1
|
Liu W, Zhang B, Liu T, Jiang J, Liu Y. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Image Analysis: A Review. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:4749. [PMID: 39066145 PMCID: PMC11280964 DOI: 10.3390/s24144749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a poor prognosis. Its early diagnosis and accurate treatment mainly rely on medical imaging, so accurate medical image analysis is especially vital for pancreatic cancer patients. However, medical image analysis of pancreatic cancer is facing challenges due to ambiguous symptoms, high misdiagnosis rates, and significant financial costs. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution by relieving medical personnel's workload, improving clinical decision-making, and reducing patient costs. This study focuses on AI applications such as segmentation, classification, object detection, and prognosis prediction across five types of medical imaging: CT, MRI, EUS, PET, and pathological images, as well as integrating these imaging modalities to boost diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency. In addition, this study discusses current hot topics and future directions aimed at overcoming the challenges in AI-enabled automated pancreatic cancer diagnosis algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixuan Liu
- Sydney Smart Technology College, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004, China; (W.L.); (B.Z.)
| | - Bairui Zhang
- Sydney Smart Technology College, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004, China; (W.L.); (B.Z.)
| | - Tao Liu
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004, China;
| | - Juntao Jiang
- College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Yong Liu
- College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abler D, Schaer R, Oreiller V, Verma H, Reichenbach J, Aidonopoulos O, Evéquoz F, Jreige M, Prior JO, Depeursinge A. QuantImage v2: a comprehensive and integrated physician-centered cloud platform for radiomics and machine learning research. Eur Radiol Exp 2023; 7:16. [PMID: 36947346 PMCID: PMC10033788 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00326-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics, the field of image-based computational medical biomarker research, has experienced rapid growth over the past decade due to its potential to revolutionize the development of personalized decision support models. However, despite its research momentum and important advances toward methodological standardization, the translation of radiomics prediction models into clinical practice only progresses slowly. The lack of physicians leading the development of radiomics models and insufficient integration of radiomics tools in the clinical workflow contributes to this slow uptake. METHODS We propose a physician-centered vision of radiomics research and derive minimal functional requirements for radiomics research software to support this vision. Free-to-access radiomics tools and frameworks were reviewed to identify best practices and reveal the shortcomings of existing software solutions to optimally support physician-driven radiomics research in a clinical environment. RESULTS Support for user-friendly development and evaluation of radiomics prediction models via machine learning was found to be missing in most tools. QuantImage v2 (QI2) was designed and implemented to address these shortcomings. QI2 relies on well-established existing tools and open-source libraries to realize and concretely demonstrate the potential of a one-stop tool for physician-driven radiomics research. It provides web-based access to cohort management, feature extraction, and visualization and supports "no-code" development and evaluation of machine learning models against patient-specific outcome data. CONCLUSIONS QI2 fills a gap in the radiomics software landscape by enabling "no-code" radiomics research, including model validation, in a clinical environment. Further information about QI2, a public instance of the system, and its source code is available at https://medgift.github.io/quantimage-v2-info/ . Key points As domain experts, physicians play a key role in the development of radiomics models. Existing software solutions do not support physician-driven research optimally. QuantImage v2 implements a physician-centered vision for radiomics research. QuantImage v2 is a web-based, "no-code" radiomics research platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Abler
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roger Schaer
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Valentin Oreiller
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Himanshu Verma
- Knowledge and Intelligence Design Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Julien Reichenbach
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
| | - Orfeas Aidonopoulos
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
| | - Florian Evéquoz
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland
| | - Mario Jreige
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - John O Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Adrien Depeursinge
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sierre, Switzerland.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:133. [PMID: 36310650 PMCID: PMC9613681 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing array of tools is being developed using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for cancer imaging. The development of an optimal tool requires multidisciplinary engagement to ensure that the appropriate use case is met, as well as to undertake robust development and testing prior to its adoption into healthcare systems. This multidisciplinary review highlights key developments in the field. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of AI and ML in cancer imaging; considerations for the development of algorithms into tools that can be widely used and disseminated; and the development of the ecosystem needed to promote growth of AI and ML in cancer imaging.
Collapse
|
4
|
Extermann M, Chetty IJ, Brown SL, Al-Jumayli M, Movsas B. Predictors of Toxicity Among Older Adults with Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:179-185. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Qiu X, Tan W, Yin X, Liao L. Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential. Front Oncol 2022; 12:773840. [PMID: 35251962 PMCID: PMC8891653 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.773840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The high-throughput extraction of quantitative imaging features from medical images for the purpose of radiomic analysis, i.e., radiomics in a broad sense, is a rapidly developing and emerging research field that has been attracting increasing interest, particularly in multimodality and multi-omics studies. In this context, the quantitative analysis of multidimensional data plays an essential role in assessing the spatio-temporal characteristics of different tissues and organs and their microenvironment. Herein, recent developments in this method, including manually defined features, data acquisition and preprocessing, lesion segmentation, feature extraction, feature selection and dimension reduction, statistical analysis, and model construction, are reviewed. In addition, deep learning-based techniques for automatic segmentation and radiomic analysis are being analyzed to address limitations such as rigorous workflow, manual/semi-automatic lesion annotation, and inadequate feature criteria, and multicenter validation. Furthermore, a summary of the current state-of-the-art applications of this technology in disease diagnosis, treatment response, and prognosis prediction from the perspective of radiology images, multimodality images, histopathology images, and three-dimensional dose distribution data, particularly in oncology, is presented. The potential and value of radiomics in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are also further analyzed, and for the first time, the advances and challenges associated with dosiomics in radiotherapy are summarized, highlighting the latest progress in radiomics. Finally, a robust framework for radiomic analysis is presented and challenges and recommendations for future development are discussed, including but not limited to the factors that affect model stability (medical big data and multitype data and expert knowledge in medical), limitations of data-driven processes (reproducibility and interpretability of studies, different treatment alternatives for various institutions, and prospective researches and clinical trials), and thoughts on future directions (the capability to achieve clinical applications and open platform for radiomics analysis).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingping Zhang
- Institute of Advanced Cyberspace Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of New Networks, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yanchun Zhang
- Institute of Advanced Cyberspace Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of New Networks, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
| | - Guijuan Zhang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Xingting Qiu
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Tan
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing in Medical Image, Ministry of Education, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoxia Yin
- Institute of Advanced Cyberspace Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liefa Liao
