Botulinum toxin A versus electrogalvanic stimulation for levator ani syndrome: is one a more effective therapy?

Diagnosis and Management of Functional Pouch Disorders: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Functional disorders impart significant morbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who undergo restorative proctocolectomy.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to summarize the management strategies for various functional disorders of the pouch.

DATA SOURCES

A database search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant clinical studies assessing the management of various functional disorders in patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy.

STUDY SELECTION

Published clinical studies investigating a functional disorder of the pouch in patients who previously underwent a colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Restorative proctocolectomy was completed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or other indications such as a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes described in this review include the prevalence of functional disorders of the pouch in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy and the relevant management strategies.

RESULTS

Ten clinical studies were identified using the predetermined search terms and screened for relevancy to patients with inflammatory bowel disease who previously underwent colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A qualitative summary was developed on the basis of data from these studies and from current guidelines developed for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

LIMITATIONS

This systematic review is limited by the small number and low quality of the clinical studies included as well as the nonquantitative summary of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional disorders of the pouch are likely underdiagnosed. Although a source of significant morbidity, these diseases require additional clinical studies to better elucidate effective management strategies.

Optimal management of functional anorectal pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Functional anorectal is idiopathic and characterised by severe and potentially intractable anorectal pain. The current review aims to appraise available evidence for the management of functional anorectal pain and synthesise reported outcomes using network meta-analysis. PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched for studies investigating treatments for functional anorectal pain. The primary outcome was clinical improvement of symptoms and the secondary outcome was pain scores reported during follow-up. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of interventions was performed. A total of 1538 patients were included from 27 studies. Intramuscular injection of triamcinolone, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and biofeedback were most likely to be associated with improvement in symptoms [SUCRA (triamcinolone) = 0.79; SUCRA (SNM) = 0.74; SUCRA (Biofeedback) = 0.61]. Electrogalvanic stimulation (EGS), injection of botulinum toxin A and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) were less likely to produce clinical improvement [SUCRA (EGS) = 0.53; SUCRA (Botox) = 0.30; SUCRA (GTN) = 0.27]. SNM and biofeedback were associated with the largest reductions in pain scores [mean difference, range (SNM) = 4.6-8.2; (Biofeedback) = 4.6-6]. As biofeedback is noninvasive and may address underlying pathophysiology, it is a reasonable first-line choice in patients with high resting pressures or defecation symptoms. In patients with normal resting pressures, SNM or EGS are additional options. Although SNM is more likely to produce a meaningful response compared to EGS, EGS is noninvasive and has less morbidity. Whilst triamcinolone injection is associated with symptomatic clinical improvement, the magnitude of pain reduction is less.

A Pain in the Butt: Hemorrhoids, Fissures, Fistulas, and Other Anorectal Syndromes

Painful and bothersome anorectal syndromes can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians because structural and functional abnormalities may often coexist and require a multidisciplinary approach to management. Although it is often difficult to attribute all of a patient's anorectal symptoms to a singular disorder with definitive intervention and cure, improving quality of life, treating coexistent conditions such as functional constipation and/or defecation disorders, addressing psychological comorbidities if present, and confirming there is no evidence of inflammatory or malignant conditions are top priorities.

Proctalgia Syndromes: Update in Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional anorectal pain syndromes are a neglected yet often disabling clinical entity resulting in significant economic and psychological burden to the patient. The aim of this review is to update the practicing gastroenterologist/coloproctologist on the diagnosis and management of these complicated disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The updated Rome foundation diagnostic criteria (Rome IV) for functional anorectal pain subgroups chronic proctalgia (levator ani syndrome and unspecified functional anorectal pain) and acute proctalgia (proctalgia fugax) on the basis of symptom duration and digital rectal examination findings. Chronic proctalgia is thought to be secondary to paradoxical pelvic floor contraction in many patients and biofeedback to improve the defecation effort has proven effective for over 90% in the short term. Unfortunately, management of proctalgia fugax remains challenging and treatment outcomes modest at best. A number of therapies to relax the pelvic floor may be employed to improve symptoms in functional anorectal pain syndromes; however, only biofeedback to improve defaecatory dynamics in patients with levator ani syndrome has proven effectiveness in a randomized setting. Further investigation of treatment approaches in proctalgia fugax is required.