Determination of teicoplanin trough concentration target and appropriate total dose during the first 3 days: a retrospective study in patients with MRSA infections

Teicoplanin in peritoneal dialysis: efficacy, safety, and pharmacological considerations

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a vital treatment modality for renal failure patients, facilitating the removal of excess fluid and unwanted substances. However, peritonitis, a significant complication experienced by PD patients, necessitates careful selection of antibiotics to ensure successful treatment. Commonly used antibiotics in PD patients, such as cephalosporins and glycopeptides like vancomycin, have been associated with undesirable side effects and high failure rates. In response to these challenges, teicoplanin, a novel glycopeptide antibiotic, has gained attention due to its similar range of activity to vancomycin, extended half-life, reduced side effects, and improved elimination. The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the efficacy, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and pharmacological benefits of teicoplanin in peritoneal dialysis patients. Our research involved an extensive review of 21 articles from reputable databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The data extracted from these studies was meticulously evaluated to comprehensively understand teicoplanin's clinical profile in this specific patient population. Major findings of these studies are that glycopeptide-based regimens have higher cure rates over first-generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones, and teicoplanin demonstrated several advantages over vancomycin, such as a higher therapeutic index, good tolerance, longer half-life, lower rates of nephrotoxicity, improved elimination while being equally effective. Teicoplanin is typically administered to peritoneal dialysis patients with a loading dose of 400 mg, aiming to achieve a trough concentration of 10-15 mg/dl. Teicoplanin's improved tolerability and lack of regular serum level monitoring requirements make it a promising alternative to traditional antibiotics for clinical use.

Necessity for higher teicoplanin doses in older adults: a multicenter prospective observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Many older adult patients receive low-dose teicoplanin with varied regimens, leading to a lack of clarity on its optimal regimens and toxicity profiles in China. This study aimed to clarify these aspects by analyzing teicoplanin treatment concentrations and toxicities.

METHODS

We included older adult patients administered teicoplanin at four tertiary hospitals in Beijing from June 2021 to July 2023, targeting a trough concentration (Cmin) ≥ 10 mg/L. Teicoplanin concentrations and toxicities were monitored dynamically.

RESULTS

From 204 patients, we obtained 632 teicoplanin concentrations. Most patients (83.3%) received low-dose regimens. Suboptimal concentrations were found in 66.4% of patients within 7 days of treatment and 17.0% after 15 days. Cmin gradually increased with treatment duration and was influenced initially by creatinine and by both body weight and creatinine from days 8 to 14. The target concentration was achieved in 53.1%, 33.9%, 15.6%, and 5.5% of patients at 3, ≤ 7, 8-14, and ≥ 15 days after withdrawal, respectively. Slow elimination was associated with average Cmin and eGFR. Nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5%, 4.1%, and 31.5% of patients, respectively, without significant differences between concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Most older adult patients were underdosed, indicating a need for dose adjustment. Given the varied risk factors for suboptimal concentrations in different treatment stages, a one-size-fits-all regimen was ineffective. We recommend an initial dose of 400 mg at 12-h intervals for the first three days, with subsequent doses from days 4 to 14 adjusted based on creatinine and body weight; after day 14, a maintenance dose of 200 mg daily is advised.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100046811; 28/05/2021.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics: Defining the Therapeutic Range

PURPOSE

In the present narrative review, the authors aimed to discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of antibiotics and clinical response (including efficacy and toxicity). In addition, this review describes how this relationship can be applied to define the therapeutic range of a particular antibiotic (or antibiotic class) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Relevant clinical studies that examined the relationship between PK/PD of antibiotics and clinical response (efficacy and response) were reviewed. The review (performed for studies published in English up to September 2021) assessed only commonly used antibiotics (or antibiotic classes), including aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides (teicoplanin and vancomycin), and linezolid. The best currently available evidence was used to define the therapeutic range for these antibiotics.

RESULTS

The therapeutic range associated with maximal clinical efficacy and minimal toxicity is available for commonly used antibiotics, and these values can be implemented when TDM for antibiotics is performed. Additional data are needed to clarify the relationship between PK/PD indices and the development of antibiotic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM should only be regarded as a means to achieve the main goal of providing safe and effective antibiotic therapy for all patients. The next critical step is to define exposures that can prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and include these exposures as therapeutic drug monitoring targets.