- School of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bagher Ebadian H, Siddiqui F, Ghanem A, Zhu S, Lu M, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Radiomics outperforms clinical factors in characterizing human papilloma virus (HPV) for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 8. [PMID: 34781281 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac39ab] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose:To utilize radiomic features extracted from CT images to characterize Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) for patients with oropharyngeal cancer squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Methods:One hundred twenty-eight OPSCC patients with known HPV-status (60-HPV+ and 68-HPV-, confirmed by immunohistochemistry-P16-protein testing) were retrospectively studied. Radiomic features (11 feature-categories) were extracted in 3D from contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT images of gross-tumor-volumes using 'in-house' software ('ROdiomiX') developed and validated following the image-biomarker-standardization-initiative (IBSI) guidelines. Six clinical factors were investigated: Age-at-Diagnosis, Gender, Total-Charlson, Alcohol-Use, Smoking-History, and T-Stage. A Least-Absolute-Shrinkage-and-Selection-Operation (Lasso) technique combined with a Generalized-Linear-Model (Lasso-GLM) were applied to perform regularization in the radiomic and clinical feature spaces to identify the ranking of optimal feature subsets with most representative information for prediction of HPV. Lasso-GLM models/classifiers based on clinical factors only, radiomics only, and combined clinical and radiomics (ensemble/integrated) were constructed using random-permutation-sampling. Tests of significance (One-way ANOVA), average Area-Under-Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (AUC), and Positive and Negative Predictive values (PPV and NPV) were computed to estimate the generalization-error and prediction performance of the classifiers.Results:Five clinical factors, including T-stage, smoking status, and age, and 14 radiomic features, including tumor morphology, and intensity contrast were found to be statistically significant discriminators between HPV positive and negative cohorts. Performances for prediction of HPV for the 3 classifiers were: Radiomics-Lasso-GLM: AUC/PPV/NPV=0.789/0.755/0.805; Clinical-Lasso-GLM: 0.676/0.747/0.672, and Integrated/Ensemble-Lasso-GLM: 0.895/0.874/0.844. Results imply that the radiomics-based classifier enabled better characterization and performance prediction of HPV relative to clinical factors, and that the combination of both radiomics and clinical factors yields even higher accuracy characterization and predictive performance.Conclusion:Albeit subject to confirmation in a larger cohort, this pilot study presents encouraging results in support of the role of radiomic features towards characterization of HPV in patients with OPSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Bagher Ebadian
- Department of Radiation Oncology , Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Farzan Siddiqui
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Ahmed Ghanem
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Simeng Zhu
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Mei Lu
- Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, 48202, UNITED STATES
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202-2689, USA, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lei M, Varghese B, Hwang D, Cen S, Lei X, Desai B, Azadikhah A, Oberai A, Duddalwar V. Benchmarking Various Radiomic Toolkit Features While Applying the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative toward Clinical Translation of Radiomic Analysis. J Digit Imaging 2021; 34:1156-1170. [PMID: 34545475 PMCID: PMC8554949 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00506-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The image biomarkers standardization initiative (IBSI) was formed to address the standardization of extraction of quantifiable imaging metrics. Despite its effort, there remains a lack of consensus or established guidelines regarding radiomic feature terminology, the underlying mathematics and their implementation across various software programs. This creates a scenario where features extracted using different toolboxes cannot be used to build or validate the same model leading to a non-generalization of radiomic results. In this study, IBSI-established phantom and benchmark values were used to compare the variation of the radiomic features while using 6 publicly available software programs and 1 in-house radiomics pipeline. All IBSI-standardized features (11 classes, 173 in total) were extracted. The relative differences between the extracted feature values from the different software programs and the IBSI benchmark values were calculated to measure the inter-software agreement. To better understand the variations, features are further grouped into 3 categories according to their properties: 1) morphology, 2) statistic/histogram and 3)texture features. While a good agreement was observed for a majority of radiomics features across the various tested programs, relatively poor agreement was observed for morphology features. Significant differences were also found in programs that use different gray-level discretization approaches. Since these software programs do not include all IBSI features, the level of quantitative assessment for each category was analyzed using Venn and UpSet diagrams and quantified using two ad hoc metrics. Morphology features earned lowest scores for both metrics, indicating that morphological features are not consistently evaluated among software programs. We conclude that radiomic features calculated using different software programs may not be interchangeable. Further studies are needed to standardize the workflow of radiomic feature extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxi Lei
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| | - Bino Varghese
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Darryl Hwang
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Steven Cen
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| | - Xiaomeng Lei
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Bhushan Desai
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Afshin Azadikhah
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Assad Oberai
- Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 854 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| | - Vinay Duddalwar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaggi A, Mastrodicasa D, Charville GW, Jeffrey RB, Napel S, Patel B. Quantitative image features from radiomic biopsy differentiate oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021; 8:054501. [PMID: 34514033 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.5.054501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To differentiate oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using radiomics features computed from spherical samples of image regions of interest, "radiomic biopsies" (RBs). Approach: In a retrospective cohort study of 102 CT cases [68 males (67%), 34 females (33%); mean age ± SD, 63 ± 12 years ], we pathology-confirmed 42 oncocytomas (41%) and 60 chromophobes (59%). A board-certified radiologist performed two RB rounds. From each RB round, we computed radiomics features and compared the performance of a random forest and AdaBoost binary classifier trained from the features. To control for overfitting, we performed 10 rounds of 70% to 30% train-test splits with feature-selection, cross-validation, and hyperparameter-optimization on each split. We evaluated the performance with test ROC AUC. We tested models on data from the other RB round and compared with the same round testing with the DeLong test. We clustered important features for each round and measured a bootstrapped adjusted Rand index agreement. Results: Our best classifiers achieved an average AUC of 0.71 ± 0.024 . We found no evidence of an effect for RB round ( p = 1 ). We also found no evidence for a decrease in model performance when tested on the other RB round ( p = 0.85 ). Feature clustering produced seven clusters in each RB round with high agreement ( Rand index = 0.981 ± 0.002 , p < 0.00001 ). Conclusions: A consistent radiomic signature can be derived from RBs and could help distinguish oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Jaggi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Domenico Mastrodicasa
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Gregory W Charville
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - R Brooke Jeffrey
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Sandy Napel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Bhavik Patel
