1
|
Przedlacka A, Pellino G, Fletcher J, Bello F, Tekkis PP, Kontovounisios C. Current and future role of three-dimensional modelling technology in rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1754-1769. [PMID: 35070078 PMCID: PMC8727188 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i12.1754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3D) modelling technology translates the patient-specific anatomical information derived from two-dimensional radiological images into virtual or physical 3D models, which more closely resemble the complex environment encountered during surgery. It has been successfully applied to surgical planning and navigation, as well as surgical training and patient education in several surgical specialties, but its uptake lags behind in colorectal surgery. Rectal cancer surgery poses specific challenges due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, which is difficult to comprehend and visualise.
AIM To review the current and emerging applications of the 3D models, both virtual and physical, in rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS Medline/PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched using the keywords “rectal surgery”, “colorectal surgery”, “three-dimensional”, “3D”, “modelling”, “3D printing”, “surgical planning”, “surgical navigation”, “surgical education”, “patient education” to identify the eligible full-text studies published in English between 2001 and 2020. Reference list from each article was manually reviewed to identify additional relevant papers. The conference abstracts, animal and cadaveric studies and studies describing 3D pelvimetry or radiotherapy planning were excluded. Data were extracted from the retrieved manuscripts and summarised in a descriptive way. The manuscript was prepared and revised in accordance with PRISMA 2009 checklist.
RESULTS Sixteen studies, including 9 feasibility studies, were included in the systematic review. The studies were classified into four categories: feasibility of the use of 3D modelling technology in rectal cancer surgery, preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation, surgical education and surgical device design. Thirteen studies used virtual models, one 3D printed model and 2 both types of models. The construction of virtual and physical models depicting the normal pelvic anatomy and rectal cancer, was shown to be feasible. Within the clinical context, 3D models were used to identify vascular anomalies, for surgical planning and navigation in lateral pelvic wall lymph node dissection and in management of recurrent rectal cancer. Both physical and virtual 3D models were found to be valuable in surgical education, with a preference for 3D printed models. The main limitations of the current technology identified in the studies were related to the restrictions of the segmentation process and the lack of 3D printing materials that could mimic the soft and deformable tissues.
CONCLUSION 3D modelling technology has potential to be utilised in multiple aspects of rectal cancer surgery, however, it is still at the experimental stage of application in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Przedlacka
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples 80138, Campania, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08029, Spain
- Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| | - Jordan Fletcher
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mark’s Hospital Academic Institute, Imperial College London, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
| | - Fernando Bello
- Centre for Engagement and Simulation Science, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
| | - Paris P Tekkis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
- Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
- Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
- Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
- Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lorenzon L, Bini F, Landolfi F, Quinzi S, Balducci G, Marinozzi F, Biondi A, Persiani R, D’Ugo D, Tirelli F, Iannicelli E. 3D pelvimetry and biometric measurements: a surgical perspective for colorectal resections. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:977-986. [PMID: 33230658 PMCID: PMC8026460 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03802-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Male sex, high BMI, narrow pelvis, and bulky mesorectum were acknowledged as clinical variables correlated with a difficult pelvic dissection in colorectal surgery. This paper aimed at comparing pelvic biometric measurements in female and male patients and at providing a perspective on how pelvimetry segmentation may help in visualizing mesorectal distribution. METHODS A 3D software was used for segmentation of DICOM data of consecutive patients aged 60 years, who underwent elective abdominal CT scan. The following measurements were estimated: pelvic inlet, outlet, and depth; pubic tubercle height; distances from the promontory to the coccyx and to S3/S4; distance from S3/S4 to coccyx's tip; ischial spines distance; pelvic tilt; offset angle; pelvic inlet angle; angle between the inlet/sacral promontory/coccyx; angle between the promontory/coccyx/pelvic outlet; S3 angle; and pelvic inlet to pelvic depth ratio. The measurements were compared in males and females using statistical analyses. RESULTS Two-hundred patients (M/F 1:1) were analyzed. Out of 21 pelvimetry measurements, 19 of them documented a significant mean difference between groups. Specifically, female patients had a significantly wider pelvic inlet and outlet but a shorter pelvic depth, and promontory/sacral/coccyx distances, resulting in an augmented inlet/depth ratio when comparing with males (p < 0.0001). The sole exceptions were the straight conjugate (p = 0.06) and S3 angle (p = 0.17). 3D segmentation provided a perspective of the mesorectum distribution according to the pelvic shape. CONCLUSION Significant differences in the structure of pelvis exist in males and females. Surgeons must be aware of the pelvic shape when approaching the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lorenzon