Teicoplanin combined with conventional vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pulmonary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and teicoplanin are both antibiotics that have significant antimicrobial effects on Gram-positive cocci.

AIM

To explore the value of teicoplanin combined with conventional (vancomycin only) anti-infective therapy for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis pulmonary infections.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis pulmonary infections, treated in our hospital between January 2018 and February 2020, were assigned to the study and control groups using a random number table method, with 43 patients in each group. The control group received conventional treatment (vancomycin), and the study group received both teicoplanin and conventional treatment. The following indicators were assessed in both groups: the time required for symptom relief, treatment effectiveness, serum levels of inflammatory factors (procalcitonin, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein), clinical pulmonary infection scores before and after treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Patients in the study group were observed to have faster cough and expectoration resolution, white blood cell count normalization, body temperature normalization, and rales disappearance than patients in the control group (all P < 0.05); the total rate of effectiveness was 93.02% in the study group, higher than the 76.74% in the control group (P < 0.05). The pre-treatment serum levels of procalcitonin, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein as well as the clinical pulmonary infection scores were similar among the patients in both groups. However, the post-treatment serum levels of procalcitonin, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein as well as the clinical pulmonary infection scores were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional (vancomycin only) therapy, teicoplanin and vancomycin combination therapy for patients with pulmonary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections can improve patient clinical symptoms, modulate serum inflammatory factor levels, and improve treatment efficacy, without increasing the risk of adverse reactions.

Hospital Pharmacometrics for Optimal Individual Administration of Antimicrobial Agents for Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infected Patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring and target concentration intervention based on population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models has been strongly recommended for anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agents in order to provide appropriate antimicrobial chemotherapy to each individual patient, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses in hospitalized patients have been actively conducted, as evidenced with vancomycin. Teicoplanin, daptomycin, and linezolid have been the most studied antibiotics, using population pharmacokinetics of patients with MRSA. Infections caused by MRSA have higher severity and fatality rates than other antimicrobial-susceptible infections. Therefore, many medical facilities have been implementing infection control programs based on antimicrobial stewardship to prevent nosocomial infections and drug-resistant strains. Studies detailing pharmacometrics for these antibiotics have been reported to elucidate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, to determine significant factors influencing variabilities between individuals, and to develop target concentration interventions and dosing regimens for adults, the elderly, patients with renal insufficiency including those on continuous renal replacement therapies, patients with low body weight, obese patients, and pediatric patients. This review presents the details of our recent research on the optimal dosing design of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of MRSA infection based on hospital pharmacometrics. In addition, the prospect of using modeling and simulation has shown major advantages in supporting dosing regimen selection.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Model-Based Dosing Optimization of Teicoplanin in Pediatric Patients

Objectives: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin differs in children compared with adults. Our aim was to determine the PK of teicoplanin in an Asian pediatric population and to optimize dosage regimens. Methods: This was a retrospective PK study and all the data were collected from hospitalized children. We developed a population PK model using sparse data, and Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the ability of standard teicoplanin regimen and other different dosage regimens. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target trough concentration (C _min) of 10 mg/L and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD, [AUC₂₄/MIC]) of 125 for moderate infection. For severe infection, the optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target 15 mg/L and AUC₂₄/MIC of 345. Results: 159 children were included and 1.5 samples/children on average were provided. Estimated clearance of teicoplanin was 0.694 L/h (0.784/L/h/70 kg) and volume of distribution was 1.39 L. Teicoplanin standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection, while 13 mg/kg was needed for severer infection. With standard maintenance doses, both patients with moderate and severe infection failed to achieve the target C _min. 12 and 16 mg/kg/day were required to achieve a C _min ≥ 10 and 15 mg/L, respectively. However, standard maintenance dose was adequate to achieve AUC₂₄/MIC ≥ 125 for moderate infection, and 12 mg/kg/day was needed to achieve AUC₂₄/MIC ≥ 345 for severe infection. Lower weight and serum creatinine were associated with higher dose. Conclusion: Optimal doses based on the target C _min were higher than that based on the PK/PD target. To achieve the C _min and PK/PD targets simultaneously, a standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection based on simulation, while dosing higher than standard doses were required in other situation. Further clinical studies with rich sampling from children is required to confirm our findings.

Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major causes of bloodstream infections (BSI) worldwide, representing a major challenge for public health due to its resistance profile. Higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in S. aureus are associated with treatment failure and defining optimal empiric options for BSIs in settings where these isolates are prevalent is rather challenging. In silico pharmacodynamic models based on stochastic simulations (Monte Carlo) are important tools to estimate best antimicrobial regimens in different scenarios. We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of different antimicrobials regimens for the treatment of S. aureus BSI in an environment with high vancomycin MIC.

METHODS

Steady-state drug area under the curve ratio to MIC (AUC/MIC) or the percent time above MIC (fT > MIC) were modeled using a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation to achieve pharmacodynamic exposures against 110 consecutive S. aureus isolates associated with BSI.

RESULTS

Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) against all S. aureus isolates were 98% for ceftaroline; 79% and 92% for daptomycin 6 mg/kg q24h and for the high dose of 10 mg/kg q24h, respectively; 77% for linezolid 600 mg q12h when MIC was read according to CLSI M100-S26 instructions, and 64% when MIC was considered at the total growth inhibition; 65% and 86% for teicoplanin, three loading doses of 400 mg q12 h followed by 400 mg q24 h and for teicoplanin 400 mg q12 h, respectively; 61% and 76% for vancomycin 1000 mg q12 h and q8 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this model, ceftaroline and high-dose daptomycin regimens delivered best pharmacodynamic exposures against S. aureus BSIs. Teicoplanin higher dose regimen achieved the best CFR (86%) among glycopeptides, although optimal threshold was not achieved, and vancomycin performance was critically affected by the S. aureus vancomycin MIC ≥2 mg/L. Linezolid effectiveness (CFR of 73%) is also affected by high prevalence of isolates with linezolid MIC ≥2 mg/L. These data show the need to continually evaluate the pharmacodynamic profiles of antimicrobials for empiric treatment of these infections.

Optimal teicoplanin loading regimen to rapidly achieve target trough plasma concentration in critically ill patients

Teicoplanin is used for the treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. It has been demonstrated that conventional loading regimen was insufficient for teicoplanin to achieve target trough plasma concentration (C_min  > 10 mg/L). Therefore, a Chinese expert group recommended an optimal loading dose regimen of teicoplanin to treat severe Gram-positive infection. However, there was no report about the teicoplanin concentration, and the safety and efficacy of teicoplanin therapy in Chinese patients since the consensus was published. The objective of this study was to compare the teicoplanin C_min and clinical response in critically ill Chinese patients after the administration of conventional or optimal loading regimen, and to reveal the potential factors that may affect teicoplanin C_min in addition to loading regimen. Fifty-five patients were retrospectively divided into two groups based on teicoplanin loading regimen: (a) CD group (conventional loading dose group, n = 18, loading dose was 400 mg); (b) OD group (optimal loading dose group, n = 37, loading dose was 800 mg). Initially, three loading doses were administered every 12 hours, while the fourth loading dose was injected 24 hours after the third dose. The maintenance dose was 400 mg (CD group) or 800 mg (OD group), respectively. The mean teicoplanin C_min on day 2 and day 4 in the OD group was significantly higher than those in the CD group, which were 14.75 ± 5.93 mg/L vs 8.26 ± 4.87 mg/L (P < .001) and 14.90 ± 5.20 mg/L vs 9.13 ± 4.75 mg/L (P = .019), respectively. The percentages of patients in the OD group achieving the target teicoplanin C_min on day 2 and day 4 were also significantly higher than those in the CD group, which were 83.7% vs 33.3% (P < .001) and 82.4% vs 28.6% (P = .0013), respectively. Furthermore, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that body-weight exerted significant effect on teicoplanin C_min in the OD group. The percentage of favourable clinical response in the OD group was significantly higher than that in the CD group (83.8% vs 55.6%, P = .025). There was no difference between teicoplanin adverse effects in the two groups. The study demonstrated that the optimal loading dose regimen of teicoplanin can rapidly reach target C_min , and result in a good clinical efficacy and low adverse effect in critically ill Chinese patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Teicoplanin and C-Reactive Protein in Hospitalized Patients With Gram-Positive Infections

