A modified Austin/chevron osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus

Outcomes of modified chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to detect the effect of a modified chevron osteotomy on hallux valgus (HV) deformity at five-year follow up.

METHODS

Twenty patients with symptomatic HV who underwent modified chevron osteotomy between June 2014 and January 2016 were included in the present study. The minimum follow-up duration was five years. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively, six weeks postoperatively and five years postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and cosmetic and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

The AOFAS score improved from 54.40 ( ± 4.58) preoperatively to 94.30 ( ± 2.15) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 96.95 ( ± 1.54) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The VAS scores decreased from 6.30 ( ± 1.17) preoperatively to 0.15 ( ± 0.37) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean intermetatarsal angle improved from 16.00° ( ± 2.20°) preoperatively to 4.15° ( ± 1.22°) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 4.40° ( ± 1.39°) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean HV angle also improved, from 32.70° ( ± 5.34°) preoperatively to 4.80° ( ± 1.40°) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 5.20° ( ± 1.32°) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The cosmetic results were either excellent or good in 19 patients (95%). There was no recurrence in this study during the five postoperative years.

CONCLUSION

A modified chevron osteotomy can achieve successful correction of moderate-to-severe HV, with excellent outcomes at five-year follow up.

Modern approaches to the treatment of hallux rigidus

The number of patients with degenerative joint pathology is steadily increasing. Arthrosis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux rigidus) is no exception, it occurs in 20-35 % of young and working people who lead a mobile lifestyle and is manifested by a symptom complex, including pain and a significant restriction of the function of the entire lower limb. The leading cause of the pathology development is degenerative-dystrophic changes in the joint, leading to pain syndrome and restriction of movement. Today, there are a large number of treatment options, both conservative and surgical. The choice of a specific surgical intervention from the entire variety of options is a difficult task, it is strictly individual and requires consideration of various clinical manifestations of the disease and a number of other factors. So, if 10 years ago arthrodesis was considered a gold standard for the HR treatment, today most authors recommend organ-sparing treatment, in particular, shortening osteotomies of the metatarsal bone with a possible use of scaffolds for the regeneration of articular cartilage. The article analyzes the main results of the HR surgical treatment presented in the publications of national and foreign specialists. In some cases, our own recommendations on the choice of the method are suggested.

A New Alternative Surgical Treatment of Hallux Valgus, in Moderate to Severe Cases of the Disease With a Two-and-a-Half-Year Follow-Up

The study aims to evaluate the treatment of moderate to severe forms of hallux valgus with the lowest invasiveness in soft tissues and especially with an alternative modified Chevron osteotomy of the first metatarsal. Additionally, it emphasizes the necessity of the modified McBride procedure (capsuloplasty and release of specific concrete soft tissue structures) and the importance of the soft tissue manipulation in the particular surgery intra-operatively, as well as postoperative medical and personal care and duration of rehabilitation. Patients with an average age 58 years (range 51-65), who underwent a Chevron type osteotomy with combination of soft tissues interventions laterally and medially of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, for symptoms they had of systematic hallux valgus without any other degenerative problems in metatarsophalangeal joint between 2017 to the beginning of 2018, were retrospectively reviewed with an average follow-up of 29 months (range 26-31).

The influence of obesity and gender on outcome after reversed L-shaped osteotomy for hallux valgus

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus deformity (HV) affects around every fourth individual, and surgical treatment is performed in every thousandth person. There is an ongoing quest for the best surgical management and reduction of undesirable outcomes. The aim was to explore associations of obesity and gender with radiological and clinical outcome after reversed L-shaped osteotomy (ReveL) for HV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out in a retrospective cohort design at a single University Hospital in Switzerland between January 2004 and December 2013. It included adult patients treated with ReveL for HV. The primary exposure was body mass index (BMI) at the time of ReveL. The secondary exposure was gender. The primary outcome was radiological relapse of HV (HV angle [HVA] > 15 degrees [°]) at the last follow-up. Secondary outcomes were improvable patient satisfaction, complication, redo surgery, and optional hardware removal. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

