Pratique de la coloscopie en France en 2011 : résultats de l’enquête électronique « une semaine d’endoscopie en France »

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Systemic Adverse Events After Screening or Primary Diagnostic Colonoscopy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the systemic serious adverse event (SAE) rates after colonoscopy and to identify their risk factors.

METHODS

A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the comprehensive French claims databases SNDS (National Health Data System). Patients aged 30 years and over who underwent a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy in 2010-2015 were included. The rates of cardiovascular and renal SAEs were estimated within 5 days after colonoscopy. The standardized incidence ratios were calculated to compare these incidence rates with those of the same events in the general population, and the associated risk factors were assessed by multilevel logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 4,088,799 included patients (median age, 59 years [interquartile range = 50-67]; 55.2% women; 30.1% with a Charlson index score ≤1), the 5-day SAE incidence rate was 2.8/10,000 procedures for shock, 0.87/10,000 for myocardial infarction, 1.9/10,000 for stroke, 2.9/10,000 for pulmonary embolism, 5.5/10,000 for acute renal failure, and 3.3/10,000 for urolithiasis. These SAEs occurred 3.3 to 15.8 times more often during the first 5 days after colonoscopy than expected in the general population. Thirty-day mortality rates ranged from 2.2/1,000 cases of urolithiasis to 268.1/1,000 cases of shock. Increasing age was associated with an increasing incidence of SAEs. Risks of shock and acute renal failure were associated with a greater number of comorbidities than the other SAEs. Colonoscopies in university hospitals were associated with higher risks, reflecting patient selection processes.

DISCUSSION

The systemic SAEs can be associated with a substantial mortality. They should be taken into account when deciding colonoscopy, in addition to perforation and bleeding, particularly in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities.

Patient, Procedure, and Endoscopist Risk Factors for Perforation, Bleeding, and Splenic Injury After Colonoscopies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We investigated perforations, bleeding, and splenic injuries after screening or diagnostic colonoscopies to identify patient-, procedure-, endoscopist-, and facility-associated risk factors.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the SNIIRAM-PMSI national claims databases in France. A total of 4,088,799 patients, 30 years or older, undergoing a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy from 2010 through 2015 were identified. Rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) were estimated using stringent and broad definitions. Risk factors associated with perforations and major bleeding were estimated using multilevel logistic regression models, adjusted for patient, colonoscopy, and endoscopist characteristics.

RESULTS

Perforation rates ranged from 3.5 (stringent definition) to 7.3 (broad definition) per 10,000 procedures, bleeding rates ranged from 6.5 to 23.1 per 10,000 procedures, and splenic injury rates ranged from 0.20 to 0.34 per 10,000 procedures. Rates of 30-day mortality were 13.2 per 1000 bleeds, 29.2 per 1000 perforations, and 36.1 per 1000 splenic injuries (stringent definitions). Patient characteristics associated with SAEs were increasing age (especially for perforation), cancer, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Procedure characteristics associated with SAEs included polypectomy-especially of polyps larger than 1 cm with an increased risk of perforation (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.4-5.0) and bleeding (odds ratio, 13.3; 95% CI, 11.7-15.1). Less-experienced endoscopists and endoscopists who performed a smaller number of colonoscopies were independently associated with a risk of SAEs.

CONCLUSION

In an analysis of national claims databases in France, we found SAEs related to screening and diagnostic colonoscopies to be more frequent in older patients, in patients with comorbidities, and with less-experienced endoscopists. Patients at risk of SAE should be identified and colonoscopies should be performed or supervised by experienced endoscopists.

Perforations and haemorrhages after colonoscopy in 2010: a study based on comprehensive French health insurance data (SNIIRAM)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To estimate the perforation and haemorrhage rate after colonoscopy in the French population in 2010 and to identify risk factors for these complications.

METHOD

Study based on SNIIRAM and the PMSI databases. Patients treated for IBD or colorectal cancer were excluded. Two types of complications were investigated: perforation and haemorrhage. OR adjusted for patient (gender, age, chronic disease) and colonoscopy (polypectomy, emergency) characteristics were calculated by using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort was composed of 947,061 individuals. The estimated perforation rate was between 4.5 and 9.7 per 10,000 procedures and the estimated haemorrhage rate was between 9.9 and 11.0 per 10,000 procedures. The main risk factors associated with perforation and haemorrhage were the patient's age (over 80 years compared to under 40, OR=7.51 and 3.23), resection of polyps larger than 1 cm or more than 4 polyps (compared to no polypectomy, OR=2.72 and 5.12) and emergency colonoscopy (OR=4.63 and 5.99). Colonoscopy performed by a gastroenterologist performing less than 244 colonoscopies per year was associated with an increased risk of perforation (OR=2.29). Complication rates were higher in institutions performing less than 510 colonoscopies per year, but this was no longer the case after adjustment for emergency colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which includes nearly one million colonoscopies, suggests taking the gastroenterologist's number of colonoscopies into account to ensure optimal organization of the management of very elderly patients requiring colonoscopy.