Teicoplanin is an antibiotic agent used for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The clinical benefit of teicoplanin is associated with its blood concentrations, but the optimal dosing regimen is not yet known. To explore the optimal individual dosing regimen, we performed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis targeting a large-scale population, including patients with a wide range of ages, body weights, and renal functions. The PK of teicoplanin was described with a 2-compartment model, and the PD of C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations was described with a turnover maximum inhibition model. The elimination half-life of teicoplanin calculated from the final estimated parameters was 169 hours, and renal function was a significant covariate of teicoplanin clearance. The teicoplanin concentration producing 50% of the maximum inhibition of CRP production was estimated to be 2.66 mg/L. The minimum concentration of teicoplanin in patients with higher loading doses (15 mg/kg) reached the target range (15-30 mg/L) with a probability of >50% in the dosing simulation. We described the influence of body size, body composition, and renal function on the PK of teicoplanin. The population PKPD model of teicoplanin and CRP in this study should provide useful information for development of a dosing strategy including the sequential clinical benefit of teicoplanin.

Measurement of Teicoplanin Concentration With Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method Demonstrates the Usefulness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Hematologic Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that has become increasingly popular with the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for teicoplanin, and analyze trough teicoplanin concentrations achieved in patients with hematological diseases.

METHODS

The UHPLC-MS/MS method for teicoplanin was developed, validated, and applied in a retrospective analysis of trough plasma teicoplanin concentrations from 305 patients receiving standard dose, and 17 patients receiving therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided individualized dose.

RESULTS

The linear range was 3.9-52.9 mg/L. The imprecision was less than 12%, the limits of detection and quantification were less than 0.13 and 0.72 mg/L, respectively. The sample carry-over and ion suppression were insignificant. In the standard dose group, the median teicoplanin concentrations were 7.5 mg/L (days 3-5) and 8.9 mg/L (on days 6-8); and the proportion of trough levels achieving ≥10 mg/L was 20% (days 3-5) and 38% (days 6-8), respectively. In the TDM-guided individualized dose group, median teicoplanin concentration was higher (16.9 mg/L), and the proportion of trough levels ≥10 mg/L was also higher (77%) when compared with the standard dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, the present UHPLC-MS/MS method can be considered suitable for routine TDM of teicoplanin. Also, based on the insufficient trough teicoplanin concentrations achieved with standard dose regimen, and the higher trough teicoplanin concentrations achieved with TDM-guided individualized dose regimen, this study highlights the importance of TDM of teicoplanin, especially in high-risk patient groups.

Analytical Quality by Design-based development and validation of ultra pressure liquid chromatography/MS/MS method for glycopeptide antibiotics determination in human plasma

Aim: An ultra pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC)/MS/MS method for vancomycin and teicoplanin determination in human plasma was developed in accordance with analytical quality by design (AQbD) concept and fully validated. Materials & methods: Chromatographic separation was performed on ACQUITY UPLC C18 charge surface hybrid (CSH) column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) in gradient mode and the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water and pure acetonitrile. The experimental design methodology was used for the definition of optimal chromatographic and protein precipitation conditions. Results: The linearity ranges were 0.05–10 μg ml-1 for vancomycin and 0.5–200 μg ml-1 for total teicoplanin. The relative standard deviations for precision estimation were below 15% and the accuracy was within 85–115% for all quality control levels. Conclusion: The method was utilized for glycopeptide antibiotics bioanalysis.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Haematological Malignancy Patients with Febrile Neutropenia and Optimizing Dosage Regimens

