Additive intraocular pressure-lowering effects of the Rho kinase inhibitor ripasudil in Japanese patients with various subtypes of glaucoma

ROCK Inhibitors as an Alternative Therapy for Corneal Grafting: A Systematic Review

Currently, corneal blindness is affecting >10 million individuals worldwide, and there is a significant unmet medical need because only 1.5% of transplantation needs are met globally due to a lack of high-quality grafts. In light of this global health disaster, researchers are developing corneal substitutes that can resemble the human cornea in vivo and replace human donor tissue. Thus, this review examines ROCK (Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinases) inhibitors as a potential corneal wound-healing (CWH) therapy by reviewing the existing clinical and nonclinical findings. The systematic review was done from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for CWH, corneal injury, corneal endothelial wound healing, ROCK inhibitors, Fasudil, Netarsudil, Ripasudil, Y-27632, clinical trial, clinical study, case series, case reports, preclinical study, in vivo, and in vitro studies. After removing duplicates, all downloaded articles were examined. The literature search included the data till January 2023. This review summarized the results of ROCK inhibitors in clinical and preclinical trials. In a clinical trial, various ROCK inhibitors improved CWH in individuals with open-angle glaucoma, cataract, iris cyst, ocular hypertension, and other ocular diseases. ROCK inhibitors also improved ocular wound healing by increasing cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation in vitro and in vivo. ROCK inhibitors have antifibrotic, antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic characteristics in CWH, according to the existing research. ROCK inhibitors were effective topical treatments for corneal infections. Ripasudil, Y-27632, H-1152, Y-39983, and AMA0526 are a few new ROCK inhibitors that may help CWH and replace human donor tissue.

Rho kinase inhibitor for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is a group of optic neuropathies characterized by progressive degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells, axonal loss and irreversible visual field defects. Glaucoma is classified as primary or secondary, and worldwide, primary glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. Several subtypes of glaucoma exist, and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common. The etiology of POAG is unknown, but current treatments aim to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), thus preventing the onset and progression of the disease. Compared with traditional antiglaucomatous treatments, rho kinase inhibitors (ROKi) have a different pharmacodynamic. ROKi is the only current treatment that effectively lowers IOP by modulating the drainage of aqueous humor through the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal. As ROKi are introduced into the market more widely, it is important to assess the efficacy and potential AEs of the treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of ROKi with placebo or other glaucoma medication in people diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard Cochrane methods and searched databases on 11 December 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized clinical trials examining commercially available ROKi-based monotherapy or combination therapy compared with placebo or other IOP-lowering medical treatments in people diagnosed with (P)OAG or OHT. We included trials where ROKi were administered according to official glaucoma guidelines. There were no restrictions regarding type, year or status of the publication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias by using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 4953 participants diagnosed with (P)OAG or OHT. Fifteen were multicenter trials and 15 were masked trials. All participants were aged above 18 years. Trial duration varied from 24 hours to 12 months. Trials were conducted in the USA, Canada and Japan. Sixteen trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies, and one trial provided no information about funding sources. The trials compared ROKi monotherapy (netarsudil or ripasudil) or combination therapy with latanoprost (prostaglandin analog) or timolol (beta-blocker) with placebo, timolol, latanoprost or netarsudil. Reported outcomes were IOP and safety. Meta-analyses were applied to 13 trials (IOP reduction from baseline) and 15 trials (ocular AEs).  Of the trials evaluating IOP, seven were at low risk, three had some concerns, and three were at high risk of bias. Three trials found that netarsudil monotherapy may be superior to placebo (mean difference [MD] 3.11 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59 to 3.62; I² = 0%; 155 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence from three trials found that timolol may be superior to netarsudil with an MD of 0.66 mmHg (95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I² = 0%; 1415 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence from four trials found that latanoprost may be superior to netarsudil with an MD of 0.97 mmHg (95% CI 0.67 to 1.27; I² = 4%; 1283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).  Evidence from three trials showed that, compared with monotherapy with latanoprost, combination therapy with netarsudil and latanoprost probably led to an additional pooled mean IOP reduction from baseline of 1.64 mmHg (95% CI -2.16 to -1.11; 1114 participants). Evidence from three trials showed that, compared with monotherapy with netarsudil, combination therapy with netarsudil and latanoprost probably led to an additional pooled mean IOP reduction from baseline of 2.66 mmHg (95% CI -2.98 to -2.35; 1132 participants). The certainty of evidence was moderate. One trial showed that,  compared with timolol monotherapy, combination therapy with ripasudil and timolol may lead to an IOP reduction from baseline of 0.75 mmHg (95% -1.29 to -CI 0.21; 208 participants). The certainty of evidence was moderate. Of the trials assessing total ocular AEs, three were at low risk, four had some concerns, and eight were at high risk of bias.  We found very low-certainty evidence that netarsudil may lead to more ocular AEs compared with placebo, with 66 more ocular AEs per 100 person-months (95% CI 28 to 103; I² = 86%; 4 trials, 188 participants). We found low-certainty evidence that netarsudil may lead to more ocular AEs compared with latanoprost, with 29 more ocular AEs per 100 person-months (95% CI 17 to 42; I² = 95%; 4 trials, 1286 participants).  We found moderate-certainty evidence that, compared with timolol, netarsudil probably led to 21 additional ocular AEs (95% CI 14 to 27; I² = 93%; 4 trials, 1678 participants). Data from three trials (1132 participants) showed no evidence of differences in the incidence rate of AEs between combination therapy with netarsudil and latanoprost and netarsudil monotherapy (1 more event per 100 person-months, 95% CI 0 to 3); however, the certainty of evidence was low. Similarly, we found low-certainty evidence that, compared with latanoprost, combination therapy with netarsudil and latanoprost may cause 29 more ocular events per 100 person-months (95% CI 11 to 47; 3 trials, 1116 participants). We found moderate-certainty evidence that, compared with timolol monotherapy, combination therapy with ripasudil and timolol probably causes 35 more ocular events per 100 person-months (95% CI 25 to 45; 1 trial, 208 participants). In all included trials, ROKi was reportedly not associated with any particular serious AEs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that in people diagnosed with OHT or (P)OAG, the hypotensive effect of netarsudil may be inferior to latanoprost and slightly inferior to timolol. Combining netarsudil and latanoprost probably further reduces IOP compared with monotherapy. Netarsudil as mono- or combination therapy may result in more ocular AEs. However, the certainty of evidence was very low or low for all comparisons except timolol. In general, AEs were described as mild, transient, and reversible upon treatment discontinuation. ROKi was not associated with any particular serious AEs. Future trials of sufficient size and follow-up should be conducted to provide reliable information about glaucoma progression, relevant IOP measurements and a detailed description of AEs using similar terminology. This would ensure the robustness and confidence of the results and assess the intermediate- and long-term efficacy and safety of ROKi.

