1
|
Kim HJ, Choi WJ, Gwon HY, Jang SJ, Chae EY, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim HH. Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3924-3934. [PMID: 37938383 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10422-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the improvement of mammography interpretation for novice and experienced radiologists assisted by two commercial AI software. METHODS We compared the performance of two AI software (AI-1 and AI-2) in two experienced and two novice readers for 200 mammographic examinations (80 cancer cases). Two reading sessions were conducted within 4 weeks. The readers rated the likelihood of malignancy (range, 1-7) and the percentage probability of malignancy (range, 0-100%), with and without AI assistance. Differences in AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed. RESULTS Mean AUROC increased in both novice (0.86 to 0.90 with AI-1 [p = 0.005]; 0.91 with AI-2 [p < 0.001]) and experienced readers (0.87 to 0.92 with AI-1 [p < 0.001]; 0.90 with AI-2 [p = 0.004]). Sensitivities increased from 81.3 to 88.8% with AI-1 (p = 0.027) and to 91.3% with AI-2 (p = 0.005) in novice readers, and from 81.9 to 90.6% with AI-1 (p = 0.001) and to 87.5% with AI-2 (p = 0.016) in experienced readers. Specificity did not decrease significantly in both novice (p > 0.999, both) and experienced readers (p > 0.999 with AI-1 and 0.282 with AI-2). There was no significant difference in the performance change depending on the type of AI software (p > 0.999). CONCLUSION Commercial AI software improved the diagnostic performance of both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. Further validation with a larger number of cases and readers is needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Commercial AI software effectively aided mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers. KEY POINTS • Mammography interpretation remains challenging and is subject to a wide range of interobserver variability. • In this multi-reader study, two commercial AI software improved the sensitivity of mammography interpretation by both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. • Commercial AI software may effectively support mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Woo Jung Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| | - Hye Yun Gwon
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22, Gwanpyeong-Ro 170-Gil, Dongan-Gu, Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 14068, South Korea
| | - Seo Jin Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Eun Young Chae
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hee Jung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Joo Hee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hak Hee Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malik M, Yasmin S, Kumar A, Hassan Y, Rizvi Y, Iffat. Can Artificial Intelligence Beat Humans in Detecting Breast Malignancy on Mammograms? Cureus 2023; 15:e46208. [PMID: 37908910 PMCID: PMC10614479 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study was aimed at identifying how useful Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) could be in reducing false-negative reporting in mammography and early detection of breast cancer at an early stage as the best protection is early detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care setup of Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute (AECH-NORI), where 33 patients with suspicious findings on mammography and subsequent biopsy-proven malignancy were included. The findings of mammography including the lesion type, breast parenchymal density, and sensitivity of CAD detection, as well as the final biopsy results, were recorded. A second group of 40 normal screening mammograms was also included who had no symptoms, had Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category I(BI-RADS I) mammograms, and had no pathology identified on correlative sonomammography as well. RESULTS A total of 35 masses, 11 pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification, five clustered foci of macrocalcification, and nine lesions with pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification and two with pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification only were included. The CAD system was able to identify 26 masses (74%), eight lesions with pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification (72%), five foci of macrocalcification (100%), six lesions with pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification (66%), and two pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification without formed mass (100%). The overall sensitivity of the CAD system was 75.8%. CAD was able to identify 13 out of 16 masses with invasive ductal carcinoma (81.3%), eight out of nine lesions proven as invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (88.9%), two out of five masses with invasive lobular carcinoma (40%), four out of four masses with invasive mammary carcinoma (100%), and zero out of one