[Overtreatment: Initiatives to identify ineffective and inappropriate medical interventions]

[Large-Scale Medical Equipment - An Analysis of Supply Structures 20 Years after the Abolition of Site Planning]

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the supply structures of computer tomographs (CT) and positron emission tomographs (PET) 20 years after abolishing site planning of large-scale medical equipment in the German inpatient sector.

METHODOLOGY

Cartographic analyses were used to visualize the inpatient supply with CT and PET between 2010 and 2017. Regional differences were investigated in relation to population and disease burden to identify potentially over- and under-served areas.

RESULTS

Almost German-wide coverage was observed for CT. Only 0.3 percent of the population did not have access to a device within 30 minutes of driving distance. In contrast, larger segments of the population in extensive regions did not have timely access to PET. In addition, there was a high degree of regional variation in supply, which could not be explained either by population density or the disease burden of the region.

CONCLUSION

The supply structures of large-scale medical equipment over decades without concrete regulatory interventions reveal regional variation. This is to be viewed critically from both an economic and a medical perspective. The extent to which strengthening competitive elements or cross-sectoral site planning can lead to a demand-oriented and efficient supply of large-scale medical equipment still needs to be investigated in more detail.

The role of philosophy and ethics at the edges of medicine

BACKGROUND

The edge metaphor is ubiquitous in describing the present situation in the world, and nowhere is this as clearly visible as in medicine. "The edge of medicine" has become the title of books, scholarly articles, media headlines, and lecture series and seems to be imbued with hype, hope, and aversion. In order better to understand what is at stake at "the edge of medicine" this article addresses three questions: What does "the edge of medicine" mean in contemporary debates on modern medicine? What are the challenges "on the edge of medicine" (in these various meanings of "on the edge")? How can philosophy and ethics contribute with addressing these challenges?

METHODS

Literature searches in PubMed and Google Scholar are used to identify uses of the phrase "the edge of medicine" while conventional content analysis is used to analyze meanings of and challenges with "the edge of medicine." These results are then investigated with respect to how philosophy and ethics can address the identified challenges.

RESULTS

The literature reveals that "the edge of medicine" has many meanings, such as: Border; Margin (of life); Frontier; Forefront; Fringes; Plunge (abyss); Brink (verge); Conflict; and Balancing. In general, the various meanings address four basic challenges: setting limits, keeping control, make meaning, and handling conflicts or aporias. The analysis of each of the meanings of "the edge of medicine" identifies a wide range of important and urgent tasks for the humanities in general, and for philosophy and ethics in particular: 1) clarifying concepts; 2) clarifying assumptions and premises of arguments, methods, advice, and decisions; 3) elaborate new concepts and new theories; 4) conceptualize and handle uncertainty, moral regret, and residue; 5) reveal "the emperor's new clothes;" 6) identify trends and reflect on their implications; 7) demarcation; and 8) reflecting on goodness in medicine.

CONCLUSION

The phrase "the edge of medicine" expresses a wide range of challenges for modern health care. Together with other disciplines philosophy and ethics can and should make crucial contributions at "the edge of medicine," which is where the future of human beings and societies is created and formed.