Clinical and pathologic evaluation of patients with recurrence of colorectal cancer five or more years after curative resection

Pretreatment MRI-detected extramural venous invasion as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected extramural venous invasion (pmrEMVI) as a predictor of survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 1184 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent TME between January 2011 and December 2016 were reviewed. MRI data were collected from a computerized radiologic database. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess local, systemic recurrence, and disease-free survival risk based on pretreatment MRI-assessed tumor characteristics. After propensity score matching (PSM) for pretreatment MRI features, nCRT therapeutic outcomes according to pmrEMVI status were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors for early recurrence in patients receiving nCRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 62.8 months. Among all patients, the presence of pmrEMVI was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.827, 95% CI 1.285-2.597, p = 0.001) and systemic recurrence (HR 2.080, 95% CI 1.400-3.090, p < 0.001) but not local recurrence. Among patients with pmrEMVI, nCRT provided no benefit for oncological outcomes before or after PSM. Furthermore, pmrEMVI( +) was the only factor associated with early recurrence on multivariate analysis in patients receiving nCRT.

CONCLUSIONS

pmrEMVI is a poor prognostic factor for DFS and SR in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer and also serves as a predictive biomarker of poor DFS and SR following nCRT in LARC. Therefore, for patients who are positive for pmrEMVI, consideration of alternative treatment strategies may be warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study demonstrated the usefulness of pmrEMVI as a predictive biomarker for nCRT, which may assist in initial treatment decision-making in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Pretreatment MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (pmrEMVI) was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival and systemic recurrence in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. • pmrEMVI is a predictive biomarker of poor DFS following nCRT in patients with LARC. • The presence of pmrEMVI was the only factor associated with early recurrence on multivariate analysis in patients receiving nCRT.

Intrabiliary metastasis of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma mimicking choledocholithiasis 18 years after the primary tumor

This case report presents a 62-year-old male who had previously undergone curative colectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 2005 for colorectal cancer. He presented with jaundice, which was initially attributed to choledocholithiasis. After cholecystectomy and repeat ERCPs, hyperbilirubinemia persisted. There was persistent dilation of the right posterior duct on imaging, concerning for biliary stricture, possibly due to cholangiocarcinoma or intraductal papillary neoplasm. During a right posterior hepatectomy, a peripheral liver lesion was found in association with the dilated bile duct. On frozen evaluation, the lesion was found to be invasive adenocarcinoma. The final pathology was compatible with a metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma of colonic origin. A repeat colonoscopy was done with no recurrence or new lesion in the colon. This case underscores the challenges associated with diagnosing biliary issues and assessing liver lesions in patients with a remote history of cancer. It raises the question of when and whether, after primary cancer treatment, it becomes safe to explore alternative diagnoses without immediately suspecting metastasis. Another significant challenge arises in ascertaining the most suitable therapeutic approaches for these patients. This is because these extremely late recurrences might be linked to an indolent, slow-growing type of tumor, but also have been linked to cancer stem cells, and as any recurrence, demands attention.

An Unusual and Protracted Course of a Haggitt 3 Malignant Polyp Recurrence

Timely detection of colorectal cancer recurrence is paramount, as treatment of early-stage recurrence greatly improves survival and outcomes. Current guidelines outline post-resection surveillance through endoscopy, CT imaging, and tumor markers for five years; however, there is minimal data to guide follow-up beyond this. We present the case of a 60-year-old female with locoregional recurrence 15 years after endoscopic mucosal resection of a low-grade Haggit level 3 sigmoid colon polyp. Unusually the recurrence was noted as an incidental finding following investigation of an elevated alpha-fetoprotein level post liver transplant, and a retrospective review of imaging revealed a calcified sigmoid mesentery mass. While surgical pathology revealed locoregional recurrence, there was no evidence of this on surveillance and preoperative colonoscopy. Through this case, we discuss the risk factors for late recurrence of colorectal cancer whilst exploring the literature and guidelines around this subset of patients. As new guidelines are developed, it may be important to consider late recurrence and individualize follow-up regimes based on risk factors.

Metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis: Who, what, when and what to do about it

Metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis occurs due to micrometastatic disease, in up to 23% of patients who have undergone curative-intent treatment. Metachronous metastasis tends to occur within 2 years of initial treatment. Diagnosis relies on posttreatment surveillance strategies. Care for patients with metachronous CRC metastasis is complex and requires careful multidisciplinary consideration. Those with isolated and technically resectable diseases are recommended to undergo metastasectomy with adjunct chemotherapy, however, survival, even after curative-intent resection, is poor.

Development and validation of a novel radiomics nomogram for prediction of early recurrence in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence (ER) is a significant concern following curative resection of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and is linked to poor long-term survival. Reliable prediction of ER is challenging, necessitating the development of a novel radiomics-based nomogram for CRC patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 405 patients, with 298 in the training set and 107 in the external test set. Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative venous-phase computed tomography (CT) images. A radiomics signature was created using univariate logistic regression analyses and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Clinical factors were integrated into the analyses to develop a comprehensive predictive tool in a multivariate logistic regression model, resulting in a radiomics nomogram. Subsequently, the calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness of the nomogram were evaluated.