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.,Arizona State University, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang M, Tong E, Wong S, Hamrick F, Mohammadzadeh M, Rao V, Pendleton C, Smith BW, Hug NF, Biswal S, Seekins J, Napel S, Spinner RJ, Mahan MA, Yeom KW, Wilson TJ. Machine Learning Approach to Differentiation of Peripheral Schwannomas and Neurofibromas: A Multi-Center Study. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:601-609. [PMID: 34487172 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive differentiation between schwannomas and neurofibromas is important for appropriate management, preoperative counseling, and surgical planning, but has proven difficult using conventional imaging. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate machine learning approaches for differentiating peripheral schwannomas from neurofibromas. METHODS We assembled a cohort of schwannomas and neurofibromas from 3 independent institutions and extracted high-dimensional radiomic features from gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted MRI using the PyRadiomics package on Quantitative Imaging Feature Pipeline. Age, sex, neurogenetic syndrome, spontaneous pain, and motor deficit were recorded. We evaluated the performance of 6 radiomics-based classifier models with and without clinical features and compared model performance against human expert evaluators. RESULTS 107 schwannomas and 59 neurofibroma were included. The primary models included both clinical and imaging data. The accuracy of the human evaluators (0.765) did not significantly exceed the no-information rate (NIR), whereas the Support Vector Machine (0.929), Logistic Regression (0.929), and Random Forest (0.905) classifiers exceeded the NIR. Using the method of DeLong, the AUC for the Logistic Regression (AUC=0.923) and K Nearest Neighbor (AUC=0.923) classifiers was significantly greater than the human evaluators (AUC=0.766; p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS The radiomics-based classifiers developed here proved to be more accurate and had a higher AUC on the ROC curve than expert human evaluators. This demonstrates that radiomics using routine MRI sequences and clinical features can aid in differentiation of peripheral schwannomas and neurofibromas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Tong
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sam Wong
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Forrest Hamrick
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Vaishnavi Rao
- Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Brandon W Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas F Hug
- Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sandip Biswal
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jayne Seekins
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sandy Napel
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Robert J Spinner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark A Mahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kristen W Yeom
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Thomas J Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bagher-Ebadian H, Zhu S, Siddiqui F, Lu M, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Technical Note: On the development of an outcome-driven frequency filter for improving Radiomics-based modeling of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Med Phys 2021; 48:7552-7562. [PMID: 34390003 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To implement an outcome-driven frequency filter for improving radiomics-based modeling of human papilloma virus (HPV) for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred twenty-eight OPSCC patients with known HPV status (60-HPV+ and 68-HPV-, confirmed by immunohistochemistry-P16 protein testing) were retrospectively studied. A 3D Discrete Fourier Transform was applied on contrast-enhanced CT images of patient gross tumor volumes (GTV's) to transform intensity distributions to the frequency domain and estimate frequency power spectrums of HPV- and HPV+ patient cohorts. Statistical analyses were performed to rank frequency bands contributing towards prediction of HPV status. An outcome-driven frequency filter was designed accordingly and applied to GTV frequency information. 3D Inverse-Discrete-Fourier-Transform was applied to reconstruct HPV-related frequency-filtered images. Radiomics features (11 feature-categories) were extracted from pre- and post- frequency filtered images using our previously published 'ROdiomiX' software. Least-Absolute-Shrinkage-and-Selection-Operation (Lasso) combined with a Generalized-Linear-Model (Lasso-GLM) was developed to identify and rank feature subsets with optimal information for prediction of HPV+/-. Radiomics-based Lasso-GLM classifiers (pre- and post-frequency filtered) were constructed and validated using a random permutation sampling and nested cross-validation techniques. Average Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC), and Positive and Negative Predictive values (PPV, NPV) were computed to estimate generalization error and prediction performance. RESULTS Among 192 radiomic features, 15 features were found to be statistically significant discriminators between HPV+/- cohorts on post-frequency filtered CE-CT images; 14 such radiomic features were observed on pre-frequency filtered datasets. Discriminant features included tumor morphology and intensity contrast. Performances for prediction of HPV for the pre- and post-frequency filtered Lasso-GLM classifiers were: AUC/PPV/NPV = 0.789/0.755/0.805 and 0.850/0.808/0.877 respectively. Nested-CV performances for prediction of HPV for the pre- and post-frequency filtered Lasso-GLM classifiers were: AUC/PPV/NPV = 0.814/0.725/0.877 and 0.890/0.820/0.911 respectively. CONCLUSION Albeit subject to confirmation in a larger cohort, this pilot study presents encouraging results on the importance of frequency analysis prior to radiomic feature extraction toward enhancement of model performance for characterizing HPV in patients with OPSCC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Simeng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Farzan Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Mei Lu
- Department of Public Health, Henry Ford Health System, Michigan, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang M, Wong SW, Lummus S, Han M, Radmanesh A, Ahmadian SS, Prolo LM, Lai H, Eghbal A, Oztekin O, Cheshier SH, Fisher PG, Ho CY, Vogel H, Vitanza NA, Lober RM, Grant GA, Jaju A, Yeom KW. Radiomic Phenotypes Distinguish Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors from Medulloblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1702-1708. [PMID: 34266866 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and medulloblastomas have similar imaging and histologic features but distinctly different outcomes. We hypothesized that they could be distinguished by MR imaging-based radiomic phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively assembled T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images of 48 posterior fossa atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and 96 match-paired medulloblastomas from 7 institutions. Using a holdout test set, we measured the performance of 6 candidate classifier models using 6 imaging features derived by sparse regression of 900 T2WI and 900 T1WI Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based radiomics features. RESULTS From the originally extracted 1800 total Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based features, sparse regression consistently reduced the feature set to 1 from T1WI and 5 from T2WI. Among classifier models, logistic regression performed with the highest AUC of 0.86, with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 scores of 0.80, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. The top 3 important Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative features, by decreasing order of relative contribution, included voxel intensity at the 90th percentile, inverse difference moment normalized, and kurtosis-all from T2WI. CONCLUSIONS Six quantitative signatures of image intensity, texture, and morphology distinguish atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors from medulloblastomas with high prediction performance across different machine learning strategies. Use of this technique for preoperative diagnosis of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors could significantly inform therapeutic strategies and patient care discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zhang
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (M.Z.)
| | - S W Wong
- Department of Statistics (S.W.W.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - S Lummus
- Department of Physiology and Nutrition (S.L.), University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| | - M Han
- Department of Pediatrics (M.H.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - A Radmanesh
- Department of Radiology (A.R.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - S S Ahmadian
- Pathology (S.S.A., H.V.), Stanford Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - L M Prolo
- Departments of Neurosurgery (L.M.P., G.A.G.)
| | - H Lai
- Department of Radiology (H.L., A.E.), Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California and University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - A Eghbal
- Department of Radiology (H.L., A.E.), Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California and University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - O Oztekin
- Department of Neuroradiology (O.O.), Cigli Education and Research Hospital, Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.,Department of Neuroradiology (O.O.), Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Health Science University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - S H Cheshier
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery (S.H.C.), Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Intermountain Healthcare Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - C Y Ho
- Departments of Clinical Radiology & Imaging Sciences (C.Y.H.), Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - H Vogel
- Pathology (S.S.A., H.V.), Stanford Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - N A Vitanza
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (N.A.V.), Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - R M Lober
- Division of Neurosurgery (R.M.L.), Department of Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, Ohio
| | - G A Grant
- Departments of Neurosurgery (L.M.P., G.A.G.)
