Risk factors for complications after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy

McKeown esophagectomy for a thoracic esophageal carcinoma patient who has a history of definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma and total pharyngolaryngectomy for hypopharyngeal cancer

A 64-year-old man, who had previously undergone definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and endoscopic resections for metachronous multiple esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and had also received total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) for hypopharyngeal cancer, was diagnosed with ESCC in the middle thoracic esophagus (cT3N0M0). Thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy was performed for the patient. Although the tumor was tightly adherent to the thoracic duct and both main bronchi, they were successfully mobilized. In order to maintain the blood supply to the trachea, we preserved the bilateral bronchial arteries and avoided prophylactic upper mediastinal lymph node dissection. Cervical end-to-side anastomosis between the jejunum and a gastric conduit was performed. Minor pneumothorax was managed conservatively, and the patient was discharged 44 days after the surgery. Overall, thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy was safely performed in a patient with a history of TPL and dCRT. Surgeons should be very careful to prevent tracheobronchial ischemia by optimizing the extent of lymph node dissection.

Primary tracheobronchial necrosis after esophagectomy: A nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Background

The clinical features of postoperative primary tracheobronchial necrosis (P‐TBN; the necrosis without anastomotic leakage or other cervical and mediastinal abscess) remains unclear. This nationwide multicenter retrospective study first investigated the clinical features of P‐TBN after esophagectomy for upper aerodigestive tract cancer with a large cohort.

Methods

As a study of the Japan Broncho‐Esophagological Society, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted in 67 institutions. The clinical data of 6370 patients who underwent esophagectomy for laryngeal, pharyngeal, and esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were collected. Grades of P‐TBN were defined as follows: Grade 1, mucosal necrosis; Grade 2, transmural bronchial wall necrosis without fistula or perforation; Grade 3, transmural bronchial wall necrosis with fistula or perforation.

Results

P‐TBN was observed in 48 (0.75%) of 6370 patients. The incidences of P‐TBN for pharyngo‐laryngo‐cervical esophagectomy (PLCE; n = 1650), total pharyngo‐laryngo‐esophagectomy (TPLE; n = 205), and subtotal esophagectomy (SE; n = 4515) were 2.0%, 5.4%, and 0.1%, respectively. The upper mediastinal LN dissection (P = 0.016) and the higher level of the tracheal resection (P = 0.039) were significantly associated with a higher grade of necrosis in PLCE and TPLE. Overall survival rates were significantly lower in patients with Grade 2 (P = 0.009) and Grade 3 (P = 0.004) than in those with Grade 1.

Conclusion

The incidence of TBN restricted to P‐TBN was lower than previously reported. Maintaining the tracheal blood flow is essential to prevent worsening P‐TBN, especially in PLCE and TPLE. Our new P‐TBN severity grade may predict the outcome of patients with P‐TBN.

Primary tracheobronchial necrosis after esophagectomy: A nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Background

The clinical features of postoperative primary tracheobronchial necrosis (P-TBN; the necrosis without anastomotic leakage or other cervical and mediastinal abscess) remains unclear. This nationwide multicenter retrospective study first investigated the clinical features of P-TBN after esophagectomy for upper aerodigestive tract cancer with a large cohort.

Methods

As a study of the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted in 67 institutions. The clinical data of 6370 patients who underwent esophagectomy for laryngeal, pharyngeal, and esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were collected. Grades of P-TBN were defined as follows: Grade 1, mucosal necrosis; Grade 2, transmural bronchial wall necrosis without fistula or perforation; Grade 3, transmural bronchial wall necrosis with fistula or perforation.

Results

P-TBN was observed in 48 (0.75%) of 6370 patients. The incidences of P-TBN for pharyngo-laryngo-cervical esophagectomy (PLCE; n = 1650), total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE; n = 205), and subtotal esophagectomy (SE; n = 4515) were 2.0%, 5.4%, and 0.1%, respectively. The upper mediastinal LN dissection (P = 0.016) and the higher level of the tracheal resection (P = 0.039) were significantly associated with a higher grade of necrosis in PLCE and TPLE. Overall survival rates were significantly lower in patients with Grade 2 (P = 0.009) and Grade 3 (P = 0.004) than in those with Grade 1.

