Multicontrast MRI-based radiomics for the prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early triple negative breast cancer

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Breast MRI: Applications in Breast Cancer Primary Treatment Response Assessment and Prediction

ABSTRACT

Primary systemic therapy (PST) is the treatment of choice in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is nowadays also often used in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Although imaging remains pivotal to assess response to PST accurately, the use of imaging to predict response to PST has the potential to not only better prognostication but also allow the de-escalation or omission of potentially toxic treatment with undesirable adverse effects, the accelerated implementation of new targeted therapies, and the mitigation of surgical delays in selected patients. In response to the limited ability of radiologists to predict response to PST via qualitative, subjective assessments of tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), artificial intelligence-enhanced MRI with classical machine learning, and in more recent times, deep learning, have been used with promising results to predict response, both before the start of PST and in the early stages of treatment. This review provides an overview of the current applications of artificial intelligence to MRI in assessing and predicting response to PST, and discusses the challenges and limitations of their clinical implementation.

Topology-based radiomic features for prediction of parotid gland cancer malignancy grade in magnetic resonance images

PURPOSE

The malignancy grades of parotid gland cancer (PGC) have been assessed for a decision of treatment policies. Therefore, we have investigated the feasibility of topology-based radiomic features for the prediction of parotid gland cancer (PGC) malignancy grade in magnetic resonance (MR) images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-dimensional T1- and T2-weighted MR images of 39 patients with PGC were selected for this study. Imaging properties of PGC can be quantified using the topology, which could be useful for assessing the number of the k-dimensional holes or heterogeneity in PGC regions using invariants of the Betti numbers. Radiomic signatures were constructed from 41,472 features obtained after a harmonization using an elastic net model. PGC patients were stratified using a logistic classification into low/intermediate- and high-grade malignancy groups. The training data were increased by four times to avoid the overfitting problem using a synthetic minority oversampling technique. The proposed approach was assessed using a 4-fold cross-validation test.

RESULTS

The highest accuracy of the proposed approach was 0.975 for the validation cases, whereas that of the conventional approach was 0.694.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that topology-based radiomic features could be feasible for the noninvasive prediction of the malignancy grade of PGCs.

Artificial intelligence to support person-centred care in breast imaging - A scoping review

AIM

To overview Artificial Intelligence (AI) developments and applications in breast imaging (BI) focused on providing person-centred care in diagnosis and treatment for breast pathologies.

METHODS

The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of science, IEEE explore and arxiv during July 2022 and included only studies published after 2016, in French and English. Combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms (MeSH) related to breast imaging and AI were used. No keywords or MeSH terms related to patients, or the person-centred care (PCC) concept were included. Three independent reviewers screened all abstracts and titles, and all eligible full-text publications during a second stage.

RESULTS

3417 results were identified by the search and 106 studies were included for meeting all criteria. Six themes relating to the AI-enabled PCC in BI were identified: individualised risk prediction/growth and prediction/false negative reduction (44.3%), treatment assessment (32.1%), tumour type prediction (11.3%), unnecessary biopsies reduction (5.7%), patients' preferences (2.8%) and other issues (3.8%). The main BI modalities explored in the included studies were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (31.1%), mammography (27.4%) and ultrasound (23.6%). The studies were predominantly retrospective, and some variations (age range, data source, race, medical imaging) were present in the datasets used.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI tools for person-centred care are mainly designed for risk and cancer prediction and disease management to identify the most suitable treatment. However, further studies are needed for image acquisition optimisation for different patient groups, improvement and customisation of patient experience and for communicating to patients the options and pathways of disease management.

Machine learning for predicting breast-conserving surgery candidates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on DCE-MRI

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate a machine learning method for predicting breast-conserving surgery (BCS) candidates, from patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) obtained before and after NAC.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 75 patients who underwent NAC and breast surgery. First, 3,390 features were comprehensively extracted from pre- and post-NAC DCE-MRIs. Then patients were then divided into two groups: type 1, patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and single lesion shrinkage; type 2, major residual lesion with satellite foci, multifocal residual, stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). The logistic regression (LR) was used to build prediction models to identify the two groups. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

Radiomics features were significantly related to breast cancer shrinkage after NAC. The combination model achieved an AUC of 0.82, and the pre-NAC model was 0.64, the post-NAC model was 0.70, and the pre-post-NAC model was 0.80. In the combination model, 15 features, including nine wavelet-based features, four Laplacian-of-Gauss (LoG) features, and two original features, were filtered. Among these selected were four features from pre-NAC DCE-MRI, six were from post-NAC DCE-MRI, and five were from pre-post-NAC features.

Conclusion

The model combined with pre- and post-NAC DCE-MRI can effectively predict candidates to undergo BCS and provide AI-based decision support for clinicians with ensured safety. High-order (LoG- and wavelet-based) features play an important role in our machine learning model. The features from pre-post-NAC DCE-MRI had better predictive performance.

