Metabolite interactions in prostatic fluid mimics assessed by 1H NMR

Post-acquisition water-signal removal in 3D water-unsuppressed 1 H-MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate

PURPOSE

To develop a robust processing procedure of raw signals from water-unsuppressed MRSI of the prostate for the mapping of absolute tissue concentrations of metabolites.

METHODS

Water-unsuppressed 3D MRSI data were acquired from a phantom, from healthy volunteers, and a patient with prostate cancer. Signal processing included sequential computation of the modulus of the FID to remove water sidebands, a Hilbert transformation, and k-space Hamming filtering. For the removal of the water signal, we compared Löwner tensor-based blind source separation (BSS) and Hankel Lanczos singular value decomposition techniques. Absolute metabolite levels were quantified with LCModel and the results were statistically analyzed to compare the water removal methods and conventional water-suppressed MRSI.

RESULTS

The post-processing algorithms successfully removed the water signal and its sidebands without affecting metabolite signals. The best water removal performance was achieved by Löwner tensor-based BSS. Absolute tissue concentrations of citrate in the peripheral zone derived from water-suppressed and unsuppressed ¹ H MRSI were the same and as expected from the known physiology of the healthy prostate. Maps for citrate and choline from water-unsuppressed 3D ¹ H-MRSI of the prostate showed expected spatial variations in metabolite levels.

CONCLUSION

We developed a robust relatively simple post-processing method of water-unsuppressed MRSI of the prostate to remove the water signal. Absolute quantification using the water signal, originating from the same location as the metabolite signals, avoids the acquisition of additional reference data.

Developments in proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer

In this paper, we review the developments of 1H-MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) methods designed to investigate prostate cancer, covering key aspects such as specific hardware, dedicated pulse sequences for data acquisition and data processing and quantification techniques. Emphasis is given to recent advancements in MRSI methodologies, as well as future developments, which can lead to overcome difficulties associated with commonly employed MRSI approaches applied in clinical routine. This includes the replacement of standard PRESS sequences for volume selection, which we identified as inadequate for clinical applications, by sLASER sequences and implementation of 1H MRSI without water signal suppression. These may enable a new evaluation of the complementary role and significance of MRSI in prostate cancer management.