Conclusion

The incidence of TBN restricted to P-TBN was lower than previously reported. Maintaining the tracheal blood flow is essential to prevent worsening P-TBN, especially in PLCE and TPLE. Our new P-TBN severity grade may predict the outcome of patients with P-TBN.

A survey of the clinical outcomes of cervical esophageal carcinoma surgery focusing on the presence or absence of laryngectomy using the National Clinical Database in Japan

BACKGROUND

One upside of cervical esophageal carcinoma is that radical surgery can be performed by laryngectomy, even for tumors with tracheal invasion. However, this approach drastically reduces the quality of life, such as by losing the vocal function. Cervical esophageal carcinoma is rare, and no comprehensive reports have described the current state of surgery. Using a Japanese nationwide web-based database, we analyzed the surgical outcomes of cervical esophageal carcinoma to evaluate the impact of larynx-preserving surgery.

METHODS

Based on the Japan National Clinical Database, 215 surgically treated cases of cervical esophageal carcinoma between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were compared between the larynx-preserved group and the laryngectomy group.

RESULTS

Ninety-four (43.7%) patients underwent larynx-preserving surgery. A total of 177 (82.3%) patients underwent free jejunum reconstruction. More T4b patients and more patients who underwent preoperative radiotherapy were in the laryngectomy group. There were no significant differences in the frequency and the severity of morbidities between the two groups. However, in the laryngectomy group, in-hospital death within 30 days after surgery was observed in 1 patient, and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer (P = 0.030). In the larynx-preserved group, recurrent nerve paralysis was observed in 24.5%. Re-operation (35.3%, P = 0.016), re-intubation (17.6%, P = 0.019) and tracheal necrosis (17.6%, P = 0.028) were significantly more frequent in patients who underwent pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction than in others.

CONCLUSION

Larynx-preserving surgery was therefore considered to be feasible because it was equivalent to laryngectomy regarding the short-term surgical outcomes.

Postoperative Complications Following Pharyngolaryngectomy With Total Esophagectomy: Comparison Between Cervical and Anterior Mediastinal Tracheostomy

OBJECTIVES

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Cervical tracheostomy (CT) is the first choice of tracheostomy, whereas anterior mediastinal tracheostomy (AMT) is sometimes required due to tumor extension or insufficient blood supply to the tracheal tip. However, the differences in the outcomes between CT and AMT after PLTE remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients who underwent PLTE and compared the clinical features and postoperative complications between patients with CT and AMT. The characteristics and the outcomes were compared between the groups stratified by the causes of AMT.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients, 42 (62.7%) patients underwent PLTE with CT (CT group), whereas 25 (37.3%) underwent PLTE with AMT (AMT group). The AMT group included more cervicothoracic esophageal cancers and had showed an advanced T stage compared to the CT group (P < .01 and .01, respectively). The incidences of pneumonia and surgical site infection (SSI) were more frequent in the AMT group than in the CT group (P = .03 and .01, respectively). Surgery-related mortality was only observed in the AMT group. In the AMT group, 17 (68.0%) and 8 (32.0%) patients underwent AMT because of tumor extension and insufficient supply to the tracheal tip. The latter cases underwent transthoracic esophagectomy more frequently than former cases (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

AMT after PLTE had more postoperative complications and mortality than CT. In cases that may need AMT, a transthoracic approach is preferable over transhiatal esophagectomy to avoid fatal complications when oncologically permissive.

