Conformal preoperative endorectal brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: early results of a phase I/II study

High-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer: A state-of-the-art review

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy that requires multidisciplinary treatment. By utilizing the dose-response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, increasing the radiotherapy dose can improve clinical complete remission rates. High-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) is a novel technique that delivers high doses of radiotherapy directly to the tumor via an endorectal applicator, sparing the adjacent normal tissues from excessive radiation exposure. HDREBT includes contact X-ray brachytherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. We introduce the latest developments in applicators and imaging techniques for HDREBT in rectal cancer and summarize the current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of HDREBT as a neoadjuvant, definitive, or palliative treatment option for all stages of rectal cancer patients. We also discuss the potential advantages and challenges of HDREBT in achieving organ preservation and improving the quality of life of rectal cancer patients. HDREBT has shown promising results in achieving high complete response rates, enabling nonoperative management, improving organ preservation rates, and providing effective palliation in rectal cancer patients. More studies are needed to optimize its dose and fractionation schemes in different clinical scenarios.

Radiotherapy dose escalation using endorectal brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer unsuitable for surgery: Lessons from studies in fit patients and future perspectives

Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50 % of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Treatment decision-making is challenging in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking. Elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often considered by surgeons as unfit to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). Recent data from randomized trials in young fit patients with early stage rectal cancer indicate that RT dose escalation can be safely delivered using external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients remain limited. Here, we review the current evidence in the epidemiology and the management of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. We summarize the potential of RT dose escalation to achieve long-term local control of the primary tumour, prevent disease-related morbidity, improve QoL and even organ preservation. Future perspectives and open questions will be discussed as well.

Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Reviewing the Past Two Decades of Clinical Investigation

(1) Background: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has led to improvement in local recurrence (LR) outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of preoperative external beam radiotherapy to TME reduces LR to less than 6%. As a trade-off to these gradual improvements in local therapies, the oncology community’s work is now focusing on mitigating treatment-related toxicities. In other words, if a small proportion of 4–6% of rectal cancer patients benefit from additional local therapy beyond TME, the burden of acute and long-term side effects must be considered with care. (2) Methods: With the introduction of better-quality imaging for tumor visualization and treatment planning, a new conformed radiation treatment was introduced with high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy. The treatment concept was tested in phase I and II studies: first in the pre-operative setting, and then as a boost after external beam radiation therapy, as a dose-escalation study, to achieve higher local tumor control. (3) Results: HDREBT is safe and effective in achieving a high tumor regression rate and was well tolerated in a phase II multicenter and two matched-pair studies. (4) Conclusions: HDREBT is a conformed radiation therapy that is safe and effective, and is presently explored in a phase III dose-escalation study in the NOM of patients with operable rectal cancer.

High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost After Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background: The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation has enhanced local control in rectal cancer patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) boost in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective trial was conducted based on the medical records of patients with rectal cancer, who were referred to a tertiary hospital for neoadjuvant treatment. Fifteen patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy boost after completion of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy were enrolled in the intervention group and 15 patients who were clinically matched (age, sex, stage, and distance of tumor from anal verge) were selected as the control group. EBRT schedule and concurrent chemotherapy regimen were similar in the two groups. The rate of pathological complete response (PCR), downstaging (T staging), and frequency of side effects were compared between the two groups of the study. Results: The mean age of patients was 57.97 ± 9.11 years and 18 patients (60%) were male. The results showed that T 3 and N 1 rectal cancer had the highest frequency among patients. Downstaging was observed in 66.7% and 80% of the control and intervention groups, respectively (P: 0.40). The rate of PCR was not different in the two groups (13.3% in both groups, P > 0.99). There were no significant differences in terms of treatment complications between the two groups, as well. Conclusions: HDR-BRT boost for rectal cancer is feasible and might improve downstaging in rectal cancer, but not PCR.

A Multidisciplinary Approach for the Personalised Non-Operative Management of Elderly and Frail Rectal Cancer Patients Unable to Undergo TME Surgery