RESULTS

The radiomics signature, consisting of four selected CT features, was significantly associated with ER in both the training and test datasets (P < 0.05). Independent predictors of ER included TNM stage, carcinoembryonic antigen level and differentiation grade were identified. The radiomics nomogram, incorporating all these predictors, exhibited good predictive ability in both the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.90) and the test set with an AUC of 0.85 (95 % CI, 0.72-0.99), surpassing the performance of any single candidate factor alone. Furthermore, additional analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a radiomics-based nomogram that effectively predicts early recurrence in CRC patients, enhancing the potential for timely intervention and improved outcomes.

Two cases of colorectal liver metastasis with residual liver recurrence after a long recurrence-free survival period

BACKGROUND

The rate of residual liver recurrence after the resection of colorectal liver metastases is high, and most cases recur within 5 years of the initial hepatectomy. Here, we report two cases of residual liver recurrence after radical resection of colorectal liver metastases after a long recurrence-free survival period.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1 involved a 62-year-old woman treated for ascending colon cancer in April 2011 who underwent right hepatectomy for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis in April 2012. However, in September 2021, computed tomography revealed residual recurrence in the lateral segment of the liver, and a lateral segmentectomy of the liver was performed. In Case 2, a 52-year-old man treated for cecal cancer in July 2002 underwent lateral segmentectomy of the liver for metachronous colorectal liver metastasis in October 2006. Subsequently, there was no recurrence; however, computed tomography showed residual liver recurrence in the right lobe of the liver in October 2021, and an expanded posterior hepatic segmentectomy was performed. Histopathological findings in both cases were consistent with colorectal liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We encountered two cases in which residual liver recurrence was observed after a long period of recurrence-free survival. Although rare, there have been a few cases of late recurrence of liver metastases after radical resection of cancer liver metastases.

Isolated liver metastasis detected 11 years after the curative resection of rectal cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

The duration of surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally 5 years. The overall incidence of recurrence more than 5 years after surgery for CRC in Japan has been reported to be 0.6%. Moreover, it is rare for CRC to have metachronous liver metastasis more than 10 years after surgery. Here, we present a case of liver metastasis detected 11 years after the curative resection of rectal cancer.

CASE SUMMARY

A 72-year-old man was referred to our hospital after a liver tumor was detected by abdominal ultrasonography at another hospital. He had undergone surgery for rectal cancer 11 years previously. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a tumor with a diameter of approximately 8 cm in the posterior segment, which was weakly and gradually enhanced. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT showed an abnormally high uptake on the tumorous lesion, which showed that the tumor appeared to spread convexly along the intrahepatic bile ducts. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was therefore diagnosed, and he had an extended right posterior sectionectomy and regional lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination showed that the tumor was a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and showed the same pathological characteristics as the rectal cancer. Immunohistological examination showed that the cancer cells of both the liver tumor and rectal cancer were positive for cytokeratin (CK) 20 and weakly positive for CK 7. These findings were consistent with the liver metastasis from the rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

It is possible that a liver tumor is metastatic in a patient with a previous history of CRC, even if it was more than 10 years earlier.

Clinicopathological Features of Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Over 5 Years After Radical Surgery Without Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy: Evidence From a Large Sample Study

Late recurrence (5 or more years) after radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare. This study aims to investigate the features of late recurrence in stage I–III CRC. A total of 9,754 stage I–III patients with CRC who underwent radical surgery without receiving neoadjuvant therapy, at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC), were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into three groups: early recurrence (3 months−2 years), intermediate recurrence (2–5 years), and late recurrence (over 5 years). The median duration of follow-up was 53.5 ± 30.1 months. A total of 2,341 (24.0%) patients developed recurrence. The late recurrence rate was 11.7%. Patients with a higher risk of late recurrence were more likely to be older, to be at the T4 stage, to have a higher degree of colon cancer, to have a lower frequency of signet ring cell carcinoma, to have fewer poorly differentiated tumors, to be at the early stage of CRC, along with less perineural and vascular invasions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, differentiation, T stage, N stage, perineural, and vascular invasions as independent factors for late recurrence. Late recurrent CRC has some distinctive characteristics. Although recurrence over 5 years after surgery is infrequent, an enhanced follow-up is still needed for the selected patients after 5 years.