This study used high-performance liquid chromatography to measure 202 teicoplanin plasma trough concentrations (C_min ) in 114 haematological malignancy patients with febrile neutropenia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the mean initial dose (MID) over the first 3 days of treatment: (i) MID = 533.33 mg/day (loading dose group, 400 mg q12h for three doses followed by 400 mg qd, n = 62) and (ii) MID < 533.33 mg/day (unloaded or underloaded group, n = 52). During the first 3 days after treatment, the overall C_min was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (10.96 ± 5.44 mg/L versus 6.31 ± 3.73 mg/L, mean ± S.D.; p = 0.002), as was the qualifying rate of C_min > 10 mg/L (54.5% versus 11.1%, p = 0.001), and the probability of C_min < 5 mg/L was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (13.6% versus 40.7%, p = 0.037). After 3 days, the average C_min and qualifying rates did not differ significantly between the two groups, and the average C_min was <10 mg/L in both groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that creatinine clearance (p = 0.004) and MID (p = 0.010) could affect C_min during the first 3 days of treatment and that age (p = 0.022) only could affect C_min after 3 days. In conclusion, it is necessary to apply loading dose to achieve teicoplanin C_min > 10 mg/L rapidly and, from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective, 600 mg is recommended as loading and maintenance dose for these patients when AUC₂₄ /minimum inhibitory concentration > 345.

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in hospitalized elderly patients using cystatin C as an indicator of renal function

OBJECTIVE

Serum cystatin C (CysC) has recently been proposed as an alternative marker to serum creatinine (SCR) for estimating renal clearance. In the present study, we performed a population pharmacokinetic analysis of teicoplanin (TEIC), which is mainly eliminated through the kidneys, using CysC as a predictor for renal clearance.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with MRSA infections who were administrated to the National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center between January 2012 and December 2013 were enrolled and gave 123 sets of blood TEIC concentration data. Renal clearance was estimated by the Hoek equation using CysC, by creatinine clearance predicted by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using SCR, or directly by CysC. One compartment open model with inter-individual variabilities for renal clearance and the volume of distribution as well as an additional residual error model was used to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters for TEIC.

RESULTS

The model with the best predictability was that with CysC as a predictor for renal clearance; it showed better significance than the models using estimated the glomerular filtration rate by the Hoek equation or CLcr. The final model was as follows: CL (L/hr) = 0.510 × (CysC/1.4)^-0.68 × Total body weight/60^0.81, omega (CL) = 19.8% CV, VC (L) = 78.1, omega (V) = 42.7% CV.

CONCLUSION

The present results show the usefulness of CysC to more accurately predict the pharmacokinetics of drugs mainly eliminated through the kidneys, such as TEIC. However, since the sample size in this study was relatively small, further investigations on renal clearance predictability using CysC are needed.

Optimal teicoplanin dosage regimens for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in endocarditis patients and renal failure patients

This study aimed to assess whether traditional initial loading and maintenance doses of teicoplanin were appropriate in endocarditis and renal failure patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and to recommend optimal dosage regimens. Pharmacokinetic parameters and physicochemical properties of teicoplanin were performed to develop pharmacokinetic models using GastroPlus^TM. Concentration-time curves of teicoplanin in endocarditis and renal failure patients with MRSA infections were simulated by changing clearance (CL) and volume of distribution of the central compartment (V_c). Different teicoplanin dosage regimens were assessed according to the target trough concentration, and optimal teicoplanin dosage regimens were recommended. Dosage regimen of four teicoplanin doses of 6 mg/kg q12 h followed by 6 mg/kg qd is recommended for renal failure patients infected by MRSA. And optimal dosage regimen is five teicoplanin doses of 15 mg/kg q12 h followed by doses of 12 mg/kg qd for endocarditis patients infected by MRSA.

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin and attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in adult patients with haematological malignancy

OBJECTIVES

To describe the population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in adult patients with haematological malignancies receiving higher than standard doses, and to perform Monte Carlo simulations to determine dosing regimens associated with optimal teicoplanin concentrations.

METHODS

This was a hospital-based clinical trial (EudraCT 2013-004535-72). Nine blood samples were collected on Day 3, plus single trough samples on Days 7 and 10, and 24 and 48 hours after the last dose. Teicoplanin minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined for Gram-positive isolates from study patients. Population pharmacokinetic analyses and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were undertaken using Pmetrics.

