Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign"

Esophageal Dilation in Patients with Achalasia Is a Predictive Factor for the Inability to Traverse the Esophagogastric Junction with a Manometric Catheter

INTRODUCTION

The insertion of a high-resolution manometry (HRM) catheter into the stomach is essential for accurate manometric diagnoses; however, it is impossible in some cases due to the inability to traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Predictive factors for these patients have not been investigated in detail, necessitating time-consuming and burdensome procedures for investigators and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the percentage of and risk factors for failed intubation at the EGJ.

METHODS

We initially reviewed the medical charts of consecutive HRM procedures performed at our hospital between September 2018 and January 2023. Patient characteristics and the findings of endoscopy and esophagography (where available) were compared between successful and failed procedures. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ. We then validated the predictive factors identified by reviewing consecutive procedures performed between February 2023 and August 2023.

RESULTS

Among the 781 procedures performed, 55 (7.0%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. Achalasia was the most common disorder in these procedures. An older age and dilated esophagus of >34 mm were independent predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ in patients with treatment-naïve achalasia. In the validation study, 7 out of 68 procedures (10.3%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. A flowchart using the findings of endoscopy and an esophageal diameter of >34 mm predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 86.9%.

CONCLUSION

Based on an esophageal diameter >34 mm and endoscopic findings, we predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ in more than 70% of patients. A multi-center prospective study is warranted in the future.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are caused by the impaired relaxation of the upper/lower esophageal sphincter and/or defective esophageal peristaltic contractions, resulting in dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is essential for the diagnosis of primary EMD; however, the recognition of EMD and HRM by general practitioners in Japan is limited. This review summarizes the diagnosis of and treatment strategies for EMD.

SUMMARY

HRM is a specific test for the diagnosis of EMD, whereas endoscopy and barium swallow as screening tests provide characteristic findings (i.e., esophageal rosette and bird's beak sign) in some cases. It is important to note that manometric diagnoses apart from achalasia are often clinically irrelevant; therefore, the recently updated guidelines suggest additional manometric maneuvers, such as the rapid drink challenge, and further testing, including functional lumen imaging, for a more accurate diagnosis before invasive treatment. Endoscopic/surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilation, and botulinum toxin injections need to be considered for patients with achalasia and clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

KEY MESSAGE

Since the detailed pathophysiology of EMD remains unclear, their diagnosis needs to be cautiously established prior to the initiation of invasive treatment.

Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment progress of achalasia of cardia

Achalasia cardia, type of esophageal dynamic disorder, is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disease characterized by the functional loss of plexus ganglion cells in the distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter. Loss of function of the distal and lower esophageal sphincter ganglion cells is the main cause of achalasia cardia, and is more likely to occur in the elderly. Histological changes in the esophageal mucosa are considered pathogenic; however, studies have found that inflammation and genetic changes at the molecular level may also cause achalasia cardia, resulting in dysphagia, reflux, aspiration, retrosternal pain, and weight loss. Currently, the treatment options for achalasia focus on reducing the resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, helping to empty the esophagus and relieve symptoms. Treatment measures include botulinum toxin injection, inflatable dilation, stent insertion, and surgical myotomy (open or laparoscopic). Surgical procedures are often subject to controversy owing to concerns about safety and effectiveness, particularly in older patients. Herein, we review clinical epidemiological and experimental data to determine the prevalence, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment options for achalasia to support its clinical management.

Usefulness of Endoscopy for the Detection and Diagnosis of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Diseases Relating to Abnormal Esophageal Motility

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is performed to rule out organic diseases in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). Abnormal endoscopic findings can be observed during EGD, which indicate the presence of EMDs. Several endoscopic findings at both the esophagogastric junction and esophageal body that are related to EMDs have been reported. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) could be detected during EGD, and these diseases are often associated with abnormal esophageal motility. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) could improve the detection of these diseases during EGD. Although no report has been published previously on the potential usefulness of IEE in the endoscopic diagnosis of EMDs, IEE can be used to detect disorders that can be associated with abnormal esophageal motility.

Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Gastrointestinal motility disorders have a wide range of symptoms and affect patients' quality of life. With the advancement of endoscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy in motility disorders is becoming more significant. Endoscopy is necessary to rule out possible organic diseases in patients with suspected motility disorders and provide significant clues for their diagnosis. Moreover, interventional endoscopy may be a primary or alternative treatment option for selected patients with motility disorders, and it is becoming a promising field as new therapeutic applications are developed and utilized for various motility disorders. This review may provide suitable indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

High-resolution manometry with additional maneuvers using the Starlet system: normative thresholds and diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric junction outflow disorders

BACKGROUND

Chicago classification version 4.0 suggests additional maneuvers, such as upright testing, multiple rapid swallows (MRS), and the rapid drink challenge (RDC), for high-resolution manometry (HRM) to minimize ambiguity in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The present study investigated normative thresholds for these new metrics using the Starlet system as well as their diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (EGJOD).

METHODS

In study 1, 30 asymptomatic volunteers prospectively performed HRM including MRS and RDC in the supine/upright positions. We calculated normative thresholds for the new metrics, such as upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), upright intrabolus pressure (IBP), and IRP during RDC (RDC-IRP). In study 2, we retrospectively analyzed the HRM tracings of 82 patients who underwent HRM in both positions at our hospital to assess the diagnostic yields of HRM metrics.

RESULTS

Based on the results of study 1, we adopted the following normative thresholds: upright IRP < 20 mmHg, upright IBP < 21 mmHg, and RDC-IRP < 16 mmHg. In study 2, 45 patients with dysphagia or chest pain were included in the analysis to identify predictive factors for clinically relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (true EGJOD). Supine/upright IRP, RDC-IRP, and pan-esophageal pressurization > 20 mmHg during RDC (RDC-PEP) predicted true EGJOD with RDC-PEP with the highest sensitivity of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM with additional maneuvers may facilitate the diagnosis of clinically relevant EGJOD.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Are We Missing in Our Busy Endoscopy Practice?

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) form a significant part of a busy endoscopist's practice. Endoscopy plays an all-encompassing role in the diagnosis and management of EMDs including achalasia cardia. The focus on in-vogue third-space endoscopic procedures such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy often digresses the important role of endoscopy. Endoscopic evaluation forms the part of standard first-line evaluation of any dysphagia and serves to rule out a secondary cause such as an esophagogastric junction malignancy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Moreover, endoscopic evaluation may itself provide corroborative evidence that may contribute to the diagnosis of the motility disorder. Achalasia cardia may present with a wide spectrum of endoscopic findings from being entirely normal and the well-known and pathognomonic dilated sigmoid-shaped esophagus with food residue, to lesser-known ornate signs. The evidence on the role of endosonography in EMDs is conflicting and largely restricted to evaluation of pseudoachalasia. High-resolution manometry (HRM) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of EMDs. Endoscopists must also keep abreast of the latest iteration of the Chicago classification version 4.0, which differs significantly from its predecessor in being more stringent in making diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and disorders of peristalsis since these manometric findings may be seen in normal individuals and may be mimicked by opioid use and gastroesophageal reflux. The latest rendition also includes the use of provocative maneuvers and testing in both supine and sitting posture. Despite being the gold standard, there are certain lacunae in the use and interpretation of the Chicago classification of which the users should be well aware. Emerging technologies such as functional lumen imaging probe and planimetry, and timed barium esophagogram fill the lacuna in diagnosis of these motility disorders, which at times is beyond the resolution of HRM.

Differences in clinical characteristics between conservative-treatment-response group and refractory (surgical-treatment) group in patients with jackhammer esophagus

BACKGROUND

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare disease with unclear clinical features. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical characteristics of patients with JE whose symptoms were controlled with conservative treatment, such as observation or medication, versus those who were required surgical treatment, such as surgical myotomy or per oral endoscopic myotomy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with JE were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who responded to conservative treatment (C group) and patients who were refractory to conservative treatment and underwent surgery (S group). Patient age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness on computed tomography, number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis in 10 water swallows, and maximum distal contractile integral (DCI) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) were in the C group and five of 18 (28%) were in the S group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, EGD findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness, or number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis between the groups. On Starlet high-resolution manometry, the median maximum DCI value was significantly higher in the S group (32,651 mmHg-s-cm) than in the C group (17,926 mmHg-s-cm) (P = 0.0136).

CONCLUSIONS

JE treatment should be carefully considered because some patients require surgery, whereas others are controlled with conservative treatment alone. A higher DCI value in patients with JE may predict resistance to conservative treatment.