lesion identified as medullary carcinoma (0%). There was 100% detection for pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification without formed mass with CAD marking two out of two mammograms. CONCLUSION CAD performed better with combined lesions, accurately marked pleomorphic clusters of microcalcification, and identified small lesions in predominant fibrofatty parenchymal density but was not reliable in dense breast, areas of asymmetric increased density, summation artifacts, edematous breast parenchyma, and retroareolar lesions. It also performed poorly with ill-defined lesions of invasive lobular carcinoma. Human intelligence hence beats CAD for the diagnosis of breast malignancy in mammograms as per our experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Malik
- Radiology, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute (NORI), Islamabad, PAK
| | - Saeeda Yasmin
- Internal Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, PAK
| | - Anish Kumar
- Internal Medicine, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College and Hospital, Sukkur, PAK
| | - Yumna Hassan
- Internal Medicine, Insight Hospital and Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Yusra Rizvi
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Iffat
- Radiology, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute (NORI), Islamabad, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hooshmand S, Reed WM, Suleiman ME, Brennan PC. SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY: DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY-ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 2020S. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021; 197:54-62. [PMID: 34729603 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Diagnostic efficacy in medical imaging is ultimately a reflection of radiologist performance. This can be influenced by numerous factors, some of which are patient related, such as the physical size and density of the breast, and machine related, where some lesions are difficult to visualise on traditional imaging techniques. Other factors are human reader errors that occur during the diagnostic process, which relate to reader experience and their perceptual and cognitive oversights. Given the large-scale nature of breast cancer screening, even small increases in diagnostic performance equate to large numbers of women saved. It is important to identify the causes of diagnostic errors and how detection efficacy can be improved. This narrative review will therefore explore the various factors that influence mammographic performance and the potential solutions used in an attempt to ameliorate the errors made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahand Hooshmand
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Warren M Reed
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Mo'ayyad E Suleiman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Patrick C Brennan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Do YA, Jang M, Yun BL, Shin SU, Kim B, Kim SM. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Microcalcification on Mammography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081409. [PMID: 34441343 PMCID: PMC8392744 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) compared to that of dedicated breast radiologists in characterizing suspicious microcalcification on mammography. We retrospectively analyzed 435 unilateral mammographies from 420 patients (286 benign; 149 malignant) undergoing biopsy for suspicious microcalcification from June 2003 to November 2019. Commercial AI-CAD was applied to the mammography images, and malignancy scores were calculated. Diagnostic performance was compared between radiologists and AI-CAD using the area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUC). The AUCs of radiologists and AI-CAD were not significantly different (0.722 vs. 0.745, p = 0.393). The AUCs of the adjusted category were 0.726, 0.744, and 0.756 with cutoffs of 2%, 10%, and 38.03% for AI-CAD, respectively, which were all significantly higher than those for radiologists alone (all p < 0.05). None of the 27 cases downgraded to category 3 with a cutoff of 2% were confirmed as malignant on pathological analysis, suggesting that unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. Our findings suggest that the diagnostic performance of AI-CAD in characterizing suspicious microcalcification on mammography was similar to that of the radiologists, indicating that it may aid in making clinical decisions regarding the treatment of breast microcalcification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Ah Do
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (Y.A.D.); (M.J.); (B.L.Y.); (S.U.S.)
| | - Mijung Jang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (Y.A.D.); (M.J.); (B.L.Y.); (S.U.S.)
| | - Bo La Yun
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (Y.A.D.); (M.J.); (B.L.Y.); (S.U.S.)
| | - Sung Ui Shin
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (Y.A.D.); (M.J.); (B.L.Y.); (S.U.S.)