Utility of Concurrent Surgical Treatment Strategy with Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Patients with Synchronous Esophageal and Head and Neck Cancer

Background: Patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) have a high frequency to coincide with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aims to analyze the treatment results and prognosis of patients with synchronous ESCC and HNC. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2019, 5 patients underwent concurrent surgical resection of synchronous ESCC and HNC in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes and prognosis of these patients with synchronous ESCC and HNC (HNEC group) and compared the results with those of 20 patients who underwent esophagectomy with three regional lymph node dissections for ESCC during the same period (EC group). Results: The locations of HNCs were pharynx/tongue (4/1) and the clinical stages were Stage IV in all patients. Meanwhile, the clinical stages of ESCCs were Stages 0/I/II/III (1/1/2/1). All patients underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The surgical procedures concurrently performed for HNC were pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunum transfer in 3 patients, wide tongue and mandibular segment resection with mandibular reconstruction in 1 patient, and mandibular transection with radial forearm flap reconstruction in 1 patient. There was no significant difference in the frequency of postoperative complication between these two groups. The HNEC group had a significantly shorter recurrence-free survival than the EC group (P = .046). Conclusion: Head and neck surgery with thoracoscopic esophagectomy can be safely performed concurrently with local control. The risk of recurrence is higher in ESCC patients with HNC; therefore, it is important to move on to adjuvant therapy without delay.

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of induction chemotherapy as an indicator of the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients admitted to our hospital between February 2003 and November 2016 with stage IVB hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment they selected following an explanation of the different treatments available. Patients in group A received induction chemotherapy and had (1) complete/partial remission following chemotherapy and radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy or (2) stable disease following chemotherapy and surgery. Patients in group B underwent surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were evaluated using the log-rank test. Laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were compared using the cross-tabulation test.

Results

The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 22.86% and 11.43% in group A and 24.25% and 6.06% in group B, respectively (all P > 0.05). The laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were 40.0% and 74.3% in group A and 0.0% and 27.3% in group B, respectively (all P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of post-operative complications between the two groups (group A 8.6%, group B 12.1%; P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Induction chemotherapy may be an appropriate first choice to ensure laryngeal and oesophageal preservation in the individualised treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion.

Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Synchronous or metachronous esophageal, and head and neck cancers are often observed, and we occasionally encounter esophageal cancer cases with a past history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) for head and neck cancers. Total esophagectomy after TPL may impair blood supply to the trachea and may cause tracheal necrosis. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy can prevent the above-mentioned risks, but there is a concern about an anastomosis with the remnant upper esophagus that lost blood supply after two surgical procedures. The surgical outcomes of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy after TPL remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL at our institution between 2005 and 2017. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve consecutive patients (8 men and 4 women) were included in this study. The median period between TPL and esophagectomy was 32 months (range 2-185 months). All patients underwent esophagectomy via right open thoracotomy and reconstruction using a gastric tube with intrathoracic anastomosis. Although the esophagogastric anastomosis was made on the remnant upper esophagus, which had already lost blood supply from the inferior thyroid artery, there was no case of anastomotic leakage or esophageal necrosis, and hospital mortality was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with a history of TPL is a safe procedure, which can prevent severe complications including anastomotic leakage or tracheal necrosis.

Treatment outcomes for one-stage concurrent surgical resection and reconstruction of synchronous esophageal and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

It is not uncommon to see the synchronous presentation of esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) and head and neck cancer (HNC), and most patients were treated with staged interventions. This study retrospectively reported the outcomes of patients with synchronous ESCC and HNC treated with one-stage concurrent surgical resection and reconstruction.

METHODS

We identified 17 consecutive patients with synchronous ESCC and HNC undergoing primary concurrent surgical resections between 2011 and 2017 at our hospital. All patients had received esophageal screenings prior to treatment.

RESULTS

The HNC patients in this study had the following subsite involvements: oral cavity (n = 5), oropharynx (n = 4), larynx (n = 1), hypopharynx (n = 9), and thyroid gland (n = 1). Eighty percent of the HNC subsites (16/20) were treated in advanced stages, while most ESCCs were treated at early stages. The mean follow-up time was 3.2 ± 1.6 years. Surgery-associated morbidity and mortality were 94.1% and 0%, respectively, and the most common complication was anastomotic leakage. The two-year overall survival, 2-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival, and 2-year distant metastasis-free survival were 86.7%, 85.6%, and 78.7%, respectively. No significant difference was found between overall survival and HNC subsite or anastomotic leakage. Four patients (23.5%) developed secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) within a mean follow-up period of 2.9 years (standard deviation 1.6 years).

