Treatment of Gram-positive left-sided infective endocarditis with daptomycin

Comparison of daptomycin and glycopeptide efficacy and safety for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The indications of daptomycin have been extended to off-label indications including prosthesis-related infection, and bone and joint infection (BJI). However, efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly demonstrated compared with the standard of care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect of daptomycin and glycopeptides for complicated infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing daptomycin and standard of care for Gram-positive infections, published until 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological success. The main safety outcome was any severe adverse event (SAE) (grade  ≥3).

RESULTS

Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 1095 patients. Six (75%) were in complicated skin and soft-structure infections, one (12.5%) in bacteraemia and one (12.5%) in a BJI setting. Six RCTs used vancomycin as a comparator and two used either vancomycin or teicoplanin. All-cause mortality and clinical cure were not different between groups. The microbiological cure rate was superior in patients who received daptomycin [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.35)]. The risk of SAEs [RR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.36-0.90)] was lower in the daptomycin arm.

CONCLUSIONS

While daptomycin is associated with a significantly lower risk of SAEs and a better microbiological eradication, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good-quality evidence, especially in bacteraemia and endocarditis where further RCTs should be conducted.

The Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Daptomycin in the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Asians

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of standard-dose (SD) daptomycin with those of high-dose (HD) daptomycin in complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) in an Asian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients from three medical centers diagnosed with cSSTIs were screened in the clinical information system. Patients included in the analysis were divided into two groups: those who received daptomycin at doses ≥ 6 mg/kg (HD group) and those receiving 4 mg/kg (SD group). The demographics and clinical treatment information were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 155 patients were recruited, including 108 patients in the SD group and 47 patients in the HD group. The rate of healthcare-associated infections was higher in the HD group (61.70% vs. 37.04%), demonstrating a statistically significant difference (P = 0.005). Compared with the SD group, the HD group had statistically significant early clinical stabilization (72.34% vs 52.78%, P = 0.023). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that HD daptomycin was an independent effector for early clinical stabilization (HR=0.394, P < 0.001). The rate of drug-related adverse events was equally distributed in the HD and SD groups (36.17% vs. 26.85%, P = 0.243).

CONCLUSION

Compared with SD daptomycin, HD daptomycin increased the rate of early clinical stabilization in Asian patients with cSSTIs, whereas the incidence of adverse events did not increase.

Effectiveness and safety of daptomycin in patients with infective endocarditis undergoing heart valve replacement: a subgroup analysis from real-world data

BACKGROUND

European Cubicin^® Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE) was a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter registry that collected real-world clinical outcomes following daptomycin use for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. EU-CORE data from patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who underwent heart valve replacement were analysed.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes were assessed as success (cured or improved), failure, or non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded for up to 30 days after daptomycin treatment.

RESULTS

Of 610 patients with IE, 198 [32.5%; left-sided IE (LIE), 166 (83.8%); right-sided IE (RIE), 21 (10.6%); both LIE and RIE, 11 (5.6%)] underwent heart valve replacement. Other than cardiovascular disease, renal disease (18.2%), sepsis (16.2%), and diabetes mellitus (15.2%) were the most significant underlying diseases. Major pathogens in patients with positive culture results (68.0%) were Staphylococcus aureus [36.8%; methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 12.8%] and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 31.6%). Daptomycin treatment [median duration (range), 21 days (1-112)] resulted in high clinical success in patients with S. aureus (88.4%; MRSA, 80.0%) and CoNS (81.1%) infections, with an overall success rate of 83.3%. Clinical success rate was high (90.0%) in patients who received daptomycin dose >6 mg/kg/day. Overall clinical success rate in patients followed for up to 2 years was 90.7%. AEs and serious AEs possibly related to daptomycin were reported in 6 (3.0%) and 4 (2.0%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin treatment was effective and well tolerated with a sustained response in patients with IE who underwent heart valve surgery. A trend towards better clinical outcomes was observed with higher daptomycin doses.