| | - Bohyoung Kim
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 17035, Korea;
| | - Sun Mi Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (Y.A.D.); (M.J.); (B.L.Y.); (S.U.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-787-7609
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Džoić Dominković M, Ivanac G, Radović N, Čavka M. WHAT CAN WE ACTUALLY SEE USING COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION IN MAMMOGRAPHY? Acta Clin Croat 2020; 59:576-581. [PMID: 34285427 PMCID: PMC8253062 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.04.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The main goal of this study was to compare the results of computer aided detection (CAD) analysis in screening mammography with the results independently obtained by two radiologists for the same samples and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CAD for breast lesions. A total of 436 mammograms were analyzed with CAD. For each screening mammogram, the changes in breast tissue recognized by CAD were compared to the interpretations of two radiologists. The sensitivity and specificity of CAD for breast lesions were calculated using contingency table. The sensitivity of CAD for all lesions was 54% and specificity 16%. CAD sensitivity for suspicious lesions only was 86%. CAD sensitivity for microcalcifications was 100% and specificity 45%. CAD mainly ‘mistook’ glandular parenchyma, connective tissue and blood vessels for breast lesions, and blood vessel calcifications and axillary folds for microcalcifications. In this study, we confirmed CAD as an excellent tool for recognizing microcalcifications with 100% sensitivity. However, it should not be used as a stand-alone tool in breast screening mammography due to the high rate of false-positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Džoić Dominković
- 1Department of Radiology, Orašje General Hospital, Orašje, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 3University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Gordana Ivanac
- 1Department of Radiology, Orašje General Hospital, Orašje, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 3University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Niko Radović
- 1Department of Radiology, Orašje General Hospital, Orašje, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 3University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Mislav Čavka
- 1Department of Radiology, Orašje General Hospital, Orašje, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 3University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rogers W, Thulasi Seetha S, Refaee TAG, Lieverse RIY, Granzier RWY, Ibrahim A, Keek SA, Sanduleanu S, Primakov SP, Beuque MPL, Marcus D, van der Wiel AMA, Zerka F, Oberije CJG, van Timmeren JE, Woodruff HC, Lambin P. Radiomics: from qualitative to quantitative imaging. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190948. [PMID: 32101448 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically, medical imaging has been a qualitative or semi-quantitative modality. It is difficult to quantify what can be seen in an image, and to turn it into valuable predictive outcomes. As a result of advances in both computational hardware and machine learning algorithms, computers are making great strides in obtaining quantitative information from imaging and correlating it with outcomes. Radiomics, in its two forms "handcrafted and deep," is an emerging field that translates medical images into quantitative data to yield biological information and enable radiologic phenotypic profiling for diagnosis, theragnosis, decision support, and monitoring. Handcrafted radiomics is a multistage process in which features based on shape, pixel intensities, and texture are extracted from radiographs. Within this review, we describe the steps: starting with quantitative imaging data, how it can be extracted, how to correlate it with clinical and biological outcomes, resulting in models that can be used to make predictions, such as survival, or for detection and classification used in diagnostics. The application of deep learning, the second arm of radiomics, and its place in the radiomics workflow is discussed, along with its advantages and disadvantages. To better illustrate the technologies being used, we provide real-world clinical applications of radiomics in oncology, showcasing research on the applications of radiomics, as well as covering its limitations and its future direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Rogers
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sithin Thulasi Seetha
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Turkey A G Refaee
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Relinde I Y Lieverse
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renée W Y Granzier
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Grow-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Abdalla Ibrahim
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive diagnostic center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Center Universitaire De Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Simon A Keek
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Sanduleanu
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sergey P Primakov
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon P L Beuque
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Damiënne Marcus
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander M A van der Wiel
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Fadila Zerka
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cary J G Oberije
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janita E van Timmeren
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Henry C Woodruff
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D-Lab & The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang T, Shuai JJ, Li X, Wen Z. Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15175. [PMID: 31008938 PMCID: PMC6494235 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous clinical studies have reported that full field digital mammography (FFDM) can be used for diagnosis on breast cancer (BC) with promising outcome results. However, no study systematically investigates its diagnostic impact on female patients with BC. Thus, this systematic review will assess the accurate of FFDM diagnosis on BC. METHODS In this study, we will perform a comprehensive search strategy in the databases as follows: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDILINE, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information, and Wanfang Data from inception to February 28, 2019. All case-controlled studies exploring the impacts of FFDM diagnosis for patients BC will be fully considered for inclusion in this study. Two authors will independently scan the title and abstracts for relevance, and assess full texts for inclusion. They will also independently extract data and will assess methodological qualify for each included study by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan V.5.3 software (London, UK) and Stata V.12.0 software (Texas, USA) will be used to pool the data and to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of FFDM will be used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM for the diagnosis of patients with BC. CONCLUSION Its findings will provide latest evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM in female patients with BC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019125338.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
| | - Jian-jun Shuai
- Department of Imaging Center, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
| | - Xing Li
- Department of Nuclear Magnetic
| | - Zhi Wen
- Department of Computed Tomography, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Katzen J, Dodelzon K. A review of computer aided detection in mammography. Clin Imaging 2018; 52:305-309. [PMID: 30216858 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Breast screening with mammography is widely recognized as the most effective method of detecting early breast cancer and has consistently demonstrated a 20-40% decrease in mortality among screened women. Despite this, the sensitivity of mammography ranges between 70 and 90%. Computer aided detection (CAD) is an artificial intelligence (AI) technique that utilizes pattern recognition to highlight suspicious features on imaging and marks them for the radiologist to review and interpret. It aims to decrease oversights made by interpreting radiologists. Here we review the efficacy of CAD and potential future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Katzen
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61st Street, New York, NY 10065, United States of America.
