Investigation of bone quality of the first and second sacral segments amongst trauma patients: concerns about iliosacral screw fixation

Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pelvic ring fractures are becoming more common in the aging population and can prove to be fatal, having mortality rates between 10% and 16%. Stabilization of these fractures is challenging and often require immediate internal fixation. Therefore, it is necessary to have a biomechanical understanding of the different fixation techniques for pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

A previously validated three-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and femur was used for this study. A unilateral pelvic ring fracture was simulated by resecting the left side of the sacrum and pelvis. Five different fixation techniques were used to stabilize the fracture. A compressive follower load and pure moment was applied to compare different biomechanical parameters including range of motion (contralateral sacroiliac joint, L1-S1 segment, L5-S1 segment), and stresses (L5-S1 nucleus stresses, instrument stresses) between different fixation techniques.

RESULTS

Trans-iliac-trans-sacral screw fixation at S1 and S2 showed the highest stabilization for horizontal and vertical displacement at the sacral fracture site and reduction of contralateral sacroiliac joint for bending and flexion range of motion by 165% and 121%, respectively. DTSF (Double transiliac rod and screw fixation) model showed highest stabilization in horizontal displacement at the pubic rami fracture site, while the L5_PF_W_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation with cross connectors) and L5_PF_WO_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation without cross connectors) showed higher rod stresses, reduced L1-S1 (approximately 28%), and L5-S1 (approximately 90%) range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer sacral screw fixations were superior in stabilizing sacral and contralateral sacroiliac joint range of motion. Lumbopelvic fixations displayed a higher degree of stabilization in the horizontal displacement compared to vertical displacement of pubic rami fracture, while also indicating the highest rod stresses. When determining the surgical approach for pelvic ring fractures, patient-specific factors should be accounted for to weigh the advantages and disadvantages for each technique.

Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of sacroiliac screw position and length on the biomechanical properties of triangular osteosynthesis in treating unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical reference.

METHODS

Unilateral Denis type II sacral fractures were modelled using finite elements to represent Tile C pelvic ring injuries. Six sacroiliac screws were used with iliolumbar fixation patterns to fix the sacral fractures, and the sacral stability, maximum pressure, and stress distribution were compared among the internal fixation modalities.

RESULTS

The best vertical stability of the internal fixation model was achieved when the S1 segment was fixed with lengthened sacroiliac screws, followed by when the S1 segment was fixed using normal sacroiliac screws. There was no significant difference in vertical stability between the S1 + S2 dual-segment fixation model and the S1-segment fixation model. The maximum pressure under a vertical force of 600 N showed a trend of L5LS1 < L5NS1 < L5LS12 < L5LS2 < L5NS2 < L5NS12.

CONCLUSIONS

In unilateral vertical sacral fractures (Denis II) treated with triangular osteosynthesis using triangular jointing combined with unilateral iliolumbar + sacroiliac screw fixation, the use of a single lengthened sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended to achieve the best vertical stability of the sacrum with less maximum compression on the internal fixation components. If it is not possible to apply a lengthened sacroiliac screw, the use of a normal sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended. Adding an S2 screw does not significantly increase the vertical stability of the sacrum.

Outcomes at 2 years follow-up of sacral fractures associated with unstable vertical pelvic ring injuries in obese patients: a multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sacral fractures with concomitant unstable pelvic ring injuries are severe conditions which occur in patients involved in high-energy trauma. When operative treatment is required, high surgical experience on the field is mandatory, especially in a sub-polpulation of obese patients which have increased risk of complications. The aim of this multicentric retroscpective study was to describe and analyze clinical and radiological outcomes of sacral vertical fractures in obese patients with a minimum of 2 years follow-up.   Methods: A total of 121 pelvic fractures admitted to Emergency Departments of three II level trauma centres from April 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, injury mechanism, surgical data and complications were collected. The quality of life and the pelvic function were respectively measured by SF-12 questionnaires, Denis Work Scale and Majeed Score. The inter-rater agreement between the clinical scores and the Denis Work Scale was assessed.   Results: A total of 19 patients were included in the study. The average follow up was 41.16 months. The average BMI was 38.63 and the mean abdominal circumference was 128.10 cm. The average Majeed and SF-12 scores were respectively 66.47 and 74.32. Five patients were able to return to their previous employment. The post traumatic life's quality and related dysfunctions are influenced by the high BMI.   Conclusions: Faster recovery and early weight-bearing should be persued in order to minimize complications, expecially in obese patients. In these sample of patients, "triangular osteosynthesis" was the best treatment choice for sacral vertical fractures.