Despite it being the optimal curative approach, elderly and frail rectal cancer patients may not be able to undergo a total mesorectal excision. Frequently, no treatment is offered at all and the natural course of the disease is allowed to unfold. These patients are at risk for developing debilitating symptoms that impair quality of life and require palliative treatment. Recent advancements in non-operative treatment modalities have enhanced the toolbox of alternative treatment strategies in patients unable to undergo surgery. Therefore, a proposed strategy is to aim for the maximal non-operative treatment, in an effort to avoid the onset of debilitating symptoms, improve quality of life, and prolong survival. The complexity of treating elderly and frail patients requires a patient-centred approach to personalise treatment. The main challenge is to optimise the balance between local control of disease, patient preferences, and the burden of treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is a crucial element within the multidisciplinary dialogue. Since limited knowledge is available on the optimal non-operative treatment strategy, these patients should be treated by dedicated multidisciplinary rectal cancer experts with special interest in the elderly and frail. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss a multidisciplinary patient-centred treatment approach and provide a practical suggestion of a successfully implemented clinical care pathway.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO practice parameter for the performance of radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This practice parameter aims to detail the processes, qualifications of personnel, patient selection, equipment, patient and personnel safety, documentation, and quality control and improvement necessary for an HDR brachytherapy program.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

RESULTS

Brachytherapy is a radiotherapeutic modality in which radionuclide or electronic sources are used to deliver a radiation dose at a distance of up to a few centimeters by surface, intracavitary, intraluminal, or interstitial application. Brachytherapy alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy plays an important role in the management and treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy uses radionuclides, such as iridium-192, at dose rates of ≥12 Gy/hr to a designated target point or volume, and it is an important treatment for a variety of malignant and benign conditions. Its use allows for application of high doses of radiation to defined target volumes with relative sparing of adjacent critical structures.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy requires detailed attention to personnel, equipment, patient and personnel safety, and continuing staff education. Coordination between the radiation oncologist and treatment planning staff and effective quality assurance procedures are important components of successful HDR brachytherapy programs.

Optimizing treatment sequencing of chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: The KIR randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have shown low compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy and external beam radiation (CT/EBRT) with total mesorectal excision. We hypothesize that giving neoadjuvant CT before local treatment would improve CT compliance.

METHODS

Between 2010-2017, 180 patients were randomized (2:1) to either Arm A (AA) with FOLFOX x6 cycles prior to high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and surgery plus adjuvant FOLFOX x6 cycles, or Arm B (AB), with neoadjuvant HDRBT with surgery and adjuvant FOLFOX x12 cycles. The primary endpoint was CT compliance to ≥85% of full-dose CT for the first six cycles. Secondary endpoints were ypT0N0, five-year disease free survival (DFS), local control and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients were randomized to either AA (n = 120, median age (MA) 62 years) or AB (n = 60, MA 63 years). 175/180 patients completed HDRBT as planned (97.2%). In AA, two patients expired during CT; three patients post-randomization received short course EBRT because of progression under CT (n = 2, AA) or personal preference (n = 1, AB). ypT0N0 was 31% in AA and 28% in AB (p = 0.7). CT Compliance was 80% in AA and 53% in AB (p = 0.0002). Acute G3/G4 toxicity was 35.8% in AA and 27.6% in AB (p = 0.23). With a median follow-up of 48.5 months (IQR 33-72), the five-year DFS was 72.3% with AA and 68.3% with AB (p = 0.74), the five-year OS 83.8% for AA and 82.2% for AB (p = 0.53), and the five-year local recurrence was 6.3% for AA and 5.8% for AB (p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed improved compliance to neoadjuvant CT in this study. Although there is no statistical difference in ypT0N0 rate, local recurrence, and DFS between the two arms, a trend towards favourable oncological outcomes is observed.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in older patients

Striking a balance between cancer treatment and patient-centred care is becoming ever more important in older patients with rectal cancer as the population is ageing. The treatment decision made by the modern multidisciplinary colorectal team will recommend pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery for advance rectal cancer and surgery alone for early rectal cancer, as the "standard of care" is surgery. However, an alternative non-surgical treatment option should be consider for older patients with rectal cancer as the surgical harm can far outweigh the potential benefits. There is published evidence that mortality is higher with increasing age. An alternative treatment option to surgery when patients are not suitable or refusing surgery is to offer them external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or chemo radiotherapy (EBCRT). A proportion of these patients can achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) which enable adoption of 'watch and wait' strategy to avoid surgery. However, a third of patients who achieved initial cCR can develop local regrowth within the first two years. This require salvage surgery which reduces their chance of organ preservation. Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or High Dose Rate Endo Brachy Therapy (HDREBT) boost following external beam radiotherapy can improve the initial cCR rate and reduce the risk of local regrowth. Those patients with persistent residual cancer or regrowth after brachytherapy boost following EBCRT or EBRT can have salvage surgery later without compromising their chance of cure. Therefore, patients should be fully aware of their treatment options and have 'a choice' when deciding and consenting their treatment.

