1
|
Conan A, Mata A, Lenormand E, Zahariev A, Enstipp M, Jumeau J, Handrich Y. Causes for the High Mortality of European Green Toad Tadpoles in Road Stormwater Ponds: Pollution or Arrival of a New Predator? DIVERSITY 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/d15040485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Declining wetland areas cause many amphibian species to breed inside stormwater ponds (SWPs), which have been constructed alongside major roads to collect and retain polluted road runoff water. However, the suitability of such artificial ponds as a breeding habitat for amphibians remains unclear. Recently, a study found a very low survival rate of European green toad tadpoles (Bufotes viridis) inside SWPs, presumably because of high sediment pollution and/or the presence of a leech Helobdella stagnalis. To establish the effects of sediment pollution and leech presence on tadpole growth and survival, we exposed 480 green toad tadpoles to a number of controlled conditions inside holding tanks. We tested the following conditions: (1) ‘control’ (clean sediment + clean water); (2) ‘leech’ (clean sediment + clean water + leeches); (3) ‘SWP sediment’ (clean water + polluted sediment); and (4) ‘SWP sediment + leech’ (clean water + polluted sediment + leeches). Tadpole size and survival was monitored until metamorphosis and, individuals participated in swim tests and respirometry trials to the test potential effects of pollution on their escape capacity and metabolic rate. We found that the growth rate of tadpoles exposed to the SWP sediment (condition 3) was increased, while pollution had no effect on survival. By contrast, leeches heavily preyed upon tadpoles, leaving no survivors in conditions 2 and 4. Tadpoles swim speed and metabolic rate of toadlets did not differ between the ‘control’ and ‘SWP sediment’ group, the only conditions with surviving individuals. Our study found that leeches had the strongest effect on tadpole survival and were likely responsible for the low survival rates in SWPs observed recently. Hence, we suggest that adequate management measures are needed to limit leech penetration inside SWPs (frequent dredging/draining) to prevent these artificial structures from becoming an ecological trap for locally endangered amphibians but rather a base to help in their recovery.
Collapse
|
2
|
Conan A, Dehaut N, Enstipp M, Handrich Y, Jumeau J. Stormwater ponds as an amphibian breeding site: a case study with European green toad tadpoles. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2023; 30:12114-12124. [PMID: 36104646 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22991-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Stormwater ponds (SWPs) are built to collect and retain polluted runoff water from roads. Consequently, they are not perceived as suitable habitat for wetland species, such as many amphibians. However, given the drastic decline of wetland areas, SWPs may serve as a habitat for protected amphibian species, such as the European green toad (Bufotes viridis). The latter species is frequently found inside these artificial ponds, but their reproductive success is unknown. We assessed the suitability of SWPs as breeding habitat for European green toads by monitoring 8 SWPs and 8 semi-natural ponds (SNPs), which served as control sites. At each site, two groups of 30 tadpoles, originating at that site, were held inside two floating enclosures that contained sediment from the respective pond. During bi-weekly monitoring, tadpoles were counted and measured, allowing to estimate growth and mortality rates. A variety of biotic and abiotic factors were studied to determine the causes of potential differences in growth and mortality rates between the two pond types. While growth rate did not differ between pond types, mortality rates were significantly greater in SWPs than in SNPs. The extremely low survival rate observed in SWPs might be explained by the considerably greater pollutant concentration in their sediment and/or by the presence of leeches, which were found exclusively inside SWPs. Implementation of management measures, such as regular draining/dredging during winter, might help to lower the pollutant concentration in the sediment and reduce the density of leeches inside SWPs, improving their suitability as habitat for amphibians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Conan
- CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
- Collectivité Européenne d'Alsace, CERISE, Place du Quartier Blanc, 67964, Cedex 9, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Nathan Dehaut
- Collectivité Européenne d'Alsace, CERISE, Place du Quartier Blanc, 67964, Cedex 9, Strasbourg, France
| | - Manfred Enstipp
- CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Yves Handrich
- CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jonathan Jumeau
- Collectivité Européenne d'Alsace, CERISE, Place du Quartier Blanc, 67964, Cedex 9, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zamora-Marín JM, Ilg C, Demierre E, Bonnet N, Wezel A, Robin J, Vallod D, Calvo JF, Oliva-Paterna FJ, Oertli B. Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full? THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 753:141987. [PMID: 32911169 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of artificial ponds to regional biodiversity of five different regions, studying amphibians, water beetles and freshwater snails. This biodiversity is also compared with that observed in natural ponds from three of the investigated regions. Our results indicate that artificial ponds host, on average, about 50% of the regional pool of lentic species. When compared to natural ponds, the artificial ponds always supported a substantially lower alpha richness (54% of the natural pond richness). The invertebrate communities presented high values of beta diversity and were represented by a restricted set of widely distributed species, and by numerous rare species. There were discrepancies among the taxonomic groups: overall, amphibians benefited most from the presence of artificial ponds, since 65% of the regional lentic species pools for this group was found in artificial ponds, whereas 43% and 42% was observed in the case of beetles and snails, respectively. However, each invertebrate group was promptly the most benefited animal group in a single pond type. Therefore, artificial pond types were complementary among them in terms of contribution to regional diversity of the three animal groups. Based on these results, we forecast that future human-dominated landscapes in which most ponds are artificial will be particularly impoverished in terms of freshwater biodiversity, underlining the need to conserve existing natural ponds and to create new "near-natural" ponds. However, if properly designed and managed, artificial ponds could make a substantial contribution to support freshwater biodiversity at a regional scale. Furthermore, the number and diversity of artificial ponds must be high in each considered landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Manuel Zamora-Marín
- Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Christiane Ilg
- VSA, Swiss Water Association, Center of Competence for Surface Water Quality, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Eliane Demierre
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, HEPIA, 1254 Jussy, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nelly Bonnet
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, HEPIA, 1254 Jussy, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Wezel
- ISARA, AgroSchool for Life, Agroecology and Environment Research Unit, 23 Rue Jean Baldassini, 69364 Lyon, France
| | - Joël Robin
- ISARA, AgroSchool for Life, Agroecology and Environment Research Unit, 23 Rue Jean Baldassini, 69364 Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Vallod
- ISARA, AgroSchool for Life, Agroecology and Environment Research Unit, 23 Rue Jean Baldassini, 69364 Lyon, France
| | - José Francisco Calvo
- Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Beat Oertli
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, HEPIA, 1254 Jussy, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|