[Infrarenal aortic ectasia in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)]

Abdominal aortic diameter and cardiovascular status in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Although much debated, an exaggerated inflammatory response to advanced atherosclerosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). Clinical presentation, infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter and RPF mass thickness were retrospectively analyzed in 166 patients with idiopathic RPF seen at our referral center between April 1998 and December 2019. Patients were stratified to their infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter at presentation (i.e., non-ectatic [< 25 mm]; ectatic [25-29 mm]; and aneurysmal [≥ 30 mm]) to compare characteristics across groups with an undilated or dilated aorta. Ectatic or aneurysmal aortic dilatation was present in 34% of patients. Most clinical characteristics did not differ across abdominal aortic diameter stratified groups, but RPF mass thickness was greater in patients presenting with aortic aneurysmal dilatation compared to that in patients with an undilated aorta (49.0 mm [IQR 34.0-62.0] vs 32.5 mm [IQR 25.3-47.8]; P < 0.001). A positive linear association was found between aortic diameter on a continuous scale and RPF mass thickness (β 0.32 [95% CI 0.34-0.96]; P < 0.001). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and acute-phase reactant levels (β 0.28 [95% CI 0.15-0.95]; P < 0.01). Treatment success across aortic diameter stratified groups did not differ (P = 0.98). Treatment induced RPF mass regression was not associated with an increase in aortic expansion rate (P = 0.44). Aortic dilatation was prevalent among patients. Infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter was independently associated with RPF mass thickness. Findings support the concept that at least in a subset of patients, RPF may be secondary to advanced atherosclerosis.