- grid.8142.f0000 0001 0941 3192General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy ,grid.417007.5Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, RM Italy
| | - Fabiano Bini
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, “Sapienza” University of Rome, via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Landolfi
- grid.417007.5Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, RM Italy
| | - Serena Quinzi
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, “Sapienza” University of Rome, via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- grid.417007.5Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, RM Italy
| | - Franco Marinozzi
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, “Sapienza” University of Rome, via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Biondi
- grid.8142.f0000 0001 0941 3192General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- grid.8142.f0000 0001 0941 3192General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D’Ugo
- grid.8142.f0000 0001 0941 3192General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavio Tirelli
- grid.8142.f0000 0001 0941 3192General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Elsa Iannicelli
- grid.417007.5Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, RM Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bocková M, Hoch J, Kestlerová A, Amler E. The dead space after extirpation of rectum. Current management and searching for new materials for filling. Physiol Res 2020; 68:S509-S515. [PMID: 32118483 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pelvic surgeries such as extirpation of the rectum or pelvic exenteration lead to a creation of a dead space, which can be cause of complication, such as bowel obstruction, perineal hernia, abscess or hematoma. A growing incidence of complication is expected in connection with the increasing use of laparoscopic and robotic approaches or ELAPE method. Since the bone structures do not allow compression, the only way to deal with the dead space is to fill it in. Present methods provide the filling with omental or myofascial flaps. The length and the mobility of the omental flap can be the limitation. Myofascial flaps are technically more demanding and bring the complications of a donor place. Synthetic or biological meshes do not deal with dead space problematic. Modern technologies using nanomaterials offer the possibility to produce a material with specific properties for example shape, inner structure, surface, or time of degradation. The modified material could also satisfy the requirements for filling the dead space after surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bocková
- Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Atallah S. Anatomical Considerations and Procedure-Specific Aspects Important in Preventing Operative Morbidity during Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33:157-167. [PMID: 32351339 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
As transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) becomes increasingly utilized, its technical challenges and potential pitfalls have become more clearly appreciated. This chapter explores the differences in how anatomy presents itself from the taTME vantage point as compared with traditional approaches to taTME, and how special problems unique to taTME pose a new set of operative challenges. Morbidity related, specifically, to the technique of taTME is also delineated with particular focus on male urethral injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Atallah
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Angriman I, Carvello M, Celentano V, Colombo F, Di Candido F, Laureti S, Luglio G, Poggioli G, Rottoli M, Scaringi S, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Crohn's disease. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:421-448. [PMID: 32172396 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02183-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a position statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of Crohn's disease management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of Crohn's disease. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - I Angriman
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - F Di Candido
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Laureti
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - G Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Scaringi
- Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - S Leone
- CEO, Associazione nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Carvello M, Celentano V, Coco C, Colombo F, Geccherle A, Luglio G, Rottoli M, Scarpa M, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Zinicola R, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:397-419. [PMID: 32124113 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Coco
- UOC Chirurgia Generale 2, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Geccherle
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Scarpa
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Zinicola
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - S Leone
- Associazione Nazionale Per Le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P, Bello F. 3D imaging and printing in pelvic colorectal cancer: 'The New Kid on the Block'. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23:171-173. [PMID: 30656576 PMCID: PMC6440928 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1922-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. .,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - P Tekkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - F Bello
