A nation-wide survey of follow-up strategies for esophageal cancer patients after a curative esophagectomy or a complete response by definitive chemoradiotherapy in Japan

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2

In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.

An optimized postsurgery follow-up strategy for patients with esophageal cancer: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

After radical surgery, patients with esophageal cancer should undergo long-term surveillance of disease relapse. However, the optimal follow-up strategy remains to be explored.

METHOD

A total of 4688 patients were recruited. Recursive partition analysis was applied to develop recurrence risk stratification for patients. The follow-up strategies of each stratification were developed based on monthly recurrence probability and validated by bootstrap validation and an external dataset. A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the follow-up strategies.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into four groups according to four pathological features. The authors applied a random survival forest to calculate the monthly recurrence probability of each group. Based on the temporal distribution of recurrences, the authors further established surveillance strategies for four groups. The strategies were validated as optimal protocols by bootstrap resampling and another dataset. Markov cost-effective analysis indicated that our recommended strategies outperformed the mainstream protocols from guidelines. Using less than 12 visits across the first 5 years on average, our follow-up strategies were more efficient than the NCCN recommended strategies (14 visits average). Our results also supported the computerized tomography from the neck to the upper abdomen as a routine examination and PETCT of distant metastasis for some groups with high risks.

CONCLUSION

Our study provided data-driven evidence of personalized and economic follow-up strategies for esophageal cancer patients and shed light on follow-up optimization for other cancer types.

Effective Postoperative Surveillance Protocol after Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy Focusing on Symptoms in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal postoperative surveillance protocol after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer has still not been established. We investigated the risk factors for recurrence of esophageal cancer to devise an appropriate surveillance protocol. We focused on the appearance and worsening of symptoms to determine if additional imaging examinations should be performed.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled 416 patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junctional cancer who had undergone thoracoscopic esophagectomy at Tokai University Hospital. Outpatient visits for the patients are usually scheduled at least 4 times per year with CT imaging and blood biochemical examination. We evaluated the time to recurrence after esophagectomy, especially the correlation of this parameter with the appearance and worsening of symptoms during the postoperative outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 416 patients, recurrence occurred in 127 patients (30.5%). The median time to recurrence was 6 months after esophagectomy; recurrence occurred within 24 months in 112 patients (88%), and 51 of these patients (40%) developed some new symptom(s) (symptomatic group) before the diagnosis of recurrence. The number of patients who developed recurrence within 6 months was significantly higher in the symptomatic group compared with that in the asymptomatic group (66.7% vs 46.0%, p = 0.02). The overall survival in the symptomatic group was significantly shorter than that in the asymptomatic group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We advocate an effective surveillance protocol depending on the appearance and worsening of symptoms to diagnose recurrence of esophageal cancer; we recommend routine imaging examinations every 6 months and clinical outpatient follow-up at even shorter intervals for the first 24 months after esophagectomy.

An International Multicenter Study Exploring Whether Surveillance After Esophageal Cancer Surgery Impacts Oncological and Quality of Life Outcomes (ENSURE)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of surveillance on recurrence pattern, treatment, survival and health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) following curative-intent resection for esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although therapies for recurrent esophageal cancer may impact survival and HRQL, surveillance protocols after primary curative treatment are varied and inconsistent, reflecting a lack of evidence.

METHODS

European iNvestigation of SUrveillance after Resection for Esophageal cancer was an international multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers (2009-2015) across 20 centers (NCT03461341). Intensive surveillance (IS) was defined as annual computed tomography for 3 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes included treatment, disease-specific survival, recurrence pattern, and HRQL. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Four thousand six hundred eighty-two patients were studied (72.6% adenocarcinoma, 69.1% neoadjuvant therapy, 45.5% IS). At median followup 60 months, 47.5% developed recurrence, oligometastatic in 39%. IS was associated with reduced symptomatic recurrence (OR 0.17 [0.12-0.25]) and increased tumor-directed therapy (OR 2.09 [1.58-2.77]). After adjusting for confounders, no OS benefit was observed among all patients (HR 1.01 [0.89-1.13]), but OS was improved following IS for those who underwent surgery alone (HR 0.60 [0.47-0.78]) and those with lower pathological (y)pT stages (Tis-2, HR 0.72 [0.58-0.89]). IS was associated with greater anxiety ( P =0.016), but similar overall HRQL.

