1
|
Van Hamersveld KT, Marang-Van De Mheen PJ, Nelissen RGHH, Toksvig-Larsen S. Peri-apatite coating decreases uncemented tibial component migration: long-term RSA results of a randomized controlled trial and limitations of short-term results. Acta Orthop 2018; 89:425-430. [PMID: 29741133 PMCID: PMC6066768 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1469223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Biological fixation of uncemented knee prostheses can be improved by applying hydroxyapatite coating around the porous surface via a solution deposition technique called Peri-Apatite (PA). The 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the effect of PA, revealed several components with continuous migration in the second postoperative year, particularly in the uncoated group. To evaluate whether absence of early stabilization is diagnostic of loosening, we now present long-term follow-up results. Patients and methods - 60 patients were randomized to PA-coated or uncoated (porous only) total knee arthroplasty of which 58 were evaluated with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) performed at baseline, at 3 months postoperatively and at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results - PA-coated components had a statistically significantly lower mean migration at 10 years of 0.94 mm (95% CI 0.72-1.2) compared with the uncoated group showing a mean migration of 1.72 mm (95% CI 1.4-2.1). Continuous migration in the second postoperative year was seen in 7 uncoated components and in 1 PA-coated component. All of these implants stabilized after 2 years except for 2 uncoated components. Interpretation - Peri-apatite enhances stabilization of uncemented components. The number of components that stabilized after 2 years emphasizes the importance of longer follow-up to determine full stabilization and risk of loosening in uncemented components with biphasic migration profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sören Toksvig-Larsen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm, Sweden and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Hamersveld KT, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Tsonaka R, Valstar† ER, Toksvig-Larsen S. Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated versus cemented total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B:1467-1476. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b11.bjj-2016-1347.r3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims The optimal method of tibial component fixation remains uncertain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Hydroxyapatite coatings have been applied to improve bone ingrowth in uncemented designs, but may only coat the directly accessible surface. As peri-apatite (PA) is solution deposited, this may increase the coverage of the implant surface and thereby fixation. We assessed the tibial component fixation of uncemented PA-coated TKAs versus cemented TKAs. Patients and Methods Patients were randomised to PA-coated or cemented TKAs. In 60 patients (30 in each group), radiostereometric analysis of tibial component migration was evaluated as the primary outcome at baseline, three months post-operatively and at one, two and five years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the repeated measurements. Results After five years of follow-up, one (cemented) component was revised due to ligament instability. Overall, uncemented PA-coated tibial components migrated significantly more (p = 0.003), with the mean maximum total point motion (MTPM) at five years being 0.62 mm (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.49 to 0.76) for cemented tibial components and 0.97 mm (95% CI 0.81 to 1.15) for PA-coated tibial components in TKA. However, between three months and five years the cemented TKAs migrated significantly more (p = 0.02), displaying a MTPM of 0.27 mm (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.36) versus 0.13 mm (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.25) for PA-coated tibial components. One implant in each group was considered at risk for aseptic loosening due to continuous migration after five years of follow-up, albeit with different migration patterns for each group (i.e. higher initial migration but diminishing over time for the PA-coated component versus gradually increasing migration for the cemented component). Conclusion The tibial components of PA-coated TKAs showed more overall migration compared with the tibial components of cemented TKAs. However, post hoc analysis showed that this difference was caused by higher migration of PA-coated components in the first three months, after which a stable migration pattern was observed. Clinically, there was no significant difference in outcome between the groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1467–76.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. T. van Hamersveld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden
University Medical Center, Post zone J11-R, P.O.
Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - P. J. Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Medical Decision Making,
Leiden University Medical Center, Post zone J10-S, P.O.
Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - R. Tsonaka
- Department of Medical Statistics and BioInformatics,
Leiden University Medical Center, Post zone
S5-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300
RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E. R. Valstar†
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden
University Medical Center, Post zone J11-R, P.O.
Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - S. Toksvig-Larsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hässleholm
Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, P.O.