Decision-Making Strategy for Rectal Cancer Management Using Radiation Therapy for Elderly or Comorbid Patients

Rectal cancer predominantly affects patients older than 70 years, with peak incidence at age 80 to 85 years. However, the standard treatment paradigm for rectal cancer oftentimes cannot be feasibly applied to these patients owing to frailty or comorbid conditions. There are currently little information and no treatment guidelines to help direct therapy for patients who are elderly and/or have significant comorbidities, because most are not included or specifically studied in clinical trials. More recently various alternative treatment options have been brought to light that may potentially be utilized in this group of patients. This critical review examines the available literature on alternative therapies for rectal cancer and proposes a treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians in treatment decision making for elderly and comorbid patients.

Age Is Not a Limiting Factor in Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Patients with Localized Cancer

This review examines the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT otherwise known as brachytherapy) in cancer treatment for elderly patients. Despite their advanced age and associated comorbidities, elderly patients should receive definitive cancer therapies, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT). In fact, RT becomes first-line option for patients who are not eligible for surgery (due to comorbidities, anticoagulant drugs, and risk of disfigurement) or those who refuse it. It emerged from this review of the literature as effective, simple, safe, and comfortable and was associated with good local control, low toxicity rates, and excellent cosmesis and provided a cost benefit. IRT may be used as sole treatment for small cancers or as a useful adjunct to surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in more advanced (or lymph node positive) cases, especially when the aim is local control with adequate preservation of normal tissue function. As palliative treatment, IRT preserves quality of life and/or improves survival. It is to be hoped that this review will serve as a helpful guide for members of multidisciplinary teams that are involved in treating elderly patients with cancer.

Benefit of adaptive CT-based treatment planning in high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

In this planning study, we investigated the dosimetric benefit of repeat CT-based treatment planning at each fraction vs. the use of a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions for high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included 11 patients that received a CT scan with applicator in situ for all three fractions. The treatment plan of the first fraction was projected on the repeat CT scans to simulate the use of a single treatment plan. In addition, replanning was performed on the repeat CT scans, and these were compared to the corresponding projected treatment plans.

RESULTS

Repeat CT-based treatment planning resulted on average in a 21% higher (p = 0.01) conformity index compared to single CT-based treatment planning. Projecting the initial treatment plan to the repeat CT scans of fraction two and three, 12/22 fractions reached a CTV D98 of 85% of the prescribed dose of 7 Gy, which increased to 14/22 using replanning. For the remaining fractions, median CTV D98 was 4.2 Gy, and an intervention would be necessary to correct applicator balloon setup or to remove remaining air and/or feces between the CTV and the applicator.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions may result in a suboptimal treatment at later fractions. Therefore, repeat CT imaging should be the minimal standard practice in HDREBT for rectal cancer to determine whether an intervention would be necessary. Replanning based on repeat CT imaging resulted in more conformal treatment plans and is therefore recommended.

Adaptive radiation dose escalation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a review

Total mesorectal excision (TME) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has offered superior control for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but can carry a quality of life cost. Fortunately, some patients achieve a complete response after CRT alone without the added morbidity caused by surgery. Efforts to increase fidelity of radiation treatment planning and delivery may allow for escalated doses of radiotherapy (RT) with limited off-target toxicity and elicit more pathological complete responses (pCR) to CRT thereby sparing more rectal cancer patients from surgery. In this review, methods of delivering escalated RT boost above 45-50.4 Gy are discussed including: 3D conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy. Newly developed adaptive boost strategies and imaging modalities used in RT planning and response evaluation such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are also discussed.

Endoluminal and Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies: a Systematic Review

Radiation therapy is an integral component in the multimodality management of many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at all stages of clinical presentation. With recent advances in technology and radiation delivery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be delivered with reduced toxicity. However, despite these advances, EBRT doses are still limited by the presence of radiosensitive serial structures near clinical targets in the GI tract. Relative to EBRT techniques, brachytherapy techniques have a lower integral dose and more rapid fall-off, allowing for high-dose delivery with little normal tissue exposure. Given the unique characteristics of brachytherapy, it is an attractive strategy to treat GI malignancies. This review addresses the application of both high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) to multiple GI malignancies for both definitive and palliative management.

