Inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare type classification system for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

The distance between the femoral nerve and anterior acetabulum is significantly shorter in hip osteoarthritis than in non-osteoarthritis hip

Background

The appropriate position of retractors to minimize the risk of femoral nerve palsy remains uncertain. The purpose of this imaging study was to evaluate the distance between the femoral nerve (FN) and anterior acetabulum (AA) in hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Forty-one patients with unilateral hip OA underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Three measurement levels were defined and the minimum distance between the femoral nerve (FN) margin and anterior acetabulum (AA) rim was measured on axial T1-weighted images on the OA and normal sides at each level, with reference to an advanced neurography view. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the iliopsoas muscle was also measured at each level bilaterally by three observers. Distances and CSAs were compared between the OA and normal side. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with the distance in OA.

Results

The mean minimum FN to AA distances in OA were 19.4 mm at the top of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), 24.3 mm at the bottom of the AIIS, and 21.0 mm at the tip of the greater trochanter. These distances were significantly shorter than in normal hips at the top and bottom of the AIIS, with mean differences of 1.6 and 5.8 mm, respectively (p = 0.012, p < 0.001). CSAs of the iliopsoas in OA were significantly smaller at all levels (all p < 0.001), with reductions of 10.5 to 17.9%. The CSA of the iliopsoas at the bottom of the AIIS was associated with the FN to AA distance at the same level (p = 0.026). Interobserver reliabilities for measurements were very good to perfect (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.897 to 0.966).

Conclusions

To minimize the risk of femoral nerve palsy, surgeons should consider the change of the femoral nerve to anterior acetabulum distance in osteoarthritic hip surgery.

Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation versus conservative treatment for corticosteroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective: To compare the outcomes of steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who underwent conservative treatment and concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation

Methods: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was classified according to the Japanese Investigation Committee system. Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation was performed by aspirating the bone marrow from both iliac crests and then transplanting it to the necrotic area after the core decompression. Patients with >2-year follow-up after the concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation in our institution (Group I) and those with >2-year follow-up after the first hospital visit in a cooperative institution (Group II) were included in this study. After a randomized matching based on age, sex, type, stage, and etiology, the collapse rate in pre-collapsed stages and total hip arthroplasty conversion rate in all stages were compared between the two groups.

Results: After the matching adjustment, 33 pairs of hips were included. Preoperatively, 1, 2, 16, and 14 hips were classified as types A, B, C1, and C2, respectively, and 15, 13, 2, and 3 hips were classified as stages 1, 2, 3A, and 3B, respectively. The collapse rates in the pre-collapsed stages were 68% and 39% in Groups I and II, respectively. Total hip arthroplasty conversion rates were 33% and 45% in Groups I and II, respectively. However, Group I had significantly higher and lower conversion rates in stages 1 and 3, respectively (both P<0.05).

Conclusion: Conservative treatment may be preferable in stage 1 hips. In addition, concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation may prevent further collapse in stage 3.

Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Who should have surgery?

Objectives

Using a simple classification method, we aimed to estimate the collapse rate due to osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in order to develop treatment guidelines for joint-preserving surgeries.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 505 hips from 310 patients (141 men, 169 women; mean age 45.5 years (sd 14.9; 15 to 86)) diagnosed with ONFH and classified them using the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification. The JIC system includes four visualized types based on the location and size of osteonecrotic lesions on weightbearing surfaces (types A, B, C1, and C2) and the stage of ONFH. The collapse rate due to ONFH was calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, with radiological collapse/arthroplasty as endpoints.

Results

Bilateral cases accounted for 390 hips, while unilateral cases accounted for 115. According to the JIC types, 21 hips were type A, 34 were type B, 173 were type C1, and 277 were type C2. At initial diagnosis, 238/505 hips (47.0%) had already collapsed. Further, the cumulative survival rate was analyzed in 212 precollapsed hips, and the two-year and five-year collapse rates were found to be 0% and 0%, 7.9% and 7.9%, 23.2% and 36.6%, and 57.8% and 84.8% for types A, B, C1, and C2, respectively.

Conclusion

Type A ONFH needs no further treatment, but precollapse type C2 ONFH warrants immediate treatment with joint-preserving surgery. Considering the high collapse rate, our study results justify the importance of early diagnosis and intervention in asymptomatic patients with type C2 ONFH.

Cite this article: Y. Kuroda, T. Tanaka, T. Miyagawa, T. Kawai, K. Goto, S. Tanaka, S. Matsuda, H. Akiyama. Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Who should have surgery?. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:451–458. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0022.R1.

Which Classification System Is Most Useful for Classifying Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head?

