Pouch-vaginal fistula after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: treatment and outcomes

Gracilis muscle interposition for pouch-vaginal fistulas: a single-centre cohort study and literature review

BACKGROUND

First described by Parks and Nicholls in 1978, the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionized the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). IPAA is fraught with complications, one of which is pouch-vaginal fistulas (PVF), a rare but challenging complication noted in 3.9-15% of female patients. Surgical treatment success approximates 50%. Gracilis muscle interposition (GMI) is a promising technique that has shown good results with other types of perineal fistulas. We present the results from our institution and a comprehensive literature review.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study including all patients with a PVF treated with GMI at our institution from December 2018-January 2000. Primary outcome was complete healing after ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included. Eight of nine IPAAs (88.9%) were performed for MUC, and one for FAP. A subsequent diagnosis of Crohn's disease was made in five patients. Initial success occurred in two patients (22.2%), one patient was lost to follow-up and seven patients, after further procedures, ultimately achieved healing (77.8%). Four of five patients with Crohn's achieved complete healing (80%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical healing rates quoted in the literature for PVFs are approximately 50%. The initial healing rate was 22.2% and increased to 77.8% after subsequent surgeries, while it was 80% in patients with Crohn's disease. Given this, gracilis muscle interposition may have a role in the treatment of pouch-vaginal fistulas.

Clinical issues facing pouch patients: an introduction to a special issue on the ileal pouch

For over 40 years, restorative proctocolectomy has been used in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing proctocolectomy. Radiologists are now encountering an increasing number of patients with an ileal pouch and therefore need to understand the clinical issues and concerns in these patients. This review is the introduction of a special issue on the ileal pouch and was written with both surgeon and gastroenterology input. The intent is to assist the radiologist in understanding the clinical questions posed by both the patients and their physicians. Subsequent sessions will address specific imaging modalities and techniques, how the gastroenterologists and surgeons address issues with these patients, and a final session summarizing the sessions and speculating on future investigations and approaches.

MRI of the ileal pouch

Ileal pouch surgery is the surgical gold standard treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, ileal pouch surgery is a technically challenging procedure and is associated with high morbidity. Clinical presentations of pouch complications are often nonspecific but imaging can identify many of these complications and is essential in clinical management. This paper will focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the ileal pouch, including recommended MRI protocol and approach to imaging interpretation with an emphasis on those ileal pouch complications particularly well evaluated with MRI.

Contrast enema, CT, and small bowel series of the ileal pouch

This manuscript is part of the ileal pouch symposium and will describe the water-soluble contrast enema, CT, and small bowel series. MRI and other imaging modalities are discussed elsewhere in the symposium. Water-soluble contrast enema and CT are excellent for the evaluation of the ileal pouch. Contrast enema and CT with anal contrast administration can allow for anastomotic integrity and pouch assessment. Pre-pouch ileum, extra-intestinal manifestations, and acute symptomatology are best assessed with CT. The contrast small bowel examination is of limited utility in pouch patients and should not be performed. Indications, imaging technique, and anatomic pouch assessment with water-soluble contrast enema, CT, and contrast small bowel examination will be reviewed here.

Ileoanal pouch-related fistulae: A systematic review with meta-analysis on incidence, treatment options and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Ileoanal pouch related fistulae (PRF) are a complication of restorative proctocolectomy often requiring repeated surgical interventions and with a high risk of long-term recurrence and pouch failure.

AIMS

To assess the incidence of PRF and to report on the outcomes of available surgical treatments.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature search for articles reporting on PRF in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) from 1985 to 2020.

