Globulin–platelet model predicts significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in CHB patients with high HBV DNA and mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels

Utilizing the International Normalized Ratio-Platelet Index for Predicting Hospital Outcomes After Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a public health issue due to its elevated mortality rates. The International Normalized Ratio-platelet index (INR-Plt index) has recently been recognized as a predictive factor for liver disease progression. The potential of applying the INR-Plt index in forecasting ICH prognosis presents an intriguing subject. This study endeavors to examine the correlation between the INR-Plt index and hospital outcomes in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH.

METHODS

A retrospective examination of 283 adult ICH patients was undertaken. The INR-Plt index was computed using the formula: [INR/platelet counts (1000/μL)] × 100. The clinical outcomes evaluated consisted of mortality rates and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge. An unfavorable outcome was defined as an mRS score from 4 to 6.

RESULTS

The study found a significant correlation between the INR-Plt index and hospital mortality (odds ratio: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.07-17.31, P = 0.04). There was a 43% rise in mortality risk for every 0.1 unit increase in the INR-Plt index. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated a considerably lower survival rate at discharge for patients with an INR-Plt index >0.8 (log-rank test: P = 0.047). Regarding unfavorable outcomes, the INR-Plt index was not a significant factor according to logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The INR-Plt index is a predictor of hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH. A higher INR-Plt index value is associated with an increased risk of mortality, underlining the potential usefulness of this composite index in guiding clinical decision-making and enabling risk stratification.

Non-Invasive Serum Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Cirrhosis in Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) and AIH-Primary Biliary Cholangitis Overlap Syndrome (AIH-PBC): Red Cell Distribution Width to Platelet Ratio (RPR) Yielded the Most Promising Result

Several serum biomarkers for fibrosis assessment have been proposed in various liver diseases, but in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or overlap with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC; AIH-PBC) patients, the data are scarce. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to validate six non-invasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4 fibrosis) in such patients. We included adult patients diagnosed with AIH or AIH-PBC overlap syndrome who underwent a liver biopsy between 2011 and 2021. Laboratory data were collected to calculate the following scores: red cell distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR), aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio (AAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR). A total of 139 patients were eligible (111 AIH and 28 AIH-PBC). The prevalence of cirrhosis was 35.3% (36% in AIH and 32.1% in AIH-PBC). The AUROCs of the RPR, FIB-4, APRI, AAR, LPR, and NLR in all patients were 0.742, 0.724, 0.650, 0.640, 0.609, and 0.585, respectively. RPR was significantly superior to APRI, NLR, and LPR. Moreover, RPR showed the highest AUROC (0.915) in the overlap AIH-PBC subgroup. In conclusion, RPR yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy to predict cirrhosis in AIH and AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients, while FIB-4 was considerably optimal.

Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein as a Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Background and Objectives: Non-invasive methods for evaluating liver fibrosis have been a crucial focus of clinical research. The aim of the current study is to assess the accuracy of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in determining the stage of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who are positive for HBeAg. Materials and Methods: The current study included a total of 276 HBeAg-positive CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy. The levels of serum AFP were measured in these patients using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. The correlations between serum AFP levels and other laboratory parameters were analyzed using Spearman's correlation analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent associations between serum AFP levels and liver fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of serum AFP and other non-invasive markers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 59 (21.4%) patients were found to have elevated levels of serum AFP (>7 ng/mL). These patients displayed a significantly higher proportion of both advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis compared to those with normal serum AFP levels (0-7 ng/mL). The level of serum AFP was positively associated with levels of serum globulin (GLB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TBIL), as well as the AST-to-platelet ratio (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and Scheuer's classification, and negatively correlated with platelet (PLT) counts. Furthermore, serum AFP was found to be independently associated with significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The results of the ROC analysis showed that serum AFP was an effective predictor of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.773 (95% CI: 0.721-0.821), 0.889 (95% CI: 0.847-0.923), and 0.925 (95% CI: 0.887-0.953), respectively. These values are higher than those of the APRI and FIB-4. Conclusions: Serum AFP could serve as a valuable supplemental biomarker for determining the severity of liver fibrosis in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Construction of a Lasso regression-based prediction model for development of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a global epidemic, and its progression to cirrhosis is often overlooked by patients. Noninvasive diagnostic models for cirrhosis, which are developed using common clinical indicators, can provide reference value for the early diagnosis and treatment of cirrhosis in CHB.

AIM

To construct a prediction model for cirrhosis based on common clinical indicators.

