Impact of timing of reversal of loop ileostomy on patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

The impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection, a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic stenosis (AS) is a common complication after colorectal resection. However, the predisposing factors for stricture formation are not fully understood. Previous studies have shown anastomotic leakage (AL) to be a risk factor for the occurrence of AS. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with AL following elective, sphincter preserving, colorectal resection, with or without diversion ostomy, between January 2009 and March 2023 were identified from a prospectively collected database. The characteristics of the anastomotic leakage, patient baseline and operative characteristics as well as the postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-leakage AS.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients developed AL and met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 (21.7%) patients were diagnosed with post-leakage AS. There was a significantly higher frequency of patients with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (18% vs 3%; p = .026) and hand-sewn anastomoses (39% vs 17%; p = .011) within the AS group. Furthermore, the extent of the anastomotic defect was significantly higher in the AS group compared with the non-AS group (50%, IQR 27-71 vs. 20%, IQR 9-40, p = 0.011). Similar findings were observed between the study groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, medical comorbidities, diagnosis, surgical procedure, surgical approach (open vs. minimally invasive), and anastomotic fashioning (side-to-end vs. end-to-end). On multivariate analysis, the extent of the anastomotic defect (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p = 0.034) and hand-sewn anastomoses (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01-6.98; p = 0.043) were confirmed as independent risk factors for post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the occurrence of post-leakage AS and the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or the management of AL. Time to ostomy reversal was significantly longer in the AS group (202d, IQR 169-275 vs. 318d IQR 192-416, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The extent of the anastomotic defect and hand-sewn anastomoses were confirmed as independent risk factors for the occurrence of post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or AL management, and the occurrence of post-leakage AS.

The impact of delayed closure of ileostomy on postoperative complications in patients with Crohn's disease: a case-matched study

Ileostomy creation is a common procedure to mitigate postoperative complications in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure remains controversial. This study aims to investigate whether delayed ileostomy closure (> 6 months post formation) affects postoperative complications compared to early closure (≤ 6 months post formation). Consecutive CD patients who underwent ileostomy reversal at a tertiary care center between January 1, 2013, and December 1, 2021, were included. The study compared patients who underwent early ileostomy closure to matched patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure. The 90-day postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The study included 352 eligible patients for ileostomy reversion. Our data showed that patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure had higher incidence of ileostomy-related infectious complications (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.008), a longer postoperative hospital stay (10 days with an IQR of 7-12 days versus 8 days with an IQR of 7-11 days, p = 0.024), and increased rate of ileus (28% versus 15%, p = 0.003). There were 256 patients included after 1:1 propensity score matching. The results revealed no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, infectious or non-infectious complications except for a statistically significant increase in the incidence of ileus in the delayed closure group (p = 0.01). Patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure has similar outcomes to early closure in terms of postoperative complications, except for a higher incidence of ileus.

Causes and costs of delayed closure of ileostomies in rectal cancer patients in Australasian units

BACKGROUND

Defunctioning loop ileostomies (DLIs) are a frequent adjunct to rectal cancer surgery. Delayed closure of DLIs is common and associated with increased morbidity. The reasons for delayed DLI closure are often unknown. The economic burden of delayed DLI closure is not quantified. The present study aimed to determine the reasons for, and economic burden of, delayed DLI closure.

METHODS

Clinical and economic data were audited from a prospective database of patients in two Australasian colorectal cancer centres. Patients treated at each unit with low/ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer with formation of DLI between January 2014 and December 2019 were included. Post-operative complication rate, stoma-related complication rate and costs of hospital admissions and stoma care were recorded and analysed. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors for delay to closure.

RESULTS

146 patients underwent low/ultra-low anterior resection with DLI; 135 patients (92.5%) underwent reversal. The median duration to reversal was 7 months (IQR 4.5-9.5). Sixty-six percent of patients underwent reversal >6 months after their index surgery. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with delayed reversal (P < 0.001). Non-English speakers waited longer for DLI closure (P = 0.028). The costs of outpatient stoma care (P < 0.001), post-operative care (P = 0.004), and total cost of treatment (P = 0.014) were significantly higher in the delayed closure group, with a total cost of treatment difference of $3854 NZD per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Causes of delay include systemic factors and demographic factors that can be addressed directly, addressing such causes may alleviate a significant economic burden.

Effect of Anterograde Lavage via Temporary Loop Ileostoma on the Recovery of Bowel Function in Patients Receiving Stoma Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The effect of anterograde lavage in patients with rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection and plan to receive stoma closure is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of anterograde lavage on postoperative bowel function recovery in patients who underwent temporary loop ileostomy and stoma closure.

DESIGN

This was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer and were planning to receive stoma closure from March through December 2019 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received anterograde lavage before stoma closure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Short-term functional outcomes, including time to first passing of flatus, first defecation time, and recovery time to first meal, were compared between the groups. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 222 eligible participants were included in the analysis, including 114 in the lavage group and 108 in the nonlavage group. No statistically significant differences were found in age, sex ratio, or distance between the anastomotic line and dentate line. In the lavage group, patients' time to first passing of flatus (38 vs 42 h; p = 0.006), first defecation time (42 vs 48 h; p < 0.001), recovery time to first meal (48 vs 55.5 h; p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (5 vs 7 d; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the nonlavage group, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly lower than that of the nonlavage group (25,000 vs 28,000 RMB; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (p = 0.067).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its relatively small sample size and retrospective design with single-center participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterograde lavage before stoma closure is safe and noninvasive. For patients receiving anterior resection and planning to have stoma closure, this procedure can potentially help recover bowel function more rapidly. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51.