RESULTS

34 studies comprising 770 patients with PRF after ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) were included. Incidence of PRF was 1.5-12%. In IBD patients Crohn's Disease (CD) was responsible for one every four pouch-vaginal fistulae (PVF) (OR 24.7; p=0.001). The overall fistula recurrence was 49.4%; procedure-specific recurrence was: repeat IPAA (OR 42.1; GRADE +); transvaginal repair (OR 52.3; GRADE ++) and transanal ileal pouch advancement flap (OR 56.9; GRADE ++). The overall failure rate was 19%: pouch excision (OR 0.20; GRADE ++); persistence of diverting stoma (OR 0.13; GRADE +) and persistent fistula (OR 0.18; GRADE +).

CONCLUSION

PVFs are more frequent compared to other types of PRF and are often associated to CD; surgical treatment has a risk of 50% recurrence. Repeat IPAA is the best surgical approach with a 42.1% recurrence rate.

Systematic review on the management of ileoanal pouch-vaginal fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

AIM

Ileoanal pouch-vaginal fistula (PVF) is a relatively common complication of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There are several operative approaches in the management of PVF. There is currently no consensus as to which approach is the most effective or which should be attempted first.

METHOD

A systematic review was undertaken following a publicly available protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019133750) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Online searches of databases MEDLINE and Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials and ISRCTN registry were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles met the criteria for inclusion in the study: 13 retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies, eight case series, three case reports and a case-control study. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity between included articles. Our study included 577 PVFs, and the incidence rate was 2.1%-17.1%. Both local and abdominal approaches were used in the management of PVF. The overall success of local and abdominal procedures was 44.9% and 60.2% respectively. ROBINS-I assessment revealed a critical risk of bias. GRADE assessment indicated a very low certainty in effect size and evidence quality.

CONCLUSION

Local interventions and abdominal approaches have a high failure rate. The results of this review will aid the counselling of patients with this condition. Furthermore, we provide an algorithm for discussion on the management of PVF based on experience at our local centre. The studies available on the management of PVF are low quality; a large prospective registry and Delphi consensus are required to further this area of research.

What Is the Best Surgical Treatment of Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas?

BACKGROUND

Pouch-vaginal fistula is a debilitating condition with no single best surgical treatment described. Closure of these fistulas can be incredibly difficult, and transanal, transabdominal, and transvaginal approaches have been reported with varying success rates. Recurrence is a major problem and could eventually result in repeat redo pouch or permanent diversion.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate healing rates for procedures done for pouch-vaginal fistula closure.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database complemented by chart review.

SETTINGS

This study reports data of a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent surgery for pouch-vaginal fistula from 2010 to 2017 were identified. Patients who underwent surgery with intent to close the fistula were included, and patients who had inadequate follow-up to verify fistula status were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients included underwent surgery to close pouch-vaginal fistula.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success of the surgery was the main outcome measure. Success was defined as procedures with no reported recurrence of fistula on last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients underwent surgery with an intent to close the pouch-vaginal fistula, 65 of whom had undergone index IPAA for ulcerative colitis, but 13 of these patients later had the diagnosis changed to Crohn's disease. Thirty-nine patients (56%) had a fistula originating from anal transition zone to dentate line to the vagina (not at the pouch anastomosis). In the total group of 70 patients, our successful closure rate was 39 (56%) of 70. Procedures with the highest success rates were perineal ileal pouch advancement flap and redo IPAA (61% and 69%).

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature and small number of cases are the limitations of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Although numerous procedures may be used in an attempt to close pouch-vaginal fistula, pouch advancement and redo pouch were the most successful in closing the fistula. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A841.

A Comprehensive Approach to Pouch Disorders

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis, UC with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia, and familial adenomatous polyposis. In general, patients experience good function outcomes and quality of life with an IPAA. Although pouchitis is the most well-recognized and frequent complication after IPAA, a number of additional inflammatory, postsurgical, structural, neoplastic, and functional complications may occur, resulting in pouch dysfunction. We herein provide a comprehensive review of pouch function and an approach to diagnosis and management of pouch complications.

