Comparison of the characteristics of patients with intermittent exotropia according to response to diagnostic monocular occlusion

Contrast Agent and Molecular Imaging Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Intelligent Image Sensor Combined with Visual Training in the Treatment of Children with Intermittent Exotropia in China

At present, the main treatment for strabismus is still surgical treatment, but there is no unified standard for the evaluation of the timing of surgery. This study mainly explores the clinical effects of using meta-analysis of intelligent image sensors combined with visual training to treat children with intermittent exotropia. Cochrane systematic reviews collect, evaluate, and synthesize an increasing number of original clinical research results to obtain the comprehensive effect of relevant interventions, so as to provide real and reliable evidence for health decision-making and clinical practice. It uses scientific, clear, and reproducible research methods to reduce the influence of biased factors, so it is different from traditional reviews. Cochrane systematic reviews are especially suitable for certain interventions when the pros and cons of interventions are difficult to determine based on the results of a single clinical study or when there are large differences in the clinical application process. Poor quality systematic reviews can mislead policymakers and clinicians. In the meta-analysis, the Cochrane systematic evaluation method of evidence-based medicine was used to comprehensively search the published literature research on the treatment of intermittent exotropia with vision training. Using the Cochrane system evaluation method, computer search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, manual retrieval of relevant conference documents, and inclusion of all clinical trial documents of visual training in children with intermittent exotropia was conducted. Patients with intermittent exotropia were selected, simultaneous vision, fusion function, and far stereo vision with the same vision machine were measured, and near stereo vision with a stereo vision chart was measured. The number of simultaneous vision, fusion function, and distance and near stereo vision "with" and "without" cases were recorded for all patients, and the relationship with age of onset, type of strabismus, degree of strabismus, and degree of control was counted. Among them, 91 patients who underwent strabismus correction surgery were followed up for at least 6 months with correct eye position. The presence or absence of simultaneous vision, fusion function, far stereo vision, and near stereo vision were recorded and compared with preoperative. The number of recovery and nonrecovery cases was recorded, and the relationship between the age of operation, the type of strabismus, the degree of strabismus, and the degree of control was counted. It was statistically analyzed by SPSS22.0. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in terms of the effective rate of fundus lesions, the visual training group was better than the nontraining group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: (1.25, 1.40), P < 0.0001). This study provides guidance for the early rehabilitation of children with intermittent exotropia.

Comparison Between the Deviations After 1 and 24 Hours of Diagnostic Occlusion for Basic and Divergence Excess Types of Intermittent Exotropia

PURPOSE

To compare the clinically significant (5 prism diopters [PD] or greater) changes in deviations after 1 and 24 hours of diagnostic monocular occlusion specifically for basic and divergence excess types of intermittent exotropia.

METHODS

In this prospective study, diagnostic monocular occlusion was performed at 1 and 24 hours before surgery in patients with intermittent exotropia. A change of 5 PD or greater in near and distance deviation after occlusion was considered clinically significant and used as the cut-off point for analysis. The mean clinically significant changes between the deviations after 1 and 24 hours of occlusion in patients with basic and divergence excess types of intermittent exotropia were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients with basic type and 20 patients with divergence excess type intermittent exotropia were included. No statistically significant differences were found for the mean near and distance deviations, the number of patients who had a clinically significant (5 PD or greater) increase, or the magnitude of increase in near and distance deviations after 1 hour versus 24 hours of diagnostic occlusion in patients with both types of intermittent exotropia.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic monocular occlusion for 1 hour is sufficient in patients with basic and divergence excess types of intermittent exotropia. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(1):41-45.].

Changes in Exodeviation after the Monocular Occlusion Test in Adult Patients with Intermittent Exotropia and Its Association with the Level of Control

Purpose

We investigated the changes in ocular deviation after the monocular occlusion test in adults with intermittent exotropia and evaluated its association with the level of control.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with intermittent exotropia who visited our clinic between September 2015 and May 2019. Patients with basic intermittent exotropia with a distant deviation within 10 prism diopters (PD) of the near deviation were included. The largest ocular deviations obtained before and after 1 hour of monocular occlusion were compared. The level of control was measured using the LACTOSE (Look and Cover, then Ten seconds of Observation Scale for Exotropia) control scoring system.

Results

Forty-six consecutive adult patients (28 males, 18 females; mean age, 34.3 years) were enrolled. The mean ocular deviation was 36.3 PD (range, 18 to 5 PD) at distant fixation and 38.5 PD (range, 18 to 80 PD) at near fixation, which increased significantly to 38.5 PD (p = 0.043) and 41.1 PD (p = 0.011), respectively, after monocular occlusion. The mean ocular deviation increased ≥5 PD in 14 (30.4%) and 15 (32.6%) patients at distant and near fixation, respectively. The level of control was measured in 30 patients. A higher degree of near control was significantly associated with an increase of ≥5 PD in near fixation after the test (p = 0.009 for a near control score ≤2).

Conclusions

The monocular occlusion test may help to determine the largest ocular deviation in adults with intermittent exotropia. Approximately one-third of patients exhibited an increase in ocular deviation ≥5 PD. Patients exhibiting good control were more likely to manifest an increase in the ocular deviation.