CTLA-4 affects expression of key cell cycle regulators of G0/G1 phase in neoplastic lymphocytes from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Engineered biological nanoparticles as nanotherapeutics for tumor immunomodulation

Biological nanoparticles, or bionanoparticles, are small molecules manufactured in living systems with complex production and assembly machinery. The products of the assembly systems can be further engineered to generate functionalities for specific purposes. These bionanoparticles have demonstrated advantages such as immune system evasion, minimal toxicity, biocompatibility, and biological clearance. Hence, bionanoparticles are considered the new paradigm in nanoscience research for fabricating safe and effective nanoformulations for therapeutic purposes. Harnessing the power of the immune system to recognize and eradicate malignancies is a viable strategy to achieve better therapeutic outcomes with long-term protection from disease recurrence. However, cancerous tissues have evolved to become invisible to immune recognition and to transform the tumor microenvironment into an immunosuppressive dwelling, thwarting the immune defense systems and creating a hospitable atmosphere for cancer growth and progression. Thus, it is pertinent that efforts in fabricating nanoformulations for immunomodulation are mindful of the tumor-induced immune aberrations that could render cancer nanotherapy inoperable. This review systematically categorizes the immunosuppression mechanisms, the regulatory immunosuppressive cellular players, and critical suppressive molecules currently targeted as breakthrough therapies in the clinic. Finally, this review will summarize the engineering strategies for affording immune moderating functions to bionanoparticles that tip the tumor microenvironment (TME) balance toward cancer elimination, a field still in the nascent stage.

The prognostic and therapeutic potentials of CTLA-4 in hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Hematological Malignancies (HMs) are a group of progressive, difficult-to-treat, and highly recurrent diseases. A suppressed phenotype of the immune system is present in HMs and growing evidence indicates the role of Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-Associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in the course of HMs.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the recent literature on the role of CTLA-4 in different subtypes of HMs. Here, the studies on the expression pattern, its effect on the prognosis of different HMs, and polymorphisms of CTLA-4 have been elaborated. Finally, the effect of targeting CTLA-4 in vitro and in vivo, as well as in clinical trials, is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

According to the recent literature, CTLA-4 is overexpressed in different HMs, which is correlated with poor survival, while it is associated with better a prognosis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Targeting CTLA-4 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Sezary Syndrome (SS), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL), and so on, is helpful. While this is not recommended and may even be harmful in multiple myeloma (MM) and CLL. Also, it seems that certain CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms are efficient factors in the course of HMs. Future studies may broaden our knowledge regarding the role of CTLA-4 in HMs.

Differential regulation of CTLA4 expression through BTK-dependent and independent mechanisms in CLL

Ibrutinib suppresses CLL cell CTLA4 expression in vitro and in vivo.

CTLA4 expression on CLL is regulated by non-BTKs that differ from T-cell CTLA4 regulation.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) is a major immune checkpoint and target for cancer immunotherapy. Although originally discovered and primarily studied on T cells, its role on other cell types has also been recognized in recent years. Here we describe an unexpected interaction between ibrutinib (a targeted inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase [BTK]) and CTLA4 expression on malignant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. Although BTK itself does play a role in CTLA4 expression in CLL, we demonstrate that ibrutinib’s main suppressive effect on CTLA4 protein expression and trafficking occurs through non-BTK targets influenced by this drug. This suppression is not seen in T cells, indicating a different mechanism of CTLA4 regulation in CLL vs T cells. Appreciating this distinct mechanism and the beneficial non-BTK effects of ibrutinib may contribute to understanding the immune benefits of ibrutinib treatment and lead to therapeutic approaches to improve immune function in patients with CLL by suppressing CTLA4 expression.

BTLA Expression in CLL: Epigenetic Regulation and Impact on CLL B Cell Proliferation and Ability to IL-4 Production