RESULTS

Thirty adult haematological malignancy patients were recruited with a mean (SD) loading dose, age, total body weight, and creatinine clearance of 9.5 (1.9) mg/kg, 63 (12) years, 69.1 (15.8) kg, and 72 (41) mL/min, respectively. A three-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model best described the teicoplanin concentration data. Covariates supported for inclusion in the final model were creatinine clearance for clearance and total body weight for volume of the central compartment. The median (IQR) area under the concentration-time curve from 48 to 72 hours (AUC_48-72h) was 679 (319) mg.h/L. There was a strong correlation between the AUC_48-72h and trough concentration at 72 hours (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.957, p <0.001). Dosing simulations showed that administration of five loading doses at 12-hourly intervals, stratified by total body weight and creatinine clearance, increased the probability of achieving target concentrations within 72 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

To increase the number of patients achieving optimal teicoplanin concentrations an individualized dosing approach, based on body weight and creatinine clearance, is recommended.

Change of teicoplanin loading dose requirement for incremental increases of systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in the setting of sepsis

Background Target trough concentrations are recommended for teicoplanin (TEIC) to minimize its adverse effects and to maximize efficacy in sepsis caused by grampositive cocci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. However, optimal doses to attain proper trough values in patients with sepsis have not yet been well established for TEIC. Objective This study investigated whether the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score could predict the pharmacokinetics of TEIC in patients with sepsis. Setting This study was conducted at Fukuoka University Hospital in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients using TEIC between April 2012 and March 2015. SIRS positive was defined as infection with a SIRS score ≥2. Estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a Bayesian method. Creatinine clearance rates were estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (eCcr). Main outcome measure Change of TEIC loading dose requirement for incremental increases of SIRS score. Results In total, 133 patients were enrolled: 50 non-SIRS patients and 83 patients with SIRS. The TEIC plasma trough concentration was significantly lower in SIRS than non-SIRS patients (15.7 ± 7.1 vs. 20.1 ± 8.6 μg/mL; P < 0.01), although there was no significant difference in the loading dose administered. Moreover, SIRS scores were increasingly predictive of eCcr and TEIC clearance in a stepwise manner. To achieve the target trough concentration (15-30 μg/mL), the optimal doses required in non-SIRS versus SIRS patients were 12-24 versus 18-30 mg/kg/day, respectively, during the first 48 h. Conclusions These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of TEIC are altered in SIRS patients, who required higher doses than non-SIRS patients to achieve the target trough concentration. We suggest that the SIRS score can become a new modality to determine the initial TEIC loading dose.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of teicoplanin in patients with MRSA infections

Background

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that has been used to treat serious, invasive infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The area under the drug concentration–time curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was identified as a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) parameter of glycopeptide antibiotics that correlated with bacteriological responses and clinical outcomes. Although optimized dosing regimens based on PK–PD are needed, a PK–PD analysis of teicoplanin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has not yet been performed. Thus, this study examined patients with MRSA infections, who were administered with teicoplanin in order to determine the target AUC/MIC ratio.

Methods

This study retrospectively assessed data obtained as part of our routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of teicoplanin therapy in 46 patients with MRSA infections at Kagoshima University Hospital. Serum concentrations of teicoplanin were determined using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay system and used for a Bayesian PK estimation to estimate AUC for 24 hours (AUC₂₄). The MIC value for teicoplanin was determined using a standardized agar dilution method. The effects of teicoplanin were evaluated in terms of bacteriological responses by a quantitative assessment.

Results

The estimated AUC₂₄/MIC ratios with and without bacteriological responses were 926.6±425.2 µg·h/mL (n=34) and 642.2±193.9 µg·h/mL, respectively (n=12; P<0.05). On the basis of a logistic regression analysis, AUC₂₄/MIC ratios of 500 µg·h/mL, 700 µg·h/mL, and 900 µg·h/mL gave probabilities of treatment success of 0.50, 0.72, and 0.87, respectively. Furthermore, using the Kaplan–Meier curve analysis, an AUC₂₄/MIC ratio of ≥900 led to a significantly stronger bacteriological response than an AUC₂₄/MIC ratio of <900.