Clinical evaluation of S1 alar screws application in short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion for spine infection with severe S1 vertebral body loss

Background

The one-stage posterior approach for treating spinal infection has recently been generally accepted. However, severe vertebral body loss caused by infection remains a major challenge in posterior surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical application and outcomes of S1 alar screws used in the one-stage posterior surgery of short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion after debridement for infection with severe S1 vertebral body loss.

Methods

The clinical features and treatment outcomes of 7 patients with spinal infections from August 2016 to August 2021 who were treated with one-stage posterior surgery using S1 alar screws were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data, including patient data, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), fusion time and complications of the patients, were recorded.

Results

All 7 patients were followed up for an average duration of 14.57 months (range, 12—18 months). The VAS score decreased significantly from 7.3 preoperatively (range, 6—8) to 2.6 postoperatively (range, 2—3). The ODI score demonstrated a steady and gradual increase from 73.8 preoperatively (range, 68—75) to 33.6 postoperatively (range, 30—37). Bony fusion time was observed approximately 6.8 months after surgery. Two patients in our study experienced the postoperative local pain, which could be relieved by analgesics and disappeared 3 months after the operation. There were no complications of intraoperative fracture, posterior wound infection or neurovascular injury.

Conclusions

S1 alar screws are suitable for use in the operation and could be an alternative option to S1 pedicle screws for short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion with severe S1 vertebral body loss caused by spinal infection, which could provide satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Trans-sacral screw fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries: review and expert opinion

Posterior pelvic ring injuries (i.e., sacro-iliac joint dislocations, fracture-dislocations, sacral fractures, pelvic non-unions/malunions) are challenging injury patterns which require a significant level of surgical training and technical expertise. The modality of surgical management depends on the specific injury patterns, including the specific bony fracture pattern, ilio-sacral joint involvement, and the soft tissue injury pattern. The workhorse for posterior pelvic ring stabilization has been cannulated iliosacral screws, however, trans-sacral screws may impart increased fixation strength. Depending on injury pattern and sacral anatomy, trans-sacral screws can potentially be more beneficial than iliosacral screws. In this article, the authors will briefly review pelvic mechanics and discuss their rationale for ilio-sacral and/or trans-sacral screw fixation.

Computer-aided automatic planning and biomechanical analysis of a novel arc screw for pelvic fracture internal fixation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The sacroiliac joint screw is a common fixation method for pelvic posterior ring fractures. The complex anatomical structure around the pelvis makes it impossible to find a suitable fixed path, which increases the difficulty of surgical operation. In this paper, we propose an automatic planning algorithm based on a computer-aided internal arc fixation channel for pelvic fractures for the first time.

METHODS

A channel generation algorithm based on seed derived points was designed, and the optimal channel was selected by scoring rules based on 3D erode algorithm for the generated channel. The biomechanical properties of the internal arc fixation screw and traditional internal straight fixation screw in three postures were compared using biomechanical finite element analysis.

RESULTS

The proposed algorithm verified the existence of a more adaptable internal arc fixation channel and can quantitatively plan a relatively optimal constant-curvature internal arc fixation channel in pelvises of ten adults. Significantly high stresses concentrated around the interaction region between the screws and bone may increase the risk of bone fractures and screw loosening in the long term. The experimental results show that the internal arc fixation screw has better strain and deformation performance than the internal straight fixation screw.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel arc internal fixation method for pelvic fractures was proposed to improve the safety and stability of screw fixation of pelvic fracture. The nonparametric test proved that the sacroiliac dislocation model repaired by internal arc fixation screw was significantly different from that repaired by internal straight fixation screw. The computer-aided automatic planning algorithm provides the possibility of robot-assisted pelvic fracture fixation.