Evaluation of Multiparametric MRI Radiomics-Based Nomogram in Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Two-Center study

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the performance of primary foci of breast cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributing to establish and validate radiomics-based nomograms for predicting the different pathological outcome of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively collected 387 patients with locally advanced breast cancer, all treated with NAC and received breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) before NAC. Radiomics signatures were extracted from region of interest (ROI) on multiparametric MRI to build rad score. Clinical-pathologic data and radiological features established the clinical model. The comprehensive model featured rad-score, predictive clinical-pathologic data and radiological features, which was ultimately displayed as a nomogram. Patients were grouped in 2 different ways in accordance with the Miller-Payne (MP) grading of surgical specimens. The first grouping method: 181 patients with pathological reaction grades Ⅳ∼Ⅴ were included in the significant remission group, while 206 patients with pathological reaction grades Ⅰ∼Ⅲ were included in the nonsignificant remission group. The second grouping method: 117 patients with pathological complete response (pCR) were assigned to the pCR group, and 270 patients who failed to meet pCR were assigned to in the non-pCR group. Two combined nomograms are created from 2 grouped data for predicting different pathological responses to NAC. The area under the curves (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to evaluate the performance of each model. While decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves were used for estimating the clinical application value of the nomogram.

RESULTS

Two combined nomograms embodying rad score and clinical-pathologic data outperformed, showing good calibrations for predicting response to NAC. The combined nomogram predicting pCR showed the best performance with the AUC values of 0.97, 0.90 and 0.86 in the training, testing, and external validation cohorts respectively. The AUC values of another combined nomogram predicting significant remission: 0.98, 0.88 0.80 in the training, testing and external validation cohorts. DCA showed the comprehensive model nomogram obtained the most clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined nomogram could preoperatively predict significant remission or even pCR to NAC in breast cancer based on multiparametric MRI and clinical-pathologic data.

Integration of Clinical and CT-Based Radiomic Features for Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer

The purpose of the present study was to examine the potential of a machine learning model with integrated clinical and CT-based radiomics features in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed in 329 patients with breast tumors (n = 331) before NST. Pyradiomics was used for feature extraction, and 107 features of seven classes were extracted. Feature selection was performed on the basis of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and six ICC thresholds (0.7−0.95) were examined to identify the feature set resulting in optimal model performance. Clinical factors, such as age, clinical stage, cancer cell type, and cell surface receptors, were used for prediction. We tried six machine learning algorithms, and clinical, radiomics, and clinical−radiomics models were trained for each algorithm. Radiomics and clinical−radiomics models with gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features only were also built for comparison. The linear support vector machine (SVM) regression model trained with radiomics features of ICC ≥0.85 in combination with clinical factors performed the best (AUC = 0.87). The performance of the clinical and radiomics linear SVM models showed statistically significant difference after correction for multiple comparisons (AUC = 0.69 vs. 0.78; p < 0.001). The AUC of the radiomics model trained with GLCM features was significantly lower than that of the radiomics model trained with all seven classes of radiomics features (AUC = 0.85 vs. 0.87; p = 0.011). Integration of clinical and CT-based radiomics features was helpful in the pretreatment prediction of pCR to NST in breast cancer.

Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Current and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer is correlated with better survival. Meanwhile, an expanding arsenal of post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies have proven beneficial in the absence of pCR, leading to an increased use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early breast cancer and the search for predictive biomarkers of response. The better prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could enable the escalation or de-escalation of neoadjuvant treatment strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving the clinical management of early breast cancer. Clinico-pathological prognostic factors are currently used to estimate the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic treatment but are not accurate enough to allow for personalized response prediction. Other factors have recently been proposed but are not yet implementable in daily clinical practice or remain of limited utility due to the intertumoral heterogeneity of breast cancer. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and highlight the future perspectives that could lead to the better prediction of response, focusing on the current biomarkers used for clinical decision making and the different gene signatures that have recently been proposed for patient stratification and the prediction of response to therapies. We also discuss the intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity in breast cancers as well as the emerging techniques and relevant pre-clinical models that could integrate this biological factor currently limiting the reliable prediction of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Prediction of the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With MRI-Radiomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies using MRI-radiomics for predicting the pathological complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy , and we evaluated their methodological quality using the radiomics-quality-score (RQS). Random effects meta-analysis was performed pooling area under the receiver operating characteristics curves. Publication-bias was assessed using the Egger's test and visually inspecting the funnel plot. Forty-three studies were included in the qualitative review and 34 in the meta-analysis. Summary area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0,78 (95%CI:0,74-0,81). Heterogeneity according to the I² statistic was substantial (71%) and there was no evidence of publication bias (P-value = 0,2). The average RQS was 12,7 (range:-1-26), with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.93 (95%CI:0.61-0.97). Year of publication, field intensity and synthetic RQS score do not appear to be moderators of the effect (P-value = 0.36, P-value = 0.28 and P-value = 0.92, respectively). MRI-radiomics may predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients but the heterogeneity of the current studies is still substantial.