In our previous study, while chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cases showed higher levels of B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) mRNA compared to controls, lower BTLA protein expression was observed in cases compared to controls. Hence we hypothesize that micro RNA (miR) 155-5p regulates BTLA expression in CLL. In line with earlier data, expression of BTLA mRNA and miR-155-5p is elevated in CLL (p = 0.034 and p = 0.0006, respectively) as well as in MEC-1 cell line (p = 0.009 and 0.016, respectively). Inhibition of miR-155-5p partially restored BTLA protein expression in CLL patients (p = 0.01) and in MEC-1 cell lines (p = 0.058). Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the significance of BTLA deficiency in CLL cells on proliferation and IL-4 production of B cells. We found that secretion of IL-4 is not dependent on BTLA expression, since fractions of BTLA positive and BTLA negative B cells expressing intracellular IL-4 were similar in CLL patients and controls. We demonstrated that in controls the fraction of proliferating cells is lower in BTLA positive than in BTLA negative B cells (p = 0.059), which was not observed in CLL. However, the frequency of BTLA positive Ki67+ B cells in CLL was higher compared to corresponding cells from controls (p = 0.055) while there were no differences between the examined groups regarding frequency of BTLA negative Ki67+ B cells. Our studies suggest that miR-155-5p is involved in BTLA deficiency, affecting proliferation of CLL B cells, which may be one of the mechanisms responsible for CLL pathogenesis.

Deregulated Expression of Immune Checkpoints on Circulating CD4 T Cells May Complicate Clinical Outcome and Response to Treatment with Checkpoint Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Unlike solid-tumor patients, a disappointingly small subset of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors derive clinical benefits, suggesting differential participation of inhibitory receptors involved in the development of T-cell-mediated immunosuppression. In fact, T cells in MM patients have recently been shown to display features of immunosenescence and exhaustion involved in immune response inhibition. Therefore, we aimed to identify the dominant inhibitory pathway in MM patients to achieve its effective control by therapeutic interventions. By flow cytometry, we examined peripheral blood (PB) CD4 T cell characteristics assigned to senescence or exhaustion, considering PD-1, CTLA-4, and BTLA checkpoint expression, as well as secretory effector function, i.e., capacity for IFN-γ and IL-17 secretion. Analyses were performed in a total of 40 active myeloma patients (newly diagnosed and treated) and 20 healthy controls. At the single-cell level, we found a loss of studied checkpoints’ expression on MM CD4 T cells (both effector (Teff) and regulatory (Treg) cells) primarily at diagnosis; the checkpoint deficit in MM relapse was not significant. Nonetheless, PD-1 was the only checkpoint distributed on an increased proportion of T cells in all MM patients irrespective of disease phase, and its expression on CD4 Teff cells correlated with adverse clinical courses. Among patients, the relative defect in secretory effector function of CD4 T cells was more pronounced at myeloma relapse (as seen in declined Th1/Treg and Th17/Treg cell rates). Although the contribution of PD-1 to MM clinical outcomes is suggestive, our study clearly indicated that the inappropriate expression of immune checkpoints (associated with dysfunctionality of CD4 T cells and disease clinical phase) might be responsible for the sub-optimal clinical response to therapeutic checkpoint inhibitors in MM.

Abnormal Expression of BTLA and CTLA-4 Immune Checkpoint Molecules in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the peripheral accumulation of neoplastic B cells and is frequently complicated by the systemic immunosuppression associated with an impairment in B and T lymphocyte activation. We hypothesized that the expression of immune checkpoint suppressors B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4) is disturbed in both lymphocyte subpopulations in CLL. The expression of CTLA-4 and BTLA mRNA was determined by real-time PCR, while CTLA-4 protein expression (surface or intracellular) was estimated in BTLA+ lymphocytes by flow cytometry. In CLL patients, we observed a higher gene transcript level of BTLA and CTLA-4 than in healthy individuals in both freshly isolated and PMA stimulated B and T cells. Remarkably, lower amounts of both inhibitory proteins were found in peripheral blood (PB) CLL B cells, whereas normal BTLA and elevated CTLA-4 were found in T cells. Consistently, there was a prevalence of CTLA-4+ cells within circulating BTLA+ T cells cells of patients confronting PB healthy cells. After in vitro stimulation, the only change found in CLL patients was a decrease in BTLA expression in B and T lymphocytes. In contrast, healthy lymphocytes responded more vigorously as regards the BTLA and CTLA expression with substantially higher frequency of CD69+ cells under the stimulating condition compared to corresponding cells from the CLL group. Our results indicate that CLL development is associated with the affected expression of BTLA and CTLA-4 checkpoint receptors in PB and its impaired expression might be associated with lowering of the threshold for B cell activation and proliferation, while upregulated CTLA-4 expression in CLL peripheral BTLA+ T cells may contribute to suppressed T cell effector functions. This hypothesis needs to be validated in future studies, which would allow us to explain how the increased or decreased expression of these molecules affects the cell function.