Box 351, 28125 Hässleholm, Sweden
and P.O. Box 117, 22100, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wall PDH, Richards BL, Sprowson A, Buchbinder R, Singh JA. Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature. Syst Rev 2017; 6:106. [PMID: 28558822 PMCID: PMC5450048 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0498-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not known, whether outcome reporting in trials of total joint arthroplasty in the recent years is adequate or not. Our objective was to assess whether outcomes reported in total joint replacement (TJR) trials fulfil the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0. METHODS We systematically reviewed all TJR trials in adults, published in English in 2008 or 2013. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Two authors independently applied the inclusion criteria for the studies, and any disagreement was resolved with a third review author. All outcome measures were abstracted using a pre-piloted standardised data extraction form and assessed for whether they mapped to one of the three OMERACT Filter 2.0 core areas: pathophysiological, life impact, and death. RESULTS From 1635 trials identified, we included 70 trials (30 in 2008 and 40 in 2013) meeting the eligibility criteria. Twenty-two (31%) trials reported the three essential OMERACT core areas. Among the 27 hip replacement surgery trials and 39 knee replacement surgery trials included, 11 hip (41%) and nine knee (23%) trials reported all three essential OMERACT core areas. The most common outcome domains/measures were pain (20/27, 74%) and function (23/27, 85%) in hip trials and pain (26/39, 67%) and function (27/39, 69%) in knee trials. Results were similar for shoulder and hand joint replacement trials. CONCLUSIONS We identified significant gaps in the measurement of OMERACT core outcome areas in TJR trials, despite the majority reporting outcome domains of pain and function. An international consensus of key stakeholders is needed to develop a core domain set for reporting of TJR trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42014009216.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D H Wall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Bethan L Richards
- Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Sprowson
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.,Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. .,Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richards BL, Wall PDH, Sprowson AP, Singh JA, Buchbinder R. Outcome Measures Used in Arthroplasty Trials: Systematic Review of the 2008 and 2013 Literature. J Rheumatol 2017; 44:1277-1287. [PMID: 28507180 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previously published literature assessing the reporting of outcome measures used in joint replacement randomized controlled trials (RCT) has revealed disappointing results. It remains unknown whether international initiatives have led to any improvement in the quality of reporting and/or a reduction in the heterogeneity of outcome measures used. Our objective was to systematically assess and compare primary outcome measures and the risk of bias in joint replacement RCT published in 2008 and 2013. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for RCT investigating adult patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. Two authors independently identified eligible trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS Seventy RCT (30 in 2008, 40 in 2013) met the eligibility criteria. There was no significant difference in the number of trials judged to be at low overall risk of bias (n = 6, 20%) in 2008 compared with 2013 [6 (15%); chi-square = 0.302, p = 0.75]. Significantly more trials published in 2008 did not specify a primary outcome measure (n = 25, 83%) compared with 18 trials (45%) in 2013 (chi-square = 10.6316, p = 0.001). When specified, there was significant heterogeneity in the measures used to assess primary outcomes. CONCLUSION While less than a quarter of trials published in both 2008 and 2013 were judged to be at low overall risk of bias, significantly more trials published in 2013 specified a primary outcome. Although this might represent a temporal trend toward improvement, the overall frequency of primary outcome reporting and the wide heterogeneity in primary outcomes reported remain suboptimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan L Richards
- From the Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,B.L. Richards, FRACP, MClinEpi, MSportsMed, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney; P.D. Wall, MBChB (Hons), MRCS (Edin), PhD, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; A.P. Sprowson, MD, FRCS, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; J.A. Singh, MD, MPH, Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; R. Buchbinder, MBBS (Hons), PhD, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital. Dr. Sprowson died on March 13, 2015
| | - Peter D H Wall
- From the Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,B.L. Richards, FRACP, MClinEpi, MSportsMed, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney; P.D. Wall, MBChB (Hons), MRCS (Edin), PhD, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; A.P. Sprowson, MD, FRCS, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; J.A. Singh, MD, MPH, Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; R. Buchbinder, MBBS (Hons), PhD, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital. Dr. Sprowson died on March 13, 2015
| | - Andrew P Sprowson
- From the Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,B.L. Richards, FRACP, MClinEpi, MSportsMed, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney; P.D. Wall, MBChB (Hons), MRCS (Edin), PhD, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; A.P. Sprowson, MD, FRCS, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; J.A. Singh, MD, MPH, Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; R. Buchbinder, MBBS (Hons), PhD, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital. Dr. Sprowson died on March 13, 2015
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- From the Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. .,B.L. Richards, FRACP, MClinEpi, MSportsMed, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney; P.D. Wall, MBChB (Hons), MRCS (Edin), PhD, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; A.P. Sprowson, MD, FRCS, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; J.A. Singh, MD, MPH, Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; R. Buchbinder, MBBS (Hons), PhD, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital. Dr. Sprowson died on March 13, 2015.