Improving the Stability of a Hemipelvic Prosthesis Based on Bone Mineral Density Screw Channel and Prosthesis Optimization Design

In pelvic reconstruction surgery, the hemipelvic prosthesis can cause significant changes in stress distribution due to its high stiffness, and its solid structure is not suitable for osseointegration. The purpose of this study was to identify a novel bone mineral density screw channel and design the structure of the prosthesis so as to improve the distribution of stress, promote bone growth, and enhance the biomechanical properties of the prosthesis. The mechanical characteristics of bone mineral density screw and traditional screw were compared by finite element analysis method, and redesigned by topology optimization. The direction of the newly proposed screw channel was the posterolateral entrance of the auricular surface, ending at the contralateral sacral cape. Compared to the original group, the maximum stress of the optimized prosthesis was decreased by 24.39%, the maximum stress of the sacrum in the optimized group was decreased by 27.23%, and the average strain energy density of the sacrum in the optimized group was increased by 8.43%. On the surface of screw and connecting plate, the area with micromotion more than 28 μm is reduced by 12.17%. On the screw surface, the area with micromotion more than 28 μm is reduced by 22.9%. The newly determined screw channel and optimized prosthesis design can effectively improve the biomechanical properties of a prosthesis and the microenvironment of osseointegration. This method can provide a reference for the fixation of prostheses in clinical pelvic reconstruction.

Quantitative evaluation of the sacroiliac joint fixation in stress reduction on both sacroiliac joint cartilage and ligaments: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The sacroiliac joint fixation is the last resort for patients with prolonged and severe joint pain. Although the clinical results of anterior fixations are conclusive, there exist several inevitable drawbacks with the surgical method such as the difficulty performing the surgery due to the presence of many organs. The posterior fixation technique has thus been developed to overcome those inconveniences. This study aims to assess in silico the mechanical environment following posterior and anterior fixations, focusing on stresses in both the sacroiliac cartilage and dorsal ligamentous part, as well as loads experienced by the pelvic ligaments.

METHODS

Sacroiliac joint cartilage, dorsal ligamentous part stresses and pelvic ligaments loads were evaluated with three types of fixation models. A vertical load of 600 N was applied, equally distributed via both acetabula when standing and sitting.

FINDINGS

Results show that the anterior sacroiliac joint fixation reduced von Mises stresses in the cartilage and dorsal ligamentous part and decreased ligaments loads more extensively than the posterior fixation when compared to the untreated model as a reference. However, the posterior fixation still remains the desirable and preferential treatment.

INTERPRETATION

The anterior sacroiliac joint fixation showed better performances compared to the posterior one; however, the lower invasive aspect of the latter is a fundamental clinical advantage which also has the possibility to be improved by considering various screws and cages configurations. This study provides a beneficial suggestion to improve the current fixation technique.

Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

This article seeks to provide a narrative review regarding the ability of opportunistic information available from computed tomography (CT) scans to guide decisions in spine surgery related to patient bone quality.

METHODS

A review of the literature (limited to human and English language) was performed via PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms; "osteoporosis" AND "opportunistic" AND "computed tomography" AND "spine surgery." The titles and then abstracts of all identified citations were reviewed for inclusion by 2 of the authors (MS, BAF). Relevant articles were then studied in full text.

RESULTS

A review of the literature found 25 articles that were selected for inclusion in this narrative review. These articles were broadly divided into 4 subcategories: (1) opportunistic CT (oCT) and osteoporosis detection, (2) oCT data and the quality of screw fixation, (3) utilization of Hounsfield units to assess clinical and/or radiographic outcomes following spine fusion, and (4) virtual stress testing in spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

The literature on oCT, as well as associated virtual stress-testing techniques, demonstrate the potential to enhance spine surgery outcomes by preoperatively identifying at-risk patients in need of bone health optimization and informing best techniques for performing spinal fusion surgery on patients with diminished bone quality. While our narrative summary of the limited literature to date suggests a promising future for oCT data, significant additional research and/or radiographic workflow standardization is needed to validate these methods for clinical use.

Posterior pelvic ring bone density with implications for percutaneous screw fixation

BACKGROUND

Although the second (S2) and third (S3) sacral segments have been established as potential osseous fixation pathways for screw fixation, the S2 body has been demonstrated to have inferior bone density when compared to the body of the first (S1) sacral segment. Caution regarding the use of iliosacral screws at this level has been advised as a result. As transiliac-transsacral screws traverse the lateral cortices of the posterior pelvis, they may be relying on bone with superior density for purchase, which could obviate this concern. The objective of this study was to compare the bone density of the posterior ilium and sacroiliac joint to that of the sacral body at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed, reviewing the CT scans of 100 patients without prior pelvic trauma. Each CT was confirmed to have available osseous fixation pathways at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral segments. The bone density of the posterior ilium/sacroiliac joint (PISJ) and sacral body (SB) was measured using the embedded standardized Hounsfield units (HU) tool at each sacral level.

