Geraghty KJ, O'Reilly CA, Neary PM. Excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease - is it time to question an old dogma?
Ir J Med Sci 2024;
193:1431-1434. [PMID:
37957477 DOI:
10.1007/s11845-023-03566-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease is controversial due to fears over poor wound healing leading to proctectomy. We aim to review the available literature and establish the role of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.
METHODS
A review of the current scientific literature was conducted using Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Clinical trials from 2005 to present, reporting outcomes of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease, were included. Review articles and case reports were excluded.
RESULTS
A cohort of 67 patients across four studies was included in this review. There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing. One patient (1.5%) had a non-healing wound post-operatively. Four (6%) cases of post-operative bleeding were identified, two (3%) patients were diagnosed with anal fissures and two (3%) were treated after developing perianal abscess post-procedure. There was one (1.5%) case of urinary retention, and one (1.5%) subject developed an anal stricture.
CONCLUSION
The current available evidence suggests a role for excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease patients with well-controlled symptomatic disease, though further prospective analysis is certainly warranted. The preferred operation (open vs closed) remains unclear.
FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Further prospective trials are required to investigate the optimal approach to haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.
Collapse