| | - A Jaju
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.J.), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - K W Yeom
- Radiology (K.W.Y.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spohn SK, Bettermann AS, Bamberg F, Benndorf M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Fechter T, Hölscher T, Grosu R, Chiti A, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Radiomics in prostate cancer imaging for a personalized treatment approach - current aspects of methodology and a systematic review on validated studies. Theranostics 2021; 11:8027-8042. [PMID: 34335978 PMCID: PMC8315055 DOI: 10.7150/thno.61207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies of men in the world. Due to a variety of treatment options in different risk groups, proper diagnostic and risk stratification is pivotal in treatment of PCa. The development of precise medical imaging procedures simultaneously to improvements in big data analysis has led to the establishment of radiomics - a computer-based method of extracting and analyzing image features quantitatively. This approach bears the potential to assess and improve PCa detection, tissue characterization and clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current aspects of methodology and systematically reviews available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, showing its potential for personalized therapy approaches. The qualitative synthesis includes all imaging modalities and focuses on validated studies, putting forward future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K.B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alisa S. Bettermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology - Division of Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Radu Grosu
- Institute of Computer Engineering, Vienne University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano - Milan, Italy
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hoshino I, Yokota H. Radiogenomics of gastroenterological cancer: The dawn of personalized medicine with artificial intelligence-based image analysis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:427-435. [PMID: 34337291 PMCID: PMC8316732 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiogenomics is a new field of medical science that integrates two omics, radiomics and genomics, and may bring a major paradigm shift in traditional personalized medicine strategies that require tumor tissue samples. In addition, the acquisition of the data does not require special imaging equipment or special imaging conditions, and it is possible to use image information from computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinical practice, so the versatility and cost-effectiveness of radiogenomics are expected. So far, the field of radiogenomics has developed, especially in the fields of brain tumors and breast cancer, but recently, reports of radiogenomic research on gastroenterological cancer are increasing. This review provides an overview of radiogenomic research methods and summarizes the current radiogenomic research in gastroenterological cancer. In addition, the application of artificial intelligence is considered to be indispensable for the integrated analysis of enormous omics information in the future, and the future direction of this research, including the latest technologies, will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isamu Hoshino
- Division of Gastroenterological SurgeryChiba Cancer CenterChibaJapan
| | - Hajime Yokota
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation OncologyGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lu L, Sun SH, Yang H, E L, Guo P, Schwartz LH, Zhao B. Radiomics Prediction of EGFR Status in Lung Cancer-Our Experience in Using Multiple Feature Extractors and The Cancer Imaging Archive Data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:223-230. [PMID: 32548300 PMCID: PMC7289249 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the performance of multiple radiomics feature extractors/software on predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in 228 patients with non–small cell lung cancer from publicly available data sets in The Cancer Imaging Archive. The imaging and clinical data were split into training (n = 105) and validation cohorts (n = 123). Two of the most cited open-source feature extractors, IBEX (1563 features) and Pyradiomics (1319 features), and our in-house software, Columbia Image Feature Extractor (CIFE) (1160 features), were used to extract radiomics features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed sequentially to predict EGFR mutation status using each individual feature extractor. Our univariate analysis integrated an unsupervised clustering method to identify nonredundant and informative candidate features for the creation of prediction models by multivariate analyses. In training, unsupervised clustering-based univariate analysis identified 5, 6, and 4 features from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE as candidate features, respectively. Multivariate prediction models using these features from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE yielded similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.68, 0.67, and 0.69. However, in validation, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of multivariate prediction models from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE decreased to 0.54, 0.56 and 0.64, respectively. Different feature extractors select different radiomics features, which leads to prediction models with varying performance. However, correlation between those selected features from different extractors may indicate these features measure similar imaging phenotypes associated with similar biological characteristics. Overall, attention should be paid to the generalizability of individual radiomics features and radiomics prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Lu
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Shawn H Sun
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Linning E
- Department of Radiology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Pingzhen Guo
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McNitt-Gray M, Napel S, Jaggi A, Mattonen SA, Hadjiiski L, Muzi M, Goldgof D, Balagurunathan Y, Pierce LA, Kinahan PE, Jones EF, Nguyen A, Virkud A, Chan HP, Emaminejad N, Wahi-Anwar M, Daly M, Abdalah M, Yang H, Lu L, Lv W, Rahmim A, Gastounioti A, Pati S, Bakas S, Kontos D, Zhao B, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K. Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:118-128. [PMID: 32548288 PMCID: PMC7289262 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiomic features are being increasingly studied for clinical applications. We aimed to assess the agreement among radiomic features when computed by several groups by using different software packages under very tightly controlled conditions, which included standardized feature definitions and common image data sets. Ten sites (9 from the NCI's Quantitative Imaging Network] positron emission tomography–computed tomography working group plus one site from outside that group) participated in this project. Nine common quantitative imaging features were selected for comparison including features that describe morphology, intensity, shape, and texture. The common image data sets were: three 3D digital reference objects (DROs) and 10 patient image scans from the Lung Image Database Consortium data set using a specific lesion in each scan. Each object (DRO or lesion) was accompanied by an already-defined volume of interest, from which the features were calculated. Feature values for each object (DRO or lesion) were reported. The coefficient of variation (CV), expressed as a percentage, was calculated across software packages for each feature on each object. Thirteen sets of results were obtained for the DROs and patient data sets. Five of the 9 features showed excellent agreement with CV < 1%; 1 feature had moderate agreement (CV < 10%), and 3 features had larger variations (CV ≥ 10%) even after attempts at harmonization of feature calculations. This work highlights the value of feature definition standardization as well as the need to further clarify definitions for some features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M McNitt-Gray
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Napel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - A Jaggi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - S A Mattonen
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,The University of Western Ontario, Canada
| | | | - M Muzi
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - D Goldgof
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | | | - E F Jones
- UC San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Nguyen
- UC San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Virkud
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - H P Chan
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - N Emaminejad
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Wahi-Anwar
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Daly
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Abdalah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - H Yang
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - L Lu
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - W Lv
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Rahmim
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Gastounioti
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D Kontos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Zhao
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jaggi A, Mattonen SA, McNitt-Gray M, Napel S. Stanford DRO Toolkit: Digital Reference Objects for Standardization of Radiomic Features. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:111-117. [PMID: 32548287 PMCID: PMC7289253 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Several institutions have developed image feature extraction software to compute quantitative descriptors of medical images for radiomics analyses. With radiomics increasingly proposed for use in research and clinical contexts, new techniques are necessary for standardizing and replicating radiomics findings across software implementations. We have developed a software toolkit for the creation of 3D digital reference objects with customizable size, shape, intensity, texture, and margin sharpness values. Using user-supplied input parameters, these objects are defined mathematically as continuous functions, discretized, and then saved as DICOM objects. Here, we present the definition of these objects, parameterized derivations of a subset of their radiomics values, computer code for object generation, example use cases, and a user-downloadable sample collection used for the examples cited in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Jaggi