Modified Martius flap procedure for refractory ileal pouch-vestibular fistula: a report of three cases

PURPOSE

Pouch-vaginal or vestibular fistula is an uncommon, but devastating complication that occurs in women after ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. The management of these fistulae is challenging, and it is associated with high recurrence and pouch loss rates. This report describes the use of the modified Martius flap procedure for three patients with ulcerative colitis who developed refractory pouch-vestibular fistulae.

RESULTS

Three patients with ulcerative colitis, who underwent total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, developed pouch-vestibular fistulae. The fistulae originated in the pouch-anal anastomosis site in all three cases. We performed fistulectomy and transvaginal closure with sphincteroplasty followed by the modified Martius flap procedure under diversion ileostomy. No complications occurred after ileostomy closure, and the postoperative anal function was good.

CONCLUSION

The modified Martius flap procedure is among the best options for patients with ulcerative colitis who develop refractory pouch-vestibular fistula as a complication of mucosal proctectomy.

Complications in colorectal surgery

Colorectal pediatric surgery is a diverse field that encompasses many different procedures. The pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease, the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations including complex cloaca reconstructions and the ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis present some of the most technically challenging procedures pediatric surgeons undertake. Many children prevail successfully following these surgical interventions, however, a small number of patients suffer from complications following these procedures. Anticipated postoperative problems are discussed along with medical and surgical strategies for managing these complications.

Controversies in J Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: A Focus on Handsewn Versus Stapled Anastomosis

The accepted current standard for treatment of medically refractory ulcerative colitis is total proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for restoration of continence. There are 2 techniques by which the anastomosis can be performed, including handsewn and stapled. Handsewn anastomosis with mucosectomy was the first method described; however, it has been associated with significant incontinence. The double-stapled anastomosis was developed in response to improve postoperative function. Controversy remains as to which technique is superior as both have disadvantages. This review article addresses differences between the 2 methodologies in relation to postoperative complications, anorectal physiology, functional outcomes, and oncological safety.

The Failed J Pouch

The development and refinement of proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) since its introduction in the 1970s has made it the optimal procedure of choice in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. However, it is a procedure that can be associated with significant morbidity. Pouch failure due to infection, mechanical, or functional disability represents a challenge to both surgeon and patient. Practicing surgeons who deal with revisional pouch surgery face a variety of intraoperative, postoperative, and reoperative challenges. Success requires a strategy that includes critical planning, preparation, specialized surgical techniques, and experience to achieve long-term success, minimize the adverse consequences of IPAA-related complications, and ensure solutions and hope to patients.

Challenges in the Medical and Surgical Management of Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease patients will likely come to the surgeon's attention at some point in their course of disease, and they present several unique anatomic, metabolic, and physiologic challenges. Specific and well-recognized complications of chronic Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis are presented as well as an organized and evidence-based approach to the medical and surgical management of such disease sequelae. Topics addressed in this article include intestinal fistula and short bowel syndrome, pouch complications, and deep venous thrombosis with emphasis placed on optimization of the patient's physiologic state for best outcomes.

Ileal j pouch complications and surgical solutions: a review

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is currently accepted as the standard method to restore continence after total proctocolectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ileal pouches offer improved quality of life and high patient satisfaction; however, there are many pouch-related complications due to the original disease process and change in anatomy. This is a review article of the common and some rare surgical complications after J pouches, which can be subdivided into the septic and nonseptic categories. Septic-related complications include anastomotic leak, abscess, and fistulas, whereas common nonseptic-related complications include small bowel obstruction, strictures, Crohn's disease, pouchitis, and cuffitis. Rare nonseptic complications to be discussed are prolapse, volvulus, and neoplasia.

Considerations and complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) preserves fecal continence as an alternative to permanent end ileostomy in select patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The procedure is technically demanding, and surgical complications may arise. This article outlines both the early and late complications that can occur after IPAA, as well as the workup and management of these potentially morbid conditions.