The Additive Effect of ROCK Inhibitor on Prostaglandin-Treated Japanese Patients with Glaucoma Indicating 15 mmHg and Under: ROCK U-15

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the additional effects and safety of a Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate, in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of at most 15 mmHg undergoing prostaglandin F_2α (FP) receptor agonist monotherapy (FP monotherapy).

Methods

In this prospective observational study, 30 Japanese patients with POAG and IOP of at most 15 mmHg (mean age 59.4 years; 10 men) who were undergoing FP monotherapy in both eyes were administered an additional dose of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (GLANATEC ophthalmic solution 0.4%: ripasudil) in one eye. The following factors were investigated at 1 and 3 months after the initiation of ripasudil treatment: (1) magnitude of change in IOP between the treated and contralateral untreated eyes, (2) number of treated eyes showing 20% and 30% IOP reduction, (3) IOP difference between treated and contralateral untreated eyes, and (4) safety during the treatment period. Both (1) and (3) were analyzed using the mixed-effect model for repeated measurements.

Results

The treated eyes showed significant reduction in IOP at 1 month (− 1.92 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 3 months (− 1.81 mmHg, P < 0.001). In contrast, contralateral untreated eyes did not show IOP reduction at 1 month (0.53 mmHg, P = 0.016) and 3 months (0.38 mmHg, P = 0.15). IOP reduction of − 20% and − 30% was achieved in 9 (30%) and 3 (10%) treated eyes, respectively. There were significant differences in IOP between the treated and contralateral untreated eyes at 1 month (− 2.46 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 3 months (− 2.20 mmHg, P < 0.001). Two patients experienced local adverse events (facial edema, one patient at week 1; blepharitis, one patient at 1 month); they recovered quickly after stopping ripasudil administration.

Conclusion

In patients with POAG with an IOP of at most 15 mmHg undergoing FP monotherapy, the addition of ripasudil resulted in significant IOP lowering at 1 and 3 months. Ripasudil could be used to enhance the outcome of FP monotherapy.

Trial registration

Registered UMIN ID: UMIN000030742.