RESULTS

The average S2 PISJ bone density (320.1) was significantly higher than the S1 (286.5) and S3 (278.9) PISJ (p < 0.0001) and S1 and S3 PISJ was not statistically different. The S1 sacral body bone density (231.1) was significantly higher than the S2 (182.1) and S3 (126.8) bone density (p < 0.0001). The PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at every sacral level (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The S2 PISJ bone density is significantly greater than S1. The S1, S2, and S3 PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at all sacral levels, and the S1 body has higher bone density than the S2 and S3 bodies. These differences in bone density may have implications for the stability of posterior pelvic ring fixation constructs with regard to screw purchase.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Case cohort series.

Bone density of first and second segments of normal and dysmorphic sacra

Background

Iliosacral screw fixation is safe and effective but can be complicated by loss of fixation, particularly in patients with osteopenic bone. Sacral morphology dictates where iliosacral screws may be placed when stabilizing pelvic ring injuries. In dysmorphic sacra, the safe osseous corridor of the upper sacral segment (S1) is smaller and lacks a transsacral corridor, increasing the need for fixation in the second sacral segment (S2). Previous evidence suggests that S2 is less dense than S1. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to further evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) of the S1 and S2 iliosacral osseous pathways through morphology stratification into normal and dysmorphic sacra.

Materials and methods

Pelvic computed tomography scans of 50 consecutive trauma patients, aged 18 to 50 years, from a level 1 trauma center were analyzed prospectively. Five radiographic features (upper sacral segment not recessed in the pelvis, mammillary bodies, acute alar slope, residual S1 disk, and misshapen sacral foramen) were used to identify dysmorphic characteristics, and sacra with four or five features were classified as dysmorphic. Hounsfield unit values were used to estimate the regional BMD of S1 and S2. Student’s t-test was utilized to compare the mean values at each segment, with statistical significance being set at p < 0.05. No change in clinical management occurred as a result of inclusion in this study.

Results

A statistical difference in BMD was appreciated between S1 and S2 in both normal and dysmorphic sacra (p < 0.0001), with 28.4% lower density in S2 than S1. Further, S1 in dysmorphic sacra tended to be 4% less dense than S1 in normal sacra (p = 0.047). No difference in density was appreciated at S2 based on morphology.

Conclusions

Our results would indicate that, based on BMD alone, fixation should be maximized in S1 prior to fixation in S2. In cases where S2 fixation is required, we recommend that transsacral fixation should be strongly considered if possible to bypass the S2 body and achieve fixation in the cortical bone of the ilium and sacrum.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Bone Mineral Density Mapping of Iliosacral Region: The Use of Hounsfield Units to Optimize Transsacral Screw Trajectory

Introduction

Trauma, degenerative, pediatric, and neuromuscular deformities often require placement of implants into sacrum for construct stability. In these scenarios, fixation to the ilium is often added. To date, multiple studies have validated the correlation between Hounsfield units (HU) as measured on computed tomography and bone mineral density (BMD) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess bone quality and fracture risk. We sought to map the BMD of the iliosacral region at the S1 and S2 levels using HU.

Materials and Methods

Pelvic CT scans of 100 patients were evaluated. HU measurements were taken from the anterior and posterior ilium, sacral ala, and sacral body using a best-fit circle encompassing a maximal amount of cancellous bone. Following the collection of all data points, an analysis of variance model was created to test the means and standard deviations of each anatomic region.

Results

The highest mean BMD was found in the following locations (in descending order): S1 sacral body (279.72 HU, 95% confidence interval [CI], 261.75–297.69), S1 anterior ilium (254.45 HU, 95% CI, 236.64–272.27), S2 anterior ilium (229.88 HU, 95% CI, 211.39–248.36), and the S2 sacral body (191.58 HU, 95% CI, 173.31–209.85). Comparing the anterior ilium to the sacral ala, there was a higher BMD measurement at both the S1 level by 151.7 HU (p &lt; 0.001) and the S2 level by 170.3 HU (p &lt; 0.001). The anterior ilium also showed a significantly higher BMD when compared to measurements taken at the posterior ilium at the same level: at the S1 level by 100.5 HU (p &lt; 0.001) and at the S2 level by 52.2 HU (p = 0.0006). The vertebral body had significantly higher mean BMD measurements when compared to the sacral ala at the S1 level by 176.9 HU (p &lt; 0.001) and at the S2 level by 131.95 HU (p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings indicate that there is significantly higher BMD density of the anterior ilium and sacral body when compared to the sacral ala at both the S1 and S2 levels. In addition, the anterior ilium appears to provide more dense bone than the posterior ilium, as measured by mean HU.