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Sarah A Mattonen
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Department of Medical Biophysics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Michael McNitt-Gray
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Napel
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Luo Y, Chen Y. Energy-Aware Dynamic 3D Placement of Multi-Drone Sensing Fleet. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 21:2622. [PMID: 33918003 PMCID: PMC8068405 DOI: 10.3390/s21082622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs, also known as drones) have become increasingly appealing with various applications and services over the past years. Drone-based remote sensing has shown its unique advantages in collecting ground-truth and real-time data due to their affordable costs and relative ease of operability. This paper presents a 3D placement scheme for multi-drone sensing/monitoring platforms, where a fleet of drones are sent for conducting a mission in a given area. It can range from environmental monitoring of forestry, survivors searching in a disaster zone to exploring remote regions such as deserts and mountains. The proposed drone placing algorithm covers the entire region without dead zones while minimizing the number of cooperating drones deployed. Naturally, drones have limited battery supplies which need to cover mechanical motions, message transmissions and data calculation. Consequently, the drone energy model is explicitly investigated and dynamic adjustments are deployed on drone locations. The proposed drone placement algorithm is 3D landscaping-aware and it takes the line-of-sight into account. The energy model considers inter-communications within drones. The algorithm not only minimizes the overall energy consumption, but also maximizes the whole drone team's lifetime in situations where no power recharging facilities are available in remote/rural areas. Simulations show the proposed placement scheme has significantly prolonged the lifetime of the drone fleet with the least number of drones deployed under various complex terrains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawen Luo
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Avanzo M, Wei L, Stancanello J, Vallières M, Rao A, Morin O, Mattonen SA, El Naqa I. Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics. Med Phys 2021; 47:e185-e202. [PMID: 32418336 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiomics is an emerging area in quantitative image analysis that aims to relate large-scale extracted imaging information to clinical and biological endpoints. The development of quantitative imaging methods along with machine learning has enabled the opportunity to move data science research towards translation for more personalized cancer treatments. Accumulating evidence has indeed demonstrated that noninvasive advanced imaging analytics, that is, radiomics, can reveal key components of tumor phenotype for multiple three-dimensional lesions at multiple time points over and beyond the course of treatment. These developments in the use of CT, PET, US, and MR imaging could augment patient stratification and prognostication buttressing emerging targeted therapeutic approaches. In recent years, deep learning architectures have demonstrated their tremendous potential for image segmentation, reconstruction, recognition, and classification. Many powerful open-source and commercial platforms are currently available to embark in new research areas of radiomics. Quantitative imaging research, however, is complex and key statistical principles should be followed to realize its full potential. The field of radiomics, in particular, requires a renewed focus on optimal study design/reporting practices and standardization of image acquisition, feature calculation, and rigorous statistical analysis for the field to move forward. In this article, the role of machine and deep learning as a major computational vehicle for advanced model building of radiomics-based signatures or classifiers, and diverse clinical applications, working principles, research opportunities, and available computational platforms for radiomics will be reviewed with examples drawn primarily from oncology. We also address issues related to common applications in medical physics, such as standardization, feature extraction, model building, and validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Avanzo
- Department of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, PN, 33081, Italy
| | - Lise Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA
| | | | - Martin Vallières
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Arvind Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.,Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA
| | - Olivier Morin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Sarah A Mattonen
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fornacon-Wood I, Mistry H, Ackermann CJ, Blackhall F, McPartlin A, Faivre-Finn C, Price GJ, O'Connor JPB. Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:6241-6250. [PMID: 32483644 PMCID: PMC7553896 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06957-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) compliance, harmonisation of calculation settings and platform version on the statistical reliability of radiomic features and their corresponding ability to predict clinical outcome. METHODS The statistical reliability of radiomic features was assessed retrospectively in three clinical datasets (patient numbers: 108 head and neck cancer, 37 small-cell lung cancer, 47 non-small-cell lung cancer). Features were calculated using four platforms (PyRadiomics, LIFEx, CERR and IBEX). PyRadiomics, LIFEx and CERR are IBSI-compliant, whereas IBEX is not. The effects of IBSI compliance, user-defined calculation settings and platform version were assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and confidence intervals. The influence of platform choice on the relationship between radiomic biomarkers and survival was evaluated using univariable cox regression in the largest dataset. RESULTS The reliability of radiomic features calculated by the different software platforms was only excellent (ICC > 0.9) for 4/17 radiomic features when comparing all four platforms. Reliability improved to ICC > 0.9 for 15/17 radiomic features when analysis was restricted to the three IBSI-compliant platforms. Failure to harmonise calculation settings resulted in poor reliability, even across the IBSI-compliant platforms. Software platform version also had a marked effect on feature reliability in CERR and LIFEx. Features identified as having significant relationship to survival varied between platforms, as did the direction of hazard ratios. CONCLUSION IBSI compliance, user-defined calculation settings and choice of platform version all influence the statistical reliability and corresponding performance of prognostic models in radiomics. KEY POINTS • Reliability of radiomic features varies between feature calculation platforms and with choice of software version. • Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) compliance improves reliability of radiomic features across platforms, but only when calculation settings are harmonised. • IBSI compliance, user-defined calculation settings and choice of platform version collectively affect the prognostic value of features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hitesh Mistry
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Fiona Blackhall
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew McPartlin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gareth J Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tiwari KA, Raišutis R, Liutkus J, Valiukevičienė S. Diagnostics of Melanocytic Skin Tumours by a Combination of Ultrasonic, Dermatoscopic and Spectrophotometric Image Parameters. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10090632. [PMID: 32858850 PMCID: PMC7555363 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10090632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Dermatoscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) and spectrophotometry are promising quantitative imaging techniques for the investigation and diagnostics of cutaneous melanocytic tumors. In this paper, we propose the hybrid technique and automatic prognostic models by combining the quantitative image parameters of ultrasonic B-scan images, dermatoscopic and spectrophotometric images (melanin, blood and collagen) to increase accuracy in the diagnostics of cutaneous melanoma. The extracted sets of various quantitative parameters and features of dermatoscopic, ultrasonic and spectrometric images were used to develop the four different classification models: logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes. The results were compared to the combination of only two techniques out of three. The reliable differentiation between melanocytic naevus and melanoma were achieved by the proposed technique. The accuracy of more than 90% was estimated in the case of LR, LDA and SVM by the proposed method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Anubhav Tiwari
- Ultrasound Research Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, K. Baršausko St. 59, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +370-64694913
| | - Renaldas Raišutis
- Ultrasound Research Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, K. Baršausko St. 59, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| | - Jokūbas Liutkus
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių str. 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (J.L.); (S.V.)
