Effect of a soluble pseudo-receptor on verotoxin 2-induced toxicity

Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies

Verotoxin, VT (aka Shiga toxin,Stx) is produced by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is the key pathogenic factor in EHEC-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS-hemolytic anemia/thrombocytopenia/glomerular infarct) which can follow gastrointestinal EHEC infection, particularly in children. This AB5 subunit toxin family bind target cell globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb₃), a glycosphingolipid (GSL) (aka CD77, pk blood group antigen) of the globoseries of neutral GSLs, initiating lipid raft-dependent plasma membrane Gb₃ clustering, membrane curvature, invagination, scission, endosomal trafficking, and retrograde traffic via the TGN to the Golgi, and ER. In the ER, A/B subunits separate and the A subunit hijacks the ER reverse translocon (dislocon-used to eliminate misfolded proteins-ER associated degradation-ERAD) for cytosolic access. This property has been used to devise toxoid-based therapy to temporarily block ERAD and rescue the mutant phenotype of several genetic protein misfolding diseases. The A subunit avoids cytosolic proteosomal degradation, to block protein synthesis via its RNA glycanase activity. In humans, Gb₃ is primarily expressed in the kidney, particularly in the glomerular endothelial cells. Here, Gb₃ is in lipid rafts (more ordered membrane domains which accumulate GSLs/cholesterol) whereas renal tubular Gb₃ is in the non-raft membrane fraction, explaining the basic pathology of eHUS (glomerular endothelial infarct). Females are more susceptible and this correlates with higher renal Gb₃ expression. HUS can be associated with encephalopathy, more commonly following verotoxin 2 exposure. Gb₃ is expressed in the microvasculature of the brain. All members of the VT family bind Gb₃, but with varying affinity. VT2e (pig edema toxin) binds Gb₄ preferentially. Verotoxin-specific therapeutics based on chemical analogs of Gb₃, though effective in vitro, have failed in vivo. While some analogs are effective in animal models, there are no good rodent models of eHUS since Gb₃ is not expressed in rodent glomeruli. However, the mouse mimics the neurological symptoms more closely and provides an excellent tool to assess therapeutics. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, other factors including VT–induced cytokine release and aberrant complement cascade, are now appreciated as important in eHUS. Based on atypical HUS therapy, treatment of eHUS patients with anticomplement antibodies has proven effective in some cases. A recent switch using stem cells to try to reverse, rather than prevent VT induced pathology may prove a more effective methodology.

Shiga toxin binding to glycolipids and glycans

BACKGROUND

Immunologically distinct forms of Shiga toxin (Stx1 and Stx2) display different potencies and disease outcomes, likely due to differences in host cell binding. The glycolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) has been reported to be the receptor for both toxins. While there is considerable data to suggest that Gb3 can bind Stx1, binding of Stx2 to Gb3 is variable.

METHODOLOGY

We used isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to examine binding of Stx1 and Stx2 to various glycans, glycosphingolipids, and glycosphingolipid mixtures in the presence or absence of membrane components, phosphatidylcholine, and cholesterol. We have also assessed the ability of glycolipids mixtures to neutralize Stx-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis in Vero kidney cells.

RESULTS

By ITC, Stx1 bound both Pk (the trisaccharide on Gb3) and P (the tetrasaccharide on globotetraosylceramide, Gb4), while Stx2 did not bind to either glycan. Binding to neutral glycolipids individually and in combination was assessed by ELISA. Stx1 bound to glycolipids Gb3 and Gb4, and Gb3 mixed with other neural glycolipids, while Stx2 only bound to Gb3 mixtures. In the presence of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol, both Stx1 and Stx2 bound well to Gb3 or Gb4 alone or mixed with other neutral glycolipids. Pre-incubation with Gb3 in the presence of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol neutralized Stx1, but not Stx2 toxicity to Vero cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Stx1 binds primarily to the glycan, but Stx2 binding is influenced by residues in the ceramide portion of Gb3 and the lipid environment. Nanomolar affinities were obtained for both toxins to immobilized glycolipids mixtures, while the effective dose for 50% inhibition (ED(50)) of protein synthesis was about 10(-11) M. The failure of preincubation with Gb3 to protect cells from Stx2 suggests that in addition to glycolipid expression, other cellular components contribute to toxin potency.

