Acute diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients: evidence from an international multicenter observational registry (Web-based International Register of Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Wires-T)

Long-term treatment outcomes of complicated acute diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE

The main aim of this study was to determine the short- and long-term outcomes of the non-operative management of acute left-sided complicated diverticulitis (ALCD) in severely immunocompromised patients (IMS group) and compare them with immunocompetent patients (IC group). The secondary aim was to assess the necessity of an elective surgery following a successful prior non-operative management in the IMS group after a non-operative management of the first episode of ALCD.

METHODS

Patients presented with their first episode of ALCD between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Only severely immunosuppressed patients were considered for the analysis, including the following: long-term oral or intravenous steroid intake, current malignancy undergoing chemotherapy, chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, or solid organ transplant with immunosuppressive medication. For each group, demographic data, severity of the episode, management decisions (conservative or operative), and short- and long-term outcomes were recorded and compared. A sub-analysis of patients with ALCD associating and abscess (modified Hinchey classification Ib/II) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients were included in the study: 50 among the IMS and 240 among the IC group. The rate of emergent surgery was higher in the IMS group (50.0% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.001) and was associated with increased morbidity (72.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.041) and mortality (24.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003). The duration of the hospital stay was significantly longer in the IMS group (15 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The final stoma rate was significantly higher in the IMS group (82.1% vs. 22.9, p < 0.001), with a median follow-up of 51.4 months. A total of 141 patients presented ALCD with an abscess; 25 in the IMS and 116 in the IC group. There was a higher rate of surgical intervention among the IMS group as the initial treatment approach (24.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.002), even though the conservative treatment had a similar rate of success (81.3% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.178). The recurrence rate following a non-operative approach was similar (IMS: 31.2% vs. 35.4% in the IC group, p = 0.169). Furthermore, 81.2% of non-operatively managed IMS patients (13 out of 16) did not require a surgical intervention at the end of the follow-up, with similar findings in the IC group (78/96, 81.2%, p = 0.148).

CONCLUSION

Medical treatment of immunosuppressed patients during their first ALCD episode associated with an abscess is feasible, with a high success rate and results comparable with the IC group. Moreover, taking into account the readmission rates, the need for emergent surgery of the recurrence, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity in the IMS group, conservative management with no differed scheduled surgery seems to be a safe option in this subgroup of patients.

Intra-abdominal infections survival guide: a position statement by the Global Alliance For Infections In Surgery

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital settings worldwide. The cornerstones of IAI management include rapid, accurate diagnostics; timely, adequate source control; appropriate, short-duration antimicrobial therapy administered according to the principles of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and antimicrobial stewardship; and hemodynamic and organ functional support with intravenous fluid and adjunctive vasopressor agents for critical illness (sepsis/organ dysfunction or septic shock after correction of hypovolemia). In patients with IAIs, a personalized approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and should be based on multiple aspects that require careful clinical assessment. The anatomic extent of infection, the presumed pathogens involved and risk factors for antimicrobial resistance, the origin and extent of the infection, the patient's clinical condition, and the host's immune status should be assessed continuously to optimize the management of patients with complicated IAIs.

Free perforation during the first episode of acute diverticulitis: can it be avoided?

The aims of the present study are to compare the severity of acute diverticulitis in the first episode and in later bouts, and to determine whether there are risk factors for the presence of free perforation at the onset of diverticulitis. A single-center retrospective study was conducted of patients who developed a first episode of acute diverticulitis between January 2011 and August 2021 diagnosed by computed tomography and followed up for at least 1 year. Free perforation was considered to be present in patients with diverticulitis stage III and IV according to the Hinchey classification (modified by Wasvary). The analysis included 394 patients (224 men and 170 women) with a mean age of 58 years. Forty-eight patients (12.2%) presented free perforation at some point in the course of the disease, 43 during the first episode and 5 during subsequent bouts. The perforation subgroup showed higher rates of stoma creation and mortality (relative risks of 12.3 and 23.5, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.041 95% CI 1.016-1.067), lung disease (OR 2.154 95% CI 1.038-4.472) and immunosuppression (OR: 2.812 95% CI 1.315-6.015) were independent factors for free perforation at diverticulitis onset. Free perforation occurs more frequently during the first episode of acute diverticulitis. Older patients, immunosuppressed patients and those with respiratory disease have a greater risk of presenting freely perforated diverticulitis. Therefore, it is essential to maintain a high level of clinical suspicion in these patients to activate early focus control and thus avoid fatal outcomes.

Outcomes of initially nonoperative management of diverticulitis with abscess formation in immunosuppressed patients. DIPLICAB study COLLABORATIVE group

AIM

Management of diverticulitis with abscess formation in immunosuppressed patients (IMS) remains unclear. The main objective of the study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes between IMS and immunocompetent patients (IC). The secondary aim was to identify risk factors for emergency surgery.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective cohort study was performed at 29 Spanish referral centres between 2015-2019 including consecutive patients with first episode of diverticulitis classified as modified Hinchey Ib or II. IMS included immunosuppressive therapy, biologic therapy, malignant neoplasm with active chemotherapy and chronic steroid therapy. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors to emergency surgery in IMS.

RESULTS

A total of 1395 patients were included; 118 IMS and 1277 IC. There were no significant differences in emergency surgery between IMS and IC (19.5% and 13.5%, p = 0.075) but IMS was associated with higher mortality (15.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). Similar recurrent episodes were found between IMS and IC (28% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.963). Following multivariate analysis, immunosuppressive treatment, p = 0.002; OR: 3.35 (1.57-7.15), free gas bubbles, p < 0.001; OR: 2.91 (2.01-4.21), Hinchey II, p = 0.002; OR: 1.88 (1.26-2.83), use of morphine, p < 0.001; OR: 3.08 (1.98-4.80), abscess size ≥5 cm, p = 0.001; OR: 1.97 (1.33-2.93) and leucocytosis at third day, p < 0.001; OR: 1.001 (1.001-1.002) were independently associated with emergency surgery in IMS.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative management in IMS has been shown to be safe with similar treatment failure than IC. IMS presented higher mortality in emergency surgery and similar rate of recurrent diverticulitis than IC. Identifying risk factors to emergency surgery may anticipate emergency surgery.