[Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: a literature analysis on pathophysiology and treatment]

Managing Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in the Elderly: Intrathecal Therapy

Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) was first described in 1981 by Onofrio, who used a pump for continuous and intrathecal delivery of morphine to treat cancer pain. Over the following four decades, many reports supported this treatment method with implanted pumps for cancer and non-cancer pain. To date, more than 300,000 pumps for pain therapy and spasticity have been implanted worldwide. This article reviews current knowledge regarding intrathecal opioid therapy, focusing particularly on the use of IDD in elderly patients. Current literature is presented, and the arguments in favor of and against this therapy in elderly patients are discussed.

Transient Receptor Potential Channel and Interleukin-17A Involvement in LTTL Gel Inhibition of Bone Cancer Pain in a Rat Model

Cancer pain management is a challenge for which Chinese herbal medicine might be useful. To study the spinal mechanisms of the Chinese medicated gel Long-Teng-Tong-Luo (LTTL), a 7-herb compound, on bone cancer pain, a bone cancer pain model was made by inoculating the tibias of female rats with Walker 256 cells. LTTL gel or inert gel, 0.5 g/cm(2)/d, was applied to the skin of tumor-bearing tibias for 21 days beginning a day after the inoculation. Mechanical threshold and paw withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation was measured. Transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels in lumbar dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were immunostained and counted, and lumbar spinal cord interleukin-17A (IL-17A) was measured with real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. TRP antagonists and interleukin (IL)-17A antibodies were intrathecally administered to determine their effects on bone cancer pain. The gel significantly (P < .05) alleviated cancer-induced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia and inhibited cancer-enhanced expression of IL-17A in spinal astrocytes and the TRP subfamily members V1, A1, and V4 in lumbar DRG. Intrathecal TRP antagonists at 10 µg significantly (P < .05) attenuated mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and IL-17A expression, indicating that TRP channels facilitate spinal IL-17 expression and cancer pain. IL-17A antibodies inhibited cancer pain, suggesting that IL-17A promotes such pain. The data show that LTTL gel inhibits cancer pain, and this might be accounted for by the decrease in expression of DRG TRP channels and spinal astrocyte IL-17A.

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: pathophysiology and management

Opioids are the most commonly prescribed medications to treat severe pain in the Western world. It has been estimated that up to 90% of American patients presenting to specialized pain centres are treated with opioids. Along with their analgesic properties, opioids have the potential to produce substantial side effects, such as nausea, cognitive impairment, addiction and urinary retention. In the gut, opioids exert their action on the enteric nervous system, where they bind to the myenteric and submucosal plexuses, causing dysmotility, decreased fluid secretion and sphincter dysfunction, which all leads to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). In the clinic, this is reported as nausea, vomiting, gastro-oesophageal reflux-related symptoms, constipation, etc. One of the most severe symptoms is constipation, which can be assessed using different scales for subjective assessment. Objective methods such as radiography and colonic transit time can also be used, together with manometry and evaluation of anorectal function to explore the pathophysiology. Dose-limiting adverse symptoms of OIBD can lead to insufficient pain treatment. Even though several treatment strategies are available, the side effects are still a major challenge. Traditional laxatives are normally prescribed but they are often insufficient to alleviate symptoms, especially those from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Newer prokinetics, such as prucalopride and lubiprostone, may be more effective in alleviating OIBD. Another treatment approach is co-administration of opioid antagonists, which either cannot cross the blood-brain barrier or selectively target opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. However, although these new agents have proved to be more efficacious than placebo, clinical trials still need to prove their superiority to standard co-prescribed laxative regimes.

Opioid antagonists for prevention and treatment of opioid-induced gastrointestinal effects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The therapeutic action of opioid analgesics is compromised by peripheral adverse effects, among which constipation is the most disabling as laxatives often fail to provide satisfactory relief. This review highlights recent advances in the specific control of opioid-induced constipation by opioid receptor antagonists with limited systemic bioavailability or a peripherally restricted site of action.

RECENT FINDINGS

The specific management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction is currently based on three drug entities: oral alvimopan for the shortening of postoperative ileus associated with opioid-induced pain control after bowel resection, subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for the reduction of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness, and a fixed combination of oral prolonged-release naloxone with prolonged-release oxycodone for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain. All three drug entities have been shown to attenuate opioid-induced motor stasis in the gut with a favorable adverse effect profile, while the analgesic effect of opioids remains unabated.

SUMMARY

The availability of opioid receptor antagonists with restricted access to the central nervous system provides a novel opportunity to specifically control opioid-induced constipation and other peripheral adverse effects of opioid analgesics. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

[Methylnaltrexone. A new approach for therapy of opioid-induced obstipation]

Chronic pain patients using opioids frequently suffer from constipation which compromises well-being. Such an opioid-induced gastro-intestinal complication can occur regularly in patients in palliative care as well as in analgesic sedated intensive care patients or during prolonged perioperative pain therapy. Discomfort and distress in the affected patients can be so severely pronounced that they would rather suffer from the pain than from the side effect of constipation. Conventional therapy can be insufficient in providing satisfactory relief of constipation, mostly because this opioid-induced bowel hypomotility can be laxative-resistant. Moreover, constipation does not decrease during the course of therapy as do other side effects. It is well known that opioid-induced constipation is mediated via activation of micro-opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. Selective peripheral micro-receptor antagonists (such as methylnaltrexone, Relistor) can effectively treat opioid-induced constipation. An interference with central analgesia does not occur as the molecules cannot pass the blood-brain barrier due to their charged states. A reduction of opioid therapy or the development of withdrawal symptoms can be avoided. Studies have shown that methylnaltrexone is not only safe and efficient for chronically constipated palliative care patients but offers promising therapeutic options for further patient collectives.