The American College of Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society practice parameter for the performance of radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy is a radiation therapy method in which radionuclide sources are used to deliver a radiation dose at a distance of up to a few centimeters by surface, intracavitary, intraluminal, or interstitial application. This practice parameter refers only to the use of radionuclides for brachytherapy. Brachytherapy alone or combined with external beam therapy plays an important role in the management and treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy uses radionuclides such as iridium-192 at dose rates of 20 cGy per minute (12 Gy per hour) or more to a designated target point or volume. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is indicated for treating malignant or benign tumors where the treatment volume or targeted points are defined and accessible.

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Management of Operable Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) in the preoperative and definitive management of operable rectal cancer in terms of clinical outcomes and toxicities using a systematic review.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A review of published articles from January 1990 to December 2016 was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the search terms "rectal" or "rectum" in combination with "brachytherapy," "high dose rate," "HDR," and "endorectal." Additional publications were identified by scanning references. Only studies published in English reporting clinical outcomes with ≥30 patients treated with HDREBT were included.

RESULTS

The search identified 1688 articles, of which 22 met our inclusion criteria. Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. Following preoperative HDREBT with chemoradiation therapy (CRT), the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate ranged between 18% and 31% (weighted mean rate, 22.2%); R0 resection rate, between 80% and 99% (weighted mean rate, 95.5%); and sphincter-preservation rate, between 29% and 54% (weighted mean rate, 46.4%). The weighted mean 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.1% and 81.5%, respectively. After preoperative HDREBT alone, the pCR rate ranged between 10.4% and 27% (weighted mean rate, 23.8%), the R0 rate was 96.5% (1 study), and the sphincter-preservation rate ranged between 53.8% and 75.8% (weighted mean rate, 59.4%). The weighted mean 5-year progression-free survival and OS rates were 66.6% and 70.8%, respectively. There was only 1 study of HDREBT for nonsurgical management of rectal cancer, which reported a 2-year OS rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative HDREBT either alone or in combination with CRT may result in a better pCR but may not necessarily translate into better survival, which is similar to outcomes seen following preoperative CRT alone. There were significant variations across studies in terms of patient selection, treatment approaches, and evaluation of clinical outcomes, suggesting the need for an international consensus on the dosimetric parameters and techniques of HDREBT, timing and methods of response assessment, definitions and assessment of toxicities, and optimal timing of surgery before further prospective studies. Future studies should include evaluation of the role of HDREBT in the nonsurgical curative treatment of screen-detected early cancers and organ preservation in lower rectal cancers.

The Impact of Novel Radiation Treatment Techniques on Toxicity and Clinical Outcomes In Rectal Cancer

Purpose of review

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) has been the standard technique in the treatment of rectal cancer. The use of new radiation treatment technologies such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), proton therapy (PT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) has been increasing over the past 10 years. This review will highlight the advantages and drawbacks of these techniques.

Recent findings

IMRT, PT, SBRT and BT achieve a higher target coverage conformity, a higher organ at risk sparing and enable dose escalation compared to 3DCRT. Some studies suggested a reduction in gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities and an increase in the complete pathologic response rate; however, the clinical benefit of these techniques remains controversial.

Summary

The results of these new techniques seem encouraging despite conclusive data. Further trials are required to establish their role in rectal cancer.

Endorectal Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly or Medically Inoperable Patients With Rectal Cancer: Primary Outcomes of the Phase 1 HERBERT Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost in elderly and medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A phase 1 dose-escalation study was performed. Treatment consisted of EBRT (13 × 3 Gy) followed by 3 weekly brachytherapy applications 6 weeks later. The HDREBT dose started at 5 Gy per fraction, increasing with 1 Gy per fraction if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as grade ≥3 proctitis <6 weeks after HDREBT) occurred in ≤2 patients per dose level. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose, defined as 1 dose level below the dose at which 3 patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, clinical tumor response, freedom from local progression, and local progression-free and overall survival (L-PFS and OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 83 years were included in the study. Thirty-two were evaluable for DLT and late toxicity and 33 for response evaluation. Maximum delivered dose was 8 Gy per fraction, resulting in a recommended dose of 7 Gy per fraction. Response occurred in 29 of 33 patients (87.9%), with 60.6% complete response (CR). The L-PFS and OS rates were 42% and 63%, respectively, at 2 years. Patients with CR showed a significantly improved L-PFS (60% at 2 years, P=.006) and a trend in improved OS (80% at 2 years, P=.11). Severe late toxicity occurred in 10 of 32 patients.

