The laparoscopic fundoplications: Nissen and partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication

Chylous cyst formation following laparoscopic fundoplication

Formation of an abdominal chylous cyst is a rare event, predominantly occurring after spinal, vascular or urologic retroperitoneal surgery. As far as we know, the presented case is the first report in the literature of chylous cyst formation after laparoscopic fundoplication. A 57-year-old man with a history of a conservatively treated spinal compression fracture (T11/12) underwent laparoscopic fundoplication in 1996 for recurrent heartburn with insufficient response to treatment with PPI. His reflux symptoms disappeared but over the following years he developed intermittent abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant. Gastroscopy in 2002 revealed a slight compression of the distal esophagus. CT scan revealed a cystic formation next to the distal esophagus which was initially interpreted to be part of the fundoplicate itself. Aggravation of symptoms and weight loss was noted in 2006. A further CT scan revealed a 7 cm cyst along the fundoplicate and the lesser curvature of the stomach. The cyst was subsequently drained laparoscopically. Cholesterol (351 mg/d), LDL-cholesterol (263 mg/dl), triglycerides (334 mg/dl) and chylomicrons led to the diagnosis chylous cyst and the patient was put on a medium-chain triglyceride diet. After 12 weeks the discharge stopped and the drain was removed. The patient remained symptom-free for seven months but then presented again with the same complaints. This time an even larger cyst was diagnosed, extending from the lesser curvature of the stomach through the esophageal hiatus up to the right atrium. A Roux-en-Y chylous cystojejunostomy was then performed and has solved the problem up to the present. A chylous cyst may develop after laparoscopic fundoplication. If simple drainage fails, a cystojejunostomy can solve this problem.

Histopathology of columnar-lined esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The question of whether an endoscopically normal-appearing esophagogastric junction should be biopsied in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is controversial. We have addressed this issue using endoscopy and histopathology.

METHODS

A total of 114 consecutive patients (58 males) with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease prospectively underwent endoscopy, including biopsy sampling from the esophagogastric junction. Endoscopically visible columnar-lined esophagus was defined by the presence of gastric-type mucosa above the level of the rise of the gastric folds. Histopathology was conducted using the Paull-Chandrasoma classification.

RESULTS

Of the 114 patients, 85 (74.6%) had endoscopically visible columnar-lined esophagus of length < or =0.5 cm (n = 82), 1 cm (n = 2) and 7 cm (n = 1); 29 patients (25.4%) had a normal endoscopic junction. All patients had histopathologic columnar-lined esophagus. Intestinal metaplasia and low-grade dysplasia was identified in 26 (22.8%) and 5 (4.4%) individuals, respectively, and was not statistically different in endoscopically normal vs. abnormal junction (P = 0.408 for intestinal metaplasia, P = 0.775 for low grade dysplasia). Intestinal metaplasia was independent from endoscopic esophagitis (P = 0.398) and hiatal hernia (P = 0.405).

CONCLUSIONS

Columnar-lined esophagus cannot be excluded by endoscopy. In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, biopsy sampling of normal-appearing junction is recommended for histopathologic exclusion of intestinal metaplasia and low-grade dysplasia.

Videoendoscopy and histopathology of the esophagogastric junction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

During endoscopy the stomach is considered to rise at the level of the 'gastric' folds; however, anatomical studies have demonstrated that the proximal gastric folds may in fact be esophageal. This prospective study was designed to assess the histopathology of endoscopically visible proximal gastric folds in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

35 consecutive patients (20 males) with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent video endoscopy, including biopsy sampling from the endoscopically visible esophagogastric junction (0 cm, 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm distal to the rise of gastric folds and 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm proximal to it). Endoscopy was digitally recorded and reviewed for assignment of biopsy level. Columnar-lined esophagus and esophagitis were cataloged according to the Paull-Chandrasoma histopathologic classification and the Los Angeles endoscopic classification.

RESULTS

Endoscopy: Normal endoscopic esophagogastric junction was seen in 11 (31%) patients and visible columnar-lined esophagus < or = 0.5 cm in 24 (69%).

HISTOLOGY

Columnar-lined esophagus extended 1.0 cm in 22.8% of patients and 0.5 cm in 51.4%, distal to the rise of the gastric folds. In all patients columnar-lined esophagus was interposed between squamous epithelium and gastric oxyntic mucosa. Thus, so-called gastric folds contained mucosa of esophageal origin in all patients. Intestinal metaplasia (Barrett esophagus) was detected in eight (22.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy cannot exclude histopathologic columnar-lined esophagus within gastric rugae. Thus, visible 'gastric' folds should not be used for definition of the esophagogastric junction but as a reference landmark for biopsy sampling during endoscopy.