BMI and gender increase risk of sacral fractures after multilevel instrumented spinal fusion compared with bone mineral density and pelvic parameters

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sacral fractures are a rare but potentially devastating complication. Long-fusion constructs, including the sacrum, that do not extend to the pelvis may result in sacral fractures. Besides established risk factors including gender, age, and number of levels fused, body mass index (BMI), pelvic parameters, and bone mineral density (BMD) have also been proposed as potential risk factors for postoperative sacral fractures. The literature supporting this, however, is limited.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to assess whether preoperative pelvic parameters, BMI, or BMD of patients with sacral fracture are different compared with age, gender, and fusion level-matched non-fracture controls.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion at a single academic institution between 2002 and 2016 were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measure was occurrence of a postoperative sacral fracture.

METHODS

Patients with sacral fractures after posterior instrumented spinal fusion, including the sacrum, were retrospectively identified and matched 2:1 with non-fracture controls based on gender, age, and number of levels fused. Patients with concurrent spinopelvic fixation or missing preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were excluded. Preoperative sagittal balance was assessed using lateral radiographs. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) assessment included standard measurements at L1/L2 and additional experimental measurements of the S1 body and sacral ala.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with sacral fracture were matched to non-fracture controls. The majority of the patients with sacral fracture was female (76.2%) and of advanced age (mean 66.4 years). Fracture and control groups were well matched with respect to gender, age, and number of levels fused. Standard measurements at L1/L2 showed no significant difference in BMD between the fracture and the control groups (109.9 mg/cm³ vs. 116.4 mg/cm³, p=.414). Similarly, there was no significant BMD differences between the groups using the experimental measurements of the S1 body (183.6 mg/cm³ vs. 176.2 mg/cm³, p=.567) and the sacral ala (8.9 mg/cm³ vs. 4.8 mg/cm³, p=.616). Mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and pelvic tilt were not significantly different between the groups. Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of experiencing a sacral fracture was approximately six times higher for obese patients compared with normal or underweight patients. After controlling for BMI in multivariate conditional logistic regression models, BMD was still not significantly associated with the odds of experiencing sacral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the association of preoperative BMD measured by QCT, pelvic parameters, and BMI with postoperative sacral fractures in a large patient cohort. Interestingly, our data do not show any difference in preoperative pelvic parameters and BMD between the groups. This is in line with previous reports that indicate only a few patients with sacral fracture after fusion surgery have clear evidence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density as a measure of bone quantity, rather than bone quality, may not be as important in these fractures as previously thought. Obesity, however, was associated with higher odds of experiencing postoperative sacral fractures. The present study thereby challenges the widespread concept that obesity is a protective factor against fractures in the elderly. In summary, our results suggest that BMI and gender, more than pelvic parameters and BMD, are risk factors for postoperative sacral fractures.

Computational analysis on the feasibility of transverse iliosacral screw fixation for different sacral segments

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of transverse iliosacral (TIS) screw placement in different segments of the sacrum and measure the parameters of the unilateral iliosacral (IS) screw in the case that cannot be inserted the TIS screw.

METHODS

This study used 100 pelvic continuous computed tomography images. Mimics (Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System) was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional pelvis model. All sacrums were divided into the normal group and dysmorphic group. Any difference in osseous fixation pathway (OFP) diameter in the first two segments between both groups was investigated. In dysmorphic sacrums, the optimal inserting angle and length of the unilateral S1 screw were measured. The number of foramen in every sacrum was recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-two sacrums had sacral dysmorphism. The OFP diameter for the S2 TIS screw in the dysmorphic group was larger than that in the normal group (p = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated the cutoff values as 20.55 mm and 15.18° for the S1 front edge height and S1S2 angle, respectively. In the dysmorphic case, the unilateral S1 IS screw should be inserted with a cephalad incline angle of 36.14 ± 5.97° and a ventrally incline angle of 37.33 ± 4.64°. S3 TIS screw placement rate was 53.1% in the dysmorphic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common cause of sacral dysmorphism is the fusion of the L5 to the true S1. In dysmorphic sacrums, the unilateral IS screw should be placed obliquely in the S1 segment, and the S2 segment usually has a sufficient OFP for the TIS screw. Using S3 TIS screw and two TIS screws in the first segment technique is not recommended because of a high risk.