The median weight, height, and BMI were 66.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 57.0-76.0) kilograms (kg), 1.65 (IQR 1.60-1.71) metres (m), and 24.0 (IQR 21.3-27.8) kg/m². Logistic regression analysis did not show associations of relapse with BMI, independent of age, gender, additional technique, and preoperative HVA (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adjusted] = 1.10 [95% (%) confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-1.45], p = 0.675). Relapse was 91% more likely in males (OR_adjusted = 1.91 [95% CI = 1.19-3.06], p = 0.007). Improvable satisfaction was 79% more likely in males (OR_adjusted = 1.79 [CI = 1.04-3.06], p = 0.035). Hardware removal was 47% less likely in males (OR_adjusted = 0.53 [95% CI 0.30-0.94], p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, obesity was not associated with unsatisfactory outcomes after ReveL for HV. This challenges the previous recommendation that preoperative weight loss may be necessary for a successful surgical treatment outcome. Males may be informed about potentially higher associations with unfavourable outcomes. Due to the risk of selection bias and lack of causality, findings may need to be confirmed with clinical trials.

Radiological and Clinical Outcome After Reversed L-Shaped Osteotomy: A Large Retrospective Swiss Cohort Study

The objective was to report radiological and clinical outcomes after reversed L-shaped osteotomy (ReveL) for hallux valgus (HV). A retrospective cohort study was performed between January 2004 and December 2013. The primary outcome was radiological recurrence of HV (HV angle [HVA] >15°). There were various exposure and secondary outcome variables. The results showed a median follow-up of 12.0 months (N = 827). Radiological recurrence, limited patient satisfaction, complication, revision surgery, and elective hardware removal were found in 25.0%, 15.3%, 4.6%, 2.5%, and 26.7%. Median pre- to postoperative changes were highest for HVA (delta = -16.7°). Recurrence was more likely in cases with preoperative HVA ≥40° (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adjusted]) 3.63, p < .001). Revisions were more likely with concomitant diseases and bilateral surgery (OR_adjusted 12.53, p = .010; OR_adjusted 3.35, p = .030). Hardware removal was less likely in patients ≥50 years (OR_adjusted 0.67, p = .014). In conclusion, ReveL was a good surgical option for HV because of the relatively low rates of unfavorable outcomes.

The influence of the number of screws and additional surgical procedures on outcome in hallux valgus treatment

Background

Surgical treatment of hallux valgus (HV) is one of the major flagships of orthopedic surgeons. Due to relatively unsatisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes, the search for the best surgical technique and causes for unsatisfactory outcomes continues. The objective was to investigate associations of the number of screws and additional surgical techniques for HV with radiological and clinical outcome after reversed L-shaped osteotomy (ReveL).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of adults from a single University Hospital between 2004 and 2013 was performed. The primary exposure was the number of screws (one vs two) used for osseous fixation after ReveL. The secondary exposure was an additional surgical technique for HV (e.g., Akin osteotomy). The primary outcome was a radiological recurrence of HV (HV angle (HVA) > 15°) at last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were limited patient satisfaction, complication, revision surgery, and elective hardware removal. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by logistic regression adjusting for confounders.

Results

The recurrence was 45% less likely with the use of one screw, independent of age, sex, additional technique, and preoperative HVA (odds ratio (OR_adjusted) = 0.55 [95% CI 0.30–0.98], p = 0.043). The recurrence was 162% more likely with an additional surgical technique for HV (OR_adjusted = 2.62 [1.24–5.52], p = 0.011).

Conclusion

In ReveL for HV, a single screw (instead of two screws) may be sufficient enough for a similar or even better outcome, which may also reduce costs. Additional surgical procedures for HV may be refrained from if possible. Due to limitations of a retrospective study, results may need validation with clinical trials.