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61st Street, New York, NY 10065, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Applying Data-driven Imaging Biomarker in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Preliminary Study. Sci Rep 2018; 8:2762. [PMID: 29426948 PMCID: PMC5807343 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21215-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed the feasibility of a data-driven imaging biomarker based on weakly supervised learning (DIB; an imaging biomarker derived from large-scale medical image data with deep learning technology) in mammography (DIB-MG). A total of 29,107 digital mammograms from five institutions (4,339 cancer cases and 24,768 normal cases) were included. After matching patients’ age, breast density, and equipment, 1,238 and 1,238 cases were chosen as validation and test sets, respectively, and the remainder were used for training. The core algorithm of DIB-MG is a deep convolutional neural network; a deep learning algorithm specialized for images. Each sample (case) is an exam composed of 4-view images (RCC, RMLO, LCC, and LMLO). For each case in a training set, the cancer probability inferred from DIB-MG is compared with the per-case ground-truth label. Then the model parameters in DIB-MG are updated based on the error between the prediction and the ground-truth. At the operating point (threshold) of 0.5, sensitivity was 75.6% and 76.1% when specificity was 90.2% and 88.5%, and AUC was 0.903 and 0.906 for the validation and test sets, respectively. This research showed the potential of DIB-MG as a screening tool for breast cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cho KR, Seo BK, Woo OH, Song SE, Choi J, Whang SY, Park EK, Park AY, Shin H, Chung HH. Breast Cancer Detection in a Screening Population: Comparison of Digital Mammography, Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Digital Mammography and Breast Ultrasound. J Breast Cancer 2016; 19:316-323. [PMID: 27721882 PMCID: PMC5053317 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to compare the detection of breast cancer using full-field digital mammography (FFDM), FFDM with computer-aided detection (FFDM+CAD), ultrasound (US), and FFDM+CAD plus US (FFDM+CAD+US), and to investigate the factors affecting cancer detection. Methods In this retrospective study conducted from 2008 to 2012, 48,251 women underwent FFDM and US for cancer screening. One hundred seventy-one breast cancers were detected: 115 invasive cancers and 56 carcinomas in situ. Two radiologists evaluated the imaging findings of FFDM, FFDM+CAD, and US, based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon of the American College of Radiology by consensus. We reviewed the clinical and the pathological data to investigate factors affecting cancer detection. We statistically used generalized estimation equations with a logit link to compare the cancer detectability of different imaging modalities. To compare the various factors affecting detection versus nondetection, we used Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher exact test. Results The detectability of breast cancer by US (96.5%) or FFDM+CAD+US (100%) was superior to that of FFDM (87.1%) (p=0.019 or p<0.001, respectively) or FFDM+ CAD (88.3%) (p=0.050 or p<0.001, respectively). However, cancer detectability was not significantly different between FFDM versus FFDM+CAD (p=1.000) and US alone versus FFDM+CAD+US (p=0.126). The tumor size influenced cancer detectability by all imaging modalities (p<0.050). In FFDM and FFDM+CAD, the nondetecting group consisted of younger patients and patients with a denser breast composition (p<0.050). In breast US, carcinoma in situ was more frequent in the nondetecting group (p=0.014). Conclusion For breast cancer screening, breast US alone is satisfactory for all age groups, although FFDM+ CAD+US is the perfect screening method. Patient age, breast composition, and pathological tumor size and type may influence cancer detection during screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu Ran Cho
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bo Kyoung Seo
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Ok Hee Woo
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Eun Song
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungsoon Choi
- Department of Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Young Whang
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Park
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ah Young Park
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Hyeseon Shin
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwan Hoon Chung