Quantification of the Fabry marker lysoGb3 in human plasma by tandem mass spectrometry

Morbus Fabry is a hereditary metabolic disorder with low prevalence and late clinical manifestation. A defect in the α-galactosidase gene leads to lysosomal accumulation of the glycolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3). Gb3 may be used for monitoring of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), but diagnostic sensitivity is limited. Recently, globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3) was introduced as a promising new marker with significantly better sensitivity. For Fabry diagnosis, clinical studies and possible therapy monitoring, we established a fast and reliable LC-MS/MS assay for quantification of lysoGb3 in human plasma. Protein precipitation and glycolipid extraction from EDTA plasma was performed using acetone/methanol. Samples were analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS in MRM mode. In contrast to HPLC with fluorescence detection, the LC-MS/MS method requires no derivatization, less sample preparation and less instrument analysis time (<3 min). As internal standard (ISTD), a glycine derivative of lysoGb3 was synthesized, and the product was purified by HPLC. ISTD properties such as polarity (affecting extraction and elution), ionization and fragmentation pathway were almost identical compared to the analyte. The new LC-MS/MS assay for the Fabry marker lysoGb3 shows good performance and allowed for better discrimination between Fabry patients and controls than Gb3.

Differential tissue targeting and pathogenesis of verotoxins 1 and 2 in the mouse animal model

BACKGROUND

Both verotoxin (VT)1 and VT2 share the same receptor, globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb(3)). Although VT1 is slightly more cytotoxic in vitro and binds Gb(3) with higher affinity, VT2 is more toxic in mice and may be associated with greater pathology in human infections. In this study we have compared the biodistribution of iodine 125 ((125)I)-VT1 and (125)I-VT2 versus pathology in the mouse.

METHODS

(125)I-VT1 whole-body autoradiography defined the tissues targeted. VT1 and VT2 tissue distribution, clearance, and tissue binding sites were compared. The effect of a soluble receptor analogue, adamantylGb(3), on VT2/Gb3 binding and in vivo pathology was assessed.

RESULTS

(125)I-VT1 autoradiography identified the lungs and nasal turbinates as major, previously unrecognized, targets, while kidney cortex and the bone marrow of the spine, long bones, and ribs were also significant targets. VT2 did not target the lung, but accumulated in the kidney to a greater extent than VT1. The serum half-life of VT1 was 2.7 minutes with 90% clearance at 5 minutes, while that of VT2 was 3.9 minutes with only 40% clearance at 5 minutes. The extensive binding of VT1, but not VT2, within the lung correlated with induced lung disease. Extensive hemorrhage into alveoli, edema, alveolitis and neutrophil margination was seen only after VT1 treatment. VT1 targeted lung capillary endothelial cells. Identical tissue binding sites (subsets of proximal/distal tubules and collecting ducts) for VT1 and VT2 were detected by toxin overlay of serial frozen kidney sections. Glucosuria was found to be a new marker of VT1- and VT2-induced renal pathology and positive predictor of outcome in the mouse, consistent with VT-staining of proximal tubules. Lung Gb3 migrated on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) faster than kidney Gb(3), suggesting a different lipid composition. AdamantylGb(3), a soluble Gb(3) analogue, competed effectively for Gb3 binding by VT1 and VT2 in vitro. However, the effect in the mouse model (only measured against VT2, due to the lower LD(50), a concentration required for 50% lethality) was to increase, rather than reduce, pathology and further reduce the VT2 serum clearance rate. Additional renal pathology was seen in VT2 + adamantylGb(3)-treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The lung is a preferential (Gb(3)) "sink" for VT1, which explains the relatively slower clearance of VT2 and subsequent increased VT2 renal targeting and VT2 mortality in this animal model.