Late Recurrence in a Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Local Excision: A Case Report

Some patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following surgery have been diagnosed with late recurrence more than 5 years after treatment, raising questions about the possible benefit extending surveillance beyond the recommended 5 years. In 2011, a 71-year-old male patient was diagnosed with T3N+ low-lying rectal cancer located 3 cm from the anal verge before undergoing long-course preoperative CRT. After CRT, the patient was reexamined and diagnosed with ycT1–2N0 lesion, so local excision (LE) was performed. The patient underwent intensive surveillance for up to 5 years, and no evidence of recurrence was found. At 74 months after surgery, the patient was hospitalized for a hematochezia, and local recurrence at the excision site and peritoneal seeding nodules were identified. Considering the late recurrence in this patient, it might be necessary to long-term follow-up beyond 5 years in patients with preoperative CRT followed by LE.

Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinicopathological patterns of recurrence after curative surgery for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a common tumor with a quite high-related mortality. Despite the used curative treatments, patients will develop cancer recurrence in up to 50% of the cases and/or other primary neoplasms. Although most of the recurrences are discovered within 3 years from the first treatment, a small percentage is found after 5 years. The early detection of recurrence is crucial to allow further therapies improving patients’ survival. Several follow-up programs have been developed but the optimal one is far from being established.

AIM

To evaluation of potential prognostic factors for timing and patterns of recurrence in order to plan tailored follow-up programs.

METHODS

Perioperative and long-term data of all consecutive patients surgically treated with curative intent, from January 2006 to June 2009, for colorectal adenocar-cinoma, were retrospectively reviewed to find potential prognostic factors associated with: (1) Recurrence incidence; (2) Incidence of an early (within 3 years from surgery) or late recurrence; and (3) Different sites of recurrence. In addition, the incidence of other primary neoplasms has been evaluated in a cohort of patients with a minimum potential follow-up of 10 years.

RESULTS

Our study included 234 patients. The median follow-up period has been 119 ± 46.2 mo. The recurrence rate has been 25.6%. Patients with a higher chance to develop recurrence had also the following characteristics: Higher levels of preoperative glycemia and carcinoembryonic antigen, highest anaesthesiologists Score score, occlusion, received a complex operation performed with an open technique, after a longer hospital stay, and showed advanced tumors. The independent prognostic factors for recurrence were the hospital stay, N stage 2, and M stage 1 (multivariate analysis). Younger ages were significantly associated with an early recurrence onset. Patients that received intermediate colectomies or segmental resections, having an N stage 2 or American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 3 tumors were also associated with a higher risk of liver recurrence, while metastatic diseases at diagnosis were linked with local recurrence. Neoadjuvant treatments showed lung recurrence. Finally, bigger tumors and higher lymph node ratio were associated with peritoneal recurrence (marginally significant). Thirty patients developed a second malignancy during the follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

Several prognostic factors should be considered for tailored follow-up programs, eventually, beyond 5 years from the first treatment.

Defining early recurrence in patients with resected primary colorectal carcinoma and its respective risk factors

PURPOSE

There is no evidence-based definition of early recurrence following resection of colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to define a point that discriminates between early and late recurrence in patients who have undergone colorectal cancer resection with curative intent and to analyze associated risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed at a university hospital recognized as a comprehensive cancer center, specializing in colorectal cancer surgery. Patient data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Included patients underwent resection for primary, non-metastatic colorectal carcinomas with curative intent between 1995 and 2010. Aims of the study were (1) to define the optimal cut-off point of recurrence-free survival based on overall survival using a minimum p value approach and (2) to identify patterns of initial recurrence and putative risk factors for early recurrence using regression models.

RESULTS

Recurrence was diagnosed in 412 of 1893 patients. Statistical analysis suggested that a recurrence-free survival of 16 months could be used to distinguish between early and late recurrence based on overall survival (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for early recurrence included advanced pT categories (pT3,4/ypT3,4) and positive lymph node status (pN+/ypN+). Early recurrence was independent of site of recurrence and was associated with worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of colorectal carcinoma within 16 months after primary treatment should be labeled as "early." Tumor categories pT3,4/ypT3,4 and positive lymph node status pN+/ypN+ are predictive of early recurrence.

Defining and predicting early recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The definition of "early recurrence (ER)" after rectal cancer surgery is currently unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine an evidence-based cut-off to distinguish early and late recurrence (LR) for patients with rectal cancer and compare the clinicopathological factors between the two groups.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical resection for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. A minimum p-value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to divide the patients into ER and LR groups based on overall survival. A logistic regression model was used to assess risk factors for ER.

RESULTS

A total of 763 patients were included, of which 167 (21.9%) experienced recurrence. The optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to differentiate between ER (n = 125, 74.9%) and LR (n = 42, 25.1%) was 24 months (P = 0.000001). The median postrecurrence survival of ER and LR was 12 months and 22 months, respectively (p = 0.028). The most common recurrent sites in patients with ER and LR were lung metastases, the incidence of liver metastases, however, differed considerably in ER and LR (27.2% vs 9.5%, P = 0.019). Risk factors including elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), higher ypTNM stage, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), and perineural invasion were significantly associated with ER.