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Le MT, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB, McNeill FE. Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high? Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160045. [PMID: 27187600 PMCID: PMC5124917 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The practice of investigating pathological abnormalities in the breasts of females who are asymptomatic is primarily employed using X-ray mammography. The importance of breast screening is reflected in the mortality-based benefits observed among females who are found to possess invasive breast carcinoma prior to the manifestation of clinical symptoms. It is estimated that population-based screening constitutes a 17% reduction in the breast cancer mortality rate among females affected by invasive breast carcinoma. In spite of the significant utility that screening confers in those affected by invasive cancer, limitations associated with screening manifest as potential harms affecting individuals who are free of invasive disease. Disease-free and benign tumour-bearing individuals who are subjected to diagnostic work-up following a screening examination constitute a population of cases referred to as false positives (FPs). This article discusses factors contributing to the FP rate in mammography and extends the discussion to an assessment of the consequences associated with FP reporting. We conclude that the mammography FP rate in North America is in excess based upon the observation of overtreatment of in situ lesions and the disproportionate distribution of detriment and benefit among the population of individuals recalled for diagnostic work-up subsequent to screening. To address the excessive incidence of FPs in mammography, we investigate solutions that may be employed to remediate the current status of the FP rate. Subsequently, it can be suggested that improvements in the breast-screening protocol, medical litigation risk, image interpretation software and the implementation of image acquisition modalities that overcome superimposition effects are promising solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T Le
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carmel E Mothersill
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Colin B Seymour
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona E McNeill
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rousson J, Naudin M, Marchessoux C. Matching methods evaluation framework for stereoscopic breast x-ray images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2016; 3:011007. [PMID: 26587552 PMCID: PMC4650965 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.3.1.011007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging has been intensively studied in the past few decades. Depth information is an important added value of 3-D systems over two-dimensional systems. Special focuses were devoted to the development of stereo matching methods for the generation of disparity maps (i.e., depth information within a 3-D scene). Dedicated frameworks were designed to evaluate and rank the performance of different stereo matching methods but never considering x-ray medical images. Yet, 3-D x-ray acquisition systems and 3-D medical displays have already been introduced into the diagnostic market. To access the depth information within x-ray stereoscopic images, computing accurate disparity maps is essential. We aimed at developing a framework dedicated to x-ray stereoscopic breast images used to evaluate and rank several stereo matching methods. A multiresolution pyramid optimization approach was integrated to the framework to increase the accuracy and the efficiency of the stereo matching techniques. Finally, a metric was designed to score the results of the stereo matching compared with the ground truth. Eight methods were evaluated and four of them [locally scaled sum of absolute differences (LSAD), zero mean sum of absolute differences, zero mean sum of squared differences, and locally scaled mean sum of squared differences] appeared to perform equally good with an average error score of 0.04 (0 is the perfect matching). LSAD was selected for generating the disparity maps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Rousson
- Barco NV, Healthcare Division, President Kennedypark 35, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Mathieu Naudin
- Barco NV, Healthcare Division, President Kennedypark 35, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Cédric Marchessoux
- Barco NV, Healthcare Division, President Kennedypark 35, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Mammography is the central diagnostic method for clinical diagnostics of breast cancer and the breast cancer screening program. In the clinical routine complementary methods, such as ultrasound, tomosynthesis and optional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are already combined for the diagnostic procedure. Future developments will utilize investigative procedures either as a hybrid (combination of several different imaging modalities in one instrument) or as a fusion method (the technical fusion of two or more of these methods) to implement fusion imaging into diagnostic algorithms. For screening there are reasonable hypotheses to aim for studies that individualize the diagnostic process within the screening procedure. Individual breast cancer risk prediction and individualized knowledge about sensitivity and specificity for certain diagnostic methods could be tested. The clinical implementation of these algorithms is not yet in sight.
Collapse
|