CONCLUSION

We found that HDREBT after EBRT results in a high overall response rate, with improved L-PFS for patients with a CR. The high observed rate of severe late toxicity requires further evaluation of the risks and benefits of an HDREBT boost.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: management challenges

Between 5% and 10% of patients with rectal cancer present with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), and 10% of rectal cancers recur after surgery, of which half are limited to locoregional disease only (locally recurrent rectal cancer). Exenterative surgery offers the best long-term outcomes for patients with LARC and locally recurrent rectal cancer so long as a complete (R0) resection is achieved. Accurate preoperative multimodal staging is crucial in assessing the potential operability of advanced rectal tumors, and resectability may be enhanced with neoadjuvant therapies. Unfortunately, surgical options are limited when the tumor involves the lateral pelvic sidewall or high sacrum due to the technical challenges of achieving histological clearance, and must be balanced against the high morbidity associated with resection of the bony pelvis and significant lymphovascular structures. This group of patients is usually treated palliatively and subsequently survival is poor, which has led surgeons to seek innovative new solutions, as well as revisit previously discarded radical approaches. A small number of centers are pioneering new techniques for resection of beyond-total mesorectal excision tumors, including en bloc resections of the sciatic notch and composite resections of the first two sacral vertebrae. Despite limited experience, these new techniques offer the potential for radical treatment of previously inoperable tumors. This narrative review sets out the challenges facing the management of LARCs and discusses evolving management options.

Advancing Techniques of Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Since the advent of radiation therapy for rectal cancer, there has been continual investigation of advancing technologies and techniques that allow for improved dose conformality to target structures while limiting irradiation of surrounding normal tissue. For locally advanced disease, intensity modulated and proton beam radiation therapy both provide more highly conformal treatment volumes that reduce dose to organs at risk, though the clinical benefit in terms of toxicity reduction is unclear. For early stage disease, endorectal contact therapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy may be a definitive treatment option for patients who are poor operative candidates or those with low-lying tumors that desire sphincter-preservation. Finally, there has been growing evidence that supports stereotactic body radiotherapy as a safe and effective salvage treatment for the minority of patients that locally recur following trimodality therapy for locally advanced disease. This review addresses these topics that remain areas of active clinical investigation.

Normalization of CEA Levels Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy is a Strong Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent attention has been focused on the relationship between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and pathological complete response (pCR), without consensus regarding its predictive value. This study aims to examine the association between CEA and pCR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent primary rectal cancer resection after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Patients were divided into two groups, pCR or no-pCR, based on final pathology. CEA levels were measured at the initial visit with the surgeon/oncologist and post-completion of nCRT.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one patients underwent primary rectal cancer resections after nCRT. Nineteen patients (13.5 %) achieved pCR, while 122 (86.5 %) had no-pCR. Pre-nCRT CEA levels were not significantly different between groups (2.75 vs 4.5 μg/L, p = 0.65). However, post-nCRT CEA levels were significantly lower in patients with pCR (1.7 vs 2.4 μg/L, p < 0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analyses, low post-nCRT CEA level was an independent predictor of pCR (OR 1.74, CI 1.06, 3.81) and normalization of CEA from an initially elevated level was a highly significant predictor of pCR (OR 64.8, CI 2.53, 18,371).

CONCLUSION

Low post-nCRT CEA is an independent predictor of pCR, and normalization of CEA post-nCRT is a strong predictor of pCR.

High-dose-rate pre-operative endorectal brachytherapy for patients with rectal cancer

High-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) is an image guided brachytherapy treatment for patients with rectal cancer. It is based on tumor imaging with magnetic resonance in particular, which is used to choose eligible patients and improve tumor visualization. Treatment planning is performed using 3D CT simulation and treatment planning. The treatment is given on an outpatient basis and requires minimal local anesthesia. The validation of the technique was carried out through a preoperative study and is now explored as part of a radical treatment for early rectal cancer or as a boost modality.

We describe technical aspects of the HDREBT and we discuss the ongoing institutional review board approved studies exploring the clinical applications of this treatment modality for patients with rectal cancer: 1) as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with operable rectal tumor; 2) as a option to improve local control in patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer but with previous pelvic radiation.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Europe and worldwide, with the peak incidence in patients >70 years of age. However, as the treatment algorithms for the treatment of patients with CRC become ever more complex, it is clear that a significant percentage of older CRC patients (>70 years) are being less than optimally treated. This document provides a summary of an International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) task force meeting convened in Paris in 2013 to update the existing expert recommendations for the treatment of older (geriatric) CRC patients published in 2009 and includes overviews of the recent data on epidemiology, geriatric assessment as it relates to surgery and oncology, and the ability of older CRC patients to tolerate surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment of their metastatic disease including palliative chemotherapy with and without the use of the biologics, and finally the use of adjuvant and palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of older rectal cancer patients. An overview of each area was presented by one of the task force experts and comments invited from other task force members.