Conclusion

These results suggest that an AUC₂₄/MIC ratio of ≥900 µg·h/mL is required to ensure a sufficient bacteriological response.

[The development of appropriate dosage of anti-bacterial and anti-fungal agents based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics]

An initial loading procedure has been recommended to enable teicoplanin to promptly reach an effective serum concentration for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The mean trough concentrations were 13.2 mg/L for patients with eradication of MRSA. I showed that the administration of ≥36 mg/kg during the first 3 days was effective in promptly obtaining a trough concentration target of ≥13 mg/L for the initial treatment of MRSA infections. The major adverse effect associated with linezolid treatment is reversible myelosuppression, primarily thrombocytopenia. I demonstrated that the incidence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia was higher among patients with renal failure than in patients with normal renal function. A statistically significant (p<0.01) and strong correlation (r=0.933) was observed between linezolid and creatinine clearance. A negative correlation (r=-0.567) was also shown between linezolid clearance and blood urea nitrogen. Voriconazole trough plasma concentration has been reported to correlate with hepatotoxicity. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the therapeutic range for the voriconazole trough concentration should be 2-4 mg/L. Nonlinear pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that voriconazole therapy should be initiated with a dose of 7.2-8.9 mg/kg/day for CYP2C19 wild type and 4.4-6.5 mg/kg/day for the non-wild type in patients. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia are major side effects of liposomal amphotericin B. I demonstrated that the doses of liposomal amphotericin B estimated to cause side effects of a low red blood cell count, anaemia and thrombocytopenia with 50% probability are 4.0, 3.3 and 3.0 mg/kg/day, respectively.

High-dose regimen to achieve novel target trough concentration in teicoplanin

In the treatment of severe MRSA infections such as endocarditis, more than 20 mg/L of plasma trough concentration (C(min)) is recommended for teicoplanin; however, in the treatment of common MRSA infections, recommended C(min) remains more than 10 mg/L. In this study, we set C(min) as 15-30 mg/L to obtain a favorable clinical outcome in the treatment of common MRSA infections, and investigated the optimal loading regimen that achieved the target C(min) in patients with normal renal function. Seventy-eight patients received the high-dose regimen A (6 mg/kg every 12-h for initial two days) and 60 patients received the high-dose regimen B (the first five loading doses of 10-12 mg/kg at 12-h intervals for initial three days, followed by 6 mg/kg once daily). The mean C(min) on the 4th day was 13.7 ± 5.3 mg/L in regimen A, and 20.0 ± 6.6 mg/L in regimen B (P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients achieving the 15-30 mg/L was 25.6% and 68.3% (P < 0.001). Clinical response at end-of treatment were 66.7% and 85.0% (P = 0.014). The patients of initial C(min) with ≥15 mg/L had tended to be higher clinical response than those with <15 mg/L (80.9% vs 68.6%, P = 0.084). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse effects in regimen A and B (nephrotoxicity; 1.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.413, hepatotoxicity; 5.1% vs 3.3%, P = 0.608). In conclusion, to obtain C(min) 15-30 mg/L, the first five loading doses of 10-12 mg/kg at 12-h intervals was required in patients with normal renal function.

Age- and gender-related differences in teicoplanin levels in paediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic active against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci. While teicoplanin trough levels (TTLs) >10 mg/L are commonly considered appropriate, levels >20 mg/L are aimed for in the treatment of severe infections. Due to toxicity, it is recommended to avoid levels >60 mg/L.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In our institution, the initial dosing schedule of teicoplanin (10-15 mg/kg every 12 h for three loading doses and every 24 h thereafter) is adapted according to TTLs analysed by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay on treatment days 2 to 4. Teicoplanin peak levels (TPLs) are analysed in selected cases 30 min after the end of infusion. In a retrospective analysis we evaluated 1357 TTLs and 333 TPLs from 410 treatment episodes from 2005 to 2011.