Daptomycin: Physicochemical, Analytical, and Pharmacological Properties

Daptomycin is the first approved member of a new class of antimicrobials, the cyclic lipopeptides, and presents selective action against gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains. Considering that resistance to daptomycin is rare, the drug has become very important for current clinical practice. This review covers daptomycin's physicochemical characteristics, antibacterial spectrum, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, side effects, drug interactions, and the analytical methods used to measure daptomycin in pharmaceutical products and biologic samples. Special attention has been given to therapeutic drug monitoring reports, as studies have shown its highly variable pharmacokinetics in specific circumstances, such as in patients suffering from critical illness, morbid obesity, severe sepsis, and kidney injury. For the same reason, methods described for therapeutic drug monitoring of daptomycin in the special patient population have been reviewed. In addition, the review presents a discussion of environmentally friendly analytical methods for daptomycin, which are necessary to reduce the impact of our activities on the environment. However, it was observed that there is a gap in the literature in this regard and further research involving the development of "green" methodologies for the analysis of daptomycin is necessary. The review will be useful to the clinical community in assisting with the responsible use of daptomycin, which is critical to prevent the emergence of resistant strains.

Study on daptomycin use and implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Gram-positive pathogens remains a major health issue due to the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus spp. Daptomycin offers an alternative after therapeutic failure using glycopeptides. Yet its use requires strict control given its financial impact and environmental risks. Since 2014, the use of daptomycin within our hospital has intensified, occasionally outside the scope of its approved indications.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to analyze the appropriateness of daptomycin prescriptions.

SETTING

This work was conducted in a 1500-bed University Hospital.

METHOD

A descriptive retrospective study was conducted from November 2013 to July 2014. All patients having received at least 2 days of treatment were included. Analysis of the appropriateness of daptomycin prescriptions was conducted by a multidisciplinary team comprised of infectious diseases specialists, pharmacists and a microbiologist. The appropriateness of daptomycin prescriptions was established based on Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations published in 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The indicators chosen to determine appropriateness of prescription were: treatment indication, prescribed dose and other antibiotics associated with the daptomycin prescription.

RESULTS

19 patients (14 men/5 women) were included. Observed indications were: bone and joint infection (n = 6; 32 %), infectious endocarditis (n = 5; 26 %), bacteremia (n = 5; 26 %) and complicated skin and soft tissue infection (n = 3; 16 %). Identified pathogens were: MRSA (n = 14; 74 %), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 4; 21 %) and Streptococcus mitis (n = 1; 5 %). Daptomycin was prescribed as first-line treatment in 32 % of cases (n = 6). The mean dosage was 9 mg/kg/day (5-11 mg/kg/day) for a mean duration of 11 days (2; 55 days). Clinical success was observed in 42 % of cases (n = 8). Appropriateness for daptomycin use was only established for 15 % of prescriptions (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Faced with a lack of recent recommendations on the subject, our multidisciplinary team issued a local consensus, defining the indications and dosage modalities for this reserve antibiotic. This multidisciplinary approach enables improved use of recent anti-MRSA drugs.

Daptomycin for the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: Results from European Cubicin(®) Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE)

INTRODUCTION

The European Cubicin(®) Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE(SM)) was a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter study which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of daptomycin therapy in patients with Gram-positive infections including infective endocarditis (IE).