Tumour regression grading after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a near pathologic complete response does not translate into good clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

After preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer, clinically undetectable residual tumour deposits or pathologic lymph nodes may remain in the mesorectum.

AIM

The aim of this study was to report histopathological effects of CRT and factors affecting outcome in a uniformly treated series of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, 107 patients with cT3 (threatening the mesorectal fascia or <5 cm from the anal verge), cT4 or cN2 rectal cancer were treated with preoperative CRT (25 × 2 Gy with capecitabine) and TME 6-8 weeks later. Central histopathological review followed. Tumour regression grade (TRG) was scored in pCR, near-pCR, response and no response. Cox regression was performed to identify prognosticators.

RESULTS

The 3-year distant metastasis-free interval, disease-free rate and overall survival rate were 82%, 73% and 87% (median 44 months follow-up). TRG consisted of 20% pCR, 11% near-pCR, 55% response and 14% no response. 6/21 pCR patients harboured nodal metastases. 5/12 near-pCR had ypT3 disease, while 6 harboured node metastases. 5/12 near-PCR patients developed distant metastases. ypN and TRG were powerful outcome discriminators.

CONCLUSION

The high number of near-pCR with ypT3 or ypN1/2 and their poor outcome demonstrates that "watch-and-wait" in LARC patients should be applied with care.

Challenges in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: balancing the risk of recurrence and quality of life

The management of patients with rectal cancer has improved substantially-assisted by refinements in surgical technique, the increasing accuracy of preoperative imaging, more precise delivery of radiotherapy¸and more informative feedback from the histopathologist. Multidisciplinary teams have been the key to this success. Future challenges facing multidisciplinary teams include individually tailoring therapy - in particular in deciding who does and does not need radiotherapy, utilising new radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy and new systemic therapies, and electing patients for whom chemoradiotherapy might be potentially curative without surgical resection after complete clinical response. Hence, there is an increasing focus on developing predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers. This paper explores the background to common variations in practice, and the current and future challenges in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy before surgical treatment

Neoadjuvant treatment in terms of preoperative radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in rectal cancer, but this improvement has little if any impact on overall survival. Currently performed optimal quality-controlled total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for patients in the trial setting can be associated with very low local recurrence rates of less than 10% whether the patients receive radiotherapy or not. Hence metastatic disease is now the predominant issue. The concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a potentially attractive additional or alternative strategy to radiotherapy to deal with metastases. However, randomised phase III trials, evaluating the addition of oxaliplatin at low doses plus preoperative fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT), have in the main failed to show a significant improvement on early pathological response, with the exception of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study. The integration of biologically targeted agents into preoperative CRT has also not fulfilled expectations. The addition of cetuximab appears to achieve relatively low rates of pathological complete responses, and the addition of bevacizumab has raised concerns for excess surgical morbidity. As an alternative to concurrent chemoradiation (which delivers only 5-6 weeks of chemotherapy), potential options include an induction component of 6-12 weeks of NACT prior to radiotherapy or chemoradiation, or the addition of chemotherapy after short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) or chemoradiation (defined as consolidation chemotherapy) which utilises the "dead space" of the interval between the end of chemoradiation and surgery, or delivering chemotherapy alone without any radiotherapy.

Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes

BACKGROUND

The management of primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes (PRC-bTME) and recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) is challenging. There is global variation in standards and no guidelines exist. To achieve cure most patients require extended, multivisceral, exenterative surgery, beyond conventional total mesorectal excision planes. The aim of the Beyond TME Group was to achieve consensus on the definitions and principles of management, and to identify areas of research priority.

METHODS

Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus. The Group consisted of invited experts from surgery, radiology, oncology and pathology. The process included two international dedicated discussion conferences, formal feedback, three rounds of editing and two rounds of anonymized web-based voting. Consensus was achieved with more than 80 per cent agreement; less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus. During conferences held in September 2011 and March 2012, open discussion took place on areas in which there is a low level of consensus.

RESULTS

The final consensus document included 51 voted statements, making recommendations on ten key areas of PRC-bTME and RRC. Consensus agreement was achieved on the recommendations of 49 statements, with 34 achieving consensus in over 95 per cent. The lowest level of consensus obtained was 76 per cent. There was clear identification of the need for referral to a specialist multidisciplinary team for diagnosis, assessment and further management.

