Trigeminal evoked potentials in cluster headache

Laser-Evoked Cortical Potentials in Cluster Headache

Craniofacial nociceptive processing in patients ( n = 25) suffering from unilateral cluster headache was assessed by laser-evoked cortical potentials (LEPs). Latencies and amplitudes of late (N2, P2) and middle-latency (N1) LEPs were measured in chronic (CCH, n = 9) and episodic cluster headache (ECH, n = 17). In CCH patients on headache side N1c occurred later and P2 amplitude was smaller than on the healthy control side. In active periods of ECH patients P2 latency was shorter on the headache side. In remission periods of ECH patients the N2P2 ratio was lower on the headache side. In 19 out of 26 examinations in 25 headache patients LEP deviated from normative data in healthy controls ( n = 10) without any specific pattern of altered parameters. LEPs document pathological changes in craniofacial nociception in cluster headache. However, there seems to be no pathognomonic deviation pattern that enables reliable diagnosis of cluster headache and application of LEPs in further studies of pathophysiological mechanisms.

Neuroimaging and clinical neurophysiology in cluster headache and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias

Clinical neurophysiology and neuroimaging are two non-invasive approaches used to investigate the pathophysiological basis of primary headaches, including cluster headache (CH) and other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). Modern neuroimaging has revolutionized our understanding of the pathophysiology of primary headaches, and of TACs in particular, focusing on a cerebrovascular dysfunction hypothesis toward a central triggering cause. The introduction of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and voxel-based morphometry has allowed us new insights into mechanisms underlying TACs and occurring during peripheral and/or central neuromodulation. The specific activation of neural structures that is observed exclusively in migraine and in TACs supports the hypothesis that primary headaches are driven predominantly by central nervous system dysfunction, and this has important implications from a therapeutic perspective. Neurophysiological examinations are of little value in the clinical setting; however, most of these tools offer vast potential for exploring further the pathophysiology of primary headaches and the effects of pharmacological treatments Trigeminofacial reflexes, the nociceptive flexion reflex, and evoked potentials have been used in TACs to explore the functional state of brainstem and spinal structures involved in pain processing, contributing to our understanding of the pathophysiology of these primary headaches.

Impairment of trigeminal sensory pathways in cluster headache

Cluster headache (CH) typically presents in clusters of attacks of intense (peri)orbital, unilateral pain. The distribution of the pain implies involvement of central and/or peripheral trigeminal pathways. These can be investigated by means of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials (TSEP) and blink reflexes (BR). We aimed to relate functional changes in trigeminal sensory pathways to the presence of cluster periods. TSEP and BR were performed in 28 episodic CH patients during a cluster period and repeated in 22 outside a cluster period. TSEP latencies (N1, P1 and N2) and amplitude (N1-P1 and P1-N2) and BR latencies (R1, R2 ipsilateral and R2 contralateral) were compared between sides, during and outside a cluster period and with healthy control data (n = 22). During a cluster period, N2 TSEP latencies were longer on the symptomatic side compared with the non-symptomatic side (27.2 +/- 3.0 ms vs. 26.3 +/- 3.4 ms, P = 0.02), and compared with the same side outside the cluster period (26.7 +/- 3.1 ms vs. 25.1 +/- 3.0 ms, P = 0.01). N1, P1 and N2 latencies on the symptomatic side in patients during the cluster period (14.8 +/- 2.3 ms, 20.4 +/- 2.5 ms and 27.2 +/- 3.0 ms, respectively) were significantly longer than those of healthy controls (13.4 +/- 1.9 ms, 18.8 +/- 2.4 ms and 25.0 +/- 2.6 ms, respectively, P < 0.03). Outside the cluster period, N1 latencies of both sides (15.3 +/- 2.8 ms symptomatic side and 15.4 +/- 2.6 ms asymptomatic side) were longer compared with controls (13.4 +/- 1.9 ms, P < 0.04). TSEP amplitudes and BR latencies revealed no significant differences. We conclude that abnormalities of the afferent trigeminal pathway are present in patients with cluster headache, most prominent during the cluster period, and on the symptomatic side. This seems primarily due of changes within the higher cerebral regions of the system.