Indications and oncological outcomes of selective dissection for clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer based on pretreatment imaging

Tumor regression and safe distance of distal margin after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy has been widely employed in the treatment of rectal cancer, demonstrating its utility in reducing tumor volume, downstaging tumors, and improving patient prognosis. It has become the standard preoperative treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy varies significantly among patients, with notable differences in tumor regression outcomes. In some cases, patients exhibit substantial tumor regression, even achieving pathological complete response. The assessment of tumor regression outcomes holds crucial significance for determining surgical approaches and establishing safe margins. Nonetheless, current research on tumor regression patterns remains limited, and there is considerable controversy surrounding the determination of a safe margin after neoadjuvant therapy. In light of these factors, this study aims to summarize the primary patterns of tumor regression observed following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, categorizing them into three types: tumor shrinkage, tumor fragmentation, and mucinous lake formation. Furthermore, a comparison will be made between gross and microscopic tumor regression, highlighting the asynchronous nature of regression in the two contexts. Additionally, this study will analyze the safety of non-surgical treatment in patients who achieve complete clinical response, elucidating the necessity of surgical intervention. Lastly, the study will investigate the optimal range for safe surgical resection margins and explore the concept of a safe margin distance post-neoadjuvant therapy.

Optimization of treatment strategies based on preoperative imaging features and local recurrence areas for locally advanced lower rectal cancer after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection

Purpose

Local recurrence (LR) is the main cause of treatment failure in locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC). This study evaluated the preoperative risk factors for LR in patients with LALRC to improve the therapeutic strategies.

Patients and Methods

LALRC patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed. The log-rank test was used to assess local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the prognostic risk factors for LRFS. Follow-up imaging data were used to classify LR according to the location.

Results

Overall, 376 patients were enrolled, and 8.8% (n=33) of these patients developed LR after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified positive clinical circumferential resection margin (cCRM) as an independent prognostic factor for LRFS (HR: 4.94; 95% CI, 1.75-13.94; P=0.003). The most common sites for LR were the pelvic plexus and internal iliac area (PIA) (54.5%), followed by the central pelvic area (CPA) (39.4%) and obturator area (OA) (6.1%). Following a subgroup analysis, LR in the OA was not associated with positive cCRM. Patients treated with upfront surgery (n=35, 14.1%) had a lower cCRM positive rate when compared with patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (n=12, 23.5%). However, the LR rate in the nCRT group was still lower (n=28, 36.4%) than that in the upfront surgery group (n=35, 14.%). Among patients with positive cCRM, the LR rate in patients with nCRT remained low (n=3, 10.7%).

Conclusion

Positive cCRM is an independent risk factor for LR after TME plus LPND in LALRC patients. LPND is effective and adequate for local control within the OA regardless of cCRM status. However, for LALRC patients with positive cCRM, nCRT should be considered before LPND to further reduce LR in the PIA and CPA.

Feasibility, Indications, and Prognostic Significance of Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Middle/Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy can decrease local recurrence to lateral compartments, thereby providing survival benefits.

OBJECTIVE

The safety of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy was investigated, and the surgical indications and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were established on the basis of preoperative characteristics.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Three hospitals in China.

PATIENTS

Four hundred nine patients with clinical evidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who received lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received chemoradiotherapy (n = 139) or not (n = 270).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The safety, indications, and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy were investigated.

RESULTS

The surgery times were significantly prolonged by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (291.3 vs 265.5 min; p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that poor/mucinous/signet-ring adenocarcinoma (OR = 4.42, 95% CI, 2.24-11.27; p = 0.031) and postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm (OR = 15.2, 95% CI, 5.89-53.01; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac as well as the involvement of 3 or more lateral pelvic lymph nodes were independent adverse prognostic factors.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is a practicable procedure with acceptable morbidity. Postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm and poor/signet/mucinous adenocarcinoma could be used for predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy. However, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection should be carefully considered in patients with swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac region or involvement of multiple lateral pelvic lymph nodes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 .