Long-term efficacy of the button fistula plug in the treatment of Ileal pouch-vaginal and Crohn's-related rectovaginal fistulas

BACKGROUND

Several new techniques have been described for the management of anal fistulas. The anal fistula plug has received much attention. The button plug adaptation has been heralded for use in rectovaginal and ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the long-term efficacy of the button plug in patients with such fistulas.

DESIGN

All women with ileal pouch-vaginal and rectovaginal fistulas secondary to Crohn's disease who underwent insertion of a novel button fistula plug between May 2008 and November 2009 were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

At long-term follow up of a median of 118 (interquartile range, 81.5-129.0) weeks, none of the 11 patients (0%) with ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas were considered to have healed, whereas 4 of the 9 patients (44%) with rectovaginal fistulas had healed. Each of these 4 patients whose treatment was successful were nonsmokers with an etiology of Crohn's disease and achieved complete closure of the fistula tract after one procedure, and none had been defunctioned. All repeat procedures failed.

CONCLUSION

The button fistula plug may be an option for patients with Crohn's-related rectovaginal fistulas, albeit with the caveat of advising patients of a less than 50% success rate, but not for patients with ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas. Repeat attempts cannot be justified.

Sepsis is a major predictor of failure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the risk of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure and factors predictive of failure overall and in patients with septic complications.

METHODS

Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained patient registry. All patients registered in the Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease database who had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for more than 12 months were included in the study. Pouch failure was defined as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis excision or permanent diversion. Cox proportional hazard models with death as a competing risk were created, modeling time to failure as the outcome of interest for all patients and for the subgroup of patients with septic complications.

RESULTS

The study included 1,554 patients. One hundred six patients experienced an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure (6.8%), 49 (46.2%) of these failures were caused by septic complications. Independent predictors of failure included Crohn's disease (hazard ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval [4.7, 12.0]) and postoperative sepsis (hazard ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval [4.4, 9.8]). In the subgroup of patients with failure due to postoperative septic complications, independent predictors of failure were Crohn's disease (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval [1.3, 5.7]) and presence of a pouch fistula (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval [1.3, 5.2]).

CONCLUSION

Septic complications are the most common cause of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure. Careful patient selection and the prevention of septic complications may decrease the risk of this failure.

Recurrent Fistula between Ileal Pouch and Vagina-Successful Treatment with a Gracilis Muscle Flap

Fistulae between an ileal pouch and the vagina are an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following proctocolectomy and mucosectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Several reports describe the successful use of muscle flaps to close recurrent pouch-vaginal-fistulae (PVF). However, series only contain small numbers and an optimal management has not yet been determined. We report the case of a 26-year old woman with a third recurrence of a PVF after proctocolectomy for treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis in October 2005. Because local approaches failed, definitive closure of the fistula was achieved by interposition of a gracilis muscle flap between the pouch-anal anastomosis and the vagina. The postoperative course was uneventful; the patient was discharged 7 days after surgery and remained free of recurrence and symptomatic complaints for 22 months now. The gracilis muscle flap proved to be an effective method in the treatment of recurrent PVF.

Repeat pouch surgery by the abdominal approach safely salvages failed ileal pelvic pouch

PURPOSE

: This study evaluated outcomes of patients with abdominal salvage operations for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

: Patients undergoing laparotomy for ileoanal pouch salvage were reviewed from a prospectively maintained pouch database and records.

RESULTS

: From 1983 to 2007, 241 abdominal reconstructions were performed. The median follow-up was 5 years (range, 0.04-20.8). Diagnoses before primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were ulcerative colitis in 187, familial adenomatous polyposis in 22, indeterminate colitis in 20, Crohn's disease in 9, and other in 3. The most common indications for salvage were fistula (n = 67), leak (n = 65), stricture (n = 42) pouch dysfunction (n = 40), pelvic abscess (n = 25). Seventy-one cases had a new pouch constructed. One hundred and seventy cases had the original pouch salvaged. Twenty-nine cases had either pouch excision or ileostomy without pouch excision the result of failure after reconstruction. To assess functional results and quality of life, patients with reconstruction were matched to those with a primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Significantly higher proportions of patients with reconstruction reported seepage during daytime (P = 0.002), at night (P = 0.015), and daytime pad usage (P = 0.02). Other parameters and quality of life were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

: Repeat abdominal surgery was a good alternative for pouch failure. Functional and quality of life outcomes were encouraging.

Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectourethral, rectovaginal, and pouch-vaginal fistulas: results in 53 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review our experience with gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent repair of perineal fistula using the gracilis muscle between 1995 and 2007 was undertaken. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the fistula type by gender: females (rectovaginal and pouch-vaginal) and males (rectourethral).

RESULTS

Gracilis interposition was performed in 53 patients. Seventeen women underwent 19 gracilis interpositions for 15 rectovaginal and 2 pouch-vaginal fistulas; 76% had a mean of (1-4) (mean of 2) prior failed attempt at repair. Eight patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. Two women required a second gracilis interposition. Thirty-three percent of the Crohn's disease-associated fistulas successfully healed; 75% without Crohn's successfully healed.Thirty-six males underwent gracilis interposition for rectourethral fistulas, mainly due to prostate cancer treatment; 13 (36%) had a mean of 1.5 (range 1-3) failed prior repairs. Seventeen patients experienced postoperative complications. The initial success rate in men with rectourethral fistulas was 78%. After successful second procedures in 8 patients, the overall clinical healing rate was 97%.

CONCLUSION

The gracilis muscle transposition is a safe and effective method of treating complex perianal fistulas.

Improved outcome due to increased experience and individualized management of leaks after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of leaks after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure.

METHODS

Of 1424 IPAA procedures performed at Mount Sinai Hospital from 1981 to 2003, 141 patients experienced leaks (9.9%). Data were reviewed retrospectively from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease database and clinic and hospital charts. Statistical comparisons were performed with the chi2 test.

RESULTS

There were 81 men and 60 women with a median age of 36 years (12-69). Indication for surgery was ulcerative colitis in 93% of patients. Twenty-three leaks (16.3%) originated from the pouch whereas 118 (84.1%) arose from the ileoanal anastomosis. Of ileoanal anastomosis leaks, 24.6% were associated with and 38.1% without an abscess, 12.7% were associated with a pouch-cutaneous fistula, 15.3% were associated with a pouch-vaginal fistula, and 9.3% were diagnosed radiologically. Of the 130 patients who developed symptoms, 67% had fever, 38% had abdominoperineal pain, and 6% had perineal abscess. Twenty-nine percent of those who did not have an ileostomy had increased stool frequency. Nonoperative treatment was attempted initially in 100 patients with an 80% success rate. An operative procedure was performed in 59 patients (including those who failed nonoperative treatment), including transanal repair in 34 patients with a success rate of 66%; laparotomy with direct suture repair in 7 with a success rate of 57% and combined abdominoperineal pouch reconstruction in 18 with a success rate of 72%. Overall, 119 patients (84%) have a functioning pouch. Pouch salvage after a leak increased from 67% in 1981-1984 to 88% in 2001-2003 (P = 0.0004, chi2).

CONCLUSIONS

A high rate of ileal pouch salvage can be achieved after leaks associated with the IPAA procedure if management is individualized. Improved salvage rate over time is likely a reflection of increased experience with the management of complications as well as the strategy of individualized management.

Sonography of benign conditions of the anal canal: an update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to describe our experience with sonography for the study of benign conditions of the anal canal and perianal soft tissues.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of the anal sphincters in patients with fecal incontinence and documentation of perianal inflammatory masses and tracts in those with perianal inflammatory disease are the major indications for imaging the anal canal. We augment traditional transanal sonography with transperineal scanning in both sexes and transvaginal scanning in women to better show the anal canal in its quiet state to allow an accurate assessment of the integrity of the anal sphincters and of evidence of acute or chronic inflammatory involvement.