1
|
Hughes SE, Aiyegbusi OL, McMullan C, Turner GM, Anderson N, Cruz Rivera S, Collis P, Glasby J, Lasserson D, Calvert M. Patient-reported outcomes in integrated health and social care: A scoping review. JRSM Open 2024; 15:20542704241232866. [PMID: 38529208 PMCID: PMC10962043 DOI: 10.1177/20542704241232866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have potential to support integrated health and social care research and practice; however, evidence of their utilisation has not been synthesised. Objective To identify PRO measures utilised in integrated care and adult social care research and practice and to chart the evidence of implementation factors influencing their uptake. Design Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Data sources Six databases (01 January 2010 to 19 May 2023). Study selection Articles reporting PRO use with adults (18+ years) in integrated care or social care settings. Review methods We screened articles against pre-specified eligibility criteria; 36 studies (23%) were extracted in duplicate for verification. We summarised the data using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results We identified 159 articles reporting on 216 PRO measures deployed in a social care or integrated care setting. Most articles used PRO measures as research tools. Eight (5.0%) articles used PRO measures as an intervention. Articles focused on community-dwelling participants (35.8%) or long-term care home residents (23.9%), with three articles (1.9%) focussing on integrated care settings. Stakeholders viewed PROs as feasible and acceptable, with benefits for care planning, health and wellbeing monitoring as well as quality assurance. Patient-reported outcome measure selection, administration and PRO data management were perceived implementation barriers. Conclusion This scoping review showed increasing utilisation of PROs in adult social care and integrated care. Further research is needed to optimise PROs for care planning, design effective training resources and develop policies and service delivery models that prioritise secure, ethical management of PRO data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Hughes
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan L Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Grace M Turner
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicola Anderson
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jon Glasby
- School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- IMPACT (Improving Adult Social Care Together), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rand S, Forder J, Malley J. A study of dyadic interdependence of control, social participation and occupation of adults who use long-term care services and their carers. Qual Life Res 2017; 26:3307-3321. [PMID: 28786019 PMCID: PMC5681980 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Unpaid care is an important source of support of people with long-term conditions. Interdependence of carers' and care recipients' quality of life would be expected due to the relational nature of caregiving. This study aims to explore interdependence of quality of life in carer/care-recipient dyads, especially in relation to mutual interdependence due to social feedback in the caregiving relationship and also the partner effects of one partner's experience of long-term care support on the other's outcomes. METHODS Using data collected in an interview survey of 264 adults with care support needs and their unpaid carers in England, we employed regression analysis to explore whether there is mutual interdependence of care-related quality of life within carer/care-recipient dyads for three quality of life attributes: Control over daily life, Social participation and Occupation. The influence of factors, including satisfaction with long-term care, were also considered on individuals' and dyad partners' care-related quality of life. RESULTS We found mutual interdependence of quality of life at the dyad-level for Control over daily life, but not Occupation or Social participation. A partner effect of care recipients' satisfaction with long-term care on carers' Control over daily life was also observed. Higher care recipient satisfaction with care services was associated with higher Control over daily life. By contrast, for Social participation and Occupation, there were only significant effects of care recipients' satisfaction with long-term care and their own quality of life. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the importance of considering the wider impact beyond the individual of long-term care on quality of life in the evaluation of long-term care policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Cornwallis Building, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
| | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Cornwallis Building, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Juliette Malley
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science, Cowdray House, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|