CONCLUSIONS

IS was associated with improved oncologic outcome in select cohorts, specifically patients with early-stage disease at presentation or favorable pathological stage post neoadjuvant therapy. This may inform guideline development, and enhance shared decision-making, at a time when therapeutic options for recurrence are expanding.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgical resection improves the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) nay be a prognostic biomarker in various types of cancer. Despite the noTable changes in the tumor and its microenvironment during NAC, it remains unclear how the NLR changes and which values (before or after NAC) best predict prognosis. The present study aimed to analyze changes in the NLR before and after NAC, and to determine which was a better prognostic factor. This study retrospectively analyzed 338 consecutive patients with ESCC who received NAC followed by curative resection. NLRs before (pre-NLR) and after (post-NLR) NAC were calculated, after which the impact of NAC on NLR, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as the relationship between hematological toxicities and NLR, was evaluated. Cutoff values for pre- and post-NLR were 3.7 and 2.5, respectively. Patients with high post-NLR had a worse OS (P=0.0001) and 3-year RFS (P=0.03) than those with low post-NLR. Multivariate analysis identified high post-NLR, pN1 and clinical response as independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, post-NLR was revealed as a better prognostic factor than pre-NLR for patients receiving NAC followed by surgical resection.

Surveillance Strategy after Curative Resection for Oesophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Using the Hazard Function

Background

The optimal surveillance period and frequency after curative resection for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain unclear, and current guidelines are mainly based on traditional Kaplan–Meier analyses of cumulative incidence rather than risk analysis. The aim of this study was to determine a suitable follow-up surveillance program following oesophagectomy for OSCC using the hazard function.

Methods

A total of 1187 patients who underwent curative resection for OSCC between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The changes in the estimated hazard rates (HRs) of recurrence over time were analyzed according to tumour-node-metastasis stage.

Results

Four hundred seventy-eight (40.2%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period (median, 116.5 months). The risk of recurrence peaked at 9.2 months after treatment (HR = 0.0219) and then decreased to half the peak value at 24 months post-surgery. The HRs for Stage I and II patients were low (< 0.007) post-treatment. The HR for Stage III patients peaked at 9.9 months (HR = 0.031) and the hazard curve declined to a plateau at 30 months. Furthermore, the HR peaked at 10.8 months (HR = 0.052) in Stage IV patients and then gradually declined from 50 months.

Conclusions

According to tumour-node-metastasis stage, changes in the HRs of postoperative recurrence in OSCC varied significantly. Intensive surveillance should be undertaken for 3 years in Stage III patients and for 4 years in Stage IV patients, followed by annual screening. For Stage I OSCC patients, a reduction in the surveillance intensity could be taken into consideration.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric tube cancer after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Survivors of esophageal cancer post-esophagectomy may sometimes develop gastric tube cancer (GTC). However, its clinical characteristics have not been elucidated. We conducted a retrospective nationwide survey of GTCs to clarify them.

METHODS

A questionnaire on GTCs was sent by e-mail and mail to 116 institutions certified by the Japan Esophageal Society. A total of 608 GTC cases diagnosed and treated between 2001 and 2015 were registered from 62 institutions.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 71 years, with 88.9% being diagnosed with stage I. Sixty percent of GTC cases were in the anal third of the gastric tube and 79.7% were differentiated adenocarcinomas. The median interval between esophagectomy and GTC diagnosis was 6 years, with approximately 25% of patients being diagnosed more than 10 years later. The 5-year overall survivals (5-OSs) after endoscopic and surgical treatments for GTC were 75.9% and 52.7%, respectively. Patients whose GTC was diagnosed without symptoms or by regular follow-up examination showed better 5-OSs compared to others (69.7% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.0001; and 71.4% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.0001, respectively). The prognosis of GTC cases diagnosed within 2 years of the preceding upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGI) was better than that in cases diagnosed longer than 2 years (5-OS: 73.4% vs. 48.8%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide survey revealed the clinicopathological features of GTCs for the first time. Early detection is important in improving the prognosis of GTC, and it is recommended that UGI endoscopy be continued every 2 years for 10 or more years after esophagectomy.