VIABILIDAD, INDICACIONES E IMPORTANCIA PRONSTICA DE LA DISECCIN SELECTIVA DE GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PLVICOS LATERALES DESPUS DE QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA PREOPERATORIA EN CNCER DE RECTO MEDIO/INFERIOR RESULTADOS DE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO DE GANGLIOS LATERALES EN CHINA

ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria puede disminuir la recurrencia local en los compartimentos laterales, lo que brinda beneficios de supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Se investigó la seguridad de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, y se establecieron las indicaciones quirúrgicas y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en función de las características preoperatorias.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Tres hospitales en China.PACIENTES:Cuatrocientos nueve pacientes con evidencia clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes que recibieron disección de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales se dividieron en dos grupos dependiendo de si recibieron quimiorradioterapia (n = 139) o no (n = 270).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se investigaron la seguridad, las indicaciones y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Los tiempos de cirugía se prolongaron significativamente con la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria (291,3 vs 265,5 min, p = 0,021). El análisis multivariable demostró que el adenocarcinoma mal diferenciado/mucinoso/en anillo de sello (odds ratio = 4,42, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 2,24-11,27; p = 0,031) y el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia ≥7 mm (odds ratio = 15,2, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 5,89-53,01; p < 0,001) fueron factores predictivos independientes de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. El análisis pronóstico multivariable mostró que la inflamación de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales más allá del obturador o la ilíaca interna, así como la afectación de tres o más ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, eran factores pronósticos adversos independientes.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:La quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria combinada con la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales es un procedimiento practicable con una morbilidad aceptable. Posterior a la quimiorradioterapia, el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales ≥7 mm y el adenocarcinoma pobre/en sello/mucinoso podrían usarse para predecir la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia. Sin embargo, la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales debe considerarse cuidadosamente en pacientes con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales inflamados más allá del obturador o de la región ilíaca interna o compromiso de múltiples ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improve local control and prognosis in rectal cancer patients with clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis? A multicenter lateral node study in China

AIMS

Selective lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer is widely recognized. This study aimed to determine the effects of nCRT before LPND on local control and prognosis of rectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrieved from a prospective database for rectal cancer patients with clinical LPN metastasis receiving total mesorectal excision and LPND at three institutions between January 2012 and December 2019. Selection bias was minimized using propensity score matching (PSM) and short-term and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 213) were enrolled and grouped as either nCRT (n = 97) or non-nCRT (n = 116). PSM was used to identify 83 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, nCRT patients had a longer operation duration (310.6 vs. 265.0 min, P = 0.001), lower pathological LPN metastasis rate (32.5% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.040), and fewer harvested lymph nodes (22 vs. 25, P = 0.018) compared to the non-nCRT group. However, after PSM, the two groups had similar estimated overall 3-year survival (79.5% vs. 80.7%, P = 0.922), 3-year disease-free survival (66.1% vs. 65.5, P = 0.820), and 3-year local recurrence-free survival (88.6% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.927). Distant metastasis was the predominant recurrence pattern in the overall (45/58, 77.6%) and matched (33/44, 75.0%) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

LPND without nCRT is effective and sufficient in preventing local recurrence in patients with LPN metastases. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Since systemic metastasis is the predominant recurrence pattern in patients with LPN metastasis post-LPND, improved perioperative systemic chemotherapy is needed to prevent micrometastasis.

Optimization of therapeutic strategies for selective lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer with clinical suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

Background

Selective lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection with total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is pointed out to reduce lateral compartment recurrence and to improve survival in patients with rectal cancer with LLN metastases. This study aimed to explore the safety, surgical indications, and survival outcomes of LLN dissection after nCRT.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with rectal cancer with clinical evidence of LLN metastases (n = 466) treated across three hospitals in China. Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLN dissection were grouped into nCRT (n = 155) and non-nCRT (n = 291), respectively. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias.

Results

After matching, nCRT did not significantly increase the surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss or postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, poor/mucinous/signet adenocarcinoma (P = 0.042) and post-nCRT LLN short diameter ≥7 mm (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for pathological LLN metastasis after nCRT. Overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) were significantly worse in patients with LLN metastasis, which was, however, not an independent risk factor for survival after eliminating confounders. Multivariate prognostic analysis of 40-patient subset with pathological LLN metastasis showed that distant metastasis, metastasis beyond the obturator or internal iliac region, and ≥2 LLN metastasis were independent predictors of poor overall survival.

Conclusions

Selective LLN dissection after nCRT is safe and feasible with acceptable perioperative outcomes. Patients with a post-nCRT LLN short diameter ≥7 mm or poor/mucinous/signet adenocarcinoma should receive supplementary LLN dissection after nCRT. However, patients with distant metastasis, metastasis beyond the obturator or internal iliac region, and involvement of ≥2 LLN may not benefit from LLN dissection, and LLN dissection should be carefully considered in such patients.

Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is one of the prominent reasons for local recurrence (LR) in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The evaluation criteria of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for patients in eastern (mainly in Japan) and western countries have been controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in order to guide surgical methods.