CONCLUSION

A recurrence-free interval of 24 months is the optimal cut-off value for defining ER versus LR. Elevated preoperative CEA, higher ypTNM staging, positive CRM, and perineural invasion were associated with ER of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Early postoperative recurrences for colon cancer: Results from a Pakistani rural cohort

Objectives

We conducted this study to determine the factors associated with early postoperative recurrence in colon cancer patients treated with curative intent.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for colon cancer between January 2014 and December 2016 were reviewed. All patients received either adjuvant chemotherapy or follow-up at the Bannu Institute of Nuclear Medicine Oncology and Radiotherapy (BINOR). The patients lived in rural areas of southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Results

We enrolled 72 patients, 28 of whom experienced a postoperative recurrence within 2 years (early recurrence). In univariate analysis, postoperative early relapse was significantly correlated with advanced age (>60 years, p = 0.030), nodal status (p = 0.012), pathological stage (p = 0.013), number of nodes removed (p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (p = 0.044). In multivariate analysis, age more than 60 years (p = 0.031) and fewer than 12 lymph nodes removed (p = 0.003) were independent predictors for early recurrence. The liver was the most common site of recurrence (42.8%) in this study.

Conclusion

Our results showed that advanced age and the removal of fewer than 12 lymph nodes during surgery were significant predictors for early postoperative recurrence. Identification of high-risk patients during follow-up with enhanced therapeutic modalities can improve disease-free survival.

Machine Learning in Prediction of Second Primary Cancer and Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Recurrence of CRC (Re) and onset of a second primary malignancy (SPM) are important indicators in treating CRC, but it is often difficult to predict the onset of a SPM. Therefore, we used mechanical learning to identify risk factors that affect Re and SPM.

PATIENT AND METHODS

CRC patients with cancer registry database at three medical centers were identified. All patients were classified based on Re or no recurrence (NRe) as well as SPM or no SPM (NSPM). Two classifiers, namely A Library for Support Vector Machines (LIBSVM) and Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPTree), were applied to analyze the relationship between clinical features and Re and/or SPM category by constructing optimized models.

RESULTS

When Re and SPM were evaluated separately, the accuracy of LIBSVM was 0.878 and that of REPTree was 0.622. When Re and SPM were evaluated in combination, the precision of models for SPM+Re, NSPM+Re, SPM+NRe, and NSPM+NRe was 0.878, 0.662, 0.774, and 0.778, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can be used to rank factors affecting tumor Re and SPM. In clinical practice, routine checkups are necessary to ensure early detection of new tumors. The success of prediction and early detection may be enhanced in the future by applying "big data" analysis methods such as machine learning.

Predictive Significance Of Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Determination In Postoperative Liver Metastasis Of Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

Systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction have been proved to be significantly associated with cancer progression and metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the association between preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and postoperative liver metastasis in CRC.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study evaluated 182 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection. The inflammation-based prognostic factors, including SII, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), were calculated based on preoperative laboratory data. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors correlated with postoperative liver metastasis in CRC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were respectively used to assess the predictive ability and clinical usefulness of SII for postoperative liver metastasis in CRC.

Results

The univariate and multivariable analysis confirmed SII was independently correlated with postoperative liver metastasis in CRC (p<0.001), and the ROC and DCA analysis demonstrated SII was superior to other inflammation-based factors in terms of predictive ability.

Conclusion

SII is an independent predictive indicator of postoperative liver metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer.

Is follow-up still mandatory more than 5 years after surgery for colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess if to prolong follow-up (FU) more than 5 years after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is justified or not.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for a CRC before 2013 and without any tumor recurrence (or synchronous metastases) during the first 5 years after surgery were identified from our database and included.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2012, 121 patients operated for rectal (RC) (median of FU of 84 months; range 60-211) and 97 with colonic cancer (CC) (median of FU of 78 months; range 60-139), without any tumor recurrence (or synchronous metastases) during the first 5 years after surgery, presented a late tumor recurrence: 13/121 RC (10.7%) versus 2/97 CC (2.1%) (p = 0.014); 8/13 recurrences in RC (61.5%) were observed after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, and 9/13 (69.2%) in pN0 tumors. Among the 13 recurrences, 3 had both local and metastatic recurrences (23%), 5 an isolated local recurrence (38.5%) and 5 an isolated metastatic recurrence (38.5%). After surgery for CC, the 2 recurrences were observed in patients with T3N0 tumors.

CONCLUSION

After surgery for a CRC, in patients without tumor recurrence during the first 5 years after surgery, follow-up after 5 years must be continued in rectal cancer patients because of a 10.7% rate of late recurrence. On the opposite, after surgery for colon cancer the 2% rate of late recurrence after 5 years suggested that only patients with pT3-T4 colonic cancer could probably be followed more than 5 years after surgery.

