Transfer Learning Approach and Nucleus Segmentation with MedCLNet Colon Cancer Database

From Pixels to Prognosis: A Survey on AI-Driven Cancer Patient Survival Prediction Using Digital Histology Images

Survival analysis is an integral part of medical statistics that is extensively utilized to establish prognostic indices for mortality or disease recurrence, assess treatment efficacy, and tailor effective treatment plans. The identification of prognostic biomarkers capable of predicting patient survival is a primary objective in the field of cancer research. With the recent integration of digital histology images into routine clinical practice, a plethora of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methods for digital pathology has emerged in scholarly literature, facilitating patient survival prediction. These methods have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in analyzing and interpreting whole slide images, yielding results comparable to those of expert pathologists. The complexity of AI-driven techniques is magnified by the distinctive characteristics of digital histology images, including their gigapixel size and diverse tissue appearances. Consequently, advanced patch-based methods are employed to effectively extract features that correlate with patient survival. These computational methods significantly enhance survival prediction accuracy and augment prognostic capabilities in cancer patients. The review discusses the methodologies employed in the literature, their performance metrics, ongoing challenges, and potential solutions for future advancements. This paper explains survival analysis and feature extraction methods for analyzing cancer patients. It also compiles essential acronyms related to cancer precision medicine. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that this is the inaugural review paper in the field. The target audience for this interdisciplinary review comprises AI practitioners, medical statisticians, and progressive oncologists who are enthusiastic about translating AI-driven solutions into clinical practice. We expect this comprehensive review article to guide future research directions in the field of cancer research.

Colon and lung cancer classification from multi-modal images using resilient and efficient neural network architectures

Automatic classification of colon and lung cancer images is crucial for early detection and accurate diagnostics. However, there is room for improvement to enhance accuracy, ensuring better diagnostic precision. This study introduces two novel dense architectures (D1 and D2) and emphasizes their effectiveness in classifying colon and lung cancer from diverse images. It also highlights their resilience, efficiency, and superior performance across multiple datasets. These architectures were tested on various types of datasets, including NCT-CRC-HE-100K (set of 100,000 non-overlapping image patches from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained histological images of human colorectal cancer (CRC) and normal tissue), CRC-VAL-HE-7K (set of 7180 image patches from N = 50 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, no overlap with patients in NCT-CRC-HE-100K), LC25000 (Lung and Colon Cancer Histopathological Image), and IQ-OTHNCCD (Iraq-Oncology Teaching Hospital/National Center for Cancer Diseases), showcasing their effectiveness in classifying colon and lung cancers from histopathological and Computed Tomography (CT) scan images. This underscores the multi-modal image classification capability of the proposed models. Moreover, the study addresses imbalanced datasets, particularly in CRC-VAL-HE-7K and IQ-OTHNCCD, with a specific focus on model resilience and robustness. To assess overall performance, the study conducted experiments in different scenarios. The D1 model achieved an impressive 99.80 % accuracy on the NCT-CRC-HE-100K dataset, with a Jaccard Index (J) of 0.8371, a Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.9073, a Cohen's Kappa (Kp) of 0.9057, and a Critical Success Index (CSI) of 0.8213. When subjected to 10-fold cross-validation on LC25000, the D1 model averaged (avg) 99.96 % accuracy (avg J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.9993, 0.9987, 0.9853, and 0.9990), surpassing recent reported performances. Furthermore, the ensemble of D1 and D2 reached 93 % accuracy (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.7556, 0.8839, 0.8796, and 0.7140) on the IQ-OTHNCCD dataset, exceeding recent benchmarks and aligning with other reported results. Efficiency evaluations were conducted in various scenarios. For instance, training on only 10 % of LC25000 resulted in high accuracy rates of 99.19 % (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.9840, 0.9898, 0.9898, and 0.9837) (D1) and 99.30 % (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.9863, 0.9913, 0.9913, and 0.9861) (D2). In NCT-CRC-HE-100K, D2 achieved an impressive 99.53 % accuracy (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.9906, 0.9946, 0.9946, and 0.9906) with training on only 30 % of the dataset and testing on the remaining 70 %. When tested on CRC-VAL-HE-7K, D1 and D2 achieved 95 % accuracy (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.8845, 0.9455, 0.9452, and 0.8745) and 96 % accuracy (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.8926, 0.9504, 0.9503, and 0.8798), respectively, outperforming previously reported results and aligning closely with others. Lastly, training D2 on just 10 % of NCT-CRC-HE-100K and testing on CRC-VAL-HE-7K resulted in significant outperformance of InceptionV3, Xception, and DenseNet201 benchmarks, achieving an accuracy rate of 82.98 % (J, MCC, Kp, and CSI of 0.7227, 0.8095, 0.8081, and 0.6671). Finally, using explainable AI algorithms such as Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, Score-CAM, and Faster Score-CAM, along with their emphasized versions, we visualized the features from the last layer of DenseNet201 for histopathological as well as CT-scan image samples. The proposed dense models, with their multi-modality, robustness, and efficiency in cancer image classification, hold the promise of significant advancements in medical diagnostics. They have the potential to revolutionize early cancer detection and improve healthcare accessibility worldwide.

Tissue classification and diagnosis of colorectal cancer histopathology images using deep learning algorithms. Is the time ripe for clinical practice implementation?

Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer, with histopathologic examination of biopsied tissue samples remaining the gold standard for diagnosis. During the past years, artificial intelligence (AI) has steadily found its way into the field of medicine and pathology, especially with the introduction of whole slide imaging (WSI). The main outcome of interest was the composite balanced accuracy (ACC) as well as the F1 score. The average reported ACC from the collected studies was 95.8 ±3.8%. Reported F1 scores reached as high as 0.975, with an average of 89.7 ±9.8%, indicating that existing deep learning algorithms can achieve in silico distinction between malignant and benign. Overall, the available state-of-the-art algorithms are non-inferior to pathologists for image analysis and classification tasks. However, due to their inherent uniqueness in their training and lack of widely accepted external validation datasets, their generalization potential is still limited.