Efficacy and limitations of additional steroid pulse therapy in IgA nephropathy patients whose hematuria did not remit on tonsillectomy and protocol steroid pulse therapy

Advancements in understanding the role of intestinal dysbacteriosis mediated mucosal immunity in IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy, presently recognized as the foremost primary glomerular disorder, emerges as a principal contributor to renal failure globally, with its pathogenesis yet to be fully elucidated. Extensive research has highlighted the critical role of gut microbiome in the onset and progression of IgA nephropathy, underscoring its importance in accurately delineating the disease's etiology. For example, gut microbiome dysbacteriosis can lead to the production of nephritogenic IgA1 antibodies, which form immune complexes that deposit in the kidneys, causing inflammation and damage. The gut microbiome, a source of numerous bioactive compounds, interacts with the host and plays a regulatory role in gut-immune axis modulation, earning it the moniker of the "second brain." Recent investigations have particularly emphasized a significant correlation between IgA nephropathy and gut microbiome dysbacteriosis. This article offers a detailed overview of the pathogenic mechanisms of IgA nephropathy, specifically focusing on elucidating how alterations in the gut microbiome are associated with anomalies in the intestinal mucosal system in IgA nephropathy. Additionally, it describes the possible influence of gut microbiome on recurrent IgA nephropathy following kidney transplantation. Furthermore, it compiles potential therapeutic interventions, offering both theoretical and practical foundations for the management of IgA nephropathy. Lastly, the challenges currently faced in the therapeutic approaches to IgA nephropathy are discussed.

Current treatment status of IgA nephropathy in Japan: a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

In 2020, the Committee of Clinical Practical Guideline for IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) revised the clinical practice guidelines. Herein, we conducted a questionnaire survey to assess the potential discrepancies between clinical practice guidelines and real-world practice in Japan.

METHODS

A web-based survey of members of the Japanese Society of Nephrology was conducted between November 15 and December 28, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 217 members (internal physicians: 203, pediatricians: 14) responded to the questionnaire. Of these respondents, 94.0% answered that the clinical practice guidelines were referred to "always" or "often." Approximately 66.4% respondents answered that histological grade (H-Grade) derived from the "Clinical Guidelines for IgA nephropathy in Japan, 3rd version" and the "Oxford classification" were used for pathological classification. Moreover, 73.7% respondents answered that the risk grade (R-grade) derived from the "Clinical Guidelines for IgA nephropathy in Japan, 3rd version" was referred to for risk stratification. The prescription rate of renin-angiotensin system blockers increased based on urinary protein levels (> 1.0 g/day: 88.6%, 0.5-1.0 g/day: 71.0%, < 0.5 g/day: 25.0%). Similarly, the prescription rate of corticosteroids increased according to proteinuria levels (> 1.0 g/day: 77.8%, 0.5-1.0 g/day: 52.8%, < 0.5 g/day: 11.9%). The respondents emphasized on hematuria when using corticosteroids. In cases of hematuria, the indication rate for corticosteroids was higher than in those without hematuria, even if the urinary protein level was 1 g/gCr or less. Few severe infectious diseases or serious deterioration in glycemic control were reported during corticosteroid use.

CONCLUSION

Our questionnaire survey revealed real-world aspects of IgAN treatment in Japan.

Microscopic hematuria as a risk factor for IgAN progression: considering this biomarker in selecting and monitoring patients

Hematuria-either macroscopic hematuria or asymptomatic microscopic hematuria-is a clinical feature typical but not specific for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). The only biomarker supported by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group as a predictor of progression, identifying patients needing treatment, is proteinuria >1 g/day persistent despite maximized supportive care. However, proteinuria can occur in the setting of active glomerulonephritis or secondary to sclerotic renal lesions. Microscopic hematuria is observed in experimental models of IgAN after IgA-IgG immunocomplex deposition, activation of inflammation and complement pathways. Oxidative damage, triggered by hemoglobin release, is thought to contribute to the development of proteinuria and progression. Despite being a clinical hallmark of IgAN and having a rational relationship with its pathophysiology, the value of microscopic hematuria in assessing activity and predicting outcomes in patients with IgAN is still debated. This was partly due to a lack of standardization and day-to-day variability of microhematuria, which discouraged the inclusion of microhematuria in large multicenter studies. More recently, several studies from Asia, Europe and the USA have highlighted the importance of microhematuria assessment over longitudinal follow-up, using a systematic approach with either experienced personnel or automated techniques. We report lights and shadows of microhematuria evaluation in IgAN, looking for evidence for a more consistent consensus on its value as a marker of clinical and histological activity, risk assessment and prediction of treatment response. We propose that hematuria should be included as part of the clinical decision-making process when considering when to use immunosuppressive therapy and as part of criteria for enrollment into clinical trials to test drugs targeting the inflammatory reaction elicited by immune pathway activation in IgAN.