| | - Skaidra Valiukevičienė
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių str. 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (J.L.); (S.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chinnery T, Arifin A, Tay KY, Leung A, Nichols AC, Palma DA, Mattonen SA, Lang P. Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Head and Neck Cancer Outcomes Prediction From Imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2020; 72:73-85. [PMID: 32735452 DOI: 10.1177/0846537120942134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have become a growing area of interest in predictive medicine and have the potential to aid physician decision-making to improve patient outcomes. Imaging and radiomics play an increasingly important role in these models. This review summarizes recent developments in the field of radiomics for AI in head and neck cancer. Prediction models for oncologic outcomes, treatment toxicity, and pathological findings have all been created. Exploratory studies are promising; however, validation studies that demonstrate consistency, reproducibility, and prognostic impact remain uncommon. Prospective clinical trials with standardized procedures are required for clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia Chinnery
- Department of Medical Biophysics, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Arifin
- Department of Oncology, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Keng Yeow Tay
- Department of Medical Imaging, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Medical Imaging, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Nichols
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Oncology, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah A Mattonen
- Department of Medical Biophysics, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Oncology, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pencilla Lang
- Department of Oncology, 6221Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mattonen SA, Gude D, Echegaray S, Bakr S, Rubin DL, Napel S. Quantitative imaging feature pipeline: a web-based tool for utilizing, sharing, and building image-processing pipelines. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2020; 7:042803. [PMID: 32206688 PMCID: PMC7070161 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.7.4.042803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative image features that can be computed from medical images are proving to be valuable biomarkers of underlying cancer biology that can be used for assessing treatment response and predicting clinical outcomes. However, validation and eventual clinical implementation of these tools is challenging due to the absence of shared software algorithms, architectures, and the tools required for computing, comparing, evaluating, and disseminating predictive models. Similarly, researchers need to have programming expertise in order to complete these tasks. The quantitative image feature pipeline (QIFP) is an open-source, web-based, graphical user interface (GUI) of configurable quantitative image-processing pipelines for both planar (two-dimensional) and volumetric (three-dimensional) medical images. This allows researchers and clinicians a GUI-driven approach to process and analyze images, without having to write any software code. The QIFP allows users to upload a repository of linked imaging, segmentation, and clinical data or access publicly available datasets (e.g., The Cancer Imaging Archive) through direct links. Researchers have access to a library of file conversion, segmentation, quantitative image feature extraction, and machine learning algorithms. An interface is also provided to allow users to upload their own algorithms in Docker containers. The QIFP gives researchers the tools and infrastructure for the assessment and development of new imaging biomarkers and the ability to use them for single and multicenter clinical and virtual clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Mattonen
- Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
- The University of Western Ontario, Department of Medical Biophysics, London, Ontario, Canada
- The University of Western Ontario, Department of Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dev Gude
- Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Sebastian Echegaray
- Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Shaimaa Bakr
- Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Daniel L. Rubin
- Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
- Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
- Stanford University, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Sandy Napel
- Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States
- Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States
- Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rubin DL, Ugur Akdogan M, Altindag C, Alkim E. ePAD: An Image Annotation and Analysis Platform for Quantitative Imaging. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 5:170-183. [PMID: 30854455 PMCID: PMC6403025 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Medical imaging is critical for assessing the response of patients to new cancer therapies. Quantitative lesion assessment on images is time-consuming, and adopting new promising quantitative imaging biomarkers of response in clinical trials is challenging. The electronic Physician Annotation Device (ePAD) is a freely available web-based zero-footprint software application for viewing, annotation, and quantitative analysis of radiology images designed to meet the challenges of quantitative evaluation of cancer lesions. For imaging researchers, ePAD calculates a variety of quantitative imaging biomarkers that they can analyze and compare in ePAD to identify potential candidates as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. For clinicians, ePAD provides clinical decision support tools for evaluating cancer response through reports summarizing changes in tumor burden based on different imaging biomarkers. As a workflow management and study oversight tool, ePAD lets clinical trial project administrators create worklists for users and oversee the progress of annotations created by research groups. To support interoperability of image annotations, ePAD writes all image annotations and results of quantitative imaging analyses in standardized file formats, and it supports migration of annotations from various propriety formats. ePAD also provides a plugin architecture supporting MATLAB server-side modules in addition to client-side plugins, permitting the community to extend the ePAD platform in various ways for new cancer use cases. We present an overview of ePAD as a platform for medical image annotation and quantitative analysis. We also discuss use cases and collaborations with different groups in the Quantitative Imaging Network and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Rubin
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mete Ugur Akdogan
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Cavit Altindag
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Emel Alkim
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mattonen SA, Davidzon GA, Bakr S, Echegaray S, Leung ANC, Vasanawala M, Horng G, Napel S, Nair VS. [18F] FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Tumor and Penumbra Imaging Features Predict Recurrence in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 5:145-153. [PMID: 30854452 PMCID: PMC6403030 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We identified computational imaging features on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) that predict recurrence/progression in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively identified 291 patients with NSCLC from 2 prospectively acquired cohorts (training, n = 145; validation, n = 146). We contoured the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) on all pretreatment PET images and added a 3-dimensional penumbra region that extended outward 1 cm from the tumor surface. We generated 512 radiomics features, selected 435 features based on robustness to contour variations, and then applied randomized sparse regression (LASSO) to identify features that predicted time to recurrence in the training cohort. We built Cox proportional hazards models in the training cohort and independently evaluated the models in the validation cohort. Two features including stage and a MTV plus penumbra texture feature were selected by LASSO. Both features were significant univariate predictors, with stage being the best predictor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56–2.95], P < .001). However, adding the MTV plus penumbra texture feature to stage significantly improved prediction (P = .006). This multivariate model was a significant predictor of time to recurrence in the training cohort (concordance = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.66–0.81], P < .001) that was validated in a separate validation cohort (concordance = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.67–0.81], P < .001). A combined radiomics and clinical model improved NSCLC recurrence prediction. FDG PET radiomic features may be useful biomarkers for lung cancer prognosis and add clinical utility for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shaimaa Bakr
- Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | - George Horng
- California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Viswam S Nair
- Departments of Radiology.,Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; and.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li M, Li X, Guo Y, Miao Z, Liu X, Guo S, Zhang H. Development and assessment of an individualized nomogram to predict colorectal cancer liver metastases. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2020; 10:397-414. [PMID: 32190566 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.12.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background This article aims to develop and assess the radiomics paradigm for predicting colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) from the primary tumor. Methods This retrospective study included 100 patients from the First Hospital of Jilin University from June 2017 to December 2017. The 100 patients comprised 50 patients with and 50 without CRLM. The maximum-level enhanced computed tomography (CT) image of primary cancer in the portal venous phase of each patient was selected as the original image data. To automatically implement radiomics-related paradigms, we developed a toolkit called Radiomics Intelligent Analysis Toolkit (RIAT). Results With RIAT, the model based on logistic regression (LR) using both the radiomics and clinical information signatures showed the maximum net benefit. The area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.90±0.02 (sensitivity =0.85±0.02, specificity =0.79±0.04) for the training set, 0.86±0.11 (sensitivity =0.85±0.09, specificity =0.75±0.19) for the verification set, 0.906 (95% CI, 0.840-0.971; sensitivity =0.81, specificity =0.84) for the cross-validation set, and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.761-1.000; sensitivity =0.78, specificity =0.91) for the test set. Conclusions The radiomics nomogram-based LR with clinical risk and radiomics features allows for a more accurate classification of CRLM using CT images with RIAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyang Li