Methods

We searched relevant databases (Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 05 October 2022 to evaluate the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in patients with RC in this meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 24 articles with 5843 patients were included in this study. The overall results showed that female sex, age <60 years, pretherapeutic CEA level >5 ng/ml, clinical T4 stage (cT4), clinical M1 stage (cM1), distance of the tumour from the anal verge (AV) <50 mm, tumour centre located below the peritoneal reflection (Rb), short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥8 mm before nCRT, short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥5 mm after nCRT, border irregularity of LPLN, tumour size ≥50 mm, pathological T3-4 stage (pT3-4), pathological N2 stage (pN2), mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MLNM), lymphatic invasion (LI), venous invasion (VI), CRM (+) and poor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis (P <0.05).

Conclusion

This study summarized almost all potential risk factors of LPLN metastasis and expected to provide effective treatment strategies for patients with LRC. According to the risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis, we can adopt different comprehensive treatment strategies. High-risk patients can perform lateral lymph node dissection to effectively reduce local recurrence; In low-risk patients, we can avoid overtreatment, reduce complications and trauma caused by lateral lymph node dissection, and maximize patient survival and quality of life.

Feasibility and safety of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for elderly patients with middle-low rectal cancer: results of a large multicenter lateral node collaborative group study in China

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection can improve local control in certain rectal cancer patients with LPN metastasis. However, the effects of this technically complex procedure on perioperative safety and long-term survival of elderly patients (≥ 70 years) remain unclear.

METHODS

Locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer patients diagnosed with LPN metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPN dissection at three institutions from January 2012 to December 2019 were included in this study. Additionally patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and those who did not were compared.

RESULTS

In total there were 407 patients, including 49 elderly and 358 non-elderly patients, of which 249 were male, with a median age of 58 years (range:18-85 years). In the whole cohort, operation time (280.7 vs. 292.0 min, p = 0.498) and estimated blood loss (100 vs. 100 ml, p = 0.384) were comparable in the elderly and non-elderly groups. There was no significant difference in the incidences of overall complications (24.5% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.448) and severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5) surgical complications (8.2% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.778) between the two groups. However, the incidence of urinary retention (14.3% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit admission (16.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.018) was significantly higher in the elderly group compared with those in the non-elderly group. The 3-year overall survival (88.7% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.516) and disease-free survival (81.2% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.352) were comparable between the two groups. Moreover, results in the nCRT cohort were comparable to those in the overall cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with nCRT, TME combined with LPN dissection is safe and feasible for elderly patients, demonstrating low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Elderly and non-elderly patients with LPN metastasis who undergo LPN dissection can achieve comparable 3-year survival outcomes.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850027.

Lateral Lymph Node Size and Tumor Distance From Anal Verge Accurately Predict Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improves oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, the indication for this procedure remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and the indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

DESIGN

A multi-institutional retrospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 3 university hospitals.

PATIENTS

This study involved 105 patients with locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer and clinically suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection between 2015 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Indications were set using lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis-associated preoperative factors.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients, 36 (34.3%) had pathologically confirmed lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and 77 (73.3%) underwent preoperative chemoradiation. Tumors located within 5 cm distance from the anal verge ( p = 0.02) and initial node size ≥ 6 mm ( p = 0.001) were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity was 100% (36/36) with a cutoff of 6 mm for the initial node size and 94.4% (34/36) with a cutoff of 8 mm for the initial node size. When using initial node size cutoffs of 8 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and 6 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm, the sensitivity of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was found to be 100%.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design and small sample size were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSION

Initial node size and tumor height were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. This study proposed that an initial node size of ≥8 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and ≥6 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm are optimal indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 .

EL TAMAO DEL GANGLIO LINFTICO LATERAL Y LA DISTANCIA DEL TUMOR DESDE EL BORDE ANAL PREDICEN CON PRECISIN LOS GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PLVICOS LATERALES POSITIVOS EN EL CNCER DE RECTO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO MULTIINSTITUCIONAL

ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales mejora los resultados oncológicos en pacientes con cáncer de recto con sospecha de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Sin embargo, la indicación de este procedimiento sigue sin estar clara.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue identificar los factores predictivos de la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos laterales y las indicaciones para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multiinstitucional.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en tres hospitales universitarios.PACIENTES:Este estudio involucró a 105 pacientes con cáncer de recto medio/bajo localmente avanzado y sospecha clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales que se sometieron a una escisión mesorrectal total con disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales entre 2015 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las indicaciones se establecieron utilizando los factores preoperatorios asociados con la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.RESULTADOS:Entre 105 pacientes, 36 (34,3%) tenían metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales confirmada patológicamente y 77 (73,3%) se sometieron a quimiorradiación preoperatoria. Los tumores ubicados dentro de los 5 cm desde el borde anal ( p = 0,02) y el tamaño inicial del ganglio ( p = 0,001) fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. La sensibilidad fue del 100 % (36/36), con un punto de corte de 6 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio, seguido de 8 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio (94,4%, 34/36). Cuando se utilizó un tamaño de corte inicial del ganglio de 8 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor >5 cm y 6 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor ≤5 cm, la sensibilidad de la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales fue del 100 %.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:El tamaño inicial del ganglio y la altura del tumor fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Este estudio propuso que un tamaño de ganglio inicial de ≥8 mm con un tumor a >5 cm del margen anal y ≥6 mm con un tumor a ≤5 cm del margen anal son indicaciones óptimas para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el cáncer de recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 . (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Global Status of Research on Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer from 1994 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis

Tremendous progress has been made in the field of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) in rectal cancer, but no bibliometric analysis in this field has been carried out and published. To reveal the current status and trends in LLNs in rectal cancer, this bibliometric analysis was performed. Cooperation network, co-citation and keyword co-occurrence analyses were conducted. Annual publication, cooperation relationships among authors, institutions and countries, co-cited journal, co-cited author, co-cited reference and keywords were the main outcomes. A total of 345 studies were included in this bibliometric analysis. The number of articles published in this field has been increasing year by year. The authors, institutions and countries worked closely together in this field. Japan has the largest number of published articles, accounting for 51.59% of the total publications. International Journal of Colorectal Disease (30 papers, 8.70%) published the most papers in this field. The JCOG0212 trial was the most cited article. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, multicenter, lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) and metastasis are recent hot keywords, and LLND had the highest burst strength. In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis found that Japanese institutions and authors dominated the field of LLNs in rectal cancer. The JCOG0212 trial was the most influential article, which had a significant impact on the development of guidelines. LLND is a hotspot in this field with the highest burst strength. Further prospective studies are needed in this field.

Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

An innovative instrument for laparoscopy using indocyanine green (ICG) allows easy detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lateral pelvic SLN biopsy (SLNB) using ICG fluorescence navigation in advanced lower rectal cancer and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this technique to predict the status of LPLN.

METHODS

From April 1, 2017 to December 1, 2020, we conducted lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) in 23 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who presented with LPLN but without LPLN enlargement. Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, lymph node findings, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We successfully performed the surgery using fluorescence navigation. One patient underwent bilateral LLND and 22 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic SLN were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 21 patients. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 3 patients and negative in 18 patients by frozen pathological examination. Among the 21 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLN was detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLN.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer with good accuracy, and no false-negative cases were found. No metastasis in SLNB seemed to reflect all negative LPLN metastases, and this technique can replace preventive LLND for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Transanally assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) might be an effective approach for patients with rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis, it is technically challenging because of the anatomical complexity and location of the deep pelvis. An assistance by transanal approach might be useful for a successful LLND.

METHODS

From September 2016 to May 2021, 39 patients with low rectal cancer underwent transanal total mesorectal excision with LLND. Among them, 18 patients underwent LLND using a conventional laparoscopic approach alone, while the remaining 21 underwent LLND using both conventional and transanal approaches. Their clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

The operation time for LLND on each side was significantly shorter in the transanal group (105 min vs. 54 min, P < 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss was also significantly less in the transanal group (40 g vs. 0 g, P = 0.031). The rate of overall postoperative complications ≥ grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was significantly less in the transanal group (66.7% vs. 28.6%, odds ratio: 5.000, 95% confidence intervals: 1.313-19.047, P = 0.040). The number of harvested lateral lymph nodes in both groups was similar (8.5 vs. 8, P = 0.544).

CONCLUSION

The transanal approach for LLND reduced operative time, blood loss, and morbidity compared with the conventional approach alone in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer.

Can patients with good tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy be exempted from lateral lymph node dissection?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection (LLND) can be exempted in patients with good tumor regression grading (TRG) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT)?

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT and total mesorectal resection plus selective LLND at our institution. The primary outcomes are the relationship between LLN metastasis (LLNM) and magnetic resonance imaging TRG (mrTRG) and the relationship between LLNM and pathological TRG (pTRG).