The potentials of immune checkpoints for the treatment of blood malignancies

Immune checkpoints are the regulators of the immune system, which include stimulatory and inhibitory receptors. They play substantial roles in the maintenance of immune system homeostasis and the prevention of autoimmunity and cancer. In the current review, immune checkpoints roles are surveyed in the initiation, progression, and treatment of blood malignancies. The significant roles of immune checkpoints are discussed as clinical markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of a plethora of blood malignancies and also as potential targets for the treatment of these malignancies. It could be concluded that the regulation of immune checkpoints in various blood cancers can be employed as a novel strategy to obtain effective results in leukemia treatment and introduce immune checkpoint inhibitors as sufficient weapons against blood cancers in the future.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for combating T-cell dysfunction in cancer

Under normal conditions, the immune system responds effectively to both external and internal threats without damaging healthy tissues. Cells undergoing a neoplastic transformation are one such threat. An efficient activation of T cells is enabled by T-cell receptor (TCR) interactions with antigen-presenting class I and class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), co-stimulatory molecules, and cytokines. After threatening stimuli are removed from the body, the host's immune response ceases, which prevents tissue damage or chronic inflammation. The recognition of foreign antigens is highly selective, which requires multistep regulation to avoid reactions against the antigens of healthy cells. This multistep regulation includes central and peripheral tolerance toward the body's own antigens. Here, we discuss T-cell dysfunction, which leads to poor effector function against foreign antigens, including cancer. We describe selected cellular receptors implicated in T-cell dysfunction and discuss how immune-checkpoint inhibitors can help overcome T-cell dysfunction in cancer treatment.

Immune checkpoint blockade for hematologic malignancies: a review

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with impressive responses seen in a broad variety of tumor types. Blockade of immune checkpoints and immune signaling antibodies has shown promise in multiple types of hematologic malignancies (HMs), with dramatic single agent responses for pembrolizumab and nivolumab in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). In this review, we outline the current state of immune checkpoint blockade drug development in HMs, and discuss mechanisms of activity and resistance, and highlight potential targets in the immune tumor microenvironment (TME). Blockade of T-cell checkpoint molecules PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are the most clinically mature of the immune checkpoint strategies. Novel and upcoming strategies for immune checkpoint blockade drug development in HMs using innovative combinations to modulate immunologic targets shows significant promise as a way to expand the number of patients with blood cancers who could benefit from immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint blockade: Releasing the brake towards hematological malignancies

Tumor cells utilize co-inhibitory molecules to avoid host immune destruction. Checkpoint blockade has emerged as a promising approach to treat cancer by restoring T cell effector function and breaking a tumor permissive microenvironment. Patients with hematological malignancies often have immune dysregulation, thus the role of checkpoint blockade in treatment of these neoplasms is particularly intriguing. In early trials, antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed death 1 (PD-1) signaling pathway have displayed significant efficacy with minimal toxicity in patients with relapsed and refractory hematological neoplasms. In this review, we provide evidence of dysregulation of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-Ls in the context of several major types of hematological neoplasms and summarize relevant clinical practice points for checkpoint blockade. The preclinical rationale and preliminary clinical data of potential combination approaches designed to optimize checkpoint antagonists are well presented.

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) differ in the pattern of CTLA-4 expression on CLL cells: the possible implications for immunotherapy with CTLA-4 blocking antibody

Recently, systemic administration of a human monoclonal antibody directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) expressed on circulating T cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has been considered. Also, CLL cells have been shown to express CTLA-4, increased levels of which in the leukaemic compartment are a predictor of good clinical outcome. Since both CLL and Treg microenvironment cells can be targeted by the CTLA-4 blocking antibody in this immunotherapy approach, the investigation of the functional effect of CTLA-4 blockade on CLL cells might be of potential clinical relevance. The main aim of this study was to examine the effect of CTLA-4 blockade on proliferation activity and apoptosis of CLL cells in patients with low and high CTLA-4 expression. We found that in the high CTLA-4-expressing CLL group, CTLA-4 blockade on the CLL cell surface resulted in a significant increase in the median percentages of Ki67⁺ cells and a tendency to decrease in the proportion of apoptotic cells. In contrast, in the low CTLA-4 expressors, CTLA-4 blockade did not affect the proliferation activity or the frequency of apoptosis. This study reports for the first time the different effect of CTLA-4 blockade on CLL cells in CLL patients depending on the levels of CTLA-4 expression. CTLA-4 blockade seems to induce pro-survival signals in leukaemic cells from CLL patients exhibiting high CTLA-4 expression, suggesting that an immunotherapy approach based on the systemic use of monoclonal anti-CTLA-4 antibodies could be an unfavourable strategy for some CLL patients.