- State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Xueyan Li
- State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Xiaoming Liu
- State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Shuxu Guo
- State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Huimao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Perica ER, Sun Z. A Systematic Review of Three-Dimensional Printing in Liver Disease. J Digit Imaging 2019; 31:692-701. [PMID: 29633052 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0067-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to analyse current literature related to the clinical applications of 3D printed models in liver disease. A search of the literature was conducted to source studies from databases with the aim of determining the applications and feasibility of 3D printed models in liver disease. 3D printed model accuracy and costs associated with 3D printing, the ability to replicate anatomical structures and delineate important characteristics of hepatic tumours, and the potential for 3D printed liver models to guide surgical planning are analysed. Nineteen studies met the selection criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Seventeen of them were case reports and two were original studies. Quantitative assessment measuring the accuracy of 3D printed liver models was analysed in five studies with mean difference between 3D printed models and original source images ranging from 0.2 to 20%. Fifteen studies provided qualitative assessment with results showing the usefulness of 3D printed models when used as clinical tools in preoperative planning, simulation of surgical or interventional procedures, medical education, and training. The cost and time associated with 3D printed liver model production was reported in 11 studies, with costs ranging from US$13 to US$2000, duration of production up to 100 h. This systematic review shows that 3D printed liver models demonstrate hepatic anatomy and tumours with high accuracy. The models can assist with preoperative planning and may be used in the simulation of surgical procedures for the treatment of malignant hepatic tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Rose Perica
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia
| | - Zhonghua Sun
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mattonen SA, Davidzon GA, Benson J, Leung ANC, Vasanawala M, Horng G, Shrager JB, Napel S, Nair VS. Bone Marrow and Tumor Radiomics at 18F-FDG PET/CT: Impact on Outcome Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology 2019; 293:451-459. [PMID: 31526257 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value is a prognostic marker for non-small cell lung cancer. In the setting of malignancy, bone marrow activity from fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET may be informative for clinical risk stratification. Purpose To determine whether integrating FDG PET radiomic features of the primary tumor, tumor penumbra, and bone marrow identifies lung cancer disease-free survival more accurately than clinical features alone. Materials and Methods Patients were retrospectively analyzed from two distinct cohorts collected between 2008 and 2016. Each tumor, its surrounding penumbra, and bone marrow from the L3-L5 vertebral bodies was contoured on pretreatment FDG PET/CT images. There were 156 bone marrow and 512 tumor and penumbra radiomic features computed from the PET series. Randomized sparse Cox regression by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator identified features that predicted disease-free survival in the training cohort. Cox proportional hazards models were built and locked in the training cohort, then evaluated in an independent cohort for temporal validation. Results There were 227 patients analyzed; 136 for training (mean age, 69 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 101 men) and 91 for temporal validation (mean age, 72 years ± 10; 91 men). The top clinical model included stage; adding tumor region features alone improved outcome prediction (log likelihood, -158 vs -152; P = .007). Adding bone marrow features continued to improve performance (log likelihood, -158 vs -145; P = .001). The top model integrated stage, two bone marrow texture features, one tumor with penumbra texture feature, and two penumbra texture features (concordance, 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.70, 0.85; P < .001). This fully integrated model was a predictor of poor outcome in the independent cohort (concordance, 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 0.80; P < .001) and a binary score stratified patients into high and low risk of poor outcome (P < .001). Conclusion A model that includes pretreatment fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET texture features from the primary tumor, tumor penumbra, and bone marrow predicts disease-free survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer more accurately than clinical features alone. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Mattonen
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Guido A Davidzon
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Jalen Benson
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Ann N C Leung
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Minal Vasanawala
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - George Horng
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Joseph B Shrager
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Sandy Napel
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| | - Viswam S Nair
- From the Department of Radiology, James H. Clark Center (S.A.M., A.N.C.L., S.N., V.S.N.), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (G.A.D.), and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.B., J.B.S.), Stanford University, 318 Campus Dr, Room S355, Stanford, CA 94305; Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (M.V.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (G.H.); and Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (V.S.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Napel S, Mu W, Jardim‐Perassi BV, Aerts HJWL, Gillies RJ. Quantitative imaging of cancer in the postgenomic era: Radio(geno)mics, deep learning, and habitats. Cancer 2018; 124:4633-4649. [PMID: 30383900 PMCID: PMC6482447 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Although cancer often is referred to as "a disease of the genes," it is indisputable that the (epi)genetic properties of individual cancer cells are highly variable, even within the same tumor. Hence, preexisting resistant clones will emerge and proliferate after therapeutic selection that targets sensitive clones. Herein, the authors propose that quantitative image analytics, known as "radiomics," can be used to quantify and characterize this heterogeneity. Virtually every patient with cancer is imaged radiologically. Radiomics is predicated on the beliefs that these images reflect underlying pathophysiologies, and that they can be converted into mineable data for improved diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and therapy monitoring. In the last decade, the radiomics of cancer has grown from a few laboratories to a worldwide enterprise. During this growth, radiomics has established a convention, wherein a large set of annotated image features (1-2000 features) are extracted from segmented regions of interest and used to build classifier models to separate individual patients into their appropriate class (eg, indolent vs aggressive disease). An extension of this conventional radiomics is the application of "deep learning," wherein convolutional neural networks can be used to detect the most informative regions and features without human intervention. A further extension of radiomics involves automatically segmenting informative subregions ("habitats") within tumors, which can be linked to underlying tumor pathophysiology. The goal of the radiomics enterprise is to provide informed decision support for the practice of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Napel
- Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCalifornia
| | - Wei Mu
- Department of Cancer PhysiologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida
| | | | - Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
- Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusetts
| | - Robert J. Gillies
- Department of Cancer PhysiologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Iv M, Zhou M, Shpanskaya K, Perreault S, Wang Z, Tranvinh E, Lanzman B, Vajapeyam S, Vitanza NA, Fisher PG, Cho YJ, Laughlin S, Ramaswamy V, Taylor MD, Cheshier SH, Grant GA, Young Poussaint T, Gevaert O, Yeom KW. MR Imaging-Based Radiomic Signatures of Distinct Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 40:154-161. [PMID: 30523141 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Distinct molecular subgroups of pediatric medulloblastoma confer important differences in prognosis and therapy. Currently, tissue sampling is the only method to obtain information for classification. Our goal was to develop and validate radiomic and machine learning approaches for predicting molecular subgroups of pediatric medulloblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we evaluated MR imaging datasets of 109 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma from 3 children's hospitals from January 2001 to January 2014. A computational framework was developed to extract MR imaging-based radiomic features from tumor segmentations, and we tested 2 predictive models: a double 10-fold cross-validation using a combined dataset consisting of all 3 patient cohorts and a 3-dataset cross-validation, in which training was performed on 2 cohorts and testing was performed on the third independent cohort. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test for feature selection with assessment of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate model performance. RESULTS Of 590 MR imaging-derived radiomic features, including intensity-based histograms, tumor edge-sharpness, Gabor features, and local area integral invariant features, extracted from imaging-derived tumor segmentations, tumor edge-sharpness was most useful for predicting sonic hedgehog and group 4 tumors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed superior performance of the double 10-fold cross-validation model for predicting sonic hedgehog, group 3, and group 4 tumors when using combined T1- and T2-weighted images (area under the curve = 0.79, 0.70, and 0.83, respectively). With the independent 3-dataset cross-validation strategy, select radiomic features were predictive of sonic hedgehog (area under the curve = 0.70-0.73) and group 4 (area under the curve = 0.76-0.80) medulloblastoma. CONCLUSIONS This study provides proof-of-concept results for the application of radiomic and machine learning approaches to a multi-institutional dataset for the prediction of medulloblastoma subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Iv
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.)