METHODS

Patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy at the Department of Infectious Diseases, The First or Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from 2010 to 2018 were selected, and their laboratory test indicators were collected and compared between patients with and without cirrhosis. Lasso regression model was used to screen the variables with predictive value for cirrhosis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a prediction model for cirrhosis. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the discrimination performance of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the benefit of the model, and calibration curve-based analysis (CA) was performed to assess the calibration of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 1087 CHB cases were included, of which 135 had cirrhosis. All indicators were statistically different between the two groups except for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, alanine transaminase (ALT) (P < 0.05). Lasso regression analysi identified the predictive variables as age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and platelet count (PLT). A prediction model for cirrhosis was developed by multifactorial logistic regression analysis: Logit P = 1.26 + 0.02 × age + 0.001 × AFP - 0.10 × ALB + 0.07 × GLB + 0.004 × GGT - 0.02 × PLT. The AUC of the model for predicting cirrhosis was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.87). DCA suggested that the use of the developed prediction model resulted in an increased net benefit for the patients, and CA suggested that the predictive effect of the prediction model was in accordance with the actual outcome.

CONCLUSION

The present study has developed a prediction model for cirrhosis based on age, AFP, ALB, GLB, GGT, and PLT in patients with CHB, and it is useful for the early diagnosis of cirrhosis in CHB.

Analysis of the positive results and influencing factors of hepatitis B antibody in hospitalized neonates with AgHBs positive mothers

Purpose

To investigate the results of positive antibody to hepatitis surface antigen(anti-HBs)in hospitalized neonates whose mothers were hepatitis B surface antigen (AgHBs) positive and to explore the influencing factors.

Method

The study subjects were hospitalized neonates whose mothers were positive for AgHBs. According to the serological test results of five immune markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV), they were divided into positive for anti-HBs and negative for anti-HBs. Retrospective analysis of relevant factors affecting results of anti-HBs.

Result

269 cases (80.78%) were positive for anti-HBs and 64 cases (19.22%) were negative for anti-HBs. Univariate analysis results: the number of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) injections after birth, whether HBIG was injected within 6 h, whether Hepatitis B vaccine (Hep B) was injected within 6 h, whether combined immunization within 12 h, whether Hep B was vaccinated on time after discharge, whether preterm birth, and whether low birth weight infants were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis: HBIG injection time ≤6 h (OR = 0.213), combined immunization time ≤12 h (OR = 0.024) were protective factors; premature infants (OR = 7.175), ALB/GLO (OR = 9.792) and failure to complete three vaccinations on time (OR = 12.659) were risk factors (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Although China has implemented a national immunization program, vaccination of hospitalized neonates whose mothers are positive for AgHBs has not been effective. Therefore, it is recommended to strengthen training for medical staff and families to ensure that neonates can complete the three doses of vaccination on time after discharge from the hospital and to strengthen follow-up for premature infants.

Performance of noninvasive tools for identification of minimal liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B virus infection

Background

Various noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment tools are available. Here, we evaluated the performance of the asparagine aminotransferase‐to‐platelet ratio index (APRI), the fibrosis‐4 index (FIB‐4), transient elastography (TE), and the globulin–platelet (GP) ratio for identifying liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Methods

A total of 146 patients were assessed using TE, FIB‐4, APRI, the GP ratio, and liver biopsy. Three patient grouping methods were applied: any fibrosis (AF; F0 vs. F1/2/3/4); moderate fibrosis (MF; F0/1 vs. F2/3/4); and severe fibrosis (SF; F0/1/2 vs. F3/4). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, univariate analyses, and multivariate logistic regression were conducted.

Results

Regardless of patient‐grouping method, the area under the curve (AUC) of TE and the GP ratio were similar. Using the AF grouping method, the GP ratio showed superior performance compared with APRI and FIB‐4: the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB‐4 were 0.76, 0.75, 0.70, and 0.66, respectively. Using the MF grouping method, the GP ratio also showed superior performance compared with APRI and FIB‐4: the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB‐4 were 0.66, 0.68, 0.57, and 0.53, respectively. Using the SF grouping method, the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB‐4 were not significantly different.

Conclusion

Compared with FIB‐4 and APRI, the GP ratio had higher accuracy for identifying liver fibrosis, especially early‐stage fibrosis, in patients with HBV infection.

INR-to-platelet ratio (INPR) as a novel noninvasive index for predicting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

Objective: We aimed to investigate whether a novel noninvasive index, i.e., the international normalized ratio-to-platelet ratio (INPR), was a variable in determining liver fibrosis stage in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: A total of 543 treatment-naïve CHB patients were retrospectively enrolled. Liver histology was assessed according to the Metavir scoring scheme. All common demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. Results: Based on routine clinical parameters (age, sex, HBeAg status, HBV DNA, hematological parameters, coagulation index, and liver biochemical indicators), a novel index, i.e., the INR-to-platelet ratio (INPR), was developed to magnify the unfavorable effects of liver fibrosis on INR and platelets. The AUCs of INPR for predicting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.74, 0.76 and 0.86, respectively. Compared with APRI, FIB-4, and GPR, the INPR had comparable predictive efficacy for significant fibrosis and better predictive performance for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Conclusion: INPR could be an accurate, easily calculated and inexpensive index to assess liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. Further studies are needed to verify this indicator and compare it with other noninvasive methods for predicting liver fibrosis in CHB patients.