CONCLUSION

Although one-stage concurrent surgical resection and reconstruction of synchronous ESCC and HNC were highly invasive and complicated, survival was promising. Isolated distant metastasis remained the most common failure pattern. Vigilant follow-up strategy is mandatory to detect secondary primary malignancies (SPMs), especially within the first 3 years following initial treatment.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in patients with esophageal cancer

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer patients is well established. However, neoadjuvant therapy may induce severe adverse effects that could increase postoperative morbidity. The current study evaluated the impacts of nCT and nCRT on postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in patient with esophageal cancer. We conducted a prospective study in esophageal cancer patients who received nCT (n  =  126) or nCRT (n  =  141) prior to surgery. Surgery was performed in all these patients following nCT or nCRT treatment. More patients occurred pneumonia in the nCRT-treated group compared with the nCT group (P < 0.01). The E-velocity (early diastolic filling velocity) decreased significantly (P = 0.026), while the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) significantly increased (P < 0.01) in patients of the nCRT group compared with patients from the nCT group. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed that nCRT was correlated with the incidence of pneumonia and NT-proBNP level significantly. The nCRT caused more cardiopulmonary toxicity than nCT. The strategies are needed to prevent the postoperative cardiopulmonary complications especially in patients with nCRT treatment.

Postoperative delirium after pharyngolaryngectomy with esophagectomy: a role for ramelteon and suvorexant

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium is common after extensive surgery, and is known to be associated with sleeping medications. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationships between sleeping medications and postoperative delirium after pharyngolaryngectomy with esophagectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 65 patients who underwent pharyngolaryngectomy with esophagectomy at Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital between January 2012 and March 2016. All data were assessed by two psychiatrists, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Postoperative delirium developed in 9 (13.8%) patients, with most cases (77.8%) occurring between postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3. Of the 24 patients taking a minor tranquilizer after surgery, 8 (33.3%) became delirious, but, of the remaining 41 patients taking ramelteon with or without suvorexant, only one (2.4%) became delirious after surgery. Moreover, of the 16 patients taking both ramelteon and suvorexant, no postoperative delirium was observed. Ramelteon with or without suvorexant was significantly associated with a decreased rate of postoperative delirium compared with minor tranquilizer use (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the use of ramelteon with or without suvorexant was the only significant preventive factor of postoperative delirium (odds ratio 0.060, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The use of ramelteon with or without suvorexant was the only significant preventive factor of postoperative delirium after pharyngolaryngectomy with esophagectomy. However, using minor tranquilizers was associated with postoperative delirium. We recommend ramelteon with or without suvorexant for preventing postoperative delirium after pharyngolaryngectomy with esophagectomy.

Comparison of Salvage Total Pharyngolaryngectomy and Cervical Esophagectomy Between Hypopharyngeal Cancer and Cervical Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Total pharyngolaryngectomy and cervical esophagectomy (TPLCE) after chemoradiotherapy remains a challenge because of the high rate of complications and few available data on outcomes and safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of salvage TPLCE and to compare treatment outcomes between hypopharyngeal cancer and cervical esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Data from 37 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with potentially resectable hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The survival and surgical outcomes were investigated between the hypopharyngeal cancer and cervical esophageal cancer groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in hypopharyngeal cancer group and 11 patients were included in cervical esophageal cancer group. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. Compared to the hypopharyngeal cancer group, the cervical esophageal cancer group had significantly more frequent tracheal-related complications (p < 0.05) and stronger association of distal margin of the cervical esophagus and radiation field with tracheal ischemia after salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage TPLCE can offer the exclusive chance of prolonged survival. Association of tracheal ischemia with salvage TPLCE was seen more frequently for cervical esophageal cancer. Therefore, the indication for salvage TPLCE must be carefully considered to maintain the balance between curability and safety.