METHODS

Data from the EU-CORE registry were collected for patients with IE who had received at least one dose of daptomycin between January 2006 and April 2012, across 18 countries in Europe (12), Latin America (5) and Asia (1). Clinical outcomes were assessed as success (cured or improved), failure or non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during treatment and for up to 30 days post-treatment; follow-up data were collected for 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 6075 patients included in the EU-CORE registry, 610 were diagnosed with IE as primary infection; 149 (24.4%) right-sided IE (RIE), 414 (67.9%) left-sided IE (LIE), and 47 (7.7%) with both right- and left-sided IE (BRLIE). Overall clinical success was achieved in 80.0% of patients (RIE 88.6%, LIE 76.6% and BRLIE 82.9%). Success rates for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were 90.9%, 71.7% and 66.6% in patients with RIE, LIE and BRLIE, respectively. The overall sustained clinical success rate in patients followed for up to 2 years was 86.7% (RIE 93.5%, LIE 88.3% and BRLIE 77.8%). AEs deemed possibly related to daptomycin in the investigator's opinion were reported in 2 (1.3%) RIE, 18 (4.3%) LIE and 1 (2.1%) BRLIE patients. There were 11 (1.8%) patients (2 with RIE, 8 with LIE and 1 with BRLIE) with AEs of creatine phosphokinase elevation reported as possibly related to daptomycin.

CONCLUSION

Data from this real-world clinical setting showed that daptomycin was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of LIE and BRLIE in addition to RIE caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. Two-year follow-up data showed that a high proportion of patients had a sustained response.

Therapeutic cyclic lipopeptides mining from microbes: latest strides and hurdles

Infectious diseases impose serious public health burdens and often have devastating consequences. The cyclic lipopeptides elaborated by bacteria Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Serratia, Propionibacterium and fungus Fusarium are very crucial in restraining the pathogens. Composed of a peptide and a fatty acyl moiety these amphiphilic metabolites exhibit broad spectrum antimicrobial effects. Among the plethora of cyclic lipopeptides, only selective few have emerged as robust antibiotics. For their functional vigor, polymyxin, daptomycin, surfactin, iturin, fengysin, paenibacterin and pseudofactin have been integrated in mainstream healthcare. Daptomycin has been a significant part of antimicrobial arsenal since the past decade. As the magnitude of drug resistance rises in unprecedented manner, the urgency of prospecting novel cyclic lipopeptides is being perceived. Intense research has revealed the implication of these bioactive compounds stretching beyond antibacterial and antifungal. Anticancer, immunomodulatory, prosthetic parts disinfection and vaccine adjuvancy are some of the validated prospects. This review discusses the emerging applications, mechanisms governing the biological actions, role of genomics in refining structure and function, semi-synthetic analog discovery, novel strain isolation, setbacks etc. Though its beyond the scope of the current topic, for holistic purpose, the role of lipopeptides in bioremediation and crop biotechnology has been briefly outlined. This updated critique is expected to galvanize innovations and diversify therapeutic recruitment of microbial lipopeptides.

High-dose daptomycin therapy for left-sided infective endocarditis: a prospective study from the international collaboration on endocarditis

The use of daptomycin in Gram-positive left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) has significantly increased. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of high-dose daptomycin on the outcome of left-sided IE due to Gram-positive pathogens. This was a prospective cohort study based on 1,112 cases from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE)-Plus database and the ICE-Daptomycin Substudy database from 2008 to 2010. Among patients with left-sided IE due to Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterococcus faecalis, we compared those treated with daptomycin (cohort A) to those treated with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics (cohort B). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Time to clearance of bacteremia, 6-month mortality, and adverse events (AEs) ascribable to daptomycin were also assessed. There were 29 and 149 patients included in cohort A and cohort B, respectively. Baseline comorbidities did not differ between the two cohorts, except for a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes and previous episodes of IE among patients treated with daptomycin. The median daptomycin dose was 9.2 mg/kg of body weight/day. Two-thirds of the patients treated with daptomycin had failed a previous antibiotic regimen. In-hospital and 6-month mortalities were similar in the two cohorts. In cohort A, median time to clearance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia was 1.0 day, irrespective of daptomycin dose, representing a significantly faster bacteremia clearance compared to SOC (1.0 versus 5.0 days; P < 0.01). Regimens with higher daptomycin doses were not associated with increased incidence of AEs. In conclusion, higher-dose daptomycin may be an effective and safe alternative to SOC in the treatment of left-sided IE due to common Gram-positive pathogens.