Evaluation of fracture strength of different restoration techniques applied to C-shaped 3D model teeth

Application of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM system to molars

Computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems have been widely used as a fabrication method for restorations because of their high efficiency and accuracy, which significantly reduces fabrication time. However, molars with insufficient clearance or short clinical crown lengths require retention holes or grooves on the preparation, making it difficult to replicate the shapes with the CAM milling system. In these cases, restorations using the lost-wax method are selected. This article focuses on one-piece endodontic crowns (endocrowns) fabricated with a CAD-CAM system (CAD-CAM endocrowns), in which their posts and crowns are integrated. Articles from July 2012 to August 2023 were searched in PubMed with the keyword "endocrown". This review discusses the application of CAD-CAM endocrowns to molars from the viewpoint of model experiment (fracture resistance, adaptation) and clinical research. This technique, which allows margins and internal gaps to be set within the clinically acceptable range, is reported to be an effective way of restoring molars with high survival rates in clinical research.

Effect of preparation design on the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of 3D printed one-piece endodontic crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The impact of various preparation designs on the fracture resistance and fracture type of mandibular premolars restored with 3 dimensionally (3D) printed, 1-piece endodontic crowns remains unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different preparation designs on the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of mandibular premolars restored with 3D printed 1-piece endodontic crowns after thermal aging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five freshly extracted mandibular premolars received 3 different preparation designs: with at least 2 intact cuspal walls (2CW), with only 1 intact cuspal wall (1CW), and no cuspal wall present (NoCW). One-piece endodontic crowns were designed by using a computer-aided design (CAD) software program, 3D printed, cemented to the prepared teeth with self-adhesive resin cement, and thermocycled between 5 °C and 55 °C in artificial saliva. Subsequently, all specimens were subjected to a fracture test. The results were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA (α=.05), and fracture types of all specimens were examined using a light microscope.

RESULTS

The analysis of fracture resistance values across separate designs revealed no statistically significant differences (P>.05). Mean fracture resistance values were 724.5 N in 2CW, 713 N in 1CW, and 861 N in NoCW. In 2CW and 1CW, the 1-piece endodontic crowns mostly displayed Type III fractures, whereas those in NoCW exhibited a combination of Type II and Type III fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The mandibular premolar 1-piece endodontic crowns tested in this study exhibited similar fracture resistance and type of fracture with different preparation designs.