Comparison of 12-month surgical outcomes of ab interno trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification between spatula-shaped and dual-blade microhooks

PURPOSE

To compare 12-month clinical results of spatula-shaped and dual-blade microhooks ab interno trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of Japanese open-angle glaucoma patients who underwent ab interno trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification with a 12-month follow-up. Two types of trabecular hook were used: the spatula-shaped Tanito Trabeculotomy ab interno Micro-hook^® and the Kahook Dual Blade^®. Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication scores comprised the main outcome metrics. We also analyzed and compared patient demographics and the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Trabeculotomy was performed using a spatula-shaped hook in 17 eyes and a dual-blade hook in 15 eyes. Significant reductions in IOP (p < 0.001) and medication scores (p < 0.001) were noted in both groups after the 1-month time point. The percentage changes of IOP from baseline at each time point were not significantly different between groups, though there was a significant difference in medication scores at 12 months (p = 0.0192). Postoperative complications occurred similarly in both groups; one case in the dual-blade group required additional filtration surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ab interno trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification was effective in lowering IOP both with spatula-shaped and with double-blade microhooks. At 12 months more medications were used postoperatively in the spatula-shaped microhook group; however, the reductions in the medication scores from baseline were statistically significant in both groups.

Should we keep rocking? Portraits from targeting Rho kinases in cancer

Cancer targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy, could allow the survival of patients with neoplasms currently considered incurable. In recent years, the dysregulation of the Rho-associated coiled-coil kinases (ROCK1 and ROCK2) has been associated with increased metastasis and poorer patient survival in several tumor types, and due to their essential roles in regulating the cytoskeleton, have gained popularity and progressively been researched as targets for the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Nevertheless, in a pediatric scenario, the influence of both isoforms on prognosis remains a controversial issue. In this review, we summarize the functions of ROCKs, compile their roles in human cancer and their value as prognostic factors in both, adult and pediatric cancer. Moreover, we provide the up-to-date advances on their pharmacological inhibition in pre-clinical models and clinical trials. Alternatively, we highlight and discuss detrimental effects of ROCK inhibition provoked not only by the action on off-targets, but most importantly, by pro-survival effects on cancer stem cells, dormant cells, and circulating tumor cells, along with cell-context or microenvironment-dependent contradictory responses. Together these drawbacks represent a risk for cancer cell dissemination and metastasis after anti-ROCK intervention, a caveat that should concern scientists and clinicians.

Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of ripasudil in uveitic glaucoma, exfoliation glaucoma, and steroid-induced glaucoma patients: ROCK-S, a multicentre historical cohort study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ripasudil for treatment of secondary glaucoma, a historical cohort study was conducted at 18 centres in Japan. Adults (age ≥20 years) who needed additional IOP reduction and received topical 0.4% ripasudil between 2014 and 2018 due to three secondary glaucoma subtypes, including uveitic glaucoma (UG), exfoliation glaucoma (EG) or steroid-induced glaucoma (SG) were assessed for mean IOP change from baseline prior to additional treatment with ripasudil. We further evaluated the IOP change in each glaucoma subtype, baseline characteristics of each cohort, course of uveitis-induced inflammation in UG eyes, and proportion of patients in each cohort with adverse events. In 332 eyes from 332 patients eligible for this study, the mean overall IOP reductions from baseline at 1, 3, and 6 months were −5.86 ± 9.04 mmHg (−19.4 ± 25.1%), −6.18 ± 9.03 mmHg (−20.0 ± 27.1%), and −7.00 ± 8.60 mmHg (−23.4 ± 25.6%), respectively. These changes were all statistically significant. Of 332 eyes, 109 eyes had UG, 181 had EG, and 42 eyes had SG. The IOP-lowering effects of ripasudil in UG and SG were significantly greater than those of EG at every time point. This finding could have been related to higher baseline IOP levels in UG and SG. UG patients exhibited significant decreases in mean cell score of the anterior segment after ripasudil treatment. No severe adverse events were reported. These findings suggest that treatment with ripasudil is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for IOP reduction in secondary glaucoma.

One-Year Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Ripasudil, a Rho Kinase Inhibitor, in an Addition to or Replacing Existing Treatment Regimens: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of ripasudil for 1 year in addition to or replacing existing treatment regimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for 128 eyes of 128 glaucoma patients who were prescribed ripasudil as an addition to or a switch from their preexisting antiglaucoma instillations. We investigated the rate and factors for discontinuation and intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Results: Almost half of the patients (60 eyes) discontinued ripasudil treatment before the 1 year mark, while remaining patients completed the treatment. The lack of efficacy and development of adverse effects were significantly correlated with discontinuation (P < 0.001) in the Cox proportional hazards model. In the Kaplan-Meier curve, adverse effects occurred in earlier phase and almost 60% dropped out within 3 months after ripasudil administration. However, adverse effects also occurred randomly throughout the study period. In patients who continued ripasudil, the mean IOPs (mmHg) at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment were 17.7 ± 5.1, 14.6 ± 5.0, and 14.8 ± 3.8 in the Addition group, and 17.8 ± 4.1, 15.4 ± 3.2, and 15.4 ± 5.0 in the Switch group, respectively (all P values <0.05). Conclusions: Almost half of the patients discontinued ripasudil owing to the lack of efficacy and the generation of adverse effects within the 1 year. In the remaining half, the addition and switching of ripasudil to the existing glaucoma treatment effectively reduced IOP for 1 year.

Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate in the Treatment of Glaucoma: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Selection

Reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only reliable treatment for glaucoma that maintains the patient’s visual function throughout life, and IOP-lowering eyedrops are the mainstay of therapy. Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (brand name: Glanatec ophthalmic solution 0.4%; Kowa Company, Ltd., Japan) is a Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor that lowers IOP by increasing conventional aqueous outflow. Since the approval of ripasudil eyedrops in 2014, a large store of clinical data has been amassed in Japan. With regard to safety, conjunctival hyperemia is the most common adverse drug reaction (ADR) and is usually transient and mild. Blepharitis and allergic conjunctivitis are other major local ADRs. Systemic ADRs are rare, but we should be wary of allergic reactions. With regard to efficacy, ripasudil is expected to lower IOP in almost all glaucoma subtypes (including primary open-angle glaucoma, secondary glaucoma, and primary angle-closure glaucoma) and in all patterns of treatment initiation (monotherapy, combination therapy, switching therapy, and add-on therapy). However, the status of the trabecular meshwork may affect the IOP-lowering effect of ripasudil. In patient selection, current evidence-based information on the safety and efficacy of ripasudil should be fully considered. As irreversible damage to the trabecular meshwork would considerably affect efficacy, it may be better to start ripasudil treatment during an early stage of glaucoma.

Ripasudil alleviated the inflammation of RPE cells by targeting the miR-136-5p/ROCK/NLRP3 pathway

Background

Inflammation of RPE cells led to different kinds of eye diseases and affected the normal function of the retina. Furthermore, higher levels of ROCK1 and ROCK2 induced injury of endothelial cells and many inflammatory diseases of the eyes. Ripasudil, which was used for the treatment of glaucoma, was one kind of the inhibitor of ROCK1 and ROCK2, but whether ripasudil could relieve the LPS-induced inflammation and damage of RPE cells was not clear.

Methods

We used LPS to stimulate ARPE-19 cells, the RPE cell line. After that, we detected the levels of ROCK1 and ROCK2 by western-blotting after the stimulation of LPS and treatment of ripasudil. Then luciferase reporter assays were used to confirm the targeting effect of miR-136-5p on ROCK1 and ROCK2. At last, the levels of NLRP3, ASC, caspase1, IL-1β and IL-18 were detected with the western-blotting after the knockdown of miR-136-5p.

Results

The levels of ROCK1, ROCK2 and miR-136-5p in ARPE-19 cells were promoted after the stimulation of LPS. After the treatment of ripasudil, the expression levels of ROCK1, ROCK2 and miR-136-5p were suppressed. The expression of ROCK1 and ROCK2 was targeted and inhibited by the miR-136-5p. The levels of inflammation related proteins NLRP3, ASC, caspase1, IL-1β and IL-18 was also inhibited after the treatment of ripasudil. However, the expression of these proteins was rescued after the knockdown of miR-136-5p.

Conclusion

Ripasudil relieved the inflammatory injury of RPE cells by upregulating miR-136-5p, therefore inhibiting the expression of ROCK1, ROCK2, NLRP3, ASC, caspase1, IL-1β and IL-18.

Rho kinase inhibitors-a review on the physiology and clinical use in Ophthalmology

The Rho kinase (ROCK) signaling pathway is involved in several cellular events that include cell proliferation and cytoskeleton modulation leading to cell adhesion. The ROCK pathway in the human eye has been hypothesized to play important roles in corneal endothelial cell physiology and pathologic states. In addition, ROCK signaling has been identified as an important regulator of trabecular meshwork (TM) outflow, which is altered in glaucomatous eyes. These roles in corneal and glaucomatous disease states have led to the growing interest in the development of drugs selectively targeting this pathway (ROCK inhibitors). The authors provide a review of the literature on the pathobiology of the ROCK signaling in corneal endothelial disease, glaucoma, and vitreoretinal disease, as well as the clinical usefulness of ROCK inhibitors in Ophthalmology.