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic transabdominal rectal resection.Our retrospective study involved a series of 196 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal rectal resection without ileostomy between May 2013 and April 2015 at the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine. The following patient data were collected: demographic data, manifestations of the complication, CRP levels and neutrophil percentage during the first 7 postoperative days.Anastomotic leakage was detected in 11 patients (5.6%). Each group showed significant differences (P < .05) in CRP levels on postoperative days 3 to 7; compared with other groups, the anastomotic leakage group showed significant differences in CRP levels (P < .05) on postoperative day 6. When patients were divided into groups with or without anastomotic leakage, CRP was a reliable predictor on postoperative days 4 to 7 (P < .05, area under the curve > 0.800). The best combination was CRP on postoperative day 6 (area under the curve = 0.932) with a cut-off of 76.6 mg/L, resulting in a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 94.6% and a negative predictive value of 99%.CRP is a reliable predictor of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic transabdominal rectal resection surgery. High CRP levels on postoperative days 4 to 7 indicate the need for a more careful patient evaluation.

Evaluation of techniques to prevent colorectal anastomotic leakage

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The double-stapling technique (DST) is the main method for creating a colorectal anastomosis. However, the rate of anastomotic leakage after DST remains high, and the technical risk factors have not been well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five methods of colorectal anastomosis were performed on the porcine rectum and colon: single-stapled double-purse-string (SSDP), DST, side-to-side with a linear stapler (SS-L), side-to-side with a circular stapler (SS-C), and SS-C with hand-sewn reinforcement (n = 6 for each method). In each group, burst pressures were tested, paying special attention to the locations of the first disruptions. The anastomosis line, including staples, was embedded in polyester resin, and polished sections were examined histologically.

RESULTS

Burst pressures were significantly higher in the SS-L and SS-C than those in the SSDP and DST groups (P < 0.001) and were higher in the SS-C with hand-sewn reinforcement than those in the SS-L and SS-C groups (P < 0.001). Remarkably, in the SSDP, DST, and SS-C groups, the first disruptions occurred on the staple line created by the circular stapler.

CONCLUSIONS

The experimentally strongest colorectal anastomosis created with instruments currently in use was a SS-C. This anastomosis does not overlap staple lines and does not require a purse-string suture. Hand-sewn reinforcement was effective in increasing the anastomotic strength.

Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of a 6-row 3-D linear cutter with the standard 4-row linear cutter in patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery anastomosis.

METHOD

Patients who underwent elective open gastrointestinal surgery that included stapled anastomosis using a linear cutter (Proximate®, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) between January 2011 and May 2011 were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups according to the linear cutter that was used in the surgery: the standard 4-row cutter (the S group) or the new 6-row cutter (the N group). The groups were compared based on the patient demographic data, the laboratory parameters, the preoperative diagnosis, the surgery performed, the operation time, intra-or postoperative complications, the time to oral tolerance and the length of the hospital stay.

RESULTS

The S group included 11 male and nine female patients with a mean age of 65 ± 12 (35-84) years, while the N group included 13 male and eight female patients with a mean age of 62 ± 11 (46-79) years (p =0.448, p = 0.443, respectively). Anastomotic line bleeding was observed in eight (40%) patients in the S group and in one (4.7%) patient in the N group (p = 0.006). Dehiscence of the anastomosis line was observed in two (10%) patients in the S group and none in the N group (p =0.131). Anastomotic leakage developed in three (15%) patients in the S group and in one (4.7%) patient in the N group (p = 0.269). The mean hospital stay was 12.65 ± 6.1 days in theS group and 9.52 ± 2.9 days in the N group (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The 6-row 3-D linear cutter is a safe and easily applied instrument that can be used to create anastomoses in gastrointestinal surgery. The new stapler provides some usage benefits and is also superior to the standard linear cutter with regard to anastomotic line bleeding.

[CS circular staplers for rectal surgery--a multicenter prospective study]

While circular staplers are used worldwide - especially for rectal anastomoses - there are relatively few publications on the effectiveness of these instruments. Between May 2008 and March 2009 in a prospective multicenter surveillance study 136 patients were enrolled from nine surgical units in Hungary. Rectal anastomoses were performed mainly in the upper and middle third of the rectum. In 115 cases adenocarcinoma, in 16 patients other type of malignant tumors and in 5 cases with anastomosis in the distal third were estimated too. 20 laparoscopic and 116 "conventional" surgery was performed. 32 mm diameter type CS circular staplers were used in 50, 28 mm in 85, and 25 mm in one case. Intraoperative technical failure of the device occurred in four cases, immediate correction were performed successfully in all of these patients and they recovered without postoperative complications. Late anastomotic leaks were detected in five patients, of which three healed spontaneously and two required reoperation. In the whole series two patients died representing a 1.4 percent mortality rate. The CS circular staplers proved to be appropriate for infraperitoneal rectal anastomoses.

Efeito do ácido ascórbico e da hidrocortisona na cicatrização anastomótica intestinal

OBJETIVO: Comparar a resistência cicatricial de anastomoses jejunais em ratos, submetidos à administração de vitamina C e de hidrocortisona, em distintos períodos pós-operatórios. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 40 ratos Wistar, submetidos à secção e subsequente anastomose término-terminal de segmento jejunal, a 10 cm da flexura duodenojejunal. Os animais foram distribuídos em quatro grupos (n=10): Grupo I - controle; Grupo II - administração de vitamina C oral 100 mg/kg; Grupo III - administração de hidrocortisona intraperitoneal 10 mg/kg; Grupo IV - administração de vitamina C mais hidrocortisona nas doses e vias de administração acima. Avaliaram-se as pressões de ruptura anastomótica no 5º e 21º dias do pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: Os ratos que receberam vitamina C isolada ou associada a hidrocortisona tenderam a ter pressão de ruptura maior do que os demais grupos, tanto no 5º quanto no 21º dia pós-operatório. CONCLUSÃO: A vitamina C contribui para aumentar a resistência das anastomoses jejunais dos ratos durante os primeiros cinco dias do pós-operatório. A resistência das anastomoses jejunais murinas foi pouco influenciada pela administração de corticóide intraperitoneal.