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were included, of which 24 patients (26.4%) had LLNM, 67 patients (73.6%) had no LLNM. There were significant differences of the maximum short-axis of LLN before and after nCRT, short-axis reduction rate of the LLN with maximum short-axis, length diameter reduction rate of primary tumor, mrTRG, and pTRG between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that mrTRG (P = 0.026) and pTRG (P = 0.013) were independent predictors for LLNM. The combination used by mrTRG and the maximum short-axis of LLNs ≥ 8 mm before nCRT and the maximum short-axis of LLN ≥ 5 mm after nCRT achieved specificity of 0.970, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.867, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.855. The same combination used by pTRG achieved the specificity of 0.970, PPV of 0.857 and NPV of 0.844.

CONCLUSION

The suspected positive LLNs tend to be sterilized by nCRT in patients who have a very good response to nCRT. It is rational to avoid LLND in patients whose primary tumor and LLNs both show good response to nCRT.

Establishing and validating predictive nomograms for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer based on radiologic factors and clinicopathologic characteristics

INTRODUCTION

It is critical to accurately predict the occurrence of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis. Currently, verified predictive tools are unavailable. This study aims to establish nomograms for predicting LPN metastasis in patients with rectal cancer who received or did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of patients with rectal cancer and clinical LPN metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and LPN dissection (LPND) from January 2012 to December 2019 at 3 institutions. We collected and evaluated their clinicopathologic and radiologic features, and constructed nomograms based on the multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 472 eligible patients were enrolled into the non-nCRT cohort (n = 312) and the nCRT cohort (n = 160). We established nomograms using variables from the multivariable logistic regression models in both cohorts. In the non-nCRT cohort, the variables included LPN short diameter, cT stage, cN stage, histologic grade, and malignant features, and the C-index was 0.930 in the training cohort and 0.913 in the validation cohort. In the nCRT cohort, the variables included post-nCRT LPN short diameter, ycT stage, ycN stage, histologic grade, and post-nCRT malignant features, and the C-index was 0.836 in the training dataset and 0.827 in the validation dataset. The nomograms in both cohorts were moderately calibrated and well-validated.

CONCLUSIONS

We established nomograms for patients with rectal cancer that accurately predict LPN metastasis. The performance of the nomograms in both cohorts was high and well-validated.

Open versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for mid- and low- rectal cancer: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative, pathological and oncological outcomes of open versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for mid- and low- rectal cancer using propensity score matching.

METHODS

Between September 2009 and December 2018, consecutive patients who underwent open or laparoscopic TME plus LLND were collected. Based on the propensity score matching analysis, laparoscopic TME plus LLND was compared with open TME plus LLND for the perioperative, pathological, and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were collected. There were 13 patients who underwent open TME plus LLND (open group) and 64 patients who underwent laparoscopic TME plus LLND (laparoscopic group). After propensity score matching, 13 patients in the open group were matched to 39 patients in the laparoscopic group (1:3). The laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter length of incision (5 cm vs. 20 cm, p < 0.01), less intraoperative blood loss (80 mL vs. 100 mL, p = 0.02), and shorter time to postoperative liquid diet (72 h vs. 96 h, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in both early and late postoperative complications. The 3-year overall survival was 85.9% in the laparoscopic group and 76.9% in the open group (p = 0.75), respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival was 70.6% in the laparoscopic group and 74.1% in the open group (p = 0.83), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic LLND had comparable oncological outcomes to open LLND. Moreover, laparoscopic LLND had postoperative recovery advantages over open LLND.

Malignant Features in Pretreatment Metastatic Lateral Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer Predict Distant Metastases

INTRODUCTION

Pretreatment enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLN) in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer are predictive for local recurrences after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (n(C)RT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Not much is known of the impact on oncological outcomes when in addition malignant features are present in enlarged LLN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at five tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands and Australia. All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced low rectal cancer with LLN on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and underwent n(C)RT followed by TME. LLN were considered enlarged with a short axis of ≥ 5 mm. Malignant features were defined as nodes with internal heterogeneity and/or border irregularity. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Out of 115 patients, the majority was male (75%) and the median age was 64 years (range 26-85 years). Median pretreatment LLN short axis was 7 mm (range 5-28 mm), and 60 patients (52%) had malignant features. After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with larger LLN (7 + mm) had a worse LRFS (p = 0.01) but no difference in DMFS (p = 0.37) and OS (p = 0.54) compared with patients with smaller LLN (5-6 mm). LLN patients with malignant features had no difference in LRFS (p = 0.20) but worse DMFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.006) compared with patients without malignant features in the LLN. Cox regression analysis identified LLN short axis as an independent factor for LR. Malignant features in LLN were an independent factor for DMFS.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that pretreatment enlarged LLN that also harbor malignant features are predictive of a worse DMFS. More studies will be required to further explore the role of malignant features in LLN.