BACKGROUND

Many studies have confirmed that the size and location of necrotic lesions are major factors that affect the prevalence of collapse and prognosis in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Although several classification systems categorize and quantify ONFH, there is no agreement on which one is most useful for the purpose.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared the Steinberg, modified Kerboul, and Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classifications of ONFH in terms of (1) the correlation among the three different classification systems. We further examined (2) the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the three classification systems and (3) the association of higher grades within each classification and the risk of subsequent collapse.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2014, we treated 101 hips in 74 patients for precollapse ONFH, diagnosed either on plain radiographs or MRI. Of those, one patient (1%) died, six patients (8%) were lost to followup, and two patients (3%) underwent osteotomy before 2 years, leaving 86 hips in 65 patients (88%) for analysis here. Three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequence (3D-SPGR) MRI was performed for all hips, and the presence of ONFH was determined by finding the area surrounded by the outer margin of the low-signal-intensity band on 3D-SPGR MRI. Patients with ONFH were categorized using the Steinberg, modified Kerboul, and JIC classification systems, and correlations among these three classification systems were investigated. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed by 10 orthopaedic surgeons using 40 sets of 3D-SPGR MR images. The reliability of each system was evaluated using the kappa coefficient. The cumulative survival rate with collapse and undergoing hip arthroplasty as the endpoints was evaluated for each of the three classification systems (mean followup, 9 years; range, 2-16 years), and the association of higher grades within each classification and the risk of subsequent collapse were also evaluated.

RESULTS

We found strong correlations between the Steinberg and modified Kerboul classifications (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001), the Steinberg and JIC classifications (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001), and the modified Kerboul and JIC classifications (ρ = 0.80, p < 0.001). Interobserver reliability in the JIC classification (0.72; range, 0.30-0.90) was higher than that in the Steinberg classification (0.56; range, 0.24-0.84; p < 0.001) and the modified Kerboul classification (0.57; range, 0.35-0.80; p < 0.001). The cumulative survival rate with collapse as the endpoint after a minimum of 2 years of followup in the Steinberg classification differed between Grades A (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66%-97%) and B (43%; 95% CI, 21.9%-64.8%; p = 0.007), Grades A and C (20%; 95% CI, 4.3%-35.7%; p < 0.001), and Grades B and C (p = 0.029). Survival was lower for modified Kerboul Grade 4 hips (12%; 95% CI, 0%-27.1%) than for Steinberg Grade C hips (20%; 95% CI, 4.3%-35.7%) and JIC Type C2 hips (18%; 95% CI, 2.8%-34.0%). The JIC classification was best able to identify hips at low risk of collapse because no JIC Type A hips collapsed.

CONCLUSIONS

The JIC classification was more reliable and effective, at least for early-stage ONFH, than the Steinberg or modified Kerboul classifications. Further investigation might be useful to identify whether each classification system emphasizes specific risk factors for collapse.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the sciatic and femoral nerves in healthy volunteers at 3T

Background

The aim was to clarify the normal fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the sciatic and femoral nerves at the level of the hip joint and to visualize the neural tracts with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

Methods

Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 12 women, age 20–29 years) underwent DTI for visualization with tractography and quantification of FA and ADC values on a 3 Tesla MRI (b value = 800 s/mm², motion probing gradient, 11 directions, time to repeat/echo time = 9000/72.6 ms, axial slice orientation, slice thickness = 3.0 mm with no inter-slice gap, field of view = 320 × 320 mm, 96 × 192 matrix, 75 slices, number of acquisitions = 4). Regions of interest in the sciatic nerve were defined at the femoral head, the S1 root, and the midpoint levels. The femoral nerve was evaluated at 3–4 cm proximal to the femoral head level.

Results

The tractography of the sciatic and femoral nerves were visualized in all participants. The mean FA values of the sciatic nerve were increased distally from the S1 root level, through the midpoint, and to the femoral head level (0.314, 0.446, 0.567, p = 0.001, respectively). The mean FA values of the femoral nerve were 0.565. The mean ADC values of the sciatic nerves were significantly lower in the S1 root level than in the midpoint and the femoral head level (1.481, 1.602, 1.591 × 10⁻³ × 10⁻³ mm²/s, p = 0.001, respectively). The ADC values of the femoral nerve were 1.439 × 10⁻³ mm²/s. FA and ADC values showed moderate to substantial inter- and intra-observer reliability without significant differences in gender or laterality.

Conclusion

Visualization and quantification of the sciatic and femoral nerves simultaneously around the hip joint were achieved in healthy young volunteers with DTI. Clinical application of DTI is expected to contribute to hip pain research.

Distribution of hip pain in osteoarthritis patients secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to clarify the distribution of hip pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 443 hips in 369 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to DDH; mean age was 61 years, and follow-up rate was 84 %. Hip pain was defined as preoperative pain that was relieved 3 months after total hip arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Distribution of pain originating in the hip was 89 % (393 hips) to the groin, 38 % (170 hips) to the buttock, 33 % (144 hips) to the anterior thigh, 29 % (130 hips) to the knee, 27 % (118 hips) to the greater trochanter, 17 % (76 hips) to the low back, and 8 % (34 hips) to the lower leg. When the groin, buttock, and greater trochanter were combined as the hip region, 95 % (421 hips) of pain was located in the hip region. On the other hand, when the anterior thigh, knee, lower leg, and low back were combined as the referral region, 55 % (242 hips) showed referred pain.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that rheumatologists be aware of hip disease masquerading as knee pain or low back pain.