Pattern, Stage, and Time of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer After Curative Surgery

Surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite curative surgery, some patients experience cancer recurrence. However, the pattern, stage, and time of recurrent disease (RD) remain unknown. We aimed to determine the pattern and stage of RD after curative open and laparoscopic surgery for CRC. Databases were searched using selected keywords for clinical studies that analyzed the pattern, stage, and time of RD from CRC. A systematic protocol was used for data extraction, data synthesis, and interpretation of results. Of 455 publications retrieved from databases, 9 clinical studies were selected for this systematic review. There is substantial evidence that pulmonary recurrence is most commonly associated with rectal tumors, and multisite RD appears more frequently with right-sided CRC. RD from colon cancers predominantly appears early in liver, while recurrences from rectal cancer appear late in lungs. Approximately 30% to 50% of RD after curative resection of CRC occurs within the first 2 years; however, median time to recurrence is gradually increasing, particularly for patients with rectal cancers. Advanced primary CRC is significantly correlated with more locoregional and distant RD, with worse disease-free survival. There is a decrease in the 5-year incidence of RD that is associated with prolongation of time of RD for both locoregional and metastatic disease. The duration and design of postoperative follow-up protocols for recurrences from CRC should be tailored to site and stage of primary tumor, as rectal cancers demand longer surveillance times than colon cancer.

Korean physicians' policies for postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer

Background/Aims

We explored Korean physicians' policies for surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative surgery.

METHODS

Web-based self-report questionnaires were developed. Invitations to participate were emailed to physicians who diagnosed and treated CRC from October 1 to November 15, 2015. The questionnaire consisted of the role doctors played in the surveillance, examination of surveillance, and duration of postoperative surveillance according to CRC stage or primary site of the cancer.

RESULTS

Ninety-one physicians participated in the online survey, and 78 completed the survey. Sixty-seven participants (13%) answered "up to 5 years" for stage I surveillance duration; and 11 (13%) responded with a duration of > 5 years for stage I. A total of 61 (75%) responded with a surveillance duration of up to 5 years for stage II; and 19 (24%) responded with a duration of > 5 years for stage II. Sixty-seven (97%) and 61 (91%) physicians monitored patients with stage II/III every 3 or 6 months by laboratory examination and by abdominopelvic computed tomography scan for the first year, respectively. A total of 43 (53%) responded with a surveillance duration of up to 5 years for stage IV; and 46 (46%) responded with a duration of > 5 years for stage IV after curative resection.

Conclusions

Korean physicians mostly followed up CRC using intensive postoperative surveillance. In preference to monitoring over a comparatively shorter period of time, the physicians tended to prefer monitoring patients post-operatively over a > 5 year period, particularly in cases of advanced-stage CRC.

Pulmonary metastasis in rectal cancer: a retrospective study of clinicopathological characteristics of 404 patients in Chinese cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study aim to investigate the incidence, timing and risk factors of metachronous pulmonary recurrence after curative resection in patients with rectal cancer.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary referral cancer hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 404 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection from 2007 to 2012 at Beijing Hospital were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

The pattern of recurrence was observed and evaluated.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence and timing of recurrences by site were calculated, and the risk factors of pulmonary recurrence were analysed.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival for the entire cohort was 77.0%. The most common site of recurrence was the lungs, with an incidence of 11.4%, followed by liver. Median interval from rectal surgery to diagnosis of pulmonary recurrence was much longer than that of hepatic recurrence (20 months vs 10 months, P=0.022). Tumour location, pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and positive circumferential resection margin were identified as independent risk factors for pulmonary recurrence. A predictive model based on the number of risk factors identified on multivariate analysis was developed, 5-year pulmonary recurrence-free survival for patients with 0, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors was 100%, 90.4%, 77.3% and 70.0%, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasised that the lung was the most common site of metachronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery. For patients with unfavourable risk profiles, a more intensive surveillance programme that could lead to the early detection of recurrence is strongly needed.

Optimal Surveillance Protocols After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

After patients with stage IV colorectal cancer undergo curative surgical resection, there is a large risk for recurrence. To establish optimal surveillance guidelines, an understanding of the temporal risk factors for recurrence is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to determine predictors for early (within 1 year), middle (1-2 years), and late (2 years or later) recurrence following curative resection in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at multiple institutions.

PATIENTS

The retrospective cohort study comprised 1070 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer after an R0 resection for the primary and metastatic lesions in 19 institutions from January 1997 to December 2007.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk factors for early, middle, and late recurrence were determined by logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate was 73% (784/1070). Cancer-specific survival was 29.5 months, and recurrence-free survival was 8.9 months. Early recurrence occurred in 488 (62%), middle recurrence in 184 (24%), and late recurrence in 112 (14%). In multivariable analysis, early recurrence risk factors included rectum site, depth of tumor invasion (T4), increasing N-staging, venous invasion, and liver metastasis. Late recurrence risk factors were tumor size ≤50 mm, and peritoneal dissemination.