RESULTS

Initial TTLs were <10 mg/L in 14.1% and <20 mg/L in 72.6% of episodes. Toddlers had significantly lower TTLs, with a 2-fold and 2.5-fold increased risk of having levels <10 mg/L (24.6%) and <20 mg/L (82.6%), respectively. For the entire cohort, follow-up TTLs were less likely to be <10 mg/L and more likely to be >20 mg/L when compared with initial TTLs (P < 0.001, each). Adolescent girls had significantly higher initial TPLs (P = 0.001) and significantly higher follow-up TTLs (P = 0.016) than adolescent boys. In parallel, adolescent girls had initial TPLs >60 mg/L significantly more frequently (P = 0.012) and follow-up TTLs <10 mg/L significantly less frequently (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

More tailored dosing regimens with higher loading doses, especially for toddlers, should be considered. While further pharmacokinetic data in paediatric patients are pending, therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory.

Loading regimen required to rapidly achieve therapeutic trough plasma concentration of teicoplanin and evaluation of clinical features

BACKGROUND

A trough concentration of >20 mg/L is considered the optimal dosage of teicoplanin required to ensure early therapeutic effects against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections including those in patients who develop febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy. This study determines appropriate initial doses during the first 2 days of administration and evaluates the therapeutic target teicoplanin trough concentration.

METHOD

A 2-day regimen was evaluated in patients treated with 600 mg and 1200 mg or 1200 mg and 600 mg (total 1800 mg, Group 1), 800 mg and 800 mg (total 1600 mg, Group 2), and 800 mg and 400 mg (total 1200 mg, Group 3) of teicoplanin on Days 1 and 2, respectively. We also compared the efficiency and adverse effects at trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L (Group A, n = 28) with >20 mg/L (Group B, n = 27) of teicoplanin, and also compared them with those on the similar concentrations of vancomycin (Groups C and D, n = 50 and 34, respectively).

RESULTS

The mean trough concentrations of teicoplanin on Days 4 or 5 were 22.2, 17.5, and 16.2 mg/L in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The clinical efficiency was 85.7%, 81.5%, 92.0%, and 91.5%, in Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The rates of adverse effects were not high in teicoplanin (nephrotoxicity, 7.1% and 3.7%, and hepatotoxicity, 14.3% and 11.1% in Groups A and B, respectively). However, more adverse effects tended to arise in patients who received vancomycin in nephrotoxicity (14.0% and 11.8%, in Groups C and D, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the 2-day regimens with total 1800 mg achieved the most effective therapeutic trough plasma concentration of teicoplanin (20 mg/L). However, 15-20 mg/L might also be an effective trough target for initial teicoplanin treatment. These teicoplanin regimens might be safer in terms of renal function than vancomycin.

Simplified dosing regimens of teicoplanin for patient groups stratified by renal function and weight using Monte Carlo simulation

The purpose of this study was (i) to determine the optimal dosage of teicoplanin for each patient group stratified by renal function and weight based on a population pharmacokinetic model and observed distribution of patient characteristics and (ii) to develop new simplified dosing regimens designed to achieve 15-30 μg/mL. Patient data were collected retrospectively from routine therapeutic drug monitoring files of adult patients who were given the standard loading dose regimen of teicoplanin (400 mg twice on Day 1, followed by 400 mg once daily for 2 days) and whose trough concentration was measured just before administration on Day 4. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to estimate the trough concentration at 72 h after the initial loading dose (C(min)(72 h)) and at steady state (C(ss)(min)). The percentage of observed C(min)(72 h) in patients who received the standard loading dose regimen outside the non-parametric 90% prediction interval (from 5th to 95th percentile) of the simulated C(min)(72 h) was <10%. Simplified loading dose and maintenance dose regimens for each group stratified by renal function and weight were created to achieve C(min)(72 h) and C(ss)(min) of 15 μg/mL and 20-25 μg/mL, respectively. The percentage of C(min)(72 h) and C(ss)(min) in the range 15-30 μg/mL was 43-65% and 61-82% across each renal function and weight strata, respectively. These new simplified dosing regimens of teicoplanin could be helpful in individual adjustment of the loading and maintenance doses to achieve 15-30 μg/mL.