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- From the Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,B.L. Richards, FRACP, MClinEpi, MSportsMed, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney; P.D. Wall, MBChB (Hons), MRCS (Edin), PhD, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; A.P. Sprowson, MD, FRCS, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Warwick Orthopaedics, University of Warwick; J.A. Singh, MD, MPH, Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; R. Buchbinder, MBBS (Hons), PhD, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital. Dr. Sprowson died on March 13, 2015
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Madanat R, Mäkinen TJ, Aro HT, Bragdon C, Malchau H. Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review. Acta Orthop 2014; 85:447-55. [PMID: 24954489 PMCID: PMC4164860 DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.934187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups. In this systematic review, we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines. METHODS We carried out a literature search to identify all articles published between January 2000 and December 2011 that used RSA in the evaluation of hip or knee prosthesis migration. 2 investigators independently evaluated each of the studies for adherence to the 13 individual guideline items. Since some of the 13 points included more than 1 criterion, studies were assessed on whether each point was fully met, partially met, or not met. RESULTS 153 studies that met our inclusion criteria were identified. 61 of these were published before the guidelines were introduced (2000-2005) and 92 after the guidelines were introduced (2006-2011). The methodological quality of RSA studies clearly improved from 2000 to 2011. None of the studies fully met all 13 guidelines. Nearly half (43) of the studies published after the guidelines demonstrated a high methodological quality and adhered at least partially to 10 of the 13 guidelines, whereas less than one-fifth (11) of the studies published before the guidelines had the same methodological quality. Commonly unaddressed guideline items were related to imaging methodology, determination of precision from double examinations, and also mean error of rigid-body fitting and condition number cutoff levels. INTERPRETATION The guidelines have improved methodological reporting in RSA studies, but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low. There is a need to update and clarify the guidelines for clinical hip and knee arthroplasty RSA studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Madanat
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki,Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Hannu T Aro
- Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Charles Bragdon
- Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Henrik Malchau
- Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larson BJ. Retrospective evaluation of the Duracon periapatite-coated tibial tray: midterm results and factors affecting success. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28:268-72. [PMID: 22770855 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2011] [Accepted: 05/06/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This study reports the retrospective radiographic outcome of a series of 63 consecutive total knee arthroplasties using an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated Duracon cruciate-retaining tibial baseplate (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Mahwah, NJ). Sixty-three knees were assessed at a mean follow-up of 65 months. The knees were primarily diagnosed with osteoarthritis with a mean age of 61 years. Radiographic analysis showed 6 knees with tibial baseplate radiolucencies, with all of these resolving or improving over the course of the study. All tibial baseplates were implanted with the concomitant use of autologous bone slurry. There were no reoperations for aseptic loosening, fracture, or patellofemoral problems. This intermediate study demonstrates excellent radiographic outcomes for uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated Duracon cruciate-retaining tibial baseplates and evaluates other factors felt to be important in the success of a cementless implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad J Larson
- Alpine Orthopaedic Specialist, North Logan, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Flivik G, Lund B. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27:1820-1826.e2. [PMID: 22795879 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2011] [Revised: 02/28/2012] [Accepted: 04/22/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
"Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus L Jensen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery U, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pijls BG, Valstar ER, Nouta KA, Plevier JW, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83:614-24. [PMID: 23140091 PMCID: PMC3555454 DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2012] [Accepted: 09/04/2012] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed two parallel systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the association between early migration of tibial components and late aseptic revision. METHODS One review comprised early migration data from radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies, while the other focused on revision rates for aseptic loosening from long-term survival studies. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable migration were determined according to that of several national joint registries: < 5% revision at 10 years. RESULTS Following an elaborate literature search, 50 studies (involving 847 total knee prostheses (TKPs)) were included in the RSA review and 56 studies (20,599 TKPs) were included in the survival review. The results showed that for every mm increase in migration there was an 8% increase in revision rate, which remained after correction for age, sex, diagnosis, hospital type, continent, and study quality. Consequently, migration up to 0.5 mm was considered acceptable during the first postoperative year, while migration of 1.6 mm or more was unacceptable. TKPs with migration of between 0.5 and 1.6 mm were considered to be at risk of having revision rates higher than 5% at 10 years. INTERPRETATION There was a clinically relevant association between early migration of TKPs and late revision for loosening. The proposed migration thresholds can be implemented in a phased, evidence-based introduction of new types of knee prostheses, since they allow early detection of high-risk TKPs while exposing only a small number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart G Pijls