LIMITATIONS

Because of the retrospective nature of this study, postoperative therapy was not standardized.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors differ for early, middle, and late recurrences of stage IV colorectal cancer following curative resection. Early (within 1 year) recurrence factors were rectum site, T4, N-staging, venous invasion, and liver metastasis, whereas late (2 years or later) recurrence risk factors were small tumor size and peritoneal dissemination. Our study provides important data to guide a surveillance protocol following stage IV colorectal cancer curative resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A460.

A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent

BACKGROUND

Intensive follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer is common practice but lacks a firm evidence base.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether or not augmenting symptomatic follow-up in primary care with two intensive methods of follow-up [monitoring of blood carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and scheduled imaging] is effective and cost-effective in detecting the recurrence of colorectal cancer treatable surgically with curative intent.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled open-label trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) minimum follow-up (n = 301), (2) CEA testing only (n = 300), (3) computerised tomography (CT) only (n = 299) or (4) CEA testing and CT (n = 302). Blood CEA was measured every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years; CT scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were performed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for 3 years. Those in the minimum and CEA testing-only arms had a single CT scan at 12-18 months. The groups were minimised on adjuvant chemotherapy, gender and age group (three strata).

SETTING

Thirty-nine NHS hospitals in England with access to high-volume services offering surgical treatment of metastatic recurrence.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1202 participants who had undergone curative treatment for Dukes' stage A to C colorectal cancer with no residual disease. Adjuvant treatment was completed if indicated. There was no evidence of metastatic disease on axial imaging and the post-operative blood CEA level was ≤ 10 µg/l.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome Surgical treatment of recurrence with curative intent. Secondary outcomes Time to detection of recurrence, survival after treatment of recurrence, overall survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained.

RESULTS

Detection of recurrence During 5 years of scheduled follow-up, cancer recurrence was detected in 203 (16.9%) participants. The proportion of participants with recurrence surgically treated with curative intent was 6.3% (76/1202), with little difference according to Dukes' staging (stage A, 5.1%; stage B, 7.4%; stage C, 5.6%; p = 0.56). The proportion was two to three times higher in each of the three more intensive arms (7.5% overall) than in the minimum follow-up arm (2.7%) (difference 4.8%; p = 0.003). Surgical treatment of recurrence with curative intent was 2.7% (8/301) in the minimum follow-up group, 6.3% (19/300) in the CEA testing group, 9.4% (28/299) in the CT group and 7.0% (21/302) in the CEA testing and CT group. Surgical treatment of recurrence with curative intent was two to three times higher in each of the three more intensive follow-up groups than in the minimum follow-up group; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) compared with minimum follow-up were as follows: CEA testing group, OR 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 5.65; CT group, OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.63 to 8.38; and CEA testing and CT group, OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.49. Survival A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed no significant difference between arms (log-rank p = 0.45). The baseline-adjusted Cox proportional hazards ratio comparing the minimum and intensive arms was 0.87 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.15). These CIs suggest a maximum survival benefit from intensive follow-up of 3.8%. Cost-effectiveness The incremental cost per patient treated surgically with curative intent compared with minimum follow-up was £40,131 with CEA testing, £43,392 with CT and £85,151 with CEA testing and CT. The lack of differential impact on survival resulted in little difference in QALYs saved between arms. The additional cost per QALY gained of moving from minimum follow-up to CEA testing was £25,951 and for CT was £246,107. When compared with minimum follow-up, combined CEA testing and CT was more costly and generated fewer QALYs, resulting in a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (-£208,347) and a dominated policy.

LIMITATIONS

Although this is the largest trial undertaken at the time of writing, it has insufficient power to assess whether or not the improvement in detecting treatable recurrence achieved by intensive follow-up leads to a reduction in overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous staging to detect residual disease is important before embarking on follow-up. The benefit of intensive follow-up in detecting surgically treatable recurrence is independent of stage. The survival benefit from intensive follow-up is unlikely to exceed 4% in absolute terms and harm cannot be absolutely excluded. A longer time horizon is required to ascertain whether or not intensive follow-up is an efficient use of scarce health-care resources. Translational analyses are under way, utilising tumour tissue collected from Follow-up After Colorectal Surgery trial participants, with the aim of identifying potentially prognostic biomarkers that may guide follow-up in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41458548.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 32. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Matched case-control analysis comparing oncologic outcomes between preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate patterns of recurrence and oncologic outcomes after recurrence between preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Records of patients with stage II or III locally advanced rectal cancer seen between January 2000 and December 2010 were analyzed. The outcomes for patients undergoing preoperative CRT followed by radical resection (n = 466) were compared with outcomes of patients matched for sex, age, and stage who had surgery and then postoperative CRT (n = 466). Recurrence rates and sites, treatment of recurrence, and oncologic outcomes after recurrence were investigated. The rate of sphincter preservation and permanent stoma formation were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 124 and 140 patients in the pre- and postoperative CRT groups, respectively. The local and systemic recurrence rates were 3.6% and 20.8%, respectively, in the preoperative CRT group and 3.0% and 25.3%, respectively, in the postoperative CRT group (P = 0.245). Time to recurrence was longer in the postoperative CRT group (19 months vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.029). The overall rates of sphincter preservation (sphincter preservation operation and postoperative permanent stoma formation) did not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.381). The 5-year overall survival rate after recurrence did not differ between the two groups (25.6% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.051).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative and postoperative CRT are both safe and suitable treatment methods for rectal cancer, so the choice can be tailored to the patient's situation.

Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Testing for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the blood is a recommended part of follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer following primary curative treatment. There is substantial clinical variation in the cut-off level applied to trigger further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of different blood CEA levels in identifying people with colorectal cancer recurrence in order to inform clinical practice.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted all searches to January 29 2014. We applied no language limits to the searches, and translated non-English manuscripts. We searched for relevant reviews in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDION and DARE databases. We searched for primary studies (including conference abstracts) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Science Citation Index & Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. We identified ongoing studies by searching WHO ICTRP and the ASCO meeting library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy studies, cohort studies, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of post-resection colorectal cancer follow-up that compared CEA to a reference standard. We included studies only if we could extract 2 x 2 accuracy data. We excluded case-control studies, as the ratio of cases to controls is determined by the study design, making the data unsuitable for assessing test accuracy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (BDN, IP) assessed the quality of all articles independently, discussing any disagreements. Where we could not reach consensus, a third author (BS) acted as moderator. We assessed methodological quality against QUADAS-2 criteria. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data from all included studies as 2 x 2 tables. We conducted a bivariate meta-analysis. We used the xtmelogit command in Stata to produce the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and we also produced hierarchical summary ROC plots.

MAIN RESULTS

In the 52 included studies, sensitivity ranged from 41% to 97% and specificity from 52% to 100%. In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 2.5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78% to 86%) and pooled specificity 80% (95% CI 59% to 92%). In the 23 studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 64% to 76%) and pooled specificity 88% (95% CI 84% to 92%). In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 10 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 68% (95% CI 53% to 79%) and pooled specificity 97% (95% CI 90% to 99%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CEA is insufficiently sensitive to be used alone, even with a low threshold. It is therefore essential to augment CEA monitoring with another diagnostic modality in order to avoid missed cases. Trying to improve sensitivity by adopting a low threshold is a poor strategy because of the high numbers of false alarms generated. We therefore recommend monitoring for colorectal cancer recurrence with more than one diagnostic modality but applying the highest CEA cut-off assessed (10 µg/L).

A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate about the appropriate criterion for defining a positive circumferential resection margin after radical surgery for rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to determine the importance of the extent of the circumferential resection margin with regard to outcomes in patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

We reviewed the medical charts of 780 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery from 2004 to 2009. There were 599 patients (76.8%) who did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 181 patients (23.2%) who did.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The relationship between the extent of the circumferential resection margin (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mm) and recurrence and survival was assessed.

RESULTS

Among circumferential resection margins ≤0.5, ≤1.0, ≤2.0, and ≤3.0 mm, the HR was highest and disease-free survival was longest for a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm in both the chemoradiotherapy and nonchemoradiotherapy groups. A circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm, lymphatic invasion, histology, pathologic T category, pathologic N category, preoperative CEA, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of disease-free survival in the nonchemoradiotherapy group. In the chemoradiotherapy group, a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm and histology were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both of the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-institution, retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

A circumferential resection margin of ≤1 mm had a strong association with disease-free survival compared with circumferential resection margins ≤0.5, ≤2.0, and ≤3 mm. A circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was an independent predictor of a poor outcome in both the nonchemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups.

Estimated risk of cancer transmission from organ donor to graft recipient in a national transplantation registry

BACKGROUND

Transplanted organs carry the risk of inadvertent donor cancer transmission. Some cancers in organ donors have been classified as being associated with a high or unacceptable risk, but the evidence for such recommendations is scanty.

METHODS

The risk of cancer transmission from donors characterized as high or unacceptable risk was studied by analysing transplant and cancer registry data. Donors and recipients from England (1990-2008) were identified from the UK Transplant Registry. Cancer details were obtained from cancer registries and classified using guidelines from the Council of Europe and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing.

RESULTS

Of 17,639 donors, 202 (1.1 per cent) had a history of cancer, including 61 donors with cancers classed as having an unacceptable/high risk of transmission. No cancer transmission was noted in 133 recipients of organs from these 61 donors. At 10 years after transplantation, the additional survival benefit gained by transplanting organs from donors with unacceptable/high-risk cancer was 944 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 851 to 1037) life-years, with a mean survival of 7.1 (95 per cent c.i. 6.4 to 7.8) years per recipient.

CONCLUSION

Strict implementation of present guidelines is likely to result in overestimation of cancer transmission risk in some donors. Organs from some donors with cancers defined as unacceptable/high risk can be used safely.