CONCLUSION

The consensus process has provided guidance for the management of patients with PRC-bTME or RRC, taking into account global variations in surgical techniques and technology. It has further identified areas of research priority.

Short-term outcome after neoadjuvant high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy or short-course external beam radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer

AIM

Total mesorectal excision with preoperative radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in rectal cancer, but radiotherapy increases the risk of complications. This study compared the immediate postoperative outcome after external beam radiotherapy with outome after high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT).

METHOD

Patients (n = 318) treated with preoperative HDREBT (6.5 Gy, daily, over 4 days) followed by surgery 4-8 weeks later were matched with 318 patients from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Register treated with short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 5 Gy, daily, over 5 days) and surgery in the subsequent week and with 318 patients who had surgery only (i.e. no preoperative radiotherapy; RT-) All 954 patients were followed for 30 days after surgery. Complications were divided into surgical, cardiovascular and infectious.

RESULTS

The SCRT group had fewer cardiovascular complications (3.1%) than did HDREBT (9.4%, P = 0.002) and RT- (7.2%, P = 0.03) groups. There was less perioperative bleeding in HDREBT patients (379.3 ml) than in SCRT (947.2 ml; P < 0.0001) or RT- (918.9 ml) patients, and the re-intervention rate was lower in HDREBT (4.1%) patients than in SCRT (14.2%; P = 0.005) and RT- (12.3%; P < 0.005) patients. The HDREBT group had fewer R2 resections than did the SCRT and RT- groups, but had a higher proportion of R0 resections compared with the RT- group (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

No major differences in postoperative complications were found. HDREBT patients had a higher rate of cardiovascular complications, but less perioperative bleeding and fewer re-interventions. A longer interval between radiotherapy and surgery may be beneficial for tumour regression and this could be reflected in the number of radical resections.

Clinicopathologic Comparison of High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in the Neoadjuvant Setting for Resectable Stages II and III Low Rectal Cancer

Purpose. To assess for differences in clinical, radiologic, and pathologic outcomes between patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma treated neoadjuvantly with conventional external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)) versus high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (EBT). Methods. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant EBT received 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions without chemotherapy, while those undergoing 3DRT or IMRT received 28 daily 1.8 Gy fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil. Data was collected prospectively for 7 EBT patients and retrospectively for 25 historical 3DRT/IMRT controls. Results. Time to surgery was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher rate of pathologic CR for EBT (P = 0.06). Rates of margin and lymph node positivity at resection were similar for all groups. Acute toxicity was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P = 0.025). Overall and progression-free survival were noninferior for EBT. On MRI, EBT achieved similar complete response rate and reduction in tumor volume as 3DRT and IMRT. Histopathologic comparison showed that EBT resulted in more localized treatment effects and fewer serosal adhesions. Conclusions. EBT offers several practical benefits over conventional radiotherapy techniques and appears to be at least as effective against low rectal cancer as measured by short-term outcomes.

Has the new TNM classification for colorectal cancer improved care?

In 2009, the Union for International Cancer Control issued the seventh edition of the well-used T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) classification guidelines. There has been a continual refinement of the staging for colorectal cancer since this system for assessing tumor stage was initially adopted and it has been used to guide treatment decisions for over 50 years. However, the outcome after therapy for patients with colorectal cancer is very variable, even when patients are assigned to the same TNM category. This article assesses the changes that have been made since the sixth edition and discusses whether they are, in fact, informative improvements for a practicing clinician.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies

Traditionally, there has been a high local recurrence rate in rectal cancer and 10-40% of patients require a permanent stoma. Both short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) and long-course preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) are used to reduce the risk of local recurrence and enable a curative resection. Total mesorectal excision has reduced the rate of local recurrence (even without radiotherapy) to below 10%, but has highlighted a high risk of metastatic disease in 30-40% of patients. Current trials suggest that in resectable cancers, where the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggests the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is not potentially involved, then SCPRT and CRT are equivalent in terms of outcomes such as local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For patients with more advanced disease, where the CRM is breached or threatened according to the MRI, the integration of more active chemotherapy and biological agents into chemoradiation is an attractive strategy because of the high risk of metastases. However, in none of the trials published in the last decade has chemoradiation impacted on DFS or OS. We examine the strategies of neoadjuvant, concurrent, consolidation (after chemoradiation and before surgery) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents, and the integration of biological agents for future potential strategies of treatment. We also compare the trials and compare the different strategies of long-course preoperative radiotherapy and SCPRT; the intensification of preoperative radiation and chemoradiation with dose escalation of external beam radiotherapy, using brachytherapy, intra-operative radiotherapy, hyperfractionation, and various available techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy. We recommend examining dose escalation of radiotherapy to the primary tumour where MRI predicts a threatened CRM. Of the potential treatment strategies involving cytotoxic agents, such as neoadjuvant, concurrent, consolidation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the most promising would appear to be consolidation chemotherapy following chemoradiation in locally advanced disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in MRI-selected patients who do not require radiation. Improvement in the quality of surgery is also an important future goal.