Anatomic Parameters for Instrumentation of the Sacrum and Pelvis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Multiple cadaver and radiographic analyses have been performed to define the surgical anatomy of the sacrum and pelvis. We provide a comprehensive review of this information, creating an accurate anatomic guide for practice and research.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify publications citing sacral or iliac morphometric parameters based on cadaver or radiographic anatomy.

RESULTS

A total of 780 abstracts were evaluated. Fifty-six articles were included for final review and grouped into four sections: (1) bone density, (2) bony corridors, (3) screw length and trajectory, and (4) neurovascular and alimentary anatomy.

CONCLUSION

A systematic analysis of the radiographic and gross anatomic features of the sacrum has yet to be published. This review includes details on the spatial arrangement of the S1 and S2 pedicle screws, sacroiliac screws, iliac screws, S2 alar iliac screws, and pelvic neurovascular anatomy. The study can be referenced by clinicians for sacral dissection, implant application, and ongoing advances in orthopaedic research.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Fusion typically consists of joint preparation, grafting, and rigid fixation. Fusion has been successfully used to treat symptomatic disruptions of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and degenerative sacroiliitis using purpose-specific, threaded implants. The biomechanical performance of these systems is important but has not been studied.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare two techniques for placing primary (12.5 mm) and secondary (8.5 mm) implants across the SIJ.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a human cadaveric biomechanical study of SIJ fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pure-moment testing was performed on 14 human SIJs in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) with motion measured across the SIJ. Specimens were tested intact, after destabilization (cutting the pubic symphysis), after decortication and implantation of a primary 12.5-mm implant at S1 plus an 8.5-mm secondary implant at either S1 (S1-S1, n=8) or S2 (S1-S2, n=8), after cyclic loading, and after removal of the secondary implant. Ranges of motion (ROMs) were calculated for each test. Bone density was assessed on computed tomography and correlated with age and ROM. This study was funded by Zyga Technology but was run at an independent biomechanics laboratory.

RESULTS

The mean±standard deviation intact ROM was 3.0±1.6° in FE, 1.5±1.0° in LB, and 2.0±1.0° in AR. Destabilization significantly increased the ROM by a mean 60%-150%. Implantation, in turn, significantly decreased ROM by 65%-71%, below the intact ROM. Cyclic loading did not impact ROM. Removing the secondary implant increased ROM by 46%-88% (non-significant). There was no difference between S1-S1 and S1-S2 constructs. Bone density was inversely correlated with age (R=0.69) and ROM (R=0.36-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation with two threaded rods significantly reduces SIJ motion even in the presence of joint preparation and after initial loading. The location of the secondary 8.5-mm implant does not affect construct performance. Low bone density significantly affects fixation and should be considered when planning fusion constructs. Findings should be interpreted in the context of ongoing clinical studies.

CT-based evaluation of volumetric bone density in fragility fractures of the pelvis-a matched case-control analysis

This matched case-control study compared the computed tomography (CT)-based regional bone density of patients with fragility fractures of the sacrum to a control without fracture. Patients with a sacral fracture demonstrated a significantly lower regional bone density of the sacrum, the sacral bone density not being correlated with the BMD by DXA of the spine.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to compare the computed tomography-based regional bone density measured by Hounsfield units (HUs) in patients with and without fragility fractures of the sacrum.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 50 years with a fragility fracture of the sacrum were compared to patients of similar age and gender who had a fall from standing height without fracture (n = 46). A matched case-control analysis was conducted by retrospective chart review and assessment of areal bone mineral density by lumbar DXA and by volumetric regional HU measurements in uncalibrated CT scans of the sacrum.

RESULTS

Patients with a sacral fracture (age 74 ± 11 years) showed a lower bone density in the body of S1 (HU 85 ± 22) when compared to the matched control group without fracture (age 73 ± 10 years, HU 125 ± 37, p < 0.001). The CT-based bone density of S1 did not correlate with the DXA values of the lumbar spine (r = 0.223, p = 0.136), and lumbar spine T-scores did not differ between the groups (- 2.0 ± 1.3 vs. - 1.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.786). All measurements are based on uncalibrated scans, and absolute HU values are restricted to scans made on Siemens SOMATOM Force or SOMATOM Edge scanners.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with fragility fractures of the sacrum demonstrated a lower regional volumetric bone density of the sacrum when compared to a cohort without a fracture. Local sacral volumetric bone density as measured by CT seems to be independent from the areal BMD as measured by DXA of the lumbar spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level III.