Predictive factors and the prognosis of recurrence of colorectal cancer within 2 years after curative resection

PURPOSE

Because predicting recurrence intervals and patterns would allow for appropriate therapeutic strategies, we evaluated the clinical and pathological characteristics of early and late recurrences of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who developed recurrence after undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer stage I-III between January 2000 and May 2006 were identified. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 2 years after primary surgery of colorectal cancer. Analyses were performed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival rate between the early and late recurrence groups.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-eight patients experienced early recurrence and 64 had late recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that the postoperative elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), venous invasion, and N stage correlated with the recurrence interval. The liver was the most common site of early recurrence (40.5%), whereas late recurrence was more common locally (28.1%), or in the lung (32.8%). The 5-year overall survival rates for early and late recurrence were significantly different (34.7% vs. 78.8%; P < 0.001). Survival rates after the surgical resection of recurrent lesions were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Early recurrence within 2 years after surgery was associated with poor survival outcomes after colorectal cancer recurrence. An elevated postoperative CA 19-9 level, venous invasion, and advanced N stage were found to be significant risk factors for early recurrence of colorectal cancer.

Comparison of recurrence patterns between ≤5 years and >5 years after curative operations in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To identify characteristics of recurrent colorectal cancer in terms of follow-up periods, that is, ≤5 years and >5 years after curative operations

METHODS

This study enrolled 4,023 patients. Of them, 835 patients showed recurrence after primary curative resection for colorectal cancer. Recurrence occurred ≤5 years (n = 799) or >5 years (n = 36) after curative surgery. Variables and recurrence patterns were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Among the 835 patients who experienced recurrence, only 4.3% recurred >5 years after surgery. This group showed lower preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, more tumors with expanding growth, well-differentiated histology, and no lymph node metastasis (all P < 0.05). In terms of haematogenous metastasis, lung or liver was the most prevalent site in patients who recurred after >5 years or ≤5 years, respectively (P = 0.005). In rectal cancer patients, recurrence patterns revealed the same results. In colon cancer patients, the liver was the most prevalent site in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After 5 years of follow-up, routine surveillance for detecting other malignancies seems to be sufficient. However, the possibility of late (particularly late pulmonary) recurrence should be considered. Radiologic examination to detect pulmonary metastasis should be considered in the follow-up program.

Clinical and pathological evaluation of patients with early and late recurrence of colorectal cancer

AIM

To compare the characteristics of primary cancer between patients with early recurrence and those with late recurrence of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Overall 535 patients with primary colorectal cancer were reviewed and of these 130 patients with demonstrated recurrence were evaluated. Of the 130 patients, 91 had early recurrence (less than 2 years after surgery) and 39 had late recurrence (2 years or more after surgery). The clinical and pathological characteristics of primary cancer in these two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of late recurrence was 30% of total recurrences (39/130). On average, patients with early recurrence were younger than patients with late recurrence (mean age 48 vs 54 years, p = 0.027). Adjacent organ involvement and Dukes stage C was more prevalent in the early recurrence group than in the late group. The liver was the main site of distant recurrence in the early recurrence group (64% of distant recurrences), whereas bone and peritoneum were the most frequent sites of metastases in the late recurrence group (58%). In Dukes C colon cancer patients the disease-free interval was significantly longer in those who received both adjuvant therapies than in those who received either radiotherapy or chemotherapy or neither of them.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that factors such as primary clinical signs, stage of primary tumor, and adjacent organ involvement are significant with respect to the time for recurrence of colorectal cancer. It is important to take these characteristics into account in patient care management after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Multiple primary malignancies involving colorectal cancer--clinical characteristics and prognosis with reference to surveillance

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate clinically useful information for effective screening for synchronous and metachronous second primary cancers and to suggest potential surveillance tool.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,063 patients who were treated with potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer at Gachon University, Gil Hospital from 1997 to 2007.

RESULTS

The incidence of synchronous or metachronous cancer in addition to colorectal cancer was 5.3% (57 patients). The most common second primary cancer was stomach (54.3%), followed by cancers in cervix (12.2%). The time interval between the first and second tumor in colorectal cancer associated with metachronous extracolonic malignancy ranged from 1.1 to 10.8 years. The incidence of early-stage tumor was higher in patients with synchronous cancer than in those with a metachronous cancer with statistical significance (p = 0.034). The 5-year survival rate of the colorectal cancer group without second primary cancer was 70.1%, whereas that for the second primary cancer group was 63.8% (p = 0.253). The 5-year survival rate of the colorectal cancer group with stomach cancer was 70.5%, whereas that for the second primary cancer other than stomach cancer group was 56.6% (p = 0.282).

CONCLUSION

The frequent association between colorectal cancer and gastric cancer suggests an inclusion of gastrofiberscope when surveillancing patients with colorectal cancer in Korean population. Second primary cancers may develop even 10 years after the initial operation; thus, a need for lifelong surveillance even more than 5 years may be necessary.