| | - M Zhou
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.).,Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (M.Z., O.G., Z.W.)
| | - K Shpanskaya
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.)
| | - S Perreault
- Department of Pediatrics (S.P.), Pediatric Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte Justine, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Z Wang
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (M.Z., O.G., Z.W.)
| | - E Tranvinh
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.)
| | - B Lanzman
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.)
| | - S Vajapeyam
- Department of Radiology (S.V., T.Y.P.), Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - N A Vitanza
- Department Pediatrics Hematology-Oncology (N.A.V.), Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - P G Fisher
- Department of Pediatrics (P.G.F.), Pediatric Neurology
| | - Y J Cho
- Department of Pediatrics (Y.J.C.), Pediatric Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - S Laughlin
- Departments of Radiology, Neuro-Oncology, and Neurosurgery (S.L., V.R., M.D.T.), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Ramaswamy
- Departments of Radiology, Neuro-Oncology, and Neurosurgery (S.L., V.R., M.D.T.), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M D Taylor
- Departments of Radiology, Neuro-Oncology, and Neurosurgery (S.L., V.R., M.D.T.), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S H Cheshier
- Department of Neurosurgery (S.H.C.), Pediatric Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - G A Grant
- Department of Neurosurgery (G.A.G.), Pediatric Neurosurgery, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - T Young Poussaint
- Department of Radiology (S.V., T.Y.P.), Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - O Gevaert
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (M.Z., O.G., Z.W.)
| | - K W Yeom
- From the Department of Radiology (M.I., M.Z., K.S., E.T., B.L., K.W.Y.) .,Department of Radiology (K.W.Y.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Owens CA, Peterson CB, Tang C, Koay EJ, Yu W, Mackin DS, Li J, Salehpour MR, Fuentes DT, Court LE, Yang J. Lung tumor segmentation methods: Impact on the uncertainty of radiomics features for non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205003. [PMID: 30286184 PMCID: PMC6171919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the uncertainty of radiomics features from contrast-enhanced breath-hold helical CT scans of non-small cell lung cancer for both manual and semi-automatic segmentation due to intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-software reliability. Methods Three radiation oncologists manually delineated lung tumors twice from 10 CT scans using two software tools (3D-Slicer and MIM Maestro). Additionally, three observers without formal clinical training were instructed to use two semi-automatic segmentation tools, Lesion Sizing Toolkit (LSTK) and GrowCut, to delineate the same tumor volumes. The accuracy of the semi-automatic contours was assessed by comparison with physician manual contours using Dice similarity coefficients and Hausdorff distances. Eighty-three radiomics features were calculated for each delineated tumor contour. Informative features were identified based on their dynamic range and correlation to other features. Feature reliability was then evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Feature range was used to evaluate the uncertainty of the segmentation methods. Results From the initial set of 83 features, 40 radiomics features were found to be informative, and these 40 features were used in the subsequent analyses. For both intra-observer and inter-observer reliability, LSTK had higher reliability than GrowCut and the two manual segmentation tools. All observers achieved consistently high ICC values when using LSTK, but the ICC value varied greatly for each observer when using GrowCut and the manual segmentation tools. For inter-software reliability, features were not reproducible across the software tools for either manual or semi-automatic segmentation methods. Additionally, no feature category was found to be more reproducible than another feature category. Feature ranges of LSTK contours were smaller than those of manual contours for all features. Conclusion Radiomics features extracted from LSTK contours were highly reliable across and among observers. With semi-automatic segmentation tools, observers without formal clinical training were comparable to physicians in evaluating tumor segmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance A. Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Wen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dennis S. Mackin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Mohammad R. Salehpour
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - David T. Fuentes
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Laurence E. Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wu J, Tha KK, Xing L, Li R. Radiomics and radiogenomics for precision radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:i25-i31. [PMID: 29385618 PMCID: PMC5868194 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and staging of cancer, as well as in radiation treatment planning and evaluation of therapeutic response. Recently, there has been significant interest in extracting quantitative information from clinical standard-of-care images, i.e. radiomics, in order to provide a more comprehensive characterization of image phenotypes of the tumor. A number of studies have demonstrated that a deeper radiomic analysis can reveal novel image features that could provide useful diagnostic, prognostic or predictive information, improving upon currently used imaging metrics such as tumor size and volume. Furthermore, these imaging-derived phenotypes can be linked with genomic data, i.e. radiogenomics, in order to understand their biological underpinnings or further improve the prediction accuracy of clinical outcomes. In this article, we will provide an overview of radiomics and radiogenomics, including their rationale, technical and clinical aspects. We will also present some examples of the current results and some emerging paradigms in radiomics and radiogenomics for clinical oncology, with a focus on potential applications in radiotherapy. Finally, we will highlight the challenges in the field and suggest possible future directions in radiomics to maximize its potential impact on precision radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, USA
| | - Khin Khin Tha
- Global Station for Quantum Biomedical Science and Engineering, Global Institute for Cooperative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, USA
- Global Station for Quantum Biomedical Science and Engineering, Global Institute for Cooperative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Ruijiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, USA
- Global Station for Quantum Biomedical Science and Engineering, Global Institute for Cooperative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|