EFECTO DEL LAVADO ANTERGRADO MEDIANTE ILEOSTOMA TEMPORAL EN ASA SOBRE LA RECUPERACIN DE LA FUNCIN INTESTINAL EN PACIENTES QUE RECIBEN CIERRE DE ESTOMA UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO

ANTECEDENTES:No está claro el efecto del lavado anterógrado en pacientes con cáncer de recto con resección anterior que planean recibir el cierre del estoma.OBJETIVO:Investigar el efecto del lavado anterógrado en la recuperación de la función intestinal posoperatoria en pacientes que se sometieron a ileostomía en asa temporal y cierre de estoma.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en el hospital.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección anterior por cáncer de recto y que planeaban recibir el cierre del estoma desde marzo hasta diciembre de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes inscritos se dividieron en dos grupos según si recibieron lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados funcionales a corto plazo, incluido el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos, tiempo de la primera defecación y tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida, se compararon entre los grupos. Resultados secundarios incluyeron duración de la estancia hospitalaria, costo total de la hospitalización y complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en el análisis un total de 222 participantes elegibles, incluidos 114 en el grupo de lavado y 108 en el grupo de no lavado. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la edad, la proporción de sexos o la distancia entre la línea de anastomosis y la línea dentada. En el grupo de lavado, el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos de los pacientes (38 vs 42 h; p = 0,006), el tiempo de la primera defecación (42 vs 48 h; p < 0,001), el tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida (48 vs 55,5 h; p < 0,001) y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (5 vs 7 días; p < 0,001) fueron significativamente más cortos que los del grupo de no lavado, y el costo total de la hospitalización fue significativamente menor que el del grupo de no lavado (25000 vs 28000 RMB; p < 0,001). No hubo diferencia significativa en la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias entre los dos grupos (p = 0,067).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y su diseño retrospectivo con participantes de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:El lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma es seguro y no invasivo. Para los pacientes que se someten a una resección anterior y planean cerrar el estoma, este procedimiento puede ayudar potencialmente a recuperar la función intestinal más rápidamente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51. (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision-making?

BACKGROUND

Decision-making under uncertainty may be influenced by an individual's personality. The primary aim was to explore associations between surgeon personality traits and colorectal anastomotic decision-making.

METHODS

Colorectal surgeons worldwide participated in a two-part online survey. Part 1 evaluated surgeon characteristics using the Big Five Inventory to measure personality (five domains: agreeableness; conscientiousness; extraversion; emotional stability; openness) in response to scenarios presented in Part 2 involving anastomotic decisions (i.e. rejoining the bowel with/without temporary stomas, or permanent diversion with end colostomy). Anastomotic decisions were compared using repeated-measure ANOVA. Mean scores of traits domains were compared with normative data using two-tailed t tests.

RESULTS

In total, 186 surgeons participated, with 127 surgeons completing both parts of the survey (68.3 per cent). One hundred and thirty-one surgeons were male (70.4 per cent) and 144 were based in Europe (77.4 per cent). Forty-one per cent (77 surgeons) had begun independent practice within the last 5 years. Surgeon personality differed from the general population, with statistically significantly higher levels of emotional stability (3.25 versus 2.97 respectively), lower levels of agreeableness (3.03 versus 3.74), extraversion (2.81 versus 3.38) and openness (3.19 versus 3.67), and similar levels of conscientiousness (3.42 versus 3.40 (all P <0.001)). Female surgeons had significantly lower levels of openness (P <0.001) than males (3.06 versus 3.25). Personality was associated with anastomotic decision-making in specific scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal surgeons have different personality traits from the general population. Certain traits seem to be associated with anastomotic decision-making but only in specific scenarios. Further exploration of the association of personality, risk-taking, and decision-making in surgery is necessary.

A snapshot of intraoperative conditions to predict prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

The cause of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is multifactorial. The influence of preoperative factors on PPOI has been well documented, but little is known about the impact of intraoperative conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of intraoperative factors on PPOI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The LekCheck study database of the Colorectal Unit at the Royal Adelaide Hospital was analysed. Per patient, over 60 data points were prospectively collected between March 2018 and July 2020. Intraoperative data were collected in theatre during a one-off snapshot measure. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Data of 336 patients were included. The median age was 66 years and 58.3% were male. Ninety-three patients (27.7%) developed PPOI. Univariate analysis identified the following intraoperative variables as risk-factors of PPOI: greater volumes of intraoperative IV fluid administration (464 versus 415 mL/h for those without PPOI; p = 0.04), side-to-side anastomosis orientation (53.8 versus 41.2%; p = 0.04) and increased perioperative opioid use (6.73 versus 4.11 mg/kg morphine equivalents for patients with and without PPOI, respectively; p = 0.02). Upon multivariable analysis, increased perioperative opioid use remained significant (p = 0.05), as well as the preoperative factors anticoagulation use (p = 0.04) and higher levels of serum total protein (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that intraoperative factors may also contribute to the development of PPOI, but this could not be confirmed in the multivariate analysis. Further studies including larger patient numbers will be required to determine the impact of intraoperative conditions on the development of PPOI.