Comparison and evaluation of non-invasive models in predicting liver inflammation and fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels

Few studies have paid attention to the performances of non-invasive models in diagnosing stages of liver fibrosis and inflammation, which are critical for early and accurate assessment of prognostication and decisions on antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis B infection patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels (≤2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)). This study aimed to investigate the value of routine serum markers in evaluation of liver inflammation and fibrosis in these patients.A total of 370 consecutive chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. The Scheuer scoring system was adopted as the pathological standard for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) and the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were used to analyze the performances of the models, including aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4), red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR), globulin-platelet model (GP), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio index (GPR).To predict significant inflammation (G ≥2), the AUROC of APRI was higher than that of FIB-4 (0.705 vs 0.629, P = .001), RPR (0.705 vs 0.593, P < .001) and GP (0.705 vs 0.620, P = .002), equivalent to that of GPR (0.705 vs 0.690, P = .606). As for severe inflammation (≥G3) and significant fibrosis (≥S2), there was no statistic difference among them. To predict severe fibrosis (≥ S3), the AUROC of FIB-4 was higher than that of RPR (0.805 vs 0.750, P = .006) and GP (0.805 vs 0.755, P = .046), comparable to that of APRI (0.805 vs 0.785, P = .550) and GPR (0.805 vs 0.818, P = .694). As for significant liver histological changes (G ≥ 2 or/and S ≥ 2), the performance of APRI was higher than that of RPR (0.717 vs 0.652, P = .006), GP (0.717 vs 0.659, p = .011), equivalent to that of FIB-4 (0.717 vs 0.692, P = .254) and GPR (0.717 vs 0.680, P = .166).We found that APRI, GPR, and FIB-4 were more effective than RPR and GP for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Platelet count is closely associated with the severity of liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A cross-sectional study

Although the platelet count may provide clues regarding the severity of liver disease, there are currently no available data supporting the utility of the platelet count to evaluate the degree of liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The present study aimed to determine the association between the platelet count and the severity of liver injury in patients with chronic HBV infection. A total of 941 patients were included and were stratified into a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A group and a CTP class B/C group using the CTP scoring system. A total of 53 patients underwent liver biopsy. The pathological stage F4 was defined as cirrhosis based on the METAVIR scoring system. Compared with that in patients with CTP class A, the platelet count in patients with CTP class B/C was lower (P<0.001). Similarly, for patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, the platelet count was significantly different between the CTP class B/C and A groups (P<0.001). The platelet count was inversely correlated with the CTP score (r=-0.420, P<0.001) and independently associated with CTP grade B/C [odds ratio (OR), 0.994; 95% CI, 0.990-0.999; P=0.009]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the platelet count to distinguish CTP grade B/C from A was 0.712 and 0.791, respectively, in all patients with HBV infection and the subset with normal ALT levels. In addition, compared to patients with chronic hepatitis B, patients with cirrhosis had a lower platelet count and higher aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) (P<0.001). The platelet count was inversely correlated with FIB-4 (r=-0.855, P<0.001) and APRI (r=-0.741, P<0.001). The AUC for the platelet count to distinguish cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis B was 0.927 (sensitivity, 78.76%; specificity, 92.22%). Among patients who underwent liver biopsy, the platelet count in those with F4 was lower compared with that in patients with ≤F3 (P=0.013). The platelet count was inversely correlated with the pathological stage (r=-0.295, P=0.032) and was independently associated with F4 (OR, 0.978; 95% CI, 0.960-0.997; P=0.026). The AUC of the platelet count to distinguish F4 from patients with ≤F3 was 0.761. In conclusion, the platelet count may be used as a non-invasive marker to assess the severity of liver injury and of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection.

Noninvasive inflammatory markers for assessing liver fibrosis stage in autoimmune hepatitis patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of noninvasive inflammatory markers in predicting liver fibrosis stage in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 55 patients with AIH and 60 healthy controls in this study, and divided them into three groups: F0 (control); F1-F3 (noncirrhotic fibrosis); and F4 (cirrhosis). The following markers were analyzed for all participants: lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio (LNR); lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR); lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); immunoglobulin-to-platelet ratio (IGPR); aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI); aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR); and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4). The predictive accuracy of these noninvasive markers was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were used to analyze associations between the noninvasive markers and liver fibrosis stage.