Is S3 a Viable Osseous Fixation Pathway?

OBJECTIVES

To report the incidence of patients with a third sacral segment (S3) osseous fixation pathway (OFP) that could accommodate a transiliac-transsacral screw.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Regional Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 250 patients without pelvic trauma from January 2017 to February 2017 were included.

INTERVENTION

The axial and sagittal reconstruction images of each patient's computed abdomen and pelvis tomography (CT) scans were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Each CT was evaluated for the presence of sacral dysmorphism and whether an S3 OFP that could accommodate an intraosseous transiliac-transsacral screw exists.

RESULTS

There were 130 of the 250 patients (52%) with sacral dysmorphism. Overall, 38 of the 250 patients (15.2%) had an S3 OFP that could accommodate a 7.0-mm transiliac-transsacral style screw. When narrowed to patients who had an S3 OFP, 38 of 153 patients (24.8%) could accommodate a 7.0-mm transiliac-transsacral screw. Specific to the 38 patients with an adequate S3 OFP, 34 of 38 patients (89.5%) were noted to have sacral dysmorphism.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that 15.2% of patients have an S3 OFP large enough to accommodate an intraosseous implant. Patients who have sacral dysmorphism are more likely to have an adequate S3 OFP. Additional studies are needed to quantify the S3 OFP, understand the bone quality of the S3 segment and accompanying biomechanical implications, and investigate the anatomical concerns associated with S3 screw placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fluoroscopic iliosacral screw placement made safe

AIM

Unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries should be stabilised successfully by percutaneous iliosacral screwing. The intervention takes place under intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. The inlet and outlet views are crucial and are performed by tilting the image intensifier. Safely interpreting fluoroscopic views can be challenging in certain clinical scenarios. We demonstrated on a series of patients howpreoperative CT scans can be used to anticipate the appropriate intraoperative inlet and outlet fluoroscopic views and positioning of the patient on the operating table, thereby avoiding possible operating table obstacles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed at random 30 pelvic CT scans from patients of different ages and both sexes, utilising the sagittal reconstructions. Inlet and outlet angle measurements were calculated on the scans to determine the appropriate intraoperative inlet and outlet views.

RESULTS

The analysed CT scans showed an average inlet view of 22.3° (range 10.4°-39.8°) and an average outlet view of 42.3° (range 31.5°-53.1°). Sex and age had no influence on results. The calculated required free space under the operating table for unobstructed tilting of the C-arm was a minimum of 145cm.

CONCLUSION

The significant anatomic variations of the posterior pelvic ring have been well documented in the literature. The angles required to obtain appropriate intraoperative inlet and outlet views are not perpendicular and differ greatly from traditional settings, which directed the beam 45° caudally and 45° cranially. The fluoroscopic beam would need to be angled differently in each patient to obtain ideal cardinal views that ultimately assist in safe iliosacral screw placement. To avoid collision of the C-arm with the operating table, it is essential to provide secure free space under the operating table of at least 145cm.

Opportunistic Use of CT Imaging for Osteoporosis Screening and Bone Density Assessment: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical opportunities for the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for inferring bone quality and to critically analyze the correlation between dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and diagnostic CT as reported in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed in February 2016 using the PubMed interface. The inclusion criteria were English language, studies performed using living human subjects, studies pertaining to orthopaedics, use of conventional diagnostic CT scans, studies that measured cancellous bone, and studies that reported Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements directly rather than a computed bone mineral density.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies that reported on a total of 9,109 patients were included. Of these, 10 studies correlated HU measurements of trabecular bone with DXA-based bone assessment. Reported correlation coefficients ranged between 0.399 and 0.891, and 5 of the studies reported appropriate threshold HU levels for diagnosing osteoporosis or osteopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct HU measurement from diagnostic CT scans has the potential to be used opportunistically for osteoporosis screening, but in its current state it is not ready for clinical implementation. There is a lack of exchangeability among different machines that limits its broad applicability. Future research efforts should focus on identifying thresholds at specific anatomic regions in high-risk patients in order to have the greatest impact on patients. However, using diagnostic CT to infer region-specific osteoporosis could be extraordinarily valuable to orthopaedic surgeons and primary care physicians, and merits further research.