Clinical importance of surgical treatment of low rectal carcinoma in anus-preserving procedure--an analysis of 86 cases

We investigated the methods and experiences of an anus-preserving procedure in curative resection of low rectal carcinoma. Eighty-six patients with low rectal carcinoma underwent Dixon's procedure with device assistance. Patients were then observed for the effects of operation. The operation was successful in all patients. Pathologic examination of specimens revealed negative margins. Complications such as anastomotic leakage were found in 7 cases. All patients recovered well. Device assistance may contribute to the successful performance of anus-preserving procedure in low rectal carcinoma. Whether the anus can be preserved or not depends on the accurate measurement of the distal length of the rectum. A meticulous hemostasis and avoidance of tension on the stoma are key measures for avoiding anastomotic leakage.

High-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancers

AIM: To determine the feasibility and safety of high dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDR-ILBT) boost during preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

METHODS: Between 2008 and 2009, thirty-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (≥ T3 or N+), were treated initially with concurrent capecitabine (825 mg/m² oral twice daily) and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (45 Gy in 25 fractions), then were randomized to group A; HDR-ILBT group (n = 17) to receive 5.5-7 Gy × 2 to gross tumor volume (GTV) and group B; EBRT group (n = 19) to receive 5.4 Gy × 3 fractions to GTV with EBRT. All patients underwent total mesorectal excision.

RESULTS: Grade 3 acute toxicities were registered in 12 patients (70.6%) in group A and in 8 (42.1%) in group B. Complete pathologic response of T stage (ypT0) in group A was registered in 10 patients (58.8%) and in group B, 3 patients (15.8%) had ypT0 (P < 0.0001). Sphincter preservation was reported in 6/9 patients (66.7%) in group A and in 5/10 patients (50%) in group B (P < 0.01). Overall radiological response was 68.15% and 66.04% in Group A and B, respectively. During a median follow up of 18 mo, late grade 1 and 2 sequelae were registered in 3 patients (17.6%) and 4 patients (21.1%) in the groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION: HDR-ILBT was found to be effective dose escalation technique in preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancers, with higher response rates, downstaging and with manageable acute toxicities.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparison between intravenous 5-fluorouracil and oral capecitabine

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine provides an attractive alternative to intravenous (IV) 5-flourouracil (5-FU) in chemoradiation regimes for rectal cancer by avoiding the need for intravenous access and inpatient stay. We aimed to compare retrospectively the efficacy of concurrent capecitabine with IV 5-FU in preoperative pelvic chemoradiation schedules for rectal cancer in our centre.

METHOD

Patients treated from January 2005 to June 2007 were included. Information was collected on patient characteristics; treatment details; pathological response to treatment; recurrence and survival. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V17.

RESULTS

All patients had pelvic radiation. Ninety-nine patients were treated with capecitabine and 97 with 5-FU. The two groups were well matched for age, sex and TNM stage. There were significantly more PS (performance status) 0 patients in the capecitabine group (51%vs 30%) (P = 0.001). Of the 99 patients in the capecitabine group, 91 (92%) were able to undergo surgery with 84 (93%) achieving R0 resection. In the 5-FU group, these proportions were 87 (90%) and 70 (80%). The difference in the rate of R0 resection was statistically significant (P = 0.024). The APR rate was 35% in the capecitabine group compared with 47% in the 5-FU group (P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) rates between capecitabine (14%) and 5-FU(12%). A higher pCR rate (30%) was observed in patients who underwent a brachytherapy boost (P = 0.051). There were three local recurrences in the whole patient group, (capecitabine 1; 5-FU 2). Thirty-five patients had distant metastases, 14 in the capecitabine and 21 in the 5-FU group. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence between the two groups. Six patients in each group had grade 3 toxicity with diarrhoea being more common with capecitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for rectal cancer is efficacious and comparable to 5-FU (IV). It is more convenient, is well tolerated and avoids the need for inpatient admission.