Pharmacologic treatment of hand-, knee- and hip-osteoarthritis

Periarticular hypertonic dextrose vs intraarticular hyaluronic acid injections: a comparison of two minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Background

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevailing form of joint disease. Despite the importance of minimally invasive therapeutic methods of KOA, there is a lack of evidence to compare intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection vs traditional dextrose prolotherapy.

Objective

The aim was to compare the therapeutic effects of prolotherapy with hypertonic dextrose vs hyaluronic acid on function and pain in KOA cases.

Materials and methods

One hundred and four KOA patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups, each containing 52 patients. The hyaluronic acid (HA) group were treated by 2.5 mL of hyaluronic acid intraarticulary, and the hypertonic dextrose (HD) group received 10 mL of 12.5% dextrose periarticulary. Injections were repeated three times with 1-week intervals. Pain intensity, measured by visual analog scale, and knee function, scaled by the Western Ontario and McMaster university arthritis index scores were compared between the two groups before and 3 months after intervention. Pain and function of the knee improved significantly (P<0.001) in all patients. However, significantly more symptom relief was found in the HA over the HD group. Prolotherapy with hypertonic dextrose and intraarticular injection of hyaluronic acid results in the same pain reduction and symptom relief as a noninvasive therapeutic method of KOA.

Conclusion

These results recommended intraarticular hyaluronic acid rather than prolotherapy by hypertonic dextrose for KOA symptoms relief.

Topical therapies for knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) involves millions of adults around the world.

PURPOSE

To analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of topical therapies and their contemporary placement in knee OA management criteria.

METHODS

A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search related to the role of topical therapies in knee OA was carried out.

RESULTS

Many types of local therapy have been reported, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like diclofenac and ketoprofen; capsaicin, cream containing glucosamine sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and camphor; nimesulide; civamide cream 0.075%; menthol; drug-free gel containing ultra-deformable phospholipid vesicles (TDT 064); 4Jointz utilizing Acteev technology; herbal therapies; gel of medical leech (Hirudo medicinalis) saliva extract; and gel prepared using Lake Urmia mud. One systematic review showed that topical diclofenac and topical ketoprofen can alleviate pain. However, another systematic review found that topical diclofenac and ketoprofen had limited efficacy in knee OA at 6 to 12 weeks. Many studies with a low level of evidence have reported some pain mitigation using the rest of aforementioned topical therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some controversy exists on the role of topical NSAIDs, current management guidelines advise topical NSAIDs as an option and even first-line therapy for knee OA treatment, particularly among elderly patients. Topical NSAIDs may be contemplated as similar options to oral NSAIDs and are associated with fewer gastrointestinal complications when compared with oral NSAIDs. Caution should be taken with the use of both topical and oral NSAIDs, including close adherence to dosing regimens and monitoring, especially for patients with previous complications of NSAIDs. The role of other topical therapies needs further research.

How does surgery compare with advanced intra-articular therapies in knee osteoarthritis: current thoughts

The objectives of osteoarthritis (OA) management are to reduce pain and inflammation, slow cartilage degradation, improve function and reduce disability. Current strategies for managing knee OA include nonpharmacological interventions, oral pharmacological treatments, localized intra-articular injections, and surgery. It has become evident that the inflammatory response is a key contributor to the development and progression of knee OA. Signaling pathways involving growth factors and cytokines are being investigated for the development of new therapies that target the underlying biological processes causing the disease. This concept of 'molecular orthopedics' enables more patient-centered diagnostic and treatment strategies. In contrast to other conservative therapies, which ultimately only address OA symptoms, intra-articular injections, in particular autologous conditioned serum (ACS), provide benefits that have the potential to outweigh those of established pharmacological treatments and surgery. Surgery has historically been considered the final solution for treatment of knee OA, both by treating physicians and by patients; however, there are increasing concerns regarding the lack of randomized clinical trials providing evidence to support this opinion. Intra-articular injection of ACS has demonstrated efficacy as a treatment for knee OA in a number of studies, with a very low rate of adverse events and side effects, compared with surgery. Treatment with ACS utilizes the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines and regenerative growth factors to support the natural healing processes in the knee, and has the potential to provide a valuable alternative to surgical intervention.

Thai massage, and Thai herbal compress versus oral ibuprofen in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this study was to verify the clinical responses to Thai massage (TM) and Thai herbal compression (THC) for treating osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in comparison to oral ibuprofen. This study was a randomized, evaluator-blind, controlled trial. Sixty patients with OA of the knee were randomly assigned to receive either a one-hour session of TM or THC (three times weekly) or oral ibuprofen (three times daily). The duration of treatment was three weeks. The clinical assessments included visual analog scale assessing pain and stiffness, Lequesne's functional index, time for climbing up ten steps, and physician's and patient's overall opinions on improvement. In a within-group comparison, each treatment modality caused a significant improvement of all variables determined for outcome assessments. In an among group comparison, all modalities provided nearly comparable clinical efficacy after a three-week symptomatic treatment of OA of the knee, in which a trend toward greatest improvement was likely to be found in THC group. In conclusion, TM and THC generally provided comparable clinical efficacy to oral ibuprofen after three weeks of treatment and could be considered as complementary and alternative treatments for OA of the knee.