RESULTS

AAR, LPR, LMR, IGPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were linked to liver fibrosis-stage (P < 0.05), with correlation indices of - 0.219, 0.258, - 0.149, 0.647, 0.841, and 0.704, respectively, but not LNR (P = 0.093). area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LPR, IGPR, AAR, LMR, APRI, and FIB-4 for detecting cirrhosis (F4 vs. F0-F3) were 0.936 (95% confidence interval: 0.870-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.939 (0.875-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.528 (0.319-0.738, P = 0.768), 0.555 (0.409-0.700, P = 0.568), 0.798 (0.694-0.902, P = 0.002), and 0.881 (0.796-0.967, P < 0.001). Our multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage, with a coefficient of 0.385 (95% confidence interval: 0.103-0.667, P = 0.007) and 14.903 (2.091-27.786, P = 0.023), respectively.

CONCLUSION

LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage in treatment-naive AIH, and were superior to APRI and FIB-4 in detecting cirrhosis.

Recent advances in assessment and treatment of chronic hepatitis B

This paper reviews the recent advances in the assessment and treatment of chronic hepatitis B with regard to predicting inflammation and fibrosis with non-invasive biomarkers and transient elastography, clinical benefits of long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) antiviral therapy, serological benefits (HBeAg and HBsAg loss) of concurrent or sequential NAs and pegylated interferon, as well as risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

A Noninvasive Score to Predict Liver Fibrosis in HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B Patients with Normal or Minimally Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

Noninvasive fibrosis tests are highly needed but have not been well studied in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or minimally elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. This study is aimed at developing a noninvasive score system to predict liver fibrosis in these patients. HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with ALT levels of <80 IU/l and liver histology (n = 290) were assigned to training (n = 203) or validation (n = 87) groups. Training group patients were divided into nonsignificant (F0–1) and significant fibrosis (F2–4) according to METAVIR stages. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors for liver fibrosis and develop a score system. The capacity of the score to identify the severity of fibrosis was displayed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under ROC (AUROC) values. Multivariate logistic regression showed that HBeAg (ratios of the sample to the cutoff values (S/CO)) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM; kilopascals (kPa)) were independent factors of liver fibrosis. A score system composed of HBeAg and LSM by assigning a point of 1, 2, or 3 to different HBeAg and LSM levels, respectively, was developed. The scores 2-3, 4, and 5-6 of the sum of HBeAg and LSM points indicated nonsignificant, indeterminate, and significant fibrosis, respectively. The score system had an AUROC of 0.880 and showed similar performance in validation group patients. The accuracy for identifying significant and nonsignificant fibrosis was 77.14% in validation group patients and 71.26% in the entire group of patients. It is suggested that this noninvasive score system can accurately predict hepatic fibrosis and may reduce the need for liver biopsy in HBeAg-positive patients with normal or minimally elevated ALT levels.

Value of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-to-platelet ratio in diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To investigate the value of the gamma-glutamyltraspeptidase (GGT)-to-platelet (PLT) ratio (GPR) in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We included 390 untreated CHB patients in this study. The GPR, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-PLT ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) of all patients were analysed to determine if these parameter were correlated with age, gender, medical history, liver function [total bilirubin (TBil), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and AST], GGT, PLT count, or hepatic fibrosis stage. The GPR, APRI, and FIB-4, as well as the combination of the GPR and APRI or the GPR and FIB-4 were assessed in different cirrhosis stages using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate their value in diagnosing hepatic fibrosis in CHB patients.

RESULTS

The GPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were not correlated with CHB patients’ age, gender, or disease duration (P > 0.05), but all of these parameters were positively correlated with serum ALT, AST, GGT, and PLT count (P < 0.01). Additionally, the GPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were positively correlated with hepatic fibrosis (P < 0.01); the areas under the ROC curve for the GPR in F1, F2, F3, and F4 stages were 0.723, 0.741, 0.826, and 0.833, respectively, which were significantly higher than the respective values for the FIB-4 and APRI (F1: 0.581, 0.612; F2: 0.706, 0.711; F3: 0.73, 0.751; and F4: 0.799, 0.778). The respective diagnostic cut-off points for each stage were 0.402, 0.448, 0.548, and 0.833, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 88.8% and 87.5% in F1, 72.7% and 89.7% in F2, 81.3% and 98.6% in F3, and 80% and 97.4% in F4 when the GPR and APRI were connected in parallel; 86.6% and 90.2%, 78.4% and 96%, 78.6% and 97.4%, and 73.2% and 97.9%, respectively, when the GPR and APRI were connected in series; 80.2% and 89%, 65% and 89%, 70.3% and 98.5%, and 78.8% and 96.8%, respectively, when the GPR and FIB-4 were connected in parallel; and 83.6% and 87.9%, 76.8% and 96.6%, 72.7% and 98%, and 74.4% and 97.7%, respectively, when the GPR and FIB-4 were connected in series.

CONCLUSION

The GPR, as a serum diagnostic index of liver fibrosis, is more accurate, sensitive, and easy to use than the FIB-4 and APRI, and the GPR can significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic fibrosis diagnosis in CHB when combined with the FIB-4 or APRI.