Bansal N, Glidden DV, Mehrotra R, Townsend RR, Cohen J, Linke L, Palad F, Larson H, Hsu CY. Treating Home Versus Predialysis Blood Pressure Among In-Center Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Am J Kidney Dis 2021;
77:12-22. [PMID:
32800842 PMCID:
PMC7752836 DOI:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.06.014]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE
Observational studies have reported a U-shaped association between blood pressure (BP) before a hemodialysis session and death. In contrast, because a linear association between out-of-dialysis-unit BP and death has been reported, home BP may be a better target for treatment. To test the feasibility of this approach, we conducted a pilot trial of treating home versus predialysis BP in hemodialysis patients.
STUDY DESIGN
A 4-month, parallel, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS
50 prevalent hemodialysis patients in San Francisco and Seattle. Participants were randomly assigned using 1:1 block randomization, stratified by site.
INTERVENTIONS
To target home systolic BP (SBP) of 100-<140 mm Hg versus predialysis SBP of 100-<140mm Hg. Home and predialysis SBPs were ascertained every 2 weeks. Dry weight and BP medications were adjusted to reach the target SBP.
OUTCOMES
Primary outcomes were feasibility, adherence, safety. and tolerability.
RESULTS
50 of 70 (71%) patients who were approached agreed to participate. All enrollees completed the study except for 1 who received a kidney transplant. In the home BP treatment group, adherence to obtaining/reporting home BP was 97.4% (and consistent over the 4 months). There was no increased frequency of high (defined as SBP>200mm Hg; 0.2% vs 0%) or low (defined as<90mm Hg; 1.8% vs 1.2%) predialysis BP readings in the home versus predialysis treatment arms, respectively. However, participants in the home BP arm had higher frequency of fatigue (32% vs 16%).
LIMITATIONS
Small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot trial demonstrates feasibility and high adherence to home BP measurement and treatment in hemodialysis patients. Larger trials to test the long-term feasibility, efficacy, and safety of home BP treatment in hemodialysis patients should be conducted.
FUNDERS
National Institutes of Health, Satellite Healthcare, and Northwest Kidney Centers.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03459807.
Collapse