1
|
Romano V, Ferrara M, Gatti F, Airaldi M, Borroni D, Aragona E, Rocha-de-Lossada C, Gabrielli F, Papa FT, Romano MR, Calza S, Semeraro F. Topical Antiseptics in Minimizing Ocular Surface Bacterial Load Before Ophthalmic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2024; 261:165-175. [PMID: 38211781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the reduction of the ocular surface bacterial load induced by 2 commercially available ophthalmic antiseptic formulations, povidone-iodine (PVI) 0.6% and chlorhexidine (CLX) 0.02%, before ocular surgery. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. METHODS Seventy adult patients undergoing intraocular surgery (phacoemulsification) were randomized to receive in the index eye PVI (group A) 4 times a day for 3 days or CLX (group B) 4 times a day for 3 days before surgery. The untreated eye was used as control. A conjunctival swab was taken in both eyes before (T0) and after (T1) therapy. Microbial DNA was quantified with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. The Mick algorithm was used to compare the abundance of each genus/genera against the distribution of abundances from the reference. At T1, patients filled a questionnaire to evaluate therapy-induced symptoms. Primary outcome was the reduction of bacterial DNA at T1 (microbial load), vs control arm, expressed as mean number of real-time PCR cycle times (CTs). Secondary outcomes were taxonomic composition, differential abundance, and therapy-induced ocular symptoms. RESULTS The T0-T1 difference in CT was significant in group B, but not in group A (mean [95% CI], 0.99 [0.33] vs 0.26 [0.15], P < .001, and 0.65 [0.3] vs 0.45 [0.41], P = .09, respectively). The taxonomic composition, alpha, and beta diversity remained consistent at all time points in both groups. The rate of patients reporting therapy-induced ocular symptoms and the mean discomfort grade were greater in group A than in group B (97% vs 26% and 4.97±2.48 vs 0.66±1.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Compared with PVI 0.6%, CLX 0.02% induced a greater reduction of ocular surface bacterial load, with no significant alterations of the taxonomic composition. Moreover, CLX was better tolerated than PVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Romano
- From the Eye Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia (V.R., F.S.), Brescia, Italy; Eye Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia (V.R., Fr.G., F.S.), Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Gatti
- Eye Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia (V.R., Fr.G., F.S.), Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Airaldi
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia (M.A.), Brescia, Italy; St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital (M.A.), Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Davide Borroni
- Eyemetagenomics Ltd, Covent Garden (D.B., C.R.-d.-l.), London, United Kingdom
| | - Emanuela Aragona
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute (E.A.), Milan, Italy
| | - Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
- Eyemetagenomics Ltd, Covent Garden (D.B., C.R.-d.-l.), London, United Kingdom; Ophthalmology Department, QVision, Vithas Almería (C.R.-d.-l.), Almeria, Spain; Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga (C.R.-d.-l.), Malaga, Spain
| | - Federico Gabrielli
- Biolab SRL, Laboratorio di Genetica e Genomica Molecolare (Fe.G., F.T.P.), Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Filomena Tiziana Papa
- Biolab SRL, Laboratorio di Genetica e Genomica Molecolare (Fe.G., F.T.P.), Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Mario R Romano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University (M.R.R.), Milan, Italy; Department of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Gavazzeni-Castelli (M.R.R.), Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Calza
- Unit of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia (S.C.), Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Semeraro
- From the Eye Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia (V.R., F.S.), Brescia, Italy; Eye Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia (V.R., Fr.G., F.S.), Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garcia O’Farrill N, Abi Karam M, Villegas VM, Flynn HW, Grzybowski A, Schwartz SG. New Approaches to Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance in Endophthalmitis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:321. [PMID: 38543107 PMCID: PMC10974156 DOI: 10.3390/ph17030321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Endophthalmitis is a rare but vision-threatening infection characterized by marked inflammation of intraocular fluids and tissues, uncommonly seen following surgery and intravitreal injection. Antimicrobials are used worldwide in the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial and fungal infections of the eye and are standard treatment in the preoperative and postoperative care of surgical patients. However, antimicrobials are reported to be overprescribed in many parts of the world, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR complicates the prophylaxis and treatment of endophthalmitis. This article examines the prevalence and mechanisms of AMR in ocular microorganisms, emphasizing the importance of understanding AMR patterns for tailored treatments. It also explores prophylaxis and management strategies for endophthalmitis, with a discussion on the use of intracameral antibiotic administration. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery is common in many parts of the world but is still controversial in some locations, especially in the US. Finally, it highlights the role of stewardship in ophthalmology and its benefits in the treatment of endophthalmitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noraliz Garcia O’Farrill
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR 00936, USA; (N.G.O.); (V.M.V.)
| | - Mariana Abi Karam
- Department of Ophthalmology, MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA;
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Victor M. Villegas
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR 00936, USA; (N.G.O.); (V.M.V.)
| | - Harry W. Flynn
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Andrzej Grzybowski
- Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 61-553 Poznan, Poland;
| | - Stephen G. Schwartz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dionne E, Spadaro JZ, Atayde AMP, Kombo N. Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Among U.S. Ophthalmologists and Optometrists from 2018 to 2021 in the Medicare Part D Database. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2024; 40:144-151. [PMID: 38206649 DOI: 10.1089/jop.2023.0126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess antibiotic prescribing patterns among ophthalmologists and optometrists from 2018 to 2021. Methods: This is an observational, retrospective cohort study of the Medicare Part D prescriber public use files from 2018 to 2020. Prescription trends were analyzed with analysis of variance and negative binomial regression tests based on specialty, region, and types of antibiotics. Results: From 2018 to 2021, the number of ophthalmologists in the Medicare Part D database decreased from 18,452 to 18,285, and the number of optometrists increased from 23,071 to 24,734. Throughout the study period, the total number and proportion of antibiotic prescriptions by ophthalmologists and optometrists stayed almost constant with a dip in 2020, likely reflecting the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both ophthalmologists and optometrists demonstrated geographic regional differences in prescribing patterns. The South consistently had the highest average number of claims per provider. Of the antibiotics prescribed by ophthalmologists in 2021, 48.6% are from the fluoroquinolone class, 20.5% are from the aminoglycoside class, and 18.2% are from the macrolide class. Optometrists were found to be more likely to prescribe antibiotics in a formulation combined with a corticosteroid throughout the study period. Conclusions: Our results have shown that prescribing patterns among ophthalmologists and optometrists have demonstrated significant changes in prescriptions of microbial resistance-promoting antibiotics. These patterns persist despite nation-wide attempts to control antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyssa Dionne
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jane Z Spadaro
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Agata M P Atayde
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ninani Kombo
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghita AM, Iliescu DA, Ghita AC, Ilie LA. Susceptibility of Ocular Surface Bacteria to Various Antibiotic Agents in a Romanian Ophthalmology Clinic. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3409. [PMID: 37998545 PMCID: PMC10670825 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Periodic assessment of bacterial contamination is necessary as it allows proper guidance in cases of eye infections through the use of appropriate antibiotics. Due to the extensive use of antibiotic treatment, many strains of the microbiota that cause infections are resistant to the usual ophthalmic antibiotics. The present study provides an updated assessment of the susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria found on the ocular surface to the most commonly used antibiotic agents in patients undergoing cataract surgery. A total of 993 patients were included in the study with ages between 44 and 98 years old. Conjunctival cultures were collected 7 days before cataract surgery. The response of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to various antibiotic classes, such as glycopeptides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, phenicols, tetracyclines, rifamycins, macrolides and penicillins, was assessed. From the tested antibiotics, vancomycin had 97.8% efficacy on Gram-positive bacteria. In the cephalosporin category, we observed a high level of resistance of the cefuroxime for both Gram-positive and negative bacteria. Antibiotics that have more than 90% efficacy on Gram-positive bacteria are meropenem, imipenem, netilmicin, amikacin and rifampicin. On Gram-negative bacteria, we found 100% efficacy of all tested fluoroquinolones, i.e., aminoglycosides (except for tobramycin), doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin and chloramphenicol. The current study illustrates patterns of increased resistance in certain bacteria present on the ocular surface to some of the commonly used antibiotics in ophthalmological clinical practice. One such revealing example is cefuroxime, which has been highly used as an intracameral antibiotic for the prevention of bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelian Mihai Ghita
- Department of Physiology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Bld., 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Ophthalmology Department, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independenței Street, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
- Ocularcare Ophthalmology Clinic, 128 Ion Mihalache Bld., 012244 Bucharest, Romania; (A.C.G.); (L.A.I.)
| | - Daniela Adriana Iliescu
- Department of Physiology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Bld., 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Ocularcare Ophthalmology Clinic, 128 Ion Mihalache Bld., 012244 Bucharest, Romania; (A.C.G.); (L.A.I.)
| | - Ana Cristina Ghita
- Ocularcare Ophthalmology Clinic, 128 Ion Mihalache Bld., 012244 Bucharest, Romania; (A.C.G.); (L.A.I.)
| | - Larisa Adriana Ilie
- Ocularcare Ophthalmology Clinic, 128 Ion Mihalache Bld., 012244 Bucharest, Romania; (A.C.G.); (L.A.I.)
| |
Collapse
|