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.,Simulation and Modelling in Medicine and Surgery, Centre for Engagement and Simulation Science, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pellino G, Biondo S, Codina Cazador A, Enríquez-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Roig-Vila JV, García-Granero E. Pelvic exenterations for primary rectal cancer: Analysis from a 10-year national prospective database. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:5144-5153. [PMID: 30568391 PMCID: PMC6288654 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify short-term and oncologic outcomes of pelvic exenterations (PE) for locally advanced primary rectal cancer (LAPRC) in patients included in a national prospective database. METHODS Few studies report on PE in patients with LAPRC. For this study, we included PE for LAPRC performed between 2006 and 2017, as available, from the Rectal Cancer Registry of the Spanish Association of Surgeons [Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC)]. Primary endpoints included procedure-associated complications, 5-year local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A propensity-matched comparison with patients who underwent non-exenterative surgery for low rectal cancers was performed as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS Eight-two patients were included. The mean age was 61.8 ± 11.5 years. More than half of the patients experienced at least one complication. Surgical site infections were the most common complication (abdominal wound 18.3%, perineal closure 19.4%). Thirty-three multivisceral resections were performed, including two hepatectomies and four metastasectomies. The long-term outcomes of the 64 patients operated on before 2013 were assessed. The five-year LR was 15.6%, the distant recurrence rate was 21.9%, and OS was 67.2%, with a mean survival of 43.8 mo. R+ve resection increased LR [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.58, 95%CI: 1.04-30.07, P = 0.04]. The quality of the mesorectum was associated with DFS. Perioperative complications were independent predictors of shorter survival (HR = 3.53, 95%CI: 1.12-10.94, P = 0.03). In the propensity-matched analysis, PE was associated with better quality of the specimen and tended to achieve lower LR with similar OS. CONCLUSION PE is an extensive procedure, justified if disease-free margins can be obtained. Further studies should define indications, accreditation policy, and quality of life in LAPRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | - Sebastiano Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain
| | - Antonio Codina Cazador
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery--Colorectal Unit, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona 17001, Spain
| | | | - Eloy Espín-Basany
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | | | - Eduardo García-Granero
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Preoperative surgical planning based on cadaver simulation and 3D imaging for a retrorectal tumour: description and video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:709-713. [PMID: 30225754 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1854-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
10
|
Sahnan K, Adegbola SO, Tozer PJ, Patel U, Ilangovan R, Warusavitarne J, Faiz OD, Hart AL, Phillips RKS, Lung PFC. Innovation in the imaging perianal fistula: a step towards personalised medicine. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756284818775060. [PMID: 29854001 PMCID: PMC5971375 DOI: 10.1177/1756284818775060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perianal fistula is a topic both hard to understand and to teach. The key to understanding the treatment options and the likely success is deciphering the exact morphology of the tract(s) and the amount of sphincter involved. Our aim was to explore alternative platforms better to understand complex perianal fistulas through three-dimensional (3D) imaging and reconstruction. METHODS Digital imaging and communications in medicine images of spectral attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were imported onto validated open-source segmentation software. A specialist consultant gastrointestinal radiologist performed segmentation of the fistula, internal and external sphincter. Segmented files were exported as stereolithography files. Cura (Ultimaker Cura 3.0.4) was used to prepare the files for printing on an Ultimaker 3 Extended 3D printer. Animations were created in collaboration with Touch Surgery™. RESULTS Three examples of 3D printed models demonstrating complex perianal fistula were created. The anatomical components are displayed in different colours: red: fistula tract; green: external anal sphincter and levator plate; blue: internal anal sphincter and rectum. One of the models was created to be split in half, to display the internal opening and allow complexity in the intersphincteric space to better evaluated. An animation of MRI fistulography of a trans-sphincteric fistula tract with a cephalad extension in the intersphincteric space was also created. CONCLUSION MRI is the reference standard for assessment of perianal fistula, defining anatomy and guiding surgery. However, communication of findings between radiologist and surgeon remains challenging. Feasibility of 3D reconstructions of complex perianal fistula is realized, with the potential to improve surgical planning, communication with patients, and augment training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kapil Sahnan
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Samuel O. Adegbola
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Philip J. Tozer
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Uday Patel
- Gastrointestinal Imaging, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | | | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Omar D. Faiz
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L. Hart
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | - Robin K. S. Phillips
- Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and
Academic Institute, Harrow, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|