Nationwide survey of the follow-up practices for patients with esophageal carcinoma after radical treatment: historical changes and future perspectives in Japan

BACKGROUND

No post-treatment follow-up methods have been established yet for patients with esophageal carcinoma who undergo radical esophagectomy (Surg) or who show complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT-CR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of follow-up of the Surg and dCRT-CR patients in Japan, and understand the current reality and problems to establish an optimal follow-up method.

METHODS

A questionnaire on the follow-up method adopted was sent by e-mail to 124 institutions approved by the Japan Esophageal Society as training institutions for board-certified esophageal surgeons; responses were received from 89 institutions. The data were compared with those obtained by a similar survey conducted in 2014.

RESULTS

Follow-up methods markedly varied among institutions. Almost all institutions scheduled computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least once a year up to postoperative year 5 for both the Surg and dCRT-CR groups. At least 70% of the institutions continued follow-up up to postoperative year 10, and this proportion had increased as compared to that reported from the 2014 survey. Only 25-30% of the institutions scheduled follow-up screening for metachronous head and neck cancer for both groups, and the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after the treatment were seldom assessed. These trends remained unchanged as compared to those reported from the 2014 survey.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the consensus of follow-up protocol could not be established. More attention is required for detection of metachronous cancers and assessment of the HR-QOL. Establishment of a consensus-based follow-up system and verification of its effectiveness are required.

Second primary malignancies in patients with clinical T1bN0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive therapies: supplementary analysis of the JCOG trial: JCOG0502

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are still at a high risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs) after definitive therapies. We evaluated the development of SPMs and explored its risk factors in patients with clinical T1bN0 ESCC.

METHODS

JCOG0502 prospectively compared esophagectomy with definitive chemo-radiotherapy for clinical T1bN0 ESCC. Here, we reviewed all JCOG0502 patients' data for SPMs and investigated the risk factors for SPMs using uni-variable and multivariable analyses by Fine and Gray model.

RESULTS

Among 379 enrolled patients, 213 underwent esophagectomy and 166 received chemo-radiotherapy. Patient characteristics were male (85%); median age [63 (range 41-75) years; location of the primary tumor (upper/middle/lower thoracic esophagus, 11%/63%/27%, respectively]; alcohol consumption history (79%); smoking history (66%); prevalence of no/several/many/unknown Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) (45%/36%/8%/11%, respectively). In a median follow-up of 7.1 years, 118 SPMs occurred in 99 (26%) patients. Cumulative incidences of SPMs after 3, 5, and 10 years were 9%, 15%, and 36%, respectively. The most common primary tumor sites were the head and neck (35%), stomach (20%) and lungs (14%). In multivariable analyses, compared to no LVLs, several LVLs [hazard ratio (HR) 2.24, 95% confidential interval (CI) 1.32-3.81] and many LVLs (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.27-6.52) were significantly associated with the development of SPMs. Sixteen patients died due to the SPMs.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of SPMs was high. The presence of LVLs, which was a predictive factor for SPMs, may be useful for surveillance planning.

Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the poorest prognosis. Esophagectomy, which is the mainstay of curative-intent treatments, imposes excessive surgical stress on the patients, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy remain high. On the other hand, the number of survivors after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is increasing due to recent improvements in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatments for this cancer. However, esophagectomy still has a great influence on the fundamental aspect of patients' lives, that is, the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), including their physical, emotional, and social functions in the short- and long-term postoperatively. HR-QOL is a multifactorial concept used to assess the symptoms and functional changes caused by the disease itself and treatments from the patients' perspectives. Therefore, assessing the HR-QOL of patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy is becoming increasingly important. However, the status of HR-QOL changes after esophagectomy has not been satisfactorily evaluated, and there is no worldwide consensus as to how the postoperative HR-QOL can be improved. This review aimed to raise awareness of healthcare providers, such as surgeons and nurses, on the importance of HR-QOL in patients with esophageal cancer after curative-intent esophagectomy by providing multifaceted information concerning the short- and long-term HR-QOLs, including the status of changes and the determinants of HR-QOL after esophagectomy, and furthermore, essential points for improvement of HR-QOL after esophagectomy.

Evaluation of postoperative surveillance strategies for esophago-gastric cancers in the UK and Ireland

Esophago-gastric malignancies are associated with a high recurrence rate; yet there is a lack of evidence to inform guidelines for the standardization and structure of postoperative surveillance after curatively intended treatment. This study aimed to capture the variation in postoperative surveillance strategies across the UK and Ireland, and enquire the opinions and beliefs around surveillance from practicing clinicians. A web-based survey consisting of 40 questions was sent to surgeons or allied health professionals performing or involved in surgical care for esophago-gastric cancers at high-volume centers in the UK. Respondents from each center completed the survey on what best represented their center. The first section of the survey evaluated the timing and components of follow-ups, and their variation between centers. The second section evaluated respondents perspective on how surveillance can be structured. Thirty-five respondents from 27 centers consisting 28 consultants, 6 senior trainees and 1 specialist nurse had completed the questionnaire; 45.7% of responders arranged clinical follow-up at 2-4 weeks. Twenty responders had a specific postoperative surveillance protocol for their patients. Of these, 31.4% had a standardized protocol for all patients, while 25.7% tailored it to patient needs. Patient preference, comorbidities and chance of recurrence were considered as major factors for necessitating more intense surveillance than currently practiced. There is a significant variation in how patients are monitored after surgery between centers in the UK. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to link surveillance strategies to both survival outcomes and quality of life of patients and to evaluate the prognostic value of different postoperative surveillance strategies.

Residual carcinoma cells after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: striving toward appropriate judgment of biopsy

In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who are treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), identification of the presence or absence of residual or recurrent carcinoma is usually pivotal in their clinical management. In addition, the extent of carcinoma invasion into the esophageal wall could determine the clinical outcome of these patients following CRT. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the response to CRT both macroscopically and histologically in a consecutive series of 42 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy following curative esophageal resection at Tohoku University Hospital between August 2011 and December 2012. The histological grading of tumor regression was as follows: grade 3, markedly effective (no viable residual tumor cells); grade 2, moderately effective (residual tumor cells in less than one-third of the tumor); grade 1, slightly effective (1b, residual tumor cells in one-third to two-thirds of the tumor; 1a, residual tumor cells in more than two-thirds of the tumor); and grade 0, ineffective. In this study, we selected grade 2 and 1b cases because they might show a complete response with definitive CRT. We evaluated the presence of any residual in situ lesions and tumor depth in detail. The grading of tumor regression in primary sites was as follows: grade 3 (7 cases), grade 2 (16 cases), grade 1b (13 cases), and grade 1a (6 cases). The concordance rate between macroscopic and histopathological evaluation on the depth of the tumor was 40% (17/42). Among 29 cases (grade 2 and grade 1b), intraepithelial lesions were not detected in 17 cases, and tumor nests were not detected in the lamina propria mucosae in 9 cases. The results of this study highlight the difficulties of detecting residual carcinoma cells using conventional endoscopic biopsy in patients who have received CRT. Therefore, when residual cancer is clinically suspected in patients who have received CRT, the biopsy specimen should be obtained from the deep layer of the esophagus whenever possible. Additionally, close follow-up is required using positron emission tomography/computed tomography, endoscopy, and other radiological evaluations.