- Department of Orthopaedics, Bio Imaging Group, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stilling M, Mechlenburg I, Amstrup A, Soballe K, Klebe T. Precision of novel radiological methods in relation to resurfacing humeral head implants: assessment by radiostereometric analysis, DXA, and geometrical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132:1521-30. [PMID: 22773108 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1580-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resurfacing humeral head implants (RHHI) are used to preserve bone stock and restore normal anatomy in the osteoarthritic shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was: (1) to describe the use of novel radiological methods in relation to evaluation of RHHI; (2) to estimate the precision of these methods; and (3) to present preliminary clinical and radiological results at 6 months follow-up after Copeland and Global Cap RHHI. METHODS Twenty-one patients (10 females) at a mean age of 64 (39-82) years and with shoulder osteoarthritis were randomized to a Copeland (n = 11) or Global C.A.P (n = 10) RHHI. Migration of the RHHI was analyzed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The length of gleno-humeral offset (LGHO) was measured on radiographs. The patients were followed clinically with questionnaires. RESULTS Precision of the radiological methods was high for the LGHO and acceptable for RSA and for DXA. At 6 months, shoulder function had improved significantly for both RHHI groups. LGHO increased significantly for the Copeland RHHI and was slightly reduced for the Global C.A.P. RHHI. The implant migration and BMD change around the implant from baseline until 6 months follow-up was comparable for both RHHI. CONCLUSION Radiostereometric analysis and DXA can be used for evaluation of RHHI, but expectedly with a lower precision as compared to standards of TKA or THA. Geometric analysis of the prosthetic shoulder is precise. We interpret that the early radiological and clinical results of the two RHHI are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiken Stilling
- Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, Building 10 A, Office 13, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allen MJ, Leone KA, Dunbar MJ, Race A, Rosenbaum PF, Sacks JM. Tibial component fixation with a peri-apatite coating: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis in a canine total knee arthroplasty model. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27:1138-48. [PMID: 22364907 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2011] [Accepted: 12/24/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cementless fixation for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains problematic. Peri-Apatite (PA), a solution-deposited hydroxyapatite, is under investigation as an option for improving the fixation of cementless tibial components. In this study, radiostereometric analysis was used to document implant migration in 48 dogs that underwent TKA with cementless, PA-coated, or cemented tibial components. Migration at 12 weeks was similar in the 2 groups. At 12 months, there was greater migration in the PA-coated group, but the difference between the 2 groups was below the threshold considered clinically significant. In this canine TKA model, cementless fixation with PA performed less well than did cemented fixation, but not to a degree that would make a clinical difference in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Allen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bercovy M, Beldame J, Lefebvre B, Duron A. A prospective clinical and radiological study comparing hydroxyapatite-coated with cemented tibial components in total knee replacement. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 94:497-503. [PMID: 22434466 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.94b4.27496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This prospective study compares the outcome of 157 hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated tibial components with 164 cemented components in the ROCC Rotating Platform total knee replacement in 291 patients. The mean follow-up was 7.6 years (5.2 to 11). There were two revisions for loosening: one for an HA-coated and one for a cemented tibial component. Radiological evaluation demonstrated no radiolucent lines with the HA-coated femoral components. A total of three HA-coated tibial components exhibited radiolucent lines at three months post-operatively and these disappeared after three further months of protected weight-bearing. With HA-coated components the operating time was shorter (p < 0.006) and the radiological assessment of the tibial interface was more stable (p < 0.01). Using revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component as the end point, the survival rates at nine years was identical for both groups at 99.1%. Our results suggest that HA-coated components perform at least as well as the same design with cemented components and compare favourably with those of series describing cemented or porous-coated knee replacements, suggesting that fixation of both components with hydroxyapatite is a reliable option in primary total knee replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bercovy
- Centre Médical Vauban, 2A Avenue de Ségur, Paris 75007, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wolterbeek N, Garling EH, Mertens BJ, Nelissen RGHH, Valstar ER. Kinematics and early migration in single-radius mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27:398-402. [PMID: 22055272 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2011] [Revised: 10/15/2011] [Accepted: 10/17/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mobile-bearing variant of a single-radius design is assumed to provide more freedom of motion compared to the fixed-bearing variant because the insert does not restrict the natural movements of the femoral component. This would reduce the contact stresses and wear which in turn may have a positive effect on the fixation of the prosthesis to the bone and thereby decreases the risk for loosening. The aim of this study was to evaluate early migration of the tibial component and kinematics of a mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis of the same single-radius design. METHODS Twenty Triathlon single-radius posterior-stabilized knee prostheses were implanted (9 mobile-bearing and 11 fixed-bearing). Fluoroscopy and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) were performed 6 and 12 months post-operatively. FINDINGS The 1 year post-operative RSA results showed considerable early migrations in 3 out of 9 mobile-bearing patients and 1 out of 11 fixed-bearing patients. The range of knee flexion was the same for the mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing group. The mobile insert was following the femoral component during motion. INTERPRETATION Despite the mobile insert following the femoral component during motion, and therefore performing as intended, no kinematic advantages of the mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis were seen. The fixed-bearing knee performed as good as the mobile-bearing knee and maybe even slightly better based on less irregular kinematics and less early migrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Wolterbeek
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pijls BG, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Fiocco M, Nelissen RGHH. The beneficial effect of hydroxyapatite lasts: a randomized radiostereometric trial comparing hydroxyapatite-coated, uncoated, and cemented tibial components for up to 16 years. Acta Orthop 2012; 83:135-41. [PMID: 22329667 PMCID: PMC3339526 DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.665330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In contrast to early migration, the long-term migration of hydroxyapatite- (HA-) coated tibial components in TKA has been scantily reported. This randomized controlled trial investigated the long-term migration measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of HA-coated, uncoated, and cemented tibial components in TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS 68 knees were randomized to HA-coated (n = 24), uncoated (n = 20), and cemented (n = 24) components. All knees were prospectively followed for 11-16 years, or until death or revision. RSA was used to evaluate migration at yearly intervals. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was according to the Knee Society system. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM, adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, revisions, and BMI) was used to take into account the repeated-measurement design. RESULTS The present study involved 742 RSA analyses. The mean migration at 10 years was 1.66 mm for HA, 2.25 mm for uncoated and 0.79 mm for the cemented group (p < 0.001). The reduction of migration by HA as compared to uncoated components was most pronounced for subsidence and external rotation. 3 tibial components were revised for aseptic loosening (2 uncoated and 1 cemented), 3 for septic loosening (2 uncoated and 1 cemented), and 1 for instability (HA-coated). 2 of these cases were revised for secondary loosening after a period of stability: 1 case of osteolysis and 1 case of late infection. There were no statistically significant differences between the fixation groups regarding clinical or radiographic scores. INTERPRETATION HA reduces migration of uncemented tibial components. This beneficial effect lasts for more than 10 years. Cemented components showed the lowest migration. Longitudinal follow-up of TKA with RSA allows early detection of secondary loosening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart G Pijls
- Bio Imaging Group (BIG), Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | - Bart L Kaptein
- Bio Imaging Group (BIG), Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Voigt JD, Mosier M. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011; 82:448-59. [PMID: 21657975 PMCID: PMC3237036 DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.590762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether there is a clinical benefit to adding hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings to total knee implants, especially with the tibial component, where failure of the implant more often occurs. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all prospective randomized trials for determining whether the overall clinical results (as a function of durability, function, and adverse events) favored HA-coated tibial components. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed for the years 1990 to September 16, 2010. We restricted our search to randomized controlled trials involving participants receiving either an HA-coated tibia or other forms of tibial fixation. The primary outcome measures evaluated were durability, function, and acute adverse events. RESULTS Data from 926 evaluable primary total knee implants in 14 studies were analyzed. Using an RSA definition for durability, HA-coated tibial components (porous or press-fit) without screw fixation were less likely to be unstable at 2 years than porous and cemented metal-backed tibial components (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.98; p = 0.04, I(2) = 39%, M-H random effects model). There was no significant difference in durability, as measured from revision and evaluated at 2 and 8-10 years, between groups. Also, functional status using different validated measures showed no significant difference at 2 and 5 years, no matter what measure was used. Lastly, there was no significant difference in adverse events. Limitations included small numbers of evaluable patients (≤ 50) in 7 of the 14 trials identified, and a lack of "hard" evidence of durability with need for replacement (i.e. frank failure, pain, or loss of functionality). INTERPRETATION In patients > 65 years of age, an HA-coated tibial implant may provide better durability than other forms of tibial fixation. Larger trials should be undertaken comparing the long-term durability, function, and adverse events of HA-coated implants with those of other porous-coated tibial implants in younger, more active OA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Voigt
- 99 Glenwood Rd., Ridgewood, NJ; Washburn University, Topeka, KS, USA
| | - Michael Mosier
- 99 Glenwood